Hello. What is yours antutu v7 score ? Its strange becouse i have 165k. Snapdragon 835 chip should have 200k. Can someone do some test and put scren here ? This is mine:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Mine is 189806
on US998 V30+ on 7.1.2,US99810C December Security patch.
Unfortunately synthetics are just that and vary from device, software, background processes ect. Are you having specific slow downs or issues?
on 8.0 Oreo
Velrix said:
Unfortunately synthetics are just that and vary from device, software, background processes ect. Are you having specific slow downs or issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i dont. Can someone start antutu 7 test on android 7.1.2? I think its normal on nugat, becouse system dont see antutu like a game, and the ,,boost mode" is off.
regod said:
No i dont. Can someone start antutu 7 test on android 7.1.2? I think its normal on nugat, becouse system dont see antutu like a game, and the ,,boost mode" is off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you are good
156K on my LG V30 H930 7.1.2 old frimware.
the highest I did on H933 is 184033
Also 165K on new Atututu. And my Axon 7 with S820 gets 172K.
Pretty wierd that these scores are that low (not that synthetics matter, but still). My U11 which has the same SOC managed to get 210k on the first run.
Lenovo Z2 Plus with Custom ROM AEX 5.1
My Score goes to 163k :good:
regod said:
Hello. What is yours antutu v7 score ? Its strange becouse i have 165k. Snapdragon 835 chip should have 200k. Can someone do some test and put scren here ? This is mine:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you cannot do the test while charging, particularly with qualcomm quickcharge, it skews the results not in your favor
On 8.0
Gottylol said:
Pretty wierd that these scores are that low (not that synthetics matter, but still). My U11 which has the same SOC managed to get 210k on the first run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U11 uses cheats in GUI for UX test in Antutu. Somehow it keeps refresh rate at 60fps constantly or similar tweaks to cheat user experience
frisky124 said:
Also 165K on new Atututu. And my Axon 7 with S820 gets 172K.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is another reason I don't use Antutu. My previous phone (Moto Quark) got a certain score -- within 10,000 points -- depending whether or not I put it in the freezer first for a few minutes to chill it. Then, Antutu released a "new" version, and suddenly the phone jumped 40,000 points. NOTHING about the phone had changed. The phone was NOT any faster in any way than it was before. But Antutu realizes HIGHER SCORES make people think they have better phones. So, suddenly with new version they artificially added more "points" to all phones.
Billy Madison said:
U11 uses cheats in GUI for UX test in Antutu. Somehow it keeps refresh rate at 60fps constantly or similar tweaks to cheat user experience
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I stopped using Antutu for that reason and more. It never showed how I REALLY used my phone day to day, and so many OEMs (OnePlus and others) constantly cheat to boost their scores FOR JUST THESE BENCHMARK TESTS. They artificially boost performance to levels that cannot be sustained more than a few minutes without overheating and melting down. OEMs that do NOT cheat on these benchmark tests are then penalized by having "lower" scores.
I found myself doing stupid stuff like putting my phone in the freezer for 10 minutes to chill it down before running Antutu tests so I would get higher scores, and then I realized that didn't prove anything. Since I don't carry a portable cooler with me full of ice to chill my phone when I'm not using it...
Billy Madison said:
U11 uses cheats in GUI for UX test in Antutu. Somehow it keeps refresh rate at 60fps constantly or similar tweaks to cheat user experience
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have no idea what you're talking about do you? Refresh rate is measured in Hz and have nothing to do with your framerate in benchmarks.
Thought i'd update this thread a little because performance has increased substantially with custom roms.
ChazzMatt said:
...
I found myself doing stupid stuff like putting my phone in the freezer for 10 minutes to chill it down before running Antutu tests so I would get higher scores, ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol that's just like "the open window mod" in winter times for the cpu overclocking hunters ?
give a peep on benchmarks, no real world usage reflection there. makes fun watching them but nothing more :good:
Alex-M8 said:
You have no idea what you're talking about do you? Refresh rate is measured in Hz and have nothing to do with your framerate in benchmarks.
Thought i'd update this thread a little because performance has increased substantially with custom roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What rom and kernel?
LG-H930 (v21O)
Stock ROM
I freshed up my v30 after trying different mods and roms, so i did a clean refurbish flash of 21o + magisk and get this result with Antutu 7.1.3
Stock Result 168.151 Points
Now ive started to freeze some applications with Titanium Backup, sometimes its better to not freeze things (you can get serious problems or just less points) but you can get out more performance. Didnt went too deep into it, just tried with a few things i dont need. In this way it was possible for me to get out about 10% more points in Antutu, im sure theres more possible if i would try with each and every entry in Titanium Backup.
Points after quick debloating 186.343
Does more Antutu Points really mean more performance or is it just within the benchmark? I mean do 10% more points mean 10% more performance?
Is there already somewhere a list of things we can freeze without doubts?
I've got this after a short time of doing nothing with my device.
Related
Appears to show that the Tegra2 Version (for S Korea) is significantly faster than the Exynos (Intl) version.
http://forums.tmonews.com/index.php?topic=16966.0
Though as mentioned here that version should be avoided for other reasons:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13234818&postcount=4
That's the exynos chip from MWC(1ghz) , which also scored 2000 on Quadrant I would even buy the sgs2 if it scored 750 , if its as smooth as it is now in UI interaction
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
murklor said:
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SGS2 would have scored higher in games if it wasn't capped at 60 FPS
murklor said:
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
... [needed to remove to post]
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that - I was conscious it might be old news.
I had forgotten about the speed bump - doh!
Have anyone tried GLBenchmark? If not I would be grateful if anyone tried and published the score.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GLBenchmark 2.0
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
flooki said:
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is the setting used by the benchmark, not a limitation in the GPU or the display.
thats not right is it?
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad. Of course it could be a game bug with mali400, chances are pretty high.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
murklor said:
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea ive seen that-think its just a bug rather than performance measure, im sure gameloft will release a s2 version
murklor said:
The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
tjtj4444 said:
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for link
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Probably because they announced that it would be 4 times faster than previous devices (meaning Galaxy S I guess) before doing any benchmarks, and then realised that it was nowhere near 4 times faster
So they had to overclock as much as they could.
KingKuba13 said:
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Sensation will come with a 1.2GHz dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU so I guess they didn't want to look like they were not keeping pace.
Hello Guys, i have a freaky problem, i see a lot of screen with Android 2.2.1 Custom Rom, with a Score over 1.300.
I have just 1.000 +/- but never 1.300 how can i tune my Rom for over 1.300 Score in Quadrant?
I use MIUI Froyo from Trip with Launcher Pro Plus, i killed all processes and delete all Apps what i dont need, what is wrong?
g00x said:
Hello Guys, i have a freaky problem, i see a lot of screen with Android 2.2.1 Custom Rom, with a Score over 1.300.
I have just 1.000 +/- but never 1.300 how can i tune my Rom for over 1.300 Score in Quadrant?
I use MIUI Froyo from Trip with Launcher Pro Plus, i killed all processes and delete all Apps what i dont need, what is wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't expect much and it doesn't matter
Higher score doesnt always means that yo device is faster
Sent from my X10x using XDA App
live4speed said:
Higher score doesnt always means that yo device is faster
Sent from my X10x using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh wow i thought it does ,and yea my quadrant runs 1300 , when i do it 2nd time
always ignore the first results on those benchmark apps
but i agree that people need to stop obsessing with these things, data2sd could give you high scores but the phone would lag so, if you can cheat it doesn't mean anything.
I used data 2 sd, and got a quadrant score of 2600, but phone started to lag. don't worry about the score, i mean, once you've seen yours get that high, the novelty wears off
Sent from my X10 TripNMiUI using XDA Premium App
I agree. Have achieved 2839 with data2sd and 1603 without, but you have to spend 5 minutes changing all your settings about to get this plus it burns through your battery. No one would actually use the phone like that. And you have to keep lots of memery free so either few apps installed or all on SD and it takes ages for them to appear again on reboot.
Pics
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And you don't really notice any difference actually using phone so bit pointless.
I only use quadrant now to compare between roms that are both set to my personal preferences to compare performance.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
I agree that benchmark scores are not important in everyday use and that u can have great scores and laggy phone, BUT his question stil stands.
Why does he get low scores at same setup that most people have graet score?
Nevermind the benefits of high scores, what is the reason?
3 things....
1) he needs to close useless apps ...
2) move quadrant to sd card (with app2sd)
3) run benchmark 2 times ... 2nd result should be around 1300 on custom roms ...
if you got still really bad performance, maybe your sd card is slow/"old"
Replying to the thread title:
Chuck Norris.-
KingCifer said:
3 things....
1) he needs to close useless apps ...
2) move quadrant to sd card (with app2sd)
3) run benchmark 2 times ... 2nd result should be around 1300 on custom roms ...
if you got still really bad performance, maybe your sd card is slow/"old"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. i have A LOT of running apps, widgets
2. i do not use app2sd and data2sd
3. i do run quadrant 2 times
4. my SD is stock class 2
on Wolf's CM 6 my score (Quadrant advanced) is from 1350 to 1550
_
and another strange thing is:
my work mate have x10. we bought it from the same operator. he bought it 2 months after i did.
We both, at the same time, installed same custom ROM (Wolf's CM 6). We followed the exact same procedure (after SD format and repair via PC Companion) and without any exta apps (only Quadrant) instaled i have much better Quadrant scores, he has some issues that i dont have, my battery lasts almost twice longer.
Strange, is'nt it?
But, on the other way, he has BMW M5 and I have Mazda 2, so I think this is fair.
it all depends on how you did your initial charge for battery. did you use it right away, or charge it right away for 5+ hours? ask your mate what he did
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
As far as I understand electonics, battery condition can have influence on battery life, but not on benchmark scores when both of batterys are completly full and on the same setup.
I'm running Vanilla RootBox 5-18 w/ houstonn minimum 167ghz kernel. These are real crappy Quadrant Standard scores. I'm amazed at how bad they are. I've ran RootBox before, and I was getting around 7000+ I'm not sure why they've dropped so much, and on stock I got 8000+ but this.. This is just sad. I'm not saying this is a RootBox problem, Im just wondering if any of you guys are getting these results?
I tuned everything to its MAX for one and the other one is the usual settings I have it on. But for it to be on max, isn't this a little low.
The 5k one is max settings the 3k one is my normal settings.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Settings for max.
Thanks! Looking forward to yalls comments.
Sent from my Optimus G using xda premium
Eh. Benchmark scores are influenced by so many things, they're not really a very good indicator of performance. Does your phone do what you need it to? Is it quick enough for you? Then don't work about any bm score.
Sent from my Optimus G using XDA Premium HD app
Digil said:
Eh. Benchmark scores are influenced by so many things, they're not really a very good indicator of performance. Does your phone do what you need it to? Is it quick enough for you? Then don't work about any bm score.
Sent from my Optimus G using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Tyler44346 said:
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What??? When you flash a different ROM just wipe "system reset" and if you want system. That will format you data, system and cache partitions. This is known as a "clean flash". Then wipe dalvik/cache and reboot.
BM scores are irrelevant. What matters is how the ROM/phone performs.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Tyler44346 said:
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not why. Software can influence benchmarks. I've used some lagfixes on my Captivate to push it higher than some S3 scores. Ignore benchmarks they have no importance. I'd worry more about the phone doing what I want without issues.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
This. And also, the quality of the benchmarking solution can be an issue as well. I have heard that Quadrant is outdated and does not benchmark fast, quality phones very well. Check out Antutu maybe....
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Its always been easy to cheat at synthetic benchmarks. They're worthless.
Sent via LG E970 with houstonn aokp 4.2.2
I'm going to disagree s bit an say benchmarks are good for testing a phone against it self. Has your phone gotten higher scores before? If so, my guess is temperature throttling. Down load quick system info app. It will show cores and usage while operating so you can see if you're reaching top max settings. Click arrow next to info in notification tray and info will float like qslide
OG e970 stock+
mystery emotionz 5.1
1.72 GHz oc/uv
It's not entirely throttling. I've disabled temp throttling, run it in the deep freeze, etc. I also check time in state logs to verify that all cores stay pegged at maxfreq.
Sent via LG E970 with houstonn aokp 4.2.2
Lg did a great job with optimizing the stock ROM n kernel. This is why stock out scores aosp. To bad you don't feel the difference in day to day use.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
is normal to have such a low number in my verizon lg g3. g2 below lg?I tested 3 times
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sorry for my language
Mine scores a 35453. I notice your battery is at 19%, do you have battery saver enabled? That would be my bet as to the discrepancy.
CapitanFantasma said:
is normal to have such a low number in my verizon lg g3. g2 below lg?I tested 3 times
sorry for my language
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also getting slow scores such as yourself. I figured I should be getting 35k+ but nope only 30k. Be sure to update this thread of you get it figured out.
Thanks
samg77 said:
I'm also getting slow scores such as yourself. I figured I should be getting 35k+ but nope only 30k. Be sure to update this thread of you get it figured out.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What widgets and apps do you still have running in the background? That affects performance. I have bloat disabled and I can routinely get 35K and above. Highest score was 37K.
Benchmarks mean nothing if you don't know the exact state of the device.
I just tested mine and got 34222 as my score. Still a little slower than my HTC One M8.
the G3 throttles back really easily. Unless it's been sitting idle for a while or you've disabled throttling, you won't get 35k+. see this
steelersmb said:
I just tested mine and got 34222 as my score. Still a little slower than my HTC One M8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I just got with Dalvik, but only 28,213 with ART enabled.
Did a factory restore just for kicks.
Quadrant Standard 13918
Antutu 25554
After about 3 mins in the fridge....
Quadrant 23926
Antutu 35001
Temp throttling holds true......
New update
Stock g3 non rooted
Mine is 28459. All bloatware is disabled. My device was fully charged. All apps except Nova launcher are greenified.
Sent from my Rooted VS985
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There we go, finally optimized for the G3.
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What xposed tweaks are these?
Can we revisit this thread...I've been jumping back and forth between my G2 and G3 and in every day use, I find the G2 to be much snappier. Of course I'm running XDABEBB on my G2 and stock rooted on my G3...but the G2 is noticeably quicker. It looks like the benchmarks are showing that the performance of the G3 is being hampered by something. What am I missing here? While I like the G3, I can't figure out why it performs worse than the G2.
ouch1976 said:
Can we revisit this thread...I've been jumping back and forth between my G2 and G3 and in every day use, I find the G2 to be much snappier. Of course I'm running XDABEBB on my G2 and stock rooted on my G3...but the G2 is noticeably quicker. It looks like the benchmarks are showing that the performance of the G3 is being hampered by something. What am I missing here? While I like the G3, I can't figure out why it performs worse than the G2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The display. Same 801 processor having to push that many more pixels. Although, I recall watching a video of the G3 Alpha(I think it's called Alpha, it's the G3 variant with an 805) and it didn't perform all that much better than the non 805 G3.
EvoRocker said:
The display. Same 801 processor having to push that many more pixels. Although, I recall watching a video of the G3 Alpha(I think it's called Alpha, it's the G3 variant with an 805) and it didn't perform all that much better than the non 805 G3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Newer, faster clocked chip with another gig of ram...I would happily sacrifice some pixels for a quicker experience...it reminds me of the Asus Transformer Prime vs the Transformer Infinity...the older version was better in my opinion...
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm getting in the 40K-42K range also.
Not sure what the G2 gets in this benchmark.
it would be nice if you guys could edit the img out of your replies.
really sux scrolling through this huge ass screen shot repeatedly.
thanks
I haven't seen anyone do a comparison between the two, but what are your experiences so far with this setting?
I am now on light, but it is quite hard to tell since i am not using the phine the dame way. It feels that the battery goes down slower, but I am at the point where i am not sure if it is really so or I just eant it to be. I dont feel the phone performance drop, but I have not done any heavy duty tasks on light
I've done benches comparing the two, the standard gives me a lower single core score and a higher multi core score. But when I switched to the light mode, the single core score went up and the multi core score went down. I've seen someone apparently got some insane high scores with the S23 ultra, as in 1600 single core score and 5400 on the multi, but there wasn't really any kind of revelation how they got it.
erik2041999 said:
I've done benches comparing the two, the standard gives me a lower single core score and a higher multi core score. But when I switched to the light mode, the single core score went up and the multi core score went down. I've seen someone apparently got some insane high scores with the S23 ultra, as in 1600 single core score and 5400 on the multi, but there wasn't really any kind of revelation how they got it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1594 on single and 5127 on multi, thats on standard profile.
How the ****? I've done many runs and I've never even had 5k on the multiscore....
Nghtmare said:
I get 1594 on single and 5127 on multi, thats on standard profile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@erik2041999 look. I just ran the test, didnt do anything to the phone besides installing all my apps and removing stuff I dont need.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nghtmare said:
@erik2041999 look. I just ran the test, didnt do anything to the phone besides installing all my apps and removing stuff I dont need.View attachment 5831911
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have the 12gb or 8gb ram variant?
erik2041999 said:
Do you have the 12gb or 8gb ram variant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
512GB 12GB
Nghtmare said:
512GB 12GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was my latest pass, just few moments ago, with active cooling... Yes it's above the 1.5k and 5k but only now, with additional cooling, and it's not even that much higher. While you're nearing 1.6k and 5.2. I've got a ****ing dud... Cause if no one else has to do anything special and can get those scores consistently and higher, then clearly my phone is a ****ing potatoe...
Just ran another one. Don't know what to tell you :/ I know there is like a hidden code that you could input and generate a system dump and find the CPU bin score but I can't remember it
My man, do you think there's any chance you could find it out for me? I'm really curious but I haven't found anything online for newer samsung phones without having root.
Nghtmare said:
Just ran another one. Don't know what to tell you :/ I know there is like a hidden code that you could get to get a system dumb and find the CPU bin score but I can't remember it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be interested to see how this affects the battery life overall in light mode.
I get 1514 and 4831
erik2041999 said:
My man, do you think there's any chance you could find it out for me? I'm really curious but I haven't found anything online for newer samsung phones without having root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its somewhere in the *#9900# menu. I'll try to find it later, and let you know.
Nghtmare said:
Its somewhere in the *#9900# menu. I'll try to find it later, and let you know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much man, appreciate it.
erik2041999 said:
This was my latest pass, just few moments ago, with active cooling... Yes it's above the 1.5k and 5k but only now, with additional cooling, and it's not even that much higher. While you're nearing 1.6k and 5.2. I've got a ****ing dud... Cause if no one else has to do anything special and can get those scores consistently and higher, then clearly my phone is a ****ing potatoe...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont be angry this benchmark was a fckn trash with totally random scores.... I got 1200 sometimes at single core... And running again the test right after, with much hotter cpu i get 1400+ score... Next 1300...Next 1500... Its a total random trash.
Castle0617 said:
Dont be angry this benchmark was a fckn trash with totally random scores.... I got 1200 sometimes at single core... And running again the test right after, with much hotter cpu i get 1400+ score... Next 1300...Next 1500... Its a total random trash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. With these kinds of benches you have to do 5-10 of them and average the results to find the real number.