I haven't seen anyone do a comparison between the two, but what are your experiences so far with this setting?
I am now on light, but it is quite hard to tell since i am not using the phine the dame way. It feels that the battery goes down slower, but I am at the point where i am not sure if it is really so or I just eant it to be. I dont feel the phone performance drop, but I have not done any heavy duty tasks on light
I've done benches comparing the two, the standard gives me a lower single core score and a higher multi core score. But when I switched to the light mode, the single core score went up and the multi core score went down. I've seen someone apparently got some insane high scores with the S23 ultra, as in 1600 single core score and 5400 on the multi, but there wasn't really any kind of revelation how they got it.
erik2041999 said:
I've done benches comparing the two, the standard gives me a lower single core score and a higher multi core score. But when I switched to the light mode, the single core score went up and the multi core score went down. I've seen someone apparently got some insane high scores with the S23 ultra, as in 1600 single core score and 5400 on the multi, but there wasn't really any kind of revelation how they got it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1594 on single and 5127 on multi, thats on standard profile.
How the ****? I've done many runs and I've never even had 5k on the multiscore....
Nghtmare said:
I get 1594 on single and 5127 on multi, thats on standard profile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@erik2041999 look. I just ran the test, didnt do anything to the phone besides installing all my apps and removing stuff I dont need.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nghtmare said:
@erik2041999 look. I just ran the test, didnt do anything to the phone besides installing all my apps and removing stuff I dont need.View attachment 5831911
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have the 12gb or 8gb ram variant?
erik2041999 said:
Do you have the 12gb or 8gb ram variant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
512GB 12GB
Nghtmare said:
512GB 12GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was my latest pass, just few moments ago, with active cooling... Yes it's above the 1.5k and 5k but only now, with additional cooling, and it's not even that much higher. While you're nearing 1.6k and 5.2. I've got a ****ing dud... Cause if no one else has to do anything special and can get those scores consistently and higher, then clearly my phone is a ****ing potatoe...
Just ran another one. Don't know what to tell you :/ I know there is like a hidden code that you could input and generate a system dump and find the CPU bin score but I can't remember it
My man, do you think there's any chance you could find it out for me? I'm really curious but I haven't found anything online for newer samsung phones without having root.
Nghtmare said:
Just ran another one. Don't know what to tell you :/ I know there is like a hidden code that you could get to get a system dumb and find the CPU bin score but I can't remember it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be interested to see how this affects the battery life overall in light mode.
I get 1514 and 4831
erik2041999 said:
My man, do you think there's any chance you could find it out for me? I'm really curious but I haven't found anything online for newer samsung phones without having root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its somewhere in the *#9900# menu. I'll try to find it later, and let you know.
Nghtmare said:
Its somewhere in the *#9900# menu. I'll try to find it later, and let you know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much man, appreciate it.
erik2041999 said:
This was my latest pass, just few moments ago, with active cooling... Yes it's above the 1.5k and 5k but only now, with additional cooling, and it's not even that much higher. While you're nearing 1.6k and 5.2. I've got a ****ing dud... Cause if no one else has to do anything special and can get those scores consistently and higher, then clearly my phone is a ****ing potatoe...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont be angry this benchmark was a fckn trash with totally random scores.... I got 1200 sometimes at single core... And running again the test right after, with much hotter cpu i get 1400+ score... Next 1300...Next 1500... Its a total random trash.
Castle0617 said:
Dont be angry this benchmark was a fckn trash with totally random scores.... I got 1200 sometimes at single core... And running again the test right after, with much hotter cpu i get 1400+ score... Next 1300...Next 1500... Its a total random trash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. With these kinds of benches you have to do 5-10 of them and average the results to find the real number.
Related
Appears to show that the Tegra2 Version (for S Korea) is significantly faster than the Exynos (Intl) version.
http://forums.tmonews.com/index.php?topic=16966.0
Though as mentioned here that version should be avoided for other reasons:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13234818&postcount=4
That's the exynos chip from MWC(1ghz) , which also scored 2000 on Quadrant I would even buy the sgs2 if it scored 750 , if its as smooth as it is now in UI interaction
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
murklor said:
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SGS2 would have scored higher in games if it wasn't capped at 60 FPS
murklor said:
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
... [needed to remove to post]
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that - I was conscious it might be old news.
I had forgotten about the speed bump - doh!
Have anyone tried GLBenchmark? If not I would be grateful if anyone tried and published the score.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GLBenchmark 2.0
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
flooki said:
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is the setting used by the benchmark, not a limitation in the GPU or the display.
thats not right is it?
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad. Of course it could be a game bug with mali400, chances are pretty high.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
murklor said:
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea ive seen that-think its just a bug rather than performance measure, im sure gameloft will release a s2 version
murklor said:
The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
tjtj4444 said:
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for link
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Probably because they announced that it would be 4 times faster than previous devices (meaning Galaxy S I guess) before doing any benchmarks, and then realised that it was nowhere near 4 times faster
So they had to overclock as much as they could.
KingKuba13 said:
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Sensation will come with a 1.2GHz dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU so I guess they didn't want to look like they were not keeping pace.
So I hate benchmarks but I got bored so I ran a quadrant on my tab...I got 4221...is that a mistake?
wow. seems great to me. I was getting about 2500. I switch my governor to performance and it jumped up to over 3500 though. I've got ally of apps though so I figure not bad for me either. What's you governor set at getting over 4000?
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
KaFrEEkAbOom said:
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok...not to be mean...don't tell me what is helpful or not...
btw: i dont CARE about benchmark scores...AT ALL!!!!!
i just wondered why it was so high since engadget and other review sites say its like 1000.
@benzoman - just stock settings on cm9 preview (rootzwiki)
Running Task 14 overclocked to 1400 here. Couldn't get me to change ROMs for almost anything. Unless it was to an updated Task ROM. I'm running some of pershoots kernel stuff too.
Don't really care about benchmarks myself either. Just thought I'd run the quadrant to see what I got compared to what you got.
As long as it's stable and doesn't lag that's all I care.
Task has always taken VERY good care of me in all aspects of what I want, and need. So that's why I'm so partial to his stuff and suggestions of what to run with his ROMs.
Thanks mate for something to do at least for a few minutes.
EDIT: Just noticed both suggested ROMs are old Task ROMs too. LMAO
Yeah I'm running to change to an older ROM so my scores go up. NOT. :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
davsarus said:
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
ezcats said:
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol glad that im not alone
Mine on ICS for the first time its benchmark is nearly 4000 too, my expression was like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
well never mind, i can return to human form at anytime so benchmark is not really a big deal, just for showing off, i thought
what is actually your best score? i have about 4000 with cm9 from pershoot and 1.7.4 aacount-kernel.
Ran this on my tab with AOKP 4.1.2 and A1 Kernell 1.8.2 running at 1.6Ghz and only got 3435
My Tab is currently running Fourth Bar Revolution ICS 4.0.4 ROM with default ROM settings and Yoda Kernel 2.4.
Quadrant @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 2915
Quadrant @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 3317
Quadrant @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 3558
AnTuTu @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 6060
AnTuTu @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 6793
AnTuTu @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 7409
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I officially have the fastest tablet on the planet according to Antutu!!
YES! Sub zero cooling for the WIN!
I forgot to add.... U S A , U S A, U S A!!! LOL
I just added my best CFbench score. This is on 1.7ghz @ 600mhz GPU.
Thanks to Diamond for the wonderful rom.
Thanks to Motley and Shaky for the amazing kernel
Thanks to Droidth3ory for all the work on the phone side of things, without your help and awesome roms I would not be into flashing!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
Congratulations man lol!!
Awesome man!
Maybe we could fab some sort of water to air intercooler. I am sure you could find one easy in NoVa, with all those boosted civics running around.
Thanks, my wife thinks I am the biggest dork in the world.
I was in the kitchen benching and all she heard was F*** YEAAH!!!!! LOL!
EDIT: I think the cooling solution I have (the temporary one atleast) is plenty for benching at 2.0ghz.
Bring it on kernel makers =)
sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
lol Congrats. I bet you could easily hit 16000. try this and I bet you score alot higher. get system tuner. then go into could tweaks. set the governor there to Performance. then set the min. speed slider all the way up to Max. now you should see all 4 of your CPU maxed out @ 1.8Ghz full time. meaning each core is active @ 1.8Ghz. the regular overclocking doesn't enable all 4 cores to run at once at those speeds. Method I just described will and is why I usually score alot higher than people on same 1.6Ghz clock speed as me. my 2D and 3D scores on quadrant was even higher than that one guy who made the 1.8Ghz available. and that was me still @ 1.6ghz. my 2D score was more than double his @ 1.8Ghz. you can also go into settings, then developer options. then enable the force gpu rendering. that should help increase your scores also.
benefit14snake said:
Thanks, my wife thinks I am the biggest dork in the world.
I was in the kitchen benching and all she heard was F*** YEAAH!!!!! LOL!
EDIT: I think the cooling solution I have (the temporary one atleast) is plenty for benching at 2.0ghz.
Bring it on kernel makers =)
sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! I have my kernel running at 1.8 GHz now. I basically enabled what I had the first time I tried, but now the voltages are the same as my latest 1.7. This time it runs fine. I am a little disappointed that the scores aren't higher though and keep wondering what else is limiting us. Hope to do more study soon. The voltage regulator is keeping us pinned at 1500mV and I haven't tried to up that yet. We don't need it yet...but we will if we want to go higher.
_motley said:
Nice! I have my kernel running at 1.8 GHz now. I basically enabled what I had the first time I tried, but now the voltages are the same as my latest 1.7. This time it runs fine. I am a little disappointed that the scores aren't higher though and keep wondering what else is limiting us. Hope to do more study soon. The voltage regulator is keeping us pinned at 1500mV and I haven't tried to up that yet. We don't need it yet...but we will if we want to go higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyway I could get a copy of your kernel? I am using a different 1.8ghz kernel but I dont think it has the tweaks yours has. Maybe PM it to me if your willing.
EDIT: I wonder if there is a way to make the kernel use 1.6ghz for balanced and then use performance to screw around with. Can I edit this myself motley?
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
Just updated with new CFbench score. Will try to go higher with this test kernel, these are just the first few runs I did.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk
Sometimes I wonder what our mates who are completely uninterested in technology think when we do something like what the OP said in the kitchen. I'm currently dating a guy who likes to write more than anything else. Writing creatively just isn't my cup of tea. He, on the other hand, is just not interested at all with technology. And somehow we've gravitated toward each other.
He some times give me weird looks when I yell out "****, yeah!" after I've hard modded something or successfully soldered things together that weren't meant to be together and still work. I guess opposites do attract.
goodintentions said:
Sometimes I wonder what our mates who are completely uninterested in technology think when we do something like what the OP said in the kitchen. I'm currently dating a guy who likes to write more than anything else. Writing creatively just isn't my cup of tea. He, on the other hand, is just not interested at all with technology. And somehow we've gravitated toward each other.
He some times give me weird looks when I yell out "****, yeah!" after I've hard modded something or successfully soldered things together that weren't meant to be together and still work. I guess opposites do attract.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My fiance knows how to work a PC because of her job. I got my first PC after we got together 10 years ago (I was 22) and she showed me the basics...then all hell broke loose.
I love anything and everything tech, and have had 5 Android devices since, not including PCs and MP3players,etc and I am constantly showing and telling her about how I have to unlock this,flash this, yadayada, and she always laughs and calls me a dork. BUT, when I bought my Prime, I didn't want her to ***** about me already having a TouchPad, so I bought her a 7" Galaxy Tab, and it turns out a lot of the stuff I showed her actually rubbed off, because she jumped right into Android and loves it.
So, you never know I guess. It's so cool that she understands much of what I tell her about home launchers, apps,Widgets, and Modding now.
hopefully someone can help me understand...i run quadrant and its only showing 1 core...i know the amaze is dual core...how do u manage this?
mylz1122 said:
hopefully someone can help me understand...i run quadrant and its only showing 1 core...i know the amaze is dual core...how do u manage this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the second core is on demand you can use system tuner to force all cores online to get better performance
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my iced out HTC Ruby
mylz1122 said:
hopefully someone can help me understand...i run quadrant and its only showing 1 core...i know the amaze is dual core...how do u manage this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's right (TGamble160 that is) there are some benefits of forcing the second core but it's not the best thing you should do for your device, the second processor is designed to provide loading process but forcing the second core to run all the time can over heat the device and cause damage that can't be repaired.
I actually came here to check out how people felt about the Amaze and to see if it was worth getting but I thought I would throw that bit of information out there because I've already had a device bork out because my neighbor loved the speed and didn't think to turn it off resulting in the burnt out paper weight.
After updating to ICS I noticed that is uses both cores fairly often and seems to be a LOT faster. It's already quick so I dont see a need to force it run both at all times.
Big help...I must say the more I have this phone the more I like it...super fast and smooth...I'm running the new revolution ice and its smooth as butter...
tgamble160 said:
the second core is on demand you can use system tuner to force all cores online to get better performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you force the 2nd core in System tuner?
ce3jay said:
how do you force the 2nd core in System tuner?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first you must have root....in sytem tuner select cpu option....then boot setting...then force all cpus....works like a dream
if you set system tuner to on demand it does not overheat the phone it still slows the processors when not being used but has them both ready for when they are needed. i keep both online on demand and my phone runs awesome! no overheating and still great battery life. however i set it to performance and the phone is blazing fast but does get warm and battery is gone in a flash.
tgamble160 said:
if you set system tuner to on demand it does not overheat the phone it still slows the processors when not being used but has them both ready for when they are needed. i keep both online on demand and my phone runs awesome! no overheating and still great battery life. however i set it to performance and the phone is blazing fast but does get warm and battery is gone in a flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does setcpu have the same capability as system tuner? I mean forcing the 2nd cpu to run?
mylz1122 said:
first you must have root....in sytem tuner select cpu option....then boot setting...then force all cpus....works like a dream
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh thats where the setting is. I must have overlooked the options last time. Thanks button clicked for ya =)
edit:
Is it also possible to change the min/max of the 2nd core? cpu0 is at 192mhz, while the 2nd core stays at the default 384mhz even with the slider all the way down. thanks.
bangsters said:
does setcpu have the same capability as system tuner? I mean forcing the 2nd cpu to run?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it does not that I know of. I always used setcpu on my g2x never saw the option to force both
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
IMG]http://img.tapatalk.com/d03628c4-e8a2-ec3b.jpg[/IMG]
System tuner is better and for those of you wondering about ics running both cores...
Sent from my iced out HTC Ruby
sdsa
glacierguy said:
IMG]http://img.tapatalk.com/d03628c4-e8a2-ec3b.jpg[/IMG]
System tuner is better and for those of you wondering about ics running both cores...
Sent from my iced out HTC Ruby
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS doesn't run on both cores? So why the f*** has htc given dual core system in it?
I am rooting and forcing them both.
imran1000 said:
ICS doesn't run on both cores? So why the f*** has htc given dual core system in it?
I am rooting and forcing them both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read the thread completely? The second core is used when needed. Otherwise single core is used to save battery.
imran1000 said:
ICS doesn't run on both cores? So why the f*** has htc given dual core system in it?
I am rooting and forcing them both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reviving a thread so old that u quoted GlacierGuy who doesnt even exist any more LMFAO
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Hello. What is yours antutu v7 score ? Its strange becouse i have 165k. Snapdragon 835 chip should have 200k. Can someone do some test and put scren here ? This is mine:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Mine is 189806
on US998 V30+ on 7.1.2,US99810C December Security patch.
Unfortunately synthetics are just that and vary from device, software, background processes ect. Are you having specific slow downs or issues?
on 8.0 Oreo
Velrix said:
Unfortunately synthetics are just that and vary from device, software, background processes ect. Are you having specific slow downs or issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i dont. Can someone start antutu 7 test on android 7.1.2? I think its normal on nugat, becouse system dont see antutu like a game, and the ,,boost mode" is off.
regod said:
No i dont. Can someone start antutu 7 test on android 7.1.2? I think its normal on nugat, becouse system dont see antutu like a game, and the ,,boost mode" is off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you are good
156K on my LG V30 H930 7.1.2 old frimware.
the highest I did on H933 is 184033
Also 165K on new Atututu. And my Axon 7 with S820 gets 172K.
Pretty wierd that these scores are that low (not that synthetics matter, but still). My U11 which has the same SOC managed to get 210k on the first run.
Lenovo Z2 Plus with Custom ROM AEX 5.1
My Score goes to 163k :good:
regod said:
Hello. What is yours antutu v7 score ? Its strange becouse i have 165k. Snapdragon 835 chip should have 200k. Can someone do some test and put scren here ? This is mine:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you cannot do the test while charging, particularly with qualcomm quickcharge, it skews the results not in your favor
On 8.0
Gottylol said:
Pretty wierd that these scores are that low (not that synthetics matter, but still). My U11 which has the same SOC managed to get 210k on the first run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U11 uses cheats in GUI for UX test in Antutu. Somehow it keeps refresh rate at 60fps constantly or similar tweaks to cheat user experience
frisky124 said:
Also 165K on new Atututu. And my Axon 7 with S820 gets 172K.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is another reason I don't use Antutu. My previous phone (Moto Quark) got a certain score -- within 10,000 points -- depending whether or not I put it in the freezer first for a few minutes to chill it. Then, Antutu released a "new" version, and suddenly the phone jumped 40,000 points. NOTHING about the phone had changed. The phone was NOT any faster in any way than it was before. But Antutu realizes HIGHER SCORES make people think they have better phones. So, suddenly with new version they artificially added more "points" to all phones.
Billy Madison said:
U11 uses cheats in GUI for UX test in Antutu. Somehow it keeps refresh rate at 60fps constantly or similar tweaks to cheat user experience
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I stopped using Antutu for that reason and more. It never showed how I REALLY used my phone day to day, and so many OEMs (OnePlus and others) constantly cheat to boost their scores FOR JUST THESE BENCHMARK TESTS. They artificially boost performance to levels that cannot be sustained more than a few minutes without overheating and melting down. OEMs that do NOT cheat on these benchmark tests are then penalized by having "lower" scores.
I found myself doing stupid stuff like putting my phone in the freezer for 10 minutes to chill it down before running Antutu tests so I would get higher scores, and then I realized that didn't prove anything. Since I don't carry a portable cooler with me full of ice to chill my phone when I'm not using it...
Billy Madison said:
U11 uses cheats in GUI for UX test in Antutu. Somehow it keeps refresh rate at 60fps constantly or similar tweaks to cheat user experience
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have no idea what you're talking about do you? Refresh rate is measured in Hz and have nothing to do with your framerate in benchmarks.
Thought i'd update this thread a little because performance has increased substantially with custom roms.
ChazzMatt said:
...
I found myself doing stupid stuff like putting my phone in the freezer for 10 minutes to chill it down before running Antutu tests so I would get higher scores, ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol that's just like "the open window mod" in winter times for the cpu overclocking hunters ?
give a peep on benchmarks, no real world usage reflection there. makes fun watching them but nothing more :good:
Alex-M8 said:
You have no idea what you're talking about do you? Refresh rate is measured in Hz and have nothing to do with your framerate in benchmarks.
Thought i'd update this thread a little because performance has increased substantially with custom roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What rom and kernel?
LG-H930 (v21O)
Stock ROM
I freshed up my v30 after trying different mods and roms, so i did a clean refurbish flash of 21o + magisk and get this result with Antutu 7.1.3
Stock Result 168.151 Points
Now ive started to freeze some applications with Titanium Backup, sometimes its better to not freeze things (you can get serious problems or just less points) but you can get out more performance. Didnt went too deep into it, just tried with a few things i dont need. In this way it was possible for me to get out about 10% more points in Antutu, im sure theres more possible if i would try with each and every entry in Titanium Backup.
Points after quick debloating 186.343
Does more Antutu Points really mean more performance or is it just within the benchmark? I mean do 10% more points mean 10% more performance?
Is there already somewhere a list of things we can freeze without doubts?
I've got this after a short time of doing nothing with my device.