Related
AOSP Magic v 0.2 Beta Testing ~ DI10, Deodexed, Zipaligned, AOSP Lock-screen, & CyanogenMod Theme ~
Looking for an AOSP, fast, clean, cyanogen mod type ROM, well AOSP Magic is for you!
Both the original and universal iterations of AOSP Magic boost many AOSP applications including messaging, calendar, and calculator.
All of the iterations, as well are deodexed for faster speed and zip-aligned for better performance.
All Verison apps have been removed.
This ROM will not format your data or delete your kernal, no kernal is included you must flash your own or the kernal you were using will stay.
Themeing is still a work in progress, more updates to come.
Version 0.2 fixes all bugs reported, please report any other bugs in this thread for me to look at.
fixed market
fixed live wallpapers
added gmail/gtalk
unthemed contacts icon to fix the icon not showing up
AOSP Magic v 0.1 Beta Testing
deodexed
zipaligned
aosp calendar
aosp messaging
aosp calculator
cyanogenmod theme
aosp lockscreen
touchwiz
superuser
ADW Launcher
launcher pro
/sdcard/extras
The same for each ROM, you can install these from your sdcard in a folder called extras.
wifi tether
spare parts
flash for 2.1
genie widget
sdx stock app remover
homeswitcher
astro file manager
Problems & Solutions
If your Latin IME keyboard isn't working try flashing LatinIME.zip below.
If your camera is fc-ing then flash camera.zip in clockwork.
If you don't like the vanilla lockscreen simply flash puzzle_lock.zip attached below.
If you also dont happen to like the mms.apk included, flash mms.apk found attached below.
Downloads
Please note this is a beta release and will more than likely bring along bugs and problems, flash only willingly and make sure you have a backup handy. Ive received reports that you do not have to disable voodoo in the flashing process. Report any bugs you run into, in this thread or by PMing me. Thankyou.
Latest ROM
AOSP Magic v 0.2 Beta Testing
Older Builds
AOSP Magic v 0.1 Beta Testing
With 2.2 or with 2.1?, I loved CM on my D1. I know the code for 2.2 was just released, just curious
WillisD said:
With 2.2 or with 2.1?, I loved CM on my D1. I know the code for 2.2 was just released, just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.1 for now, until I'm able to mess with the froyo source. Interested?
If it works with voo doo I will give it a shot
Fascinate oc1.2 for now
Forgot to say original
Thanks
Fascinate oc1.2 for now
Mean Sixteen said:
If it works with voo doo I will give it a shot
Fascinate oc1.2 for now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not too familiar with voodoo is it kernal based?
I'm interested! as long as it works with my 1.2ghz kernel with voodoo!
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
Not a developer but it changes the system to ext4.
Not sure if that answers the question.
Fascinate oc1.2 for now
zachchen1996 said:
I'm interested! as long as it works with my 1.2ghz kernel with voodoo!
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd even go as far as including the kernal in the ROM if youd like, it seems like the best at this point with voodoo, oc, and uc. That is if I can get permission from the dev.
bubby323 said:
Not too familiar with voodoo is it kernal based?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Voodoo is a lagfix kernel.
bubby323 said:
2.1 for now, until I'm able to mess with the froyo source. Interested?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey dude please i beg u to port this over to the international galaxy i9000 if u can because that way u r helping people internationally. Some people will even donate abd it shouldnt be hard.
Thanks in advance
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
bubby323 said:
2.1 for now, until I'm able to mess with the froyo source. Interested?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i'd give it a shot after i disable voodoo.
So its an actual samsung rom, with vanilla theming?
bubby323 said:
I'd even go as far as including the kernal in the ROM if youd like, it seems like the best at this point with voodoo, oc, and uc. That is if I can get permission from the dev.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey dev that would be amazing of u to include jt1134s 1.2ghz voodoo kernel with the rom! just curious this rom won't have all that nasty verizon and Samsung bloatware rite?
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
adrynalyne said:
So its an actual samsung rom, with vanilla theming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It takes the latest stock rom, deodexed, zipaligned, and themed with AOSP applications thrown in with icons, and adw launcher. It also includes a few extras like wireless tether and mobile ap, and more. The themeing is in the picture, it's a work in progress though.
zachchen1996 said:
hey dev that would be amazing of u to include jt1134s 1.2ghz voodoo kernel with the rom! just curious this rom won't have all that nasty verizon and Samsung bloatware rite?
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, but if bloatware is what you prefer I always include a flashable to gain it back, also useful for official updates.
bubby323 said:
Nope, but if bloatware is what you prefer I always include a flashable to gain it back, also useful for official updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
keep the bloatware off the rom but put up a link for back to stock or whatever for when the actual 2.2froyo update comes
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
zachchen1996 said:
keep the bloatware off the rom but put up a link for back to stock or whatever for when the actual 2.2froyo update comes
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly what I do. So it seems you guys are interested now I'm going to need a system dump and some testers, since I don't own the Fascinate.
bubby323 said:
It takes the latest stock rom, deodexed, zipaligned, and themed with AOSP applications thrown in with icons, and adw launcher. It also includes a few extras like wireless tether and mobile ap, and more. The themeing is in the picture, it's a work in progress though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey dev most of us prefer launcherpro so could u make the stock launcher launcherpro instead of adw? I think adw is really slow.
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
zachchen1996 said:
hey dev most of us prefer launcherpro so could u make the stock launcher launcherpro instead of adw? I think adw is really slow.
sent from my fascinate rooted and ocl'd to 1.2ghz with voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I include a whole bunch of launchers to choose from on boot, including adw, launcher pro, stock AOSP, and Touchwiz launcher.
whats the best and fastest and battery saving rom, for the tmobile vibrant?
PerfectRom v1.3 for the Vibrant
I think that you're gonna get biased answers, as people have only tried specific ROMs.
mmh whats the most famous rom?
Heres an idea, Flash every rom you find on here, and see if you like it, If not, go to the next one. Everyone will have a different favorite rom.
are u using axura right now? how did you overclock it to 1.3?
HRodMusic said:
whats the best and fastest and battery saving rom, for the tmobile vibrant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh...you might want to add "stable" to your wish-list. I am on Bionix 1.9.1, w/ Voodoo, which is the fastest, most stable ROM imo. However, it is ancient by todays standards, being from October, I believe, and is based upon Andoid 2.1 (Eclair).
HRodMusic said:
are u using axura right now? how did you overclock it to 1.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I'm using Nero, and I overclocked it to 1.4
im looking for a stable rom thats based on 2.2, fast and battery efficient, is that too much to ask lol?
Go download nero 3 beta.
cashyftw said:
Go download nero 3 beta.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats what im doing =-D i hope its good, could i flash that with odin?
Odin back to stock jk2 then flash Nero3
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
macnut 14 final is stable fast good looking and drains very less battery....
i will recommend macnut14
with i/o kernal
Nero with i/o kernel is a better choice. Download rom manager, and download the zip file on the nero beta3 thread, and drag it to your phone, and install from CMW.
so im testing out nero 3, so far soo good =D
It has to be between Macnut R14 and Nero Beta 3.. Use Super IO Kernel on any ROM for best results w/ battery life..
how do i get that i\o kernel? how do i install it sorry im a noob!
Sorry to be off-topic here, but this is in the wrong section, it belongs in the Q&A. Doesn't really matter anymore though, just thought I'd mention it for future reference to the OP.
thx alot, sorry about the wrong section just getting used to this site!
HRodMusic said:
mmh whats the most famous rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check each rom thread. Look at the view count.
Close thread please.
Has anyone tried this ROM? any comparison should be with LOL v1.4 or Megatron? some screenshots would not?
Wow, custom ROM based on 2.2.2! Nice one, sir, I am actually considering moving on from 2.2.
Please specify the apps you removed or the ones you kept, whatever is shorter.
When I'll back home (23.00 gtm+1) i'll update this post with your requests, ok? I love my rom, eheh! Take patience, please!
And if you don't mind, could you post the differences from 2.2 to 2.2.2?
Magnumutz said:
And if you don't mind, could you post the differences from 2.2 to 2.2.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course!!! Thanks!
any screenshots?
First Post updated!
Good job mate. As soon as I login through pc, I will try it.
DookMatt said:
First Post updated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Still want to ask to go with this rom use black statusbar as in this post http://www.androidworld.it/forum/modding-e-firmware-lg-optimus-one-114/%5Bmodifiche-rom-lol-1-4%5D-statusbar-e-icone-11534/? statusbar looks better black than white. Today afternoon I try to flash it because it seems that it is a good rom
EDIT:So I flash this rom, looks fast .. I tried to flash blackbar and works up to an hour, not to see :-(. and I miss that little power button is unable to reboot and reboot into recovery. even restore a backup of titanium applications and see how then will work. yet satisfied, and praise your good work on this rom
In future i'll not change theme and keyboard because these are original and stable! All porting having some problems... i think that theme for lol 1.4 (only 1.4) works on nessy. I hope that you like this rom. It's very fast but i must remove adw because it's so slow with zeam (very fast)
LOL Theme 1.4 works but blackbar not see the clock. ADW not use otherwise, I prefer the GO Launcher EX czech. so far it seems fast rom. For me the crucial speed and battery life
More battery life with "ondemand" governor!
the theme does not work because it does not change the file "android-policy.jar" I think... maybe..!
you must flash theme only for froyo 2.2.2!!!
LOL 1.4 is 2.2.2.enough flash original status bar and then it black bar and all is well . I can flash the kernel : Kernel Optimizations Touchscreen v1.1 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11270721&postcount=237 ???? it should work better than Mik_os in the 1.1 kernel?
mitsuu84 said:
LOL 1.4 is 2.2.2.enough flash original status bar and then it black bar and all is well . I can flash the kernel : Kernel Optimizations Touchscreen v1.1 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11270721&postcount=237 ???? it should work better than Mik_os in the 1.1 kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes you can flash sippolo's kernel without any problems
mitsuu84 said:
LOL 1.4 is 2.2.2.enough flash original status bar and then it black bar and all is well . I can flash the kernel : Kernel Optimizations Touchscreen v1.1 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11270721&postcount=237 ???? it should work better than Mik_os in the 1.1 kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you can flash it but I prefer Mik_os kernel!
and who do you think is better? Mik_os the kernel in the 1.1 kernel or sippolo? thanks for the advice
mitsuu84 said:
and who do you think is better? Mik_os the kernel in the 1.1 kernel or sippolo? thanks for the advice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sippolo's kernel fix also axis inversion and implement mik_os fix ...
mitsuu84 said:
and who do you think is better? Mik_os the kernel in the 1.1 kernel or sippolo? thanks for the advice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because I like his kernel and I have never had problems. Anyway, if you want to use sippolo kernel, you can!
EDIT: Now i flash sippolo kernel and test it. Maybe in next release I'll integrate it, ok?
DookMatt said:
Of course!!! Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, where are they?
Sent from my LG Optimus One
so yeah i was wondering if i can flash francisco's tweaks on GB 6.5.4 CM 7 from mik_os with franco's kernel.... or it doesn't change anything..? is it possible? is it better?
Help! <3
There has been so many threads and posts on this.. Yes it will work and yes it performs better.
Next time please do a search:
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&...mus+one+franco's+kernel+with+cm7&start=0&sa=N
Feeshie said:
There has been so many threads and posts on this.. Yes it will work and yes it performs better.
Next time please do a search:
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&...mus+one+franco's+kernel+with+cm7&start=0&sa=N
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm really sorry i'm new on this.. and i couldn't find it before so i'm sorry again and thanks for replying!
fernando1sg said:
so yeah i was wondering if i can flash francisco's tweaks on GB 6.5.4 CM 7 from mik_os with franco's kernel.... or it doesn't change anything..? is it possible? is it better?
Help! <3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean having CM7 + Fk18+ franco tweaks? If this is what you mean then no do not flash franco's tweaks. They have been integrated inside the kernel for some versions now (14 if not mistaken) and they conflict. Just install kernel and it will be complete
With GB you can use BFS Scheduler. it's better than CFS on smartphone
0x0v3rfl0w said:
With GB you can use BFS Scheduler. it's better than CFS on smartphone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i got the BFS version
mprou said:
Do you mean having CM7 + Fk18+ franco tweaks? If this is what you mean then no do not flash franco's tweaks. They have been integrated inside the kernel for some versions now (14 if not mistaken) and they conflict. Just install kernel and it will be complete
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn i did it already and i felt a decreasement and i ran a quadrant test and yeah it turned out a bit slower! :/ also i didnt do a nand backup so i guess i gotta flash all over again and i guess i'll use formatsystem.zip to delete franco's tweaks! Thanks for replying tho, i appreciate it
Guys this is discussion thread of ThunderVN Kernel by thachtunganh
Changelog is
here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ThunderVN Download link is
here
[10/4/2012]thunderVN v1
[18/4/2012]thunderVN v1- with KGSL from 3.0 kernel and battery improvement
[29/04/2012]thunderVN v1.02- CFS
[29/04/2012]thunderVN v1.02- BFS (Recommend to use)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source Code is
here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel Blog is
here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did he ask you to make this?!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
karthiknayak94 said:
Did he ask you to make this?!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,I asked to make this....
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Even though its a good kernel, still doesn't beats franco.kernel smoothness, in fact i've never been able to achieve franco level smoothness with any other kernel except franco itself...
With franco i get "iphone" smoothness level on contacts and settings menues, and many apps, statusbar etc..
TakamineSubasa said:
Even though its a good kernel, still doesn't beats franco.kernel smoothness, in fact i've never been able to achieve franco level smoothness with any other kernel except franco itself...
With franco i get "iphone" smoothness level on contacts and settings menues, and many apps, statusbar etc..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i found this kernel better than that one.
handryg555 said:
i found this kernel better than that one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better in what , in smoothness?? probably in 3d-games but im talking about gui
before u start criticising the kernel and pointing ur finger, just stick it up yo ...
its still in dev mode...
ccdreadcc said:
before u start criticising the kernel and pointing ur finger, just stick it up yo ...
its still in dev mode...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right..
I was suggested to use ta-gb 1.1 + hotfix kernel (as bug-free and for good battery life) but I cannot find this specific version of the kernel. Could someone give me a link or upload it please so that I could give it a try?
Between the kernel I was suggested to use and the latest, which one do you think is better in terms of battery life and less bugs? And what is the difference between the two latest releases (10/4/2012 and 18/4/2012 <-What is this kernel)?
edit: This was the result after flashing the second one:
_purple_ said:
I was suggested to use ta-gb 1.1 + hotfix kernel (as bug-free and for good battery life) but I cannot find this specific version of the kernel. Could someone give me a link or upload it please so that I could give it a try?
Between the kernel I was suggested to use and the latest, which one do you think is better in terms of battery life and less bugs? And what is the difference between the two latest releases (10/4/2012 and 18/4/2012 <-What is this kernel)?
edit: This was the result after flashing the second one:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 18/04 version has battery fixes, but also included genlock and New GPU drivers which come from 3.0 kernel.... and BTW, i'm rebasing on tagb, so don't worry, i will fix all that bug
_purple_ said:
I was suggested to use ta-gb 1.1 + hotfix kernel (as bug-free and for good battery life) but I cannot find this specific version of the kernel. Could someone give me a link or upload it please so that I could give it a try?
Between the kernel I was suggested to use and the latest, which one do you think is better in terms of battery life and less bugs? And what is the difference between the two latest releases (10/4/2012 and 18/4/2012 <-What is this kernel)?
edit: This was the result after flashing the second one:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TakamineSubasa said:
Even though its a good kernel, still doesn't beats franco.kernel smoothness, in fact i've never been able to achieve franco level smoothness with any other kernel except franco itself...
With franco i get "iphone" smoothness level on contacts and settings menues, and many apps, statusbar etc..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think, t.a gb 1.1+hotfix is based on franco's touch drivers. I have used almost all kernels so far and I think at present Roq XIII with t.a touch drivers are the best in terms of smoothness, stability and battery. Use the conservative at 480/600. Even the t.a 1.1+hotfix is superbly smooth and has superb battery. But it has a bug that when after using gps the battery drains even if the gps is turned off. Franco kernel has multiple issues 1) Frequent reboots during calls 2) Cameranot working after first use...and many other issues.
Roq xIII with t.a touchfix is as smooth as the iphone. Only thing is you have to tweak some settings on the cynogen power menu, spareparts+ and blade buddy I also moved the default launcher (Go Launcher) to my /system/apps to have the smoothness I get now. Smoothnesss cannot come just by installing the kernel. You have to tweak settings...
pradipsoman could you please verify if the kernel that you uploaded here is the 1.1 you are suggesting? The filename is v1.2 but I have to ask because it could just be a typo. What is your experience on the current version of thunder-vn? Do you still think the older 1.1 version of thunder-vn is better than the current one and why? offtopic: One more think, is Roq xIII as good as described on stock 2.3 rom? Or is it one of those kernels made for custom roms?
@ thachtunganh So what happened to my device (stock 2.3)? Are these drivers meant to be used on ics based roms?
_purple_ said:
pradipsoman could you please verify if the kernel that you uploaded here is the 1.1 you are suggesting? The filename is v1.2 but I have to ask because it could just be a typo. What is your experience on the current version of thunder-vn? Do you still think the older 1.1 version of thunder-vn is better than the current one and why? offtopic: One more think, is Roq xIII as good as described on stock 2.3 rom? Or is it one of those kernels made for custom roms?
@ thachtunganh So what happened to my device (stock 2.3)? Are these drivers meant to be used on ics based roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but no more now, go to the theard again and you will see the new kernel
I was away from XDA from 1 month....
So, I want to know can thunderVN 1.02 be used on latest hehappy's cm9 build??
Will everything be functional???
Thank YOu!
It's too soon for your second question to be answered. It's been a few hours since the kernel was released. If you give it a try there will be one more tester to give feedback.
I just flash the last kernel on hephappy's last build (youlookbeautiful) and i got stuck in lg logo
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA
@ TiioSam:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25481429&postcount=749
_purple_ said:
pradipsoman could you please verify if the kernel that you uploaded here is the 1.1 you are suggesting? The filename is v1.2 but I have to ask because it could just be a typo. What is your experience on the current version of thunder-vn? Do you still think the older 1.1 version of thunder-vn is better than the current one and why? offtopic: One more think, is Roq xIII as good as described on stock 2.3 rom? Or is it one of those kernels made for custom roms?
@ thachtunganh So what happened to my device (stock 2.3)? Are these drivers meant to be used on ics based roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can now use Thundervn Latest Release from TA Have tested it and now it does not have the wifi bug (only bug that t.a 1.1+hotfix had). It is smooth as butter and has excellent battery. Lets experiment further...
I'm testing it too. I'm satisfied by the smoothness too but how did you make a conclusion that soon about the battery life and the lack of gps bug?
thachtunganh said:
Bugs:
Slow USB read/write speed! - This will anoy some people that usually transfer files.
What i need to do next?
Increase the read and write speed of USB Mass Storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the latest 1.02 version is the above bug considered to be present? I get 7MB/s write and 15MB/s read speeds. If these are slow, what speed would be normal?
_purple_ said:
I'm testing it too. I'm satisfied by the smoothness too but how did you make a conclusion that soon about the battery life and the lack of gps bug?
On the latest 1.02 version is the above bug considered to be present? I get 7MB/s write and 15MB/s read speeds. If these are slow, what speed would be normal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's fixed, i can copy a file to my sdcard with 4.5MB/s .. if i forgot to delete it, sorry and thanks for reminding me!