Hello Guys, i have a freaky problem, i see a lot of screen with Android 2.2.1 Custom Rom, with a Score over 1.300.
I have just 1.000 +/- but never 1.300 how can i tune my Rom for over 1.300 Score in Quadrant?
I use MIUI Froyo from Trip with Launcher Pro Plus, i killed all processes and delete all Apps what i dont need, what is wrong?
g00x said:
Hello Guys, i have a freaky problem, i see a lot of screen with Android 2.2.1 Custom Rom, with a Score over 1.300.
I have just 1.000 +/- but never 1.300 how can i tune my Rom for over 1.300 Score in Quadrant?
I use MIUI Froyo from Trip with Launcher Pro Plus, i killed all processes and delete all Apps what i dont need, what is wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't expect much and it doesn't matter
Higher score doesnt always means that yo device is faster
Sent from my X10x using XDA App
live4speed said:
Higher score doesnt always means that yo device is faster
Sent from my X10x using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh wow i thought it does ,and yea my quadrant runs 1300 , when i do it 2nd time
always ignore the first results on those benchmark apps
but i agree that people need to stop obsessing with these things, data2sd could give you high scores but the phone would lag so, if you can cheat it doesn't mean anything.
I used data 2 sd, and got a quadrant score of 2600, but phone started to lag. don't worry about the score, i mean, once you've seen yours get that high, the novelty wears off
Sent from my X10 TripNMiUI using XDA Premium App
I agree. Have achieved 2839 with data2sd and 1603 without, but you have to spend 5 minutes changing all your settings about to get this plus it burns through your battery. No one would actually use the phone like that. And you have to keep lots of memery free so either few apps installed or all on SD and it takes ages for them to appear again on reboot.
Pics
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And you don't really notice any difference actually using phone so bit pointless.
I only use quadrant now to compare between roms that are both set to my personal preferences to compare performance.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
I agree that benchmark scores are not important in everyday use and that u can have great scores and laggy phone, BUT his question stil stands.
Why does he get low scores at same setup that most people have graet score?
Nevermind the benefits of high scores, what is the reason?
3 things....
1) he needs to close useless apps ...
2) move quadrant to sd card (with app2sd)
3) run benchmark 2 times ... 2nd result should be around 1300 on custom roms ...
if you got still really bad performance, maybe your sd card is slow/"old"
Replying to the thread title:
Chuck Norris.-
KingCifer said:
3 things....
1) he needs to close useless apps ...
2) move quadrant to sd card (with app2sd)
3) run benchmark 2 times ... 2nd result should be around 1300 on custom roms ...
if you got still really bad performance, maybe your sd card is slow/"old"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. i have A LOT of running apps, widgets
2. i do not use app2sd and data2sd
3. i do run quadrant 2 times
4. my SD is stock class 2
on Wolf's CM 6 my score (Quadrant advanced) is from 1350 to 1550
_
and another strange thing is:
my work mate have x10. we bought it from the same operator. he bought it 2 months after i did.
We both, at the same time, installed same custom ROM (Wolf's CM 6). We followed the exact same procedure (after SD format and repair via PC Companion) and without any exta apps (only Quadrant) instaled i have much better Quadrant scores, he has some issues that i dont have, my battery lasts almost twice longer.
Strange, is'nt it?
But, on the other way, he has BMW M5 and I have Mazda 2, so I think this is fair.
it all depends on how you did your initial charge for battery. did you use it right away, or charge it right away for 5+ hours? ask your mate what he did
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
As far as I understand electonics, battery condition can have influence on battery life, but not on benchmark scores when both of batterys are completly full and on the same setup.
Related
What's everyone getting on which ROM, kernel and CPU oc/uv program?
(not sure if this belongs in Q/A or not )
I just got 3799 using the set up below and CPU tuner + virtuos overclock , I got 5000 odd yesterday ?
I still ain't getting any more than 3900 , even uninstalling virtuos overclock controller for sleep n wake, and setting my pc to full power , with my brightness down and all tasks killed in taskmanager.
Try backing down the frequency you set your processor to. I get crappy scores at 1.86 but over 6000 at 1.78. Every chip is different.
What is your setup?ROM,Kernel and mods?Im running Eternity 1.4 w/ziggy's latest kernel and no other mods. Ive gotten [email protected] (reboots at 1.8ghz) and just tested now, [email protected] Try playing around with the governor, Im using setcpu with lagfree.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1.78ghz stock de-sensed
Infected ROM eternity 1.4.1.
Ziggy dual core kernel @
1.7
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
This is with CleanROM 2.7 (included kernel, no tweaks) not even breaking a sweat. Governor was set to conservative and I'm running "only" 1.62 GHZ OC. I don't like to run it at max. This ROM is a great combo of speed and reliability.
Mike
justj said:
1.78ghz stock de-sensed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what launcher are you using ??? do you have many widgets ? many apps installed ? have your wifi enabled ? does this matter do you think ?
I'm one who wants to always get the most out of his phone, but you guys do realize that with numbers like these, it is almost impossible to find any app that is going to have lag, so why even bother to go faster? At these speeds, you're now limited by things like your (data) connection speed and SD card read/write speed. So if we make these things faster, we're never going to see a difference anyway.
Just a does of reality. I don't think many of us use our phones to do number crunching, calculating pi to a billion digits, or use them to process SETI data to search for alien transmissions. Playing Angry Birds at 1.8 Ghz with both dual cores forced online isn't going to look any different than it does stock... except maybe your left hand gets warmer while holding the phone.
Mike
gav-collins1983 said:
what launcher are you using ??? do you have many widgets ? many apps installed ? have your wifi enabled ? does this matter do you think ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have launcher Pro with many widgets and apps installed. wifi, date everything on. As I found turnning airplane mode on doesn't really matters.
mikeyxda said:
Just a does of reality. I don't think many of us use our phones to do number crunching, calculating pi to a billion digits, or use them to process SETI data to search for alien transmissions. Playing Angry Birds at 1.8 Ghz with both dual cores forced online isn't going to look any different than it does stock... except maybe your left hand gets warmer while holding the phone.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think anyone will run their cpu at max all the time. Not with stock battery anyway. My daily setup is 1.02GHz single core UV @ 950mV. I play games like 9mm, ShadowGun etc and never had any problem with that speed.
Ok, so I think that benchmarks don't mean all that much, but thought I'd post here to get a bit more understanding.
Just ran this AnTuTu benchmark test and thought it compared well with other devices out there so far, in particular the Galaxy Nexus. Being that the REZOUND only has a temp root and is still on Gingerbread, is this not a good sign that this device is going to scream when we see S-off and full ICS roms?
Is AnTuTu even a credible Benchmark test? I have heard that "friends don't let friends run Quadrant" but am not sure if this one is any better.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks in advance for your input.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
msjohnson2868 said:
Ok, so I think that benchmarks don't mean all that much, but thought I'd post here to get a bit more understanding.
Just ran this AnTuTu benchmark test and thought it compared well with other devices out there so far, in particular the Galaxy Nexus. Being that the REZOUND only has a temp root and is still on Gingerbread, is this not a good sign that this device is going to scream when we see S-off and full ICS roms?
Is AnTuTu even a credible Benchmark test? I have heard that "friends don't let friends run Quadrant" but am not sure if this one is any better.
Thanks in advance for your input.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well im usually scoring around 5700's . them 3 phones are so close its craziness. I think once we get S-off this device will be MUCH better. If we ever even get S-off.
Completely unreliable. More for fun that anything man. Not to mention if you went from a Class 4 to a Class 10 SD card you would score significantly higher.
I guess what I'm wondering is that according to this benchmark, the stock, Sensed Rezound is really close to the Nexus, which is stock Android, and hardware optimized. Once we get s-off and ICS it seems it will be the fastest thing around.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
Again, you are going off an unreliable set of tests. Most of them mean nothing in the real world.
AtLemacks said:
Completely unreliable. More for fun that anything man. Not to mention if you went from a Class 4 to a Class 10 SD card you would score significantly higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True about the sd card...but it is fun anyway.
It seems that there is at least some reliability to this though...even if it is subjective. I'm curious to see what the improvement will be once the software on the REZOUND is the same as the Nexus.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
AtLemacks said:
Again, you are going off an unreliable set of tests. Most of them mean nothing in the real world.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any test that is reliable?
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
I prefer Quadrant, I score typically 2200-2500. Cannot wait for s-off so I can debloat this thing.
No, and everyone has their favorites. If you are only using it for ****s and giggles just use the one you like the most.
5485 Antutu here!
Did a temp root and tricked out the SD card speed. 25MB/s read speed, 6.3 MB/s Write speed.
Hey all, I scored a 5831 on Antutu. (posted on their system under 'thatsricci' as well)
I just added a PNY class10 SD card 32GB and it scored 9.0mb/s write and 15.3MB/s READ. I think that's pretty acceptable! Definitely helped the score a bit.
RAM: 891
CPU I: 1948
CPU FP: 861
2D: 274
3D: 1254
DIO: 360
SD Write:90
SD Read: 153
CPU Freq: 1512MHz
Total: 5831
So I hate benchmarks but I got bored so I ran a quadrant on my tab...I got 4221...is that a mistake?
wow. seems great to me. I was getting about 2500. I switch my governor to performance and it jumped up to over 3500 though. I've got ally of apps though so I figure not bad for me either. What's you governor set at getting over 4000?
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
KaFrEEkAbOom said:
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok...not to be mean...don't tell me what is helpful or not...
btw: i dont CARE about benchmark scores...AT ALL!!!!!
i just wondered why it was so high since engadget and other review sites say its like 1000.
@benzoman - just stock settings on cm9 preview (rootzwiki)
Running Task 14 overclocked to 1400 here. Couldn't get me to change ROMs for almost anything. Unless it was to an updated Task ROM. I'm running some of pershoots kernel stuff too.
Don't really care about benchmarks myself either. Just thought I'd run the quadrant to see what I got compared to what you got.
As long as it's stable and doesn't lag that's all I care.
Task has always taken VERY good care of me in all aspects of what I want, and need. So that's why I'm so partial to his stuff and suggestions of what to run with his ROMs.
Thanks mate for something to do at least for a few minutes.
EDIT: Just noticed both suggested ROMs are old Task ROMs too. LMAO
Yeah I'm running to change to an older ROM so my scores go up. NOT. :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
davsarus said:
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
ezcats said:
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol glad that im not alone
Mine on ICS for the first time its benchmark is nearly 4000 too, my expression was like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
well never mind, i can return to human form at anytime so benchmark is not really a big deal, just for showing off, i thought
what is actually your best score? i have about 4000 with cm9 from pershoot and 1.7.4 aacount-kernel.
Ran this on my tab with AOKP 4.1.2 and A1 Kernell 1.8.2 running at 1.6Ghz and only got 3435
My Tab is currently running Fourth Bar Revolution ICS 4.0.4 ROM with default ROM settings and Yoda Kernel 2.4.
Quadrant @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 2915
Quadrant @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 3317
Quadrant @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 3558
AnTuTu @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 6060
AnTuTu @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 6793
AnTuTu @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 7409
i was watching the phonedog.com dogfight between the Gnote and the iP 4s (no surprise the Gnote wins )
anyways, he ran the Quadrant Standard Edition so i went and installed it....his test came out to 2396. i ran the same test and mine came out to 3223. i wonder why there was such a difference? perhaps he hadn't rebooted his in awhile. i have no widgets running, perhaps that is why.
please share yours
~3300 stock, ~3800 overclocked to 1.83GHz
I don't get it. Highest ive gotten so far is like 2745. I have mine rooted with clock mod installed but on stock rom. How are you guys hitting 3,000 e on the stock rom.
Ive done all the clear RAM, reboot, & kill off backround tasks. I need more speeeeeeed! LOL>
nice jjc!
Vcolassi said:
I don't get it. Highest ive gotten so far is like 2745. I have mine rooted with clock mod installed but on stock rom. How are you guys hitting 3,000 e on the stock rom.
Ive done all the clear RAM, reboot, & kill off backround tasks. I need more speeeeeeed! LOL>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
idk m8. hopefully someone will reply with an idea. i am interested in knowing why we all have diff #'s when we have stock rom.
do you have a widget(s) running?
Rooted, stock, frozen bloat. Fast as hell.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA App
ARTAQaf said:
nice jjc!
idk m8. hopefully someone will reply with an idea. i am interested in knowing why we all have diff #'s when we have stock rom.
do you have a widget(s) running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope no widgets. I'll have to try and freeze some more bloat.
Use setcpu, and use scaling performance so that it's truly running at 1.5GHz. Samsung uses "on-demand" speed scaling, so when you test, there's a chance it might be running at less than 1.5 if it hasn't scaled up to 1.5 yet
I'm running stock ROM (only rooted), CWM b4 recovery, and Da_G overclock kernel
Dont just freeze bloat uninstall it! I never freeze it.
i'm running stock everything except i run an installed Launcher. why would mine be higher than some others? does rooting slow it down?
here is my benchmark.
Using GO launcher, 6 home screens, 11 widgets - WidgetLocker Running in background w/ beautiful widgets.
SauROM w/ DaG kernel overclocked - 1.83 ghz - V6 supercharger script 1000+hp
My setCPU is 1.83 on "performance" setting (yes it makes a difference).
*Also, used RomToolboxPro to change i/o scheduler to Deadline and increase SD read write from 128kb to 3072kb...
Here is mine running Saurom with Da G kernal. Clock is at 1566mhz.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
ARTAQaf said:
i was watching the phonedog.com dogfight between the Gnote and the iP 4s (no surprise the Gnote wins )
anyways, he ran the Quadrant Standard Edition so i went and installed it....his test came out to 2396. i ran the same test and mine came out to 3223. i wonder why there was such a difference? perhaps he hadn't rebooted his in awhile. i have no widgets running, perhaps that is why.
please share yours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couple things here, and by no means am I an Apple fan to ANY degree, but....
4S is close to year old technology, so comparing it to a brand new superphone like the Note (even the Skyrocket which has been to market for a couple months now) is silly. I generally like Phonedog and was genuinely surprised that guy would even compare the two devices. It sets a really silly precedent because 8 months from now, he'll likely make the same comparison between the Note and the Iphone5 which just might be similarly unfair, in the other direction.
Also, Quadrant is very nearly fraudulent in terms of its usefulness in showing the "actual" speed of a device, in a real-world sense, so I take ANY statement that starts or ends with Quadrant benchmarking with a huge truckload of salt.
Just my take...
-Ryan
borijess said:
Here is mine running Saurom with Da G kernal. Clock is at 1566mhz.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey did you see somewhere on here, there is a guy whos getting 3999? wonder what he has.
CWM b4, Da_G's Oc Kernel, Saurom, and a lot of bloatware uninstall.
CPU set to "Performance" 1.83ghz = 3900.
DA_g kernel, OC to 1.782, on demand, no reset and no ram clear. Wanted to see what it would if i was to do the test in real world situation (like showing off to friends);-)
Sent from a Galaxy far, far away!
Lol...how many benchmark threads are we going to start....I think there are 4 or 5 now
Sent from my SGH-I717R using XDA App
Running saurom with Da G overclocked kernel clocked @ 1.782
Sent from my SGH-I717R using XDA Premium App
3930 at 1.83
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
ARTAQaf said:
nice jjc!
idk m8. hopefully someone will reply with an idea. i am interested in knowing why we all have diff #'s when we have stock rom.
do you have a widget(s) running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have stock at&t note and get 3200-3300. If I don't clear the RAM, i get 2300-2700. So, just got to task manager, ram tab, and clear the memory, then use quadrant.
3203 Stock the way it comes setup.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk
I'm running Vanilla RootBox 5-18 w/ houstonn minimum 167ghz kernel. These are real crappy Quadrant Standard scores. I'm amazed at how bad they are. I've ran RootBox before, and I was getting around 7000+ I'm not sure why they've dropped so much, and on stock I got 8000+ but this.. This is just sad. I'm not saying this is a RootBox problem, Im just wondering if any of you guys are getting these results?
I tuned everything to its MAX for one and the other one is the usual settings I have it on. But for it to be on max, isn't this a little low.
The 5k one is max settings the 3k one is my normal settings.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Settings for max.
Thanks! Looking forward to yalls comments.
Sent from my Optimus G using xda premium
Eh. Benchmark scores are influenced by so many things, they're not really a very good indicator of performance. Does your phone do what you need it to? Is it quick enough for you? Then don't work about any bm score.
Sent from my Optimus G using XDA Premium HD app
Digil said:
Eh. Benchmark scores are influenced by so many things, they're not really a very good indicator of performance. Does your phone do what you need it to? Is it quick enough for you? Then don't work about any bm score.
Sent from my Optimus G using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Tyler44346 said:
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What??? When you flash a different ROM just wipe "system reset" and if you want system. That will format you data, system and cache partitions. This is known as a "clean flash". Then wipe dalvik/cache and reboot.
BM scores are irrelevant. What matters is how the ROM/phone performs.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Tyler44346 said:
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not why. Software can influence benchmarks. I've used some lagfixes on my Captivate to push it higher than some S3 scores. Ignore benchmarks they have no importance. I'd worry more about the phone doing what I want without issues.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
This. And also, the quality of the benchmarking solution can be an issue as well. I have heard that Quadrant is outdated and does not benchmark fast, quality phones very well. Check out Antutu maybe....
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Its always been easy to cheat at synthetic benchmarks. They're worthless.
Sent via LG E970 with houstonn aokp 4.2.2
I'm going to disagree s bit an say benchmarks are good for testing a phone against it self. Has your phone gotten higher scores before? If so, my guess is temperature throttling. Down load quick system info app. It will show cores and usage while operating so you can see if you're reaching top max settings. Click arrow next to info in notification tray and info will float like qslide
OG e970 stock+
mystery emotionz 5.1
1.72 GHz oc/uv
It's not entirely throttling. I've disabled temp throttling, run it in the deep freeze, etc. I also check time in state logs to verify that all cores stay pegged at maxfreq.
Sent via LG E970 with houstonn aokp 4.2.2
Lg did a great job with optimizing the stock ROM n kernel. This is why stock out scores aosp. To bad you don't feel the difference in day to day use.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2