In case anyone is wondering about the bench-marking scores then have a look at the below videos. Please note that all these benchmarks were ran in quick session so the phone was not allowed to take rest and all benchmarks were ran one after the other.
Quadrant Advanced:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BImCXeE3ZZA
Geekbench 2 and Geekbench 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq5Wpb-yJkY
Antutu Benchmark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU6PVxJeBFw
3D Mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU5N-KyOS8k
Vellamo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwNK2mnuECY
GFX Benchmark (Formerly known as GL Benchmark)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxNK1hpcleE
Enjoy!
Related
What is the difference between Quadrant standard and AnTuTu benchmark? I just pulled a 4105 on antutu and for some reason that doesnt seem right.
just my observation: Quadrant run for touchpad only gives score of around 2400... my nook color with 1.3ghz single core gives score of over 2600 all the time!!! i looked into the device info, it seems like it only using 1 core!!! does cm7 only recognizing one core??? what r ur guys thought??? is there a fix for it or any kernels that utilize both cores of touchpad!!!
The Quadrant results on the TP are skewed because the GPU code has not yet been implemented (or optimized) which primarily affects the FPS section (looks like is is only doing about 4 frames per second) where all the other graphics demos (especially the planet one) do 20-60 frames per second which is a 300%-600% improvement over the Nook Color running 1.2GHz.
I would be interested in other benchmarks that are not dependent on the GPU code.
try using Antutu - free from market
it separates the scores according to each test
(also shows total)
i got around 5000 - OC 1.7 ghz
Maybe it is because we are running an un-optimized alpha build...Don't worry about synthetic benchmarks anyway.
Both cores are already being used, what is your processor clocked too?
I'm completely aware benchmarks don't really mean much, but for curiosities sake, out of 3 runs, I averaged 3228 in quadrant. I am overclocked to 1782mhz ondemand.
I suggest you run SunSpider also.
So when the hype was through the roof before the phone came out i remember seeing some sites do quick reviews of the phone and showing off its anTuTu scores, the scores were always VERY high. like 9k-10k.
Iv been running a few tests on anTuTu and i max out around 6800. =/
I only saw 7k on reviews.
Should be easy to overclock to 1.8ghz and pump out 11k one day
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Warrior 3000 said:
So when the hype was through the roof before the phone came out i remember seeing some sites do quick reviews of the phone and showing off its anTuTu scores, the scores were always VERY high. like 9k-10k.
Iv been running a few tests on anTuTu and i max out around 6800. =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those test were with the International quadcore One X not S4 duelcore
what apps is everyone using for their benchmark tests? i did antutu and quadrant, got 24,430 and 12292 respectively. are those good scores?
edit: i also ran vellamo and got 2081 on html5 and 814 on metal...
I got 12700 in Quadrant and 25524 in AnTuTu all stock. Benchmarks really don't mean much.
Other people run 3dmark and Geekbench too. And Epic Citadel.
I am using latest miui 10.3.8 with locked boot loader and my geek bench score is
SINGLE CORE-498
MULTI CORE-1751(latest geek bench from play store) I have seen way higher single scoreof other users. Is there any problem in my device ?please help my smartphone is still in warranty.
Hi
Just ran the new Geekbench 5 and my score is attached along with Geekbench 4 score, definitely big difference so what has changed in the scoring method?
I read recent reviews on Geek Bench 5 showing very low scores for POCO. This is clearly a bug in the latest version. Please use GeekBench 4 for accurate scores.