Appears to show that the Tegra2 Version (for S Korea) is significantly faster than the Exynos (Intl) version.
http://forums.tmonews.com/index.php?topic=16966.0
Though as mentioned here that version should be avoided for other reasons:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13234818&postcount=4
That's the exynos chip from MWC(1ghz) , which also scored 2000 on Quadrant I would even buy the sgs2 if it scored 750 , if its as smooth as it is now in UI interaction
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
murklor said:
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SGS2 would have scored higher in games if it wasn't capped at 60 FPS
murklor said:
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
... [needed to remove to post]
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that - I was conscious it might be old news.
I had forgotten about the speed bump - doh!
Have anyone tried GLBenchmark? If not I would be grateful if anyone tried and published the score.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GLBenchmark 2.0
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
flooki said:
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is the setting used by the benchmark, not a limitation in the GPU or the display.
thats not right is it?
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad. Of course it could be a game bug with mali400, chances are pretty high.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
murklor said:
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea ive seen that-think its just a bug rather than performance measure, im sure gameloft will release a s2 version
murklor said:
The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
tjtj4444 said:
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for link
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Probably because they announced that it would be 4 times faster than previous devices (meaning Galaxy S I guess) before doing any benchmarks, and then realised that it was nowhere near 4 times faster
So they had to overclock as much as they could.
KingKuba13 said:
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Sensation will come with a 1.2GHz dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU so I guess they didn't want to look like they were not keeping pace.
Related
T-Mobile has a 1.5ghz processor, I was wondering if that is faster than ours.
Snapdragon vs exynos....ours (exynos) wins.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
pham818 said:
T-Mobile has a 1.5ghz processor, I was wondering if that is faster than ours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For you.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
pham818 said:
T-Mobile has a 1.5ghz processor, I was wondering if that is faster than ours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faster on paper? Yes.
Faster in real life? No.
Red5 said:
Faster on paper? Yes.
Faster in real life? No.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the info!
It's just like how 2.0 GHz Athlon XPs were able to match 2.8 GHz Pentium 4s back in the day on most workloads.
I have a att gs2 non skyrocket and went to tmobile to compare
i benchmarked with nena mark 2
I asked the guy if he had a working model i could dload a benchmark..
nenamark 2 :
att i777 got like 46 or 48 fps now i had just flashed a stock rooted rom so it wasnt cluttered up.
tmobile sgs2 t989 that i used inside tmobile got 53 fps have no idea what shape it was in.
t989 53 fps
i777 48fps
tmobile wins !!! better gpu ?
rancidm said:
I have a att gs2 non skyrocket and went to tmobile to compare
i benchmarked with nena mark 2
I asked the guy if he had a working model i could dload a benchmark..
nenamark 2 :
att i777 got like 46 or 48 fps now i had just flashed a stock rooted rom so it wasnt cluttered up.
tmobile sgs2 t989 that i used inside tmobile got 53 fps have no idea what shape it was in.
t989 53 fps
i777 48fps
tmobile wins !!! better gpu ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
benchmarks mean nothing if it performs slower in day to day use, and that's where the s2 wins
NJGSII said:
For you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks...you just made my night a little better!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
so what your saying since benchmarks mean nothing is that u cant prove that att sg2 is faster by a benchmark but only by observing " it apears to go faster " ?
you better take this now.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
rancidm said:
so what your saying since benchmarks mean nothing is that u cant prove that att sg2 is faster by a benchmark but only by observing " it apears to go faster " ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why dont you go into a store and try them both out for yourself?
Could you post these benchmark results by chance?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
rancidm said:
I have a att gs2 non skyrocket and went to tmobile to compare
i benchmarked with nena mark 2
I asked the guy if he had a working model i could dload a benchmark..
nenamark 2 :
att i777 got like 46 or 48 fps now i had just flashed a stock rooted rom so it wasnt cluttered up.
tmobile sgs2 t989 that i used inside tmobile got 53 fps have no idea what shape it was in.
t989 53 fps
i777 48fps
tmobile wins !!! better gpu ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screen shots? Additionally mobile benchmarks seem to be far from consistent. I just ran that benchmark about 10 times and my fps varied from mid 30s to 50s. Either device is more than sufficient for most peoples needs, and thats all that matters in the end
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
So I hate benchmarks but I got bored so I ran a quadrant on my tab...I got 4221...is that a mistake?
wow. seems great to me. I was getting about 2500. I switch my governor to performance and it jumped up to over 3500 though. I've got ally of apps though so I figure not bad for me either. What's you governor set at getting over 4000?
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
KaFrEEkAbOom said:
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok...not to be mean...don't tell me what is helpful or not...
btw: i dont CARE about benchmark scores...AT ALL!!!!!
i just wondered why it was so high since engadget and other review sites say its like 1000.
@benzoman - just stock settings on cm9 preview (rootzwiki)
Running Task 14 overclocked to 1400 here. Couldn't get me to change ROMs for almost anything. Unless it was to an updated Task ROM. I'm running some of pershoots kernel stuff too.
Don't really care about benchmarks myself either. Just thought I'd run the quadrant to see what I got compared to what you got.
As long as it's stable and doesn't lag that's all I care.
Task has always taken VERY good care of me in all aspects of what I want, and need. So that's why I'm so partial to his stuff and suggestions of what to run with his ROMs.
Thanks mate for something to do at least for a few minutes.
EDIT: Just noticed both suggested ROMs are old Task ROMs too. LMAO
Yeah I'm running to change to an older ROM so my scores go up. NOT. :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
davsarus said:
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
ezcats said:
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol glad that im not alone
Mine on ICS for the first time its benchmark is nearly 4000 too, my expression was like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
well never mind, i can return to human form at anytime so benchmark is not really a big deal, just for showing off, i thought
what is actually your best score? i have about 4000 with cm9 from pershoot and 1.7.4 aacount-kernel.
Ran this on my tab with AOKP 4.1.2 and A1 Kernell 1.8.2 running at 1.6Ghz and only got 3435
My Tab is currently running Fourth Bar Revolution ICS 4.0.4 ROM with default ROM settings and Yoda Kernel 2.4.
Quadrant @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 2915
Quadrant @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 3317
Quadrant @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 3558
AnTuTu @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 6060
AnTuTu @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 6793
AnTuTu @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 7409
I found my old galaxy S last night and thought I would run a quick benchmark using Quadrant against my galaxy S2. As you would expect the S2 overal beat the S1... apart from 3D performance. It was only a few marks faster but the S1 did out perform. This was noticeable on the gpu section where they is a planet revolving around the frame rate was almost double that of the s2. Both phones are running ginger bread 2.3.5 @ stock
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
First of all, look at all the things you have running in the background on the S2.
Second thing, you're probably running the android 4 optimized version of quadrant on the s2 and the old gb version on the s1.
Install the newest on both. Reboot them both. Test then.
If you still have problems go into settings->applications->running and see what's slowing down your phone.
It's propably because the software runs more efficient on the S1.
Also who cares about benchmarks anyways? There aren't any apps out there for the S2 which have good graphics or bring the processors to its limits. Name me one which does that.
Ive now come to the conclusion the quadrant simply is **** :d
ics 3D perf gone up but 2d dropped dramatically obviously far too software limited.
My goodness that notification bar is packed
same here my eyes were on the noti bar ,,its full.
victorator said:
First of all, look at all the things you have running in the background on the S2.
Second thing, you're probably running the android 4 optimized version of quadrant on the s2 and the old gb version on the s1.
Install the newest on both. Reboot them both. Test then.
If you still have problems go into settings->applications->running and see what's slowing down your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the replies are either fanboyism or just honest ignorance and mistakes.
First of all he is running the same current version on both.
All those things running in the background are actually on the S1 not the S2...
Frozenthunder said:
It's propably because the software runs more efficient on the S1.
Also who cares about benchmarks anyways? There aren't any apps out there for the S2 which have good graphics or bring the processors to its limits. Name me one which does that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not just quadrant standard that shows this. I have consistently been dissapointed with the SGS2 3d perf in general.
Name one?
Jet car stunts runs worse on the SGS2 and looks worse than on the SGS1.
The SGS2 refresh rate is also lower making games run worse.
IF you look at sysetm information, CUBE MAPS and CROSSBAR COMBINED not supported on the SGS2. Everything supported on the SGS1.
Personal experience, a lot of 3D games run much nicer and look nicer on the SGS1.
Really disappointed withe SGS2 screen and 3D perf.
The SGS 2 has a Mali gpu, while the SGS 1 has a PowerVR gpu. Theoretically SGS 2 should be faster but because of architecture differences it may behave worse under conditions that favour the PowerVR. I have not had problems with my SGS 2 being slow but I have not played really demanding games yet.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
DramatikBeats said:
My goodness that notification bar is packed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because that phone hasn't been switched on for a ages and it also has no Sim so when I turned it on things like Ebay spring up with old messages
Sent from my GT-I9100P using XDA
Emexrulsier said:
It's because that phone hasn't been switched on for a ages and it also has no Sim so when I turned it on things like Ebay spring up with old messages
Sent from my GT-I9100P using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for benchmark u can try Antutu app over Qadrant app since it gives more accurate results over and above Quadrant one
New update has come today and what is much important for us with support to our Primes ))))
https://play.google.com/store/apps/....android.ANMP.GloftMMHM&feature=search_result
Sent from my EPAD using Tapatalk 2
Ye I see it xD Now avable for stocks not only for eos rom! It works flawlessy on virtous rom vith moltey kernel.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app
is this a fun game?
Best android MMOrpg.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium HD app
One and only real mmorpg!
Ok...back to Virtuous tomorrow
from Prime or SGS+ using Tapatalk 2
Can anyone find out if it has gamepad support?
Is anyone else getting stutters while playing this game? Not quite sure why but I think it's down to lack of CPU power or they've set the graphics settings too high.
They occur using Motley's and SnB's kernels on the stock rom.
The game does not run as smooth as it should given all the power Tegra 3 has, but it does not stutters here.
I think the game is just not optimized for Tegra, I have seen videos of the game running on less powerful CPUs and it runs better than how it runs using the Prime.
The game runs at something like 20/25 fps.
sbeanie said:
Is anyone else getting stutters while playing this game? Not quite sure why but I think it's down to lack of CPU power or they've set the graphics settings too high.
They occur using Motley's and SnB's kernels on the stock rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not lack of CPU/GPU power, have you seen what Tegra 3 is actually capable of running? Mostlikely just not optimized for Tegra 3.
Crappy gameloft....Teyy dont know how to optymalise games for multiple-core devices....
Not that bad guys as you describe this. Sometimes lil lags but few things are better like:
- collision detection
- resolution
- lights, shadows, water effect
from Prime or SGS+ using Tapatalk 2
Zephyrot said:
The game does not run as smooth as it should given all the power Tegra 3 has, but it does not stutters here.
I think the game is just not optimized for Tegra, I have seen videos of the game running on less powerful CPUs and it runs better than how it runs using the Prime.
The game runs at something like 20/25 fps.
It is not lack of CPU/GPU power, have you seen what Tegra 3 is actually capable of running? Mostlikely just not optimized for Tegra 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, was thinking that too. It does look amazing but it clearly needs optimizing. Walking over a hill (causing the gpu to render a new landscape) causes it to stutter for a few seconds :/
sbeanie said:
Yea, was thinking that too. It does look amazing but it clearly needs optimizing. Walking over a hill (causing the gpu to render a new landscape) causes it to stutter for a few seconds :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will always happen, specially with the low I/O Speeds our Primes have.
Not that bad guys as you describe this. Sometimes lil lags but few things are better like:
- collision detection
- resolution
- lights, shadows, water effect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said it was bad I said it wasn't how it should really be. Other games with WAY, WAY better graphics run on the Prime at 60 FPS on Balanced mode (Most of the time even with the CPU under clocked at only 1 GHz.
Lets hope Gameloft optimizes the game for Tegra 3 anytime soon In the meantime I'm really enjoying the game ^^
order and chaos
Just got this waiting for it to finish the download looks awesome enough... anyone have some noob tips as in good servers and what nots ?
On another note captcha really blows lol
Proud owner of Asus Transformer Prime
And HTC Amaze 4G
Server Stone Island is a good place to start really peaceful...
After lvl 30 you can change to any other.
from Prime or SGS+ using Tapatalk 2
I haven't seen anyone do a comparison between the two, but what are your experiences so far with this setting?
I am now on light, but it is quite hard to tell since i am not using the phine the dame way. It feels that the battery goes down slower, but I am at the point where i am not sure if it is really so or I just eant it to be. I dont feel the phone performance drop, but I have not done any heavy duty tasks on light
I've done benches comparing the two, the standard gives me a lower single core score and a higher multi core score. But when I switched to the light mode, the single core score went up and the multi core score went down. I've seen someone apparently got some insane high scores with the S23 ultra, as in 1600 single core score and 5400 on the multi, but there wasn't really any kind of revelation how they got it.
erik2041999 said:
I've done benches comparing the two, the standard gives me a lower single core score and a higher multi core score. But when I switched to the light mode, the single core score went up and the multi core score went down. I've seen someone apparently got some insane high scores with the S23 ultra, as in 1600 single core score and 5400 on the multi, but there wasn't really any kind of revelation how they got it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1594 on single and 5127 on multi, thats on standard profile.
How the ****? I've done many runs and I've never even had 5k on the multiscore....
Nghtmare said:
I get 1594 on single and 5127 on multi, thats on standard profile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@erik2041999 look. I just ran the test, didnt do anything to the phone besides installing all my apps and removing stuff I dont need.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nghtmare said:
@erik2041999 look. I just ran the test, didnt do anything to the phone besides installing all my apps and removing stuff I dont need.View attachment 5831911
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have the 12gb or 8gb ram variant?
erik2041999 said:
Do you have the 12gb or 8gb ram variant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
512GB 12GB
Nghtmare said:
512GB 12GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was my latest pass, just few moments ago, with active cooling... Yes it's above the 1.5k and 5k but only now, with additional cooling, and it's not even that much higher. While you're nearing 1.6k and 5.2. I've got a ****ing dud... Cause if no one else has to do anything special and can get those scores consistently and higher, then clearly my phone is a ****ing potatoe...
Just ran another one. Don't know what to tell you :/ I know there is like a hidden code that you could input and generate a system dump and find the CPU bin score but I can't remember it
My man, do you think there's any chance you could find it out for me? I'm really curious but I haven't found anything online for newer samsung phones without having root.
Nghtmare said:
Just ran another one. Don't know what to tell you :/ I know there is like a hidden code that you could get to get a system dumb and find the CPU bin score but I can't remember it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be interested to see how this affects the battery life overall in light mode.
I get 1514 and 4831
erik2041999 said:
My man, do you think there's any chance you could find it out for me? I'm really curious but I haven't found anything online for newer samsung phones without having root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its somewhere in the *#9900# menu. I'll try to find it later, and let you know.
Nghtmare said:
Its somewhere in the *#9900# menu. I'll try to find it later, and let you know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much man, appreciate it.
erik2041999 said:
This was my latest pass, just few moments ago, with active cooling... Yes it's above the 1.5k and 5k but only now, with additional cooling, and it's not even that much higher. While you're nearing 1.6k and 5.2. I've got a ****ing dud... Cause if no one else has to do anything special and can get those scores consistently and higher, then clearly my phone is a ****ing potatoe...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont be angry this benchmark was a fckn trash with totally random scores.... I got 1200 sometimes at single core... And running again the test right after, with much hotter cpu i get 1400+ score... Next 1300...Next 1500... Its a total random trash.
Castle0617 said:
Dont be angry this benchmark was a fckn trash with totally random scores.... I got 1200 sometimes at single core... And running again the test right after, with much hotter cpu i get 1400+ score... Next 1300...Next 1500... Its a total random trash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. With these kinds of benches you have to do 5-10 of them and average the results to find the real number.