Mik_CM7 vs. Andy_CM7 - Optimus One, P500, V General

Which one do you RUN and version+++++ what kernel are you using .... most people I see use FK kernel
From My LG Optimus P509 CM7

First post. I'm using MIK_CM7 and the kernel it comes with .. plan on getting FK today
From My LG Optimus P509 CM7

If ur scared new kernel will mess up ur device...just make a nandroid backup

BlackRose 22 said:
Which one do you RUN and version+++++ what kernel are you using .... most people I see use FK kernel
From My LG Optimus P509 CM7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
andy's Rom
version 2.3.4
kernel 2.6.32.19

I Use Mik_os CM7 6.5.4 ROM with franco.kernel.v18 BFS. Its stable and smooth

andy's Rom with the latest Kernel, have for me the best battery drain and perfomance

mik cm7 with BFS Franco Kernel

With the bfs version mik said its not good for video/playback
0x0v3rfl0w said:
mik cm7 with BFS Franco Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From My LG Optimus P509 CM7

I use andy's but now im downloading mik's 6.5.5 for testing. Andy's rom and kernel was the best for me ever.

i use andy's rom with franco's kernel. i get easily 2 days of battery life. And the performance is also very good. i used mik's one but i'm more happy with andy's CM7

Related

[Q] andy's gb rom rc1 + mik_os v1.1 kernel?

I flashed andy's gb rom rc1 and was happy with the rom, only thing I missed was overclocking...so I flashed mik's v1.1 kernel.
Will this harm the phone in any way? Pls tell me, else I'll reflash the rom...
Instead is the kernel .zip available? so I wont have to reflash the rom. I am aware tht andy will be releasing a modified kernel soon with miks oc features.
But in the meanwhile I dont want my phone to have any adverse effects.
Thanks
guru_urug said:
I flashed andy's gb rom rc1 and was happy with the rom, only thing I missed was overclocking...so I flashed mik's v1.1 kernel.
Will this harm the phone in any way? Pls tell me, else I'll reflash the rom...
Instead is the kernel .zip available? so I wont have to reflash the rom. I am aware tht andy will be releasing a modified kernel soon with miks oc features.
But in the meanwhile I dont want my phone to have any adverse effects.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should notice a lot of bugs now that yo uflashed mik_os 1.1 ancient kernel . Like black screen bug , reduced performance , probabily no 3d/2d , freezes ....
Thanks @zerobarat1 for the quick reply..
Actually the performance isnt much diff, running it at 729 makes it faster actually. But yes the black screen is bugging
So,
How do I go back to original kernel without reflashing the rom....I hadnt created a nandroid Is there a zip? I read the whole gb thread and have been following them for a while...afaik I couldnt find such a zip
Anyway Im waiting to see if andy releases his updated oc kernel today, it will save me the trouble of reflashing whole rom as opposed to just flashing new kernel over current one
Reflash the ROM without wiping.

Franco Kernel Issue! MUST READ!

Hey i got a Big a** problem here i tried to go back on fk 18.1 (wiped dalvik and battery stats) and i flashed it but then it loads but right before the bootanimation the screen remains black but the phone ends loading fully i mean when you unlock the phone it vibrates right well it does vibrate so it tells me that the phone is working but the black screen doesn't go away
after seeing this i wiped and flashed MIKOS 6.6 2.3.4 ROM and i didn't flash franco's kernel and then it worked perfectly so then i flashed the kernel again (FK 18.1) AND AGAIN THE BLACK SCREEN BEFORE BOOTANIMATION! so cant use the phone :/ why the hell is this happening?!!! Help me
Which kernel are you using, I believe CFS is for Gingerbread only and BFS is for froyo, or it might be the other way around, I ended up running through the same problem, I just wiped everything, ie...dalvik,cache ( you get the picture) and reflashed the kernel, I used v18 cfs ( I believe) but make sure you do a backup, I had alot of problems using Clockworkmod's recovery so I switched back to AmonRA and Ive had no problems, Ive read that it's not recommended to use Rom Manager so just do the search for flashable custom recovery
Jrhodes85 said:
Which kernel are you using, I believe CFS is for Gingerbread only and BFS is for froyo, or it might be the other way around, I ended up running through the same problem, I just wiped everything, ie...dalvik,cache ( you get the picture) and reflashed the kernel, I used v18 cfs ( I believe) but make sure you do a backup, I had alot of problems using Clockworkmod's recovery so I switched back to AmonRA and Ive had no problems, Ive read that it's not recommended to use Rom Manager so just do the search for flashable custom recovery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh i remember i did a nand back up and BFS is for gingerbread CFS froyo but feedbacks claim that cfs is better as i said i was using Franco's kernel v1 Gingerbread last updated and i tried to go back to 18.1 which doesn't have the black screen bug problem anyways thanks for replying bud, i'll restore the nand backup!
What you want to do?
If you are using Mik 6.5.5 you have to stick with FK 18.1. There is no such issue. if you are using Mik 6.6 test release then use FK Gingerbread kernel. There is no such bug. You can not flash Fk 18.1 on Mik 6.6. You will find same problem.
franco's rom doesn't support ipv6??? is it?
williamcharles said:
franco's rom doesn't support ipv6??? is it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no useful support for IPv6 in Android.
fernando1sg said:
oh i remember i did a nand back up and BFS is for gingerbread CFS froyo but feedbacks claim that cfs is better as i said i was using Franco's kernel v1 Gingerbread last updated and i tried to go back to 18.1 which doesn't have the black screen bug problem anyways thanks for replying bud, i'll restore the nand backup!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
6.5.5 is based on kernel 2.6.32. mik's 6.6 is based on 2.6.35. fk 18.1 is based on 2.6.32!! 6.6 ROM cannot support a kernel then gingerbread..i.e., 2.6.35!!!
shashi_hv said:
6.5.5 is based on kernel 2.6.32. mik's 6.6 is based on 2.6.35. fk 18.1 is based on 2.6.32!! 6.6 ROM cannot support a kernel then gingerbread..i.e., 2.6.35!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alright thanks for replying
Fraco kernel GB causes problem with my P500...
I tested with rom CM7 miks, and now with rom void #forever
After to flash franco kernel, USB doesnt work.

[Q] I Can use CM7 + franco.kernel ?

Hi. I use AGA-ROM 1.3.5 + kernel paolo 2.6.35 in Android 2.3.3... And my question is; I Can use CM7 + franco.kernel? or CM7 is just for Android 2.3.5? I don't quite understand... What procedure should be done? Tanks (Sorry for bad Inglish )
Obviously you have the new baseband to have AGA Rom...
You have to flash the old baseband, flash mik's CM7 and after the first boot you can flash franco's kernel as well...
evripidis said:
Obviously you have the new baseband to have AGA Rom...
You have to flash the old baseband, flash mik's CM7 and after the first boot you can flash franco's kernel as well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tanks i did !

ROM stock 2.2

Does anyone have a link to the original lg optimus t by T-Mobile. 2.2 Froyo
Farmware/rom whatever you want to call it. I have it but well a backup its missing some of the original Apps that came with it. And plus I don't have room at the moment to back up my current rom to go back to it
LG O1 Running Cm7 Mik_OS 2.35
Look through the general section, there's a post on original LG roms but why do you want to go back ? I'm using Andy's 2.3.4 Phoenix rom, with Franco's GB kernel. I have "incredible " battery life
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
http://adf.ly/2pH1W
hope it helps
I don't want to just in case I need to like when returning my phone back to tmobile and for recovery sake
LG O1 Running Cm7 Mik_OS 2.35
Tmobile usa is not there
LG O1 Running Cm7 Mik_OS 2.35
hope http://adf.ly/2r2lE
is what you want
LG P509-Tmobile US
V10S 2.2.2
Yea thanks dude i've been meaning to get raid of my 540 mb backup I have just have to test it out first
viv_jen said:
hope http://adf.ly/2r2lE
is what you want
LG P509-Tmobile US
V10S 2.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG O1 Running Cm7 Mik_OS 2.35
BlackRose 22 said:
I don't want to just in case I need to like when returning my phone back to tmobile and for recovery sake
LG O1 Running Cm7 Mik_OS 2.35
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont worry about it dude i have returned 3 Optimus T phones to them with custom ROMs custom recovery and even bricked and they gave me a brand new phone free of charge no problem at all and i have T-mobile by the way

[Q] A lot of rom so what rom i should use?

Hi!
I'm actually on 6.6.1 mis'os cyanogenmod, with the 06122011 francokernel.
But i have bug, and batterylife is bad.
I think that i need to upgrade with a another room.
So my question is you advise me what rom?
can not find my way personally.
Sorry for my bad english.
Trythis rom.Its updated cm7.2 and flash the old baseband rom.
Thanks for you answer.
So a little question i should use 0.32 or 0.35?
N-SERIES, .35 KERNEL, NEW BASEBAND Baseband v20G
[10JAN]N2-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
---------------------------------------------------
F-SERIES, .35 KERNEL, OLD BASEBAND Baseband v10E
[10JAN]F2-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
---------------------------------------------------
A-SERIES .32 KERNEL, OLD BASEBAND Baseband v10E
[10JAN]A8-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
among the three
demonyunther said:
Thanks for you answer.
So a little question i should use 0.32 or 0.35?
N-SERIES, .35 KERNEL, NEW BASEBAND Baseband v20G
[10JAN]N2-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
---------------------------------------------------
F-SERIES, .35 KERNEL, OLD BASEBAND Baseband v10E
[10JAN]F2-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
---------------------------------------------------
A-SERIES .32 KERNEL, OLD BASEBAND Baseband v10E
[10JAN]A8-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
among the three
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I can tell you already,using any .35 kernel is going to kill your battery...its main objective is performance and speed where else .32 kernel is tailored towards battery with some performance...
Have you tried updating your kernel using 6.6.1 because im getting good battery life using 6.6.1
Bit if you wish to remain with .35 kernels I would recommend a-series 7.2-kang
I sometimes had connection problems using 7.2 so I switched back to 6.6.1
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Jrhodes85 said:
Well I can tell you already,using any .35 kernel is going to kill your battery...its main objective is performance and speed where else .32 kernel is tailored towards battery with some performance...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And this, boys and girls, is completely bull****.
So i will use this rom :
F-SERIES, .35 KERNEL, OLD BASEBAND Baseband v10E
[10JAN]F2-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
adfad666's CM7.2.0-RC0 Ax .35 gave me terrible screen lag and battery performance. My batter was drained to 50% in just 9 hours without using the phone.
adfad666's CM7.2.0-RC0 A8 .32 with Goldenleaf kernel drained my battery by 10% after 9 hours + WIFI was on an running. The ADW interface also is not as sluggish.
Just an observation mate.
cekuhnen said:
adfad666's CM7.2.0-RC0 A8 .32 with Goldenleaf kernel drained my battery by 10% after 9 hours + WIFI was on an running. The ADW interface also is not as sluggish.
Just an observation mate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cekuhnen said:
adfad666's CM7.2.0-RC0 Ax .35 gave me terrible screen lag and battery performance. My batter was drained to 50% in just 9 hours without using the phone.
adfad666's CM7.2.0-RC0 A8 .32 with Goldenleaf kernel drained my battery by 10% after 9 hours + WIFI was on an running. The ADW interface also is not as sluggish.
Just an observation mate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I lost 3% in 9 hours on n2(Paolo kernel)729(smartass)!so please don't draw conclusions just based on one time experience!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Finaly i think i will take the Nighty build but i have the old baseband, i need to upgrade?
What is the best build?
EDIT: Nighty build equivalent of n2(Paolo kernel) ?
demonyunther said:
Finaly i think i will take the Nighty build but i have the old baseband, i need to upgrade?
What is the best build?
EDIT: Nighty build equivalent of n2(Paolo kernel) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usethis
giude to upgrade ur baseband And i suggest u to use N2 rom,cos nightly has quiet some bugs.
Thanks, i have flash the new baseband.
And now i'm flashing [10JAN]N2-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
It's better to flash a another kernel? for better performance and battery life?
Base Band version :
V07u-000-000-MAR-23-2009 is the old baseband?
demonyunther said:
Thanks, i have flash the new baseband.
And now i'm flashing [10JAN]N2-CyanogenMod-7.2.0-RC0-OptimusOne-KANG
It's better to flash a another kernel? for better performance and battery life?
Base Band version :
V07u-000-000-MAR-23-2009 is the old baseband?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u dnt like the scrolling and less responsive screen in this rom,then flash another kernel.I use zacks cfs kernel.Google for it.
I will look this.
But for the baseband, i have the last??
demonyunther said:
V07u-000-000-MAR-23-2009 is the old baseband?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is just a bogus string hardcoded in CM7. It will show that no matter which baseband you actually have.
Ok
Thanks, i have the N2 Build and gsm work so i think i have the old baseband.
demonyunther said:
Ok
Thanks, i have the N2 Build and gsm work so i think i have the old baseband.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
N2 uses new baseband,so i assume that u have new baseband.

Categories

Resources