I'm just wondering what good benchmark results are. I'm at 683 at 1200mhz. What are you guys getting for results?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
demo23019 said:
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using king's #2 kernel. Are my numbers bad? I thought that the lower the number the better. I'm new with using benchmarks, so I really have no idea what I'm doing haha.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
i was using jacs kernel but it doesn't work with update so im stuck at 1ghz for now
Buy yea i never used setcpu to bench and with that yea lower is better.
im getting 755 with long bench
Im sure someone else will come post with similar 1.2 setup
I'm getting 622 on Long Bench in SetCPU
9.723 in Linpack
1940 in Quadrant
That's at 1200MHz on JAC's ExtremeMod with Voodoo, stock Deodexed 2.1
Dan_Brutal said:
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your numbers are fine. Dont be too conserned with benchmark scores even though it is fun to run them from a gear head point of view...
Although if you want a bit more accuracy, run any benchmark three times and average out your total score.
My scores are, so you have an idea:
Linpack= 9.2 averaged on three runs
SetCpu= Long Bench 636 averaged on three runs
Quadrant= 1863 on three runs
*(RyanZ's lagfix has been proven to cheat Quadrant thus giving users a much higher score. example: 2300,2400 etc.)*
Running Bionix 1.5 w/Jacs OC/Voodoo kernel
What is the difference between Quadrant standard and AnTuTu benchmark? I just pulled a 4105 on antutu and for some reason that doesnt seem right.
So when the hype was through the roof before the phone came out i remember seeing some sites do quick reviews of the phone and showing off its anTuTu scores, the scores were always VERY high. like 9k-10k.
Iv been running a few tests on anTuTu and i max out around 6800. =/
I only saw 7k on reviews.
Should be easy to overclock to 1.8ghz and pump out 11k one day
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Warrior 3000 said:
So when the hype was through the roof before the phone came out i remember seeing some sites do quick reviews of the phone and showing off its anTuTu scores, the scores were always VERY high. like 9k-10k.
Iv been running a few tests on anTuTu and i max out around 6800. =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those test were with the International quadcore One X not S4 duelcore
In case anyone is wondering about the bench-marking scores then have a look at the below videos. Please note that all these benchmarks were ran in quick session so the phone was not allowed to take rest and all benchmarks were ran one after the other.
Quadrant Advanced:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BImCXeE3ZZA
Geekbench 2 and Geekbench 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq5Wpb-yJkY
Antutu Benchmark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU6PVxJeBFw
3D Mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU5N-KyOS8k
Vellamo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwNK2mnuECY
GFX Benchmark (Formerly known as GL Benchmark)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxNK1hpcleE
Enjoy!
I am using latest miui 10.3.8 with locked boot loader and my geek bench score is
SINGLE CORE-498
MULTI CORE-1751(latest geek bench from play store) I have seen way higher single scoreof other users. Is there any problem in my device ?please help my smartphone is still in warranty.
Hi
Just ran the new Geekbench 5 and my score is attached along with Geekbench 4 score, definitely big difference so what has changed in the scoring method?
I read recent reviews on Geek Bench 5 showing very low scores for POCO. This is clearly a bug in the latest version. Please use GeekBench 4 for accurate scores.