Hi i was wonder what you guy think of your device. i am still using my eris but can upgrade anytime now. it is on its last leg, acting up a lot.
My question is if it were you would you jump now with thunderbolt or wait for some of the new devices on the horizon. Not sure how long i can limp my eris along. Was hoping to hold out for SGII.
With your eris, I would just keep crackflashing until something new comes out. I love my bolt and hate it at the same time. I work in a place with barely any cell phone reception which kills battery life. Come the end of october, there will be phones with 720p displays, dual core processors, and lte all in one. Wait for that to come out. I know everyone will say "There's always something better coming out" which is true, but this phone will be next to trash compared to those specs.
So, no, i wouldn't buy this phone again if i broke it today, and needed a replacement tomorrow. I would walk into the verizon store and buy a flip phone to hold me down until then
Ya i am trying to hold out i don't want to make the same two year mistake i made with my eris, jumped in to soon, it suck to be this close to a phone so much better then my eris and no official news from Verizon on upcoming devices.
I love my tbolt but if I were you I would wait. The tbolt is yesterday's news and there will be better phones in the fall. The HTC Vigor has me salivating as does the Samsung GSII.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
I would wait at least until the bionic comes out (or until its rooted) I think there's a good chance that the other phones may get pushed back (even though they have no official release date) I would look at the bionic or vigor, I'd stay away from Samsung and LG.
Considering there isn't any other new device out that supports LTE on verizon that isn't junk (Charge and Revolution), of course I would buy it again. That is, until my contract runs out and/or there's a better phone out as well (which with delays and such could be near the end of the year or early next year).
Would I want to wait for a better phone if my current phone is about dead (as was the case with my blackberry before)? No way. I waited 2 months for the thunderbolt to come out while hack charging my blackberry by applying the power/ground wires directly to the docking charge contacts on it. Screw doing that for any longer.
I have no doubt I'd buy this device again. I came from the dInc, and as deeply as the folks over there have their heads buried in the sand, the Tbolt is a significant upgrade in every measure. As far as I can tell, it's as good as it gets. Sure, you could say "There's the EVO 3D", to which I'd say "Yeah... it's about as practical as a 454 big block in a Chevette. LOTSA power with a seriously lacking network behind it." Nobody bought the Tbolt for it's impressive computational abilities. It's the LTE. It's truly the ONLY HTC with a network behind it that outstrips what the phone can do. I got REAL tired of the dInc's stock battery life of sub-3 hours at times, it's tiny screen, it's tendency to overheat, the beautiful yet power-thirsty and VERY dim screen. I've been trying to disabuse folks of delusions regarding this thing called Vigor, but nobody seems interested in acknowledging reality. But, I'll spit it out again...
The dual core chip Qualcomm is producing uses the same 45nm scorpion core the Tbolt uses, which is why Tbolts clock so well up and beyond 1.6GHz. Power requirements to produce stability is strictly a function of scaling process, all other factors being equal. Consequently, you're dual core device will be powering TWO cores identical to the Tbolt's, not at 1.1 volts but up around 1.4 volts or more, assuming a clock rate of 1.6GHz. Now I've looked at stock governors for HTC devices and they usually run 4 steps in clocking for their 1GHz devices; 245MHz, 512MHz, 768MHz, and 1.024GHz under the command of an ondemand governor with seemingly fairly low ramp-up thresholds. Assuming this will be true for future devices, you're looking at a chip that will ramp up quick under even modest loads and will eat power at more than twice the rate of a stock Tbolt. In all likelihood the display won't be anything radically different so power consumption there can be reasonably assumed to be in the same ball park. That leaves is with radios. I've yet to hear of an update to the MDM9600 radio chip that provides LTE connectivity so I'm skeptical radio efficiency will improve. The actual transmitter/receiver is very proven technology largely identical to a GSM transmitter/receiver.
So, for those salivating at the thought of dual core, 48 hour battery life, ultra-fast, ultra-high resolution devices, appreciate that the signs for those devices appearing soon don't actually exist yet.
loonatik78 said:
I got REAL tired of the dInc's stock battery life of sub-3 hours at times, it's tiny screen, it's tendency to overheat, the beautiful yet power-thirsty and VERY dim screen.
The dual core chip Qualcomm is producing uses the same 45nm scorpion core the Tbolt uses, which is why Tbolts clock so well up and beyond 1.6GHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never heard of battery problems with the Dinc (however I've never been to the Dinc forums) and everyone I know with one has good battery life and they rag on me for having my phone on the charger all day. If the Dinc's screen is dimmer than the t bolts then its almost unusable, this is the first phone I've had that I have a problem with the brightness, or lack of brightness. Some t bolts overclock well past 1.6 but most don't. I've had 4 and 1 was stable at about 1.4, 1 was stable at 1.28 and 2 weren't even stable at 1.2, my Droid X was clocked higher than any of my bolts
eraursls1984 said:
I've never heard of battery problems with the Dinc (however I've never been to the Dinc forums) and everyone I know with one has good battery life and they rag on me for having my phone on the charger all day. If the Dinc's screen is dimmer than the t bolts then its almost unusable, this is the first phone I've had that I have a problem with the brightness, or lack of brightness. Some t bolts overclock well past 1.6 but most don't. I've had 4 and 1 was stable at about 1.4, 1 was stable at 1.28 and 2 weren't even stable at 1.2, my Droid X was clocked higher than any of my bolts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The stock battery that came with my dInc was practically worthless. I couldn't count on it to last long enough to go out to dinner. I bought the 3500mAh Innocell a week later which transformed it into a wonderfully long-lived device. The original Samsung AMOLED screens in those were VERY dim. Most reviews took issue with it's lack of brightness, off colors, and it's weird version of white. It was practically useless in direct sunlight. Other Samsung phones of the era also received similar reviews. The new SuperAMOLEDs such as the one in the Charge are a dramatic improvement, but the one in the GalaxyS is identical to the dInc unit and is suffers the same drawbacks.
My Tbolt reaches it's limit at about 1.6GHz and gets VERY weird about voltages much further than that. It's difficult to say why there's such dramatic differences between devices, but I'm tempted to point the finger at on-board caches. Those tend to be more sensitive to speed and voltage than transistors and CPUs in general must be rated based upon their researched weakest link. Normally, the cache is that weak link. In PC's devices with substandard caches simply have them deactivated and are sold as lesser models, such and Intel's Celeron line. Many of those have proven to be overclocking marvels because the weakest link has been cut out of the picture.
I'll tell you what. The weirdest thing happened that made my battery life almost double..... I tried CM7 on it. Got tired of trying to set it up and restored a backup of Gingeritis3D v1.0 Beta6 and ever since then it's been a 14 hour LTE battery. All I can think is there was garbage left on /system that isn't normally wiped and I'd never wiped it or used anything but sense ROMs on it before. Who knows if that even makes sense... Beyond that, I'm clueless, but I'm loving it all the same!
I love my TBolt. I am of the mindset that if you need a phone, get the best one that is available at the time. There will always be something better over the horizon. If you can wait, then do so, but in October, there will be a rumor of something else coming. In the mean while, you have missed out on using a very nice device while putting up with <insert device here> for the next few months. Not everyone can move to a new phone when ever they want too. I can't, so I just make the best decision at the time and stick with it. I needed a new phone two months ago, so I looked at the choices I had. I picked the TBolt, and I have not been disappointed. I was already playing the battery game with my Touch Pro 2, so I took this limitation in stride. I love the power I have gained with the TBolt and have never looked back. The Vigor looks great, and if I could have waited for it, I would have; however, I needed a phone, so I made the best choice at the time. I think I made a good one. No regrets.
If I could go back in time, I'd still get the Thunderbolt. I had some rebooting issues but after the last update it's been pretty solid, and battery life hasn't been as bad as most people like to say. I can routinely get a full day out of it. That said, if I was shopping now I might wait for at least the next batch coming out in the coming month or so. If you don't need a new phone right now, there's always a newer, better one coming out, but you could end up waiting for ever for the *next* new one. Probably the biggest thing I'm left wanting is a physical keyboard, but Verizon has really been slow to get an LTE slider to market -- I'm not aware of any in the immediate pipeline.
I have a Samsung Galaxy SII along with my thunderbolt. While the SGS2 screen is amazing, viewable in bright direct sunlight for me, I don't like the fact that it does not have a search hardware button on it. The weight of the SGS2 is nice too - half that of a TBolt.
However, I would defnitely buy another TBolt to replace my current one since I like the design of the HTC devices best. I bought the TBolt originally since I wanted a 4.3" version of the incredible and am satisfied.
I would buy it again at the same time. If it was now no. The TB will be EOL soon with the TB2 coming out and another one from HTC is coming out.
I went from eris to droid 2 global to Thunderbolt... Have to say love the Thunderbolt and since I rooted and put on new rom... Performance has been great...
Sent from my A05PTH3ORYB0LT using Tapatalk
Night_Watcher said:
I went from eris to droid 2 global to Thunderbolt... Have to say love the Thunderbolt and since I rooted and put on new rom... Performance has been great...
Sent from my A05PTH3ORYB0LT using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Thunderbolt is a good phone. It does exactly what it is supposed to do. If you're on stock and get the extended battery, the phone is gold.
When you root and tweak it, the phone is platinum.
Short answer .. Yes.
I would buy the Thunderbolt again. I like mine, it suits my needs perfectly. If you can wait then do it .. there should be some pretty nice new models coming out later. There always is so get used to that. But that also means that phones like the Thunderbolt become more affordable to the masses, soon they will be on Verizons "free" upgrade list. I was in a place where I could not wait any longer and paid a lot more than they are selling for now.
If you are a power user then wait. If not then grab a Thunderbolt for cheap. The difference between these and what ever comes out soon is not going to be that great to the casual user.
Related
Hopefully this isn't something that's against the rules.
So I have a Droid Incredible and I really like it. I have the extended battery (3500) so I've never had any problems with battery life. A friend at work has a Thunderbolt that he was looking to offload and asked if I'd be interested.
I don't really know anybody who has one, so I'm asking for some opinions here.
Would it be worth the move from an Incredible to a Thunderbolt?
How's the battery life?
Is the extended battery worth getting?
How's the call quality?
The call quality sucks, battery life can be increased to a reasonable level with 4g off and the right roms and kernels. I can't give any info on an extended battery because I don't use them because they are to bulky.
Call quality for me isn't too shabby. Battery life is about the same, maybe a little less. As for the extended battery, my friends wife has it & claims it almost doubled the battery life. Only drawback: bulky as hell. 2 big differences is screen size & 4G capability.
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
Battery life, running LTE full time, has proven to be nearly twice that of my dinc. Contrary to popular opinion, the hardware on the Tbolt is a significant upgrade to the Incredible. Not only is the revised core about 25% faster, but the GPU is 400% faster and the RAM is 50% bigger. This equals speed you WILL notice even at stock speeds. That said, overclocking these is far easier, too. Where eeking out 1.19 GHz on an Incredible was an accomplishment, many Tbolts will OC to 1.41GHz easily with some remaining stable at 1.92GHz. Of course some don't do so well, but that's more the exception than the rule. I have mine overclocked to 1.6GHz, running a full Sense 3.0 3D ROM, and getting 14 hours of battery life isn't at all uncommon.
Aside from the obvious size and addition of LTE, the Tbolt is also the only Verizon device that will do both CDMA and LTE data in a call. The Tbolt is already a meaty phone and extended battery make it simply massive. The Incredible was so bad on it's battery it was useless to me without an extended battery. I'd be happier if the Tbolt had more juice, but it's not nearly the battery hog the Incredible was. I can survive a day or more with this device if I had to. The Incredible couldn't do that sitting untouched on a table.
loonatik78 said:
Battery life, running LTE full time, has proven to be nearly twice that of my dinc. Contrary to popular opinion, the hardware on the Tbolt is a significant upgrade to the Incredible. Not only is the revised core about 25% faster, but the GPU is 400% faster and the RAM is 50% bigger. This equals speed you WILL notice even at stock speeds. That said, overclocking these is far easier, too. Where eeking out 1.19 GHz on an Incredible was an accomplishment, many Tbolts will OC to 1.41GHz easily with some remaining stable at 1.92GHz. Of course some don't do so well, but that's more the exception than the rule. I have mine overclocked to 1.6GHz, running a full Sense 3.0 3D ROM, and getting 14 hours of battery life isn't at all uncommon.
Aside from the obvious size and addition of LTE, the Tbolt is also the only Verizon device that will do both CDMA and LTE data in a call. The Tbolt is already a meaty phone and extended battery make it simply massive. The Incredible was so bad on it's battery it was useless to me without an extended battery. I'd be happier if the Tbolt had more juice, but it's not nearly the battery hog the Incredible was. I can survive a day or more with this device if I had to. The Incredible couldn't do that sitting untouched on a table.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Out of curiosity, what kernel do you use? OC to 1.92 GHz stable?
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
I was getting anywhere from 4-10 of heavy-medium use, lite use I get about 14-18 hours and 24-26 hours of almost no use, this is at 1 ghz with LTE always off with BAMF stripped roms and adopt roms (although asop always had more bugs than I care for) all sense based roms I've run I get a couple hours less than that. Out of my 6 t bolts 2 were stable at 1.4, 2 at 1.2, 1 at 1 ghz, and 1 wasn't even stable at 1 ghz, I had to underclock it to 800 music.
You can increase the battery life some but there are things I'm not willing to give up, like email push, that's why I got a smartphone.
ghstrdr1985 said:
Out of curiosity, what kernel do you use? OC to 1.92 GHz stable?
I'm using Imoseyon's 3.8.0 kernel, I think. The one with the smartassV2 governor. I don't run it that fast though. Phone won't support it. I wouldn't even if I could because beyond 1.41GHz your returns start dropping off sharply relative to power being consumed. I run mine at 1.6GHz.
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
eraursls1984 said:
I was getting anywhere from 4-10 of heavy-medium use, lite use I get about 14-18 hours and 24-26 hours of almost no use, this is at 1 ghz with LTE always off with BAMF stripped roms and adopt roms (although asop always had more bugs than I care for) all sense based roms I've run I get a couple hours less than that. Out of my 6 t bolts 2 were stable at 1.4, 2 at 1.2, 1 at 1 ghz, and 1 wasn't even stable at 1 ghz, I had to underclock it to 800 music.
You can increase the battery life some but there are things I'm not willing to give up, like email push, that's why I got a smartphone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We've gone back and forth. Our experiences are VERY different. I can unplug my phone from the charger before I got to sleep and wake up 10 hours later and have 80-85% battery remaining. That's with LTE on, all updating activity on, OC'd to 1.6GHz with the kernel mentioned above. This thing would go days on standby, but I can kill it in 3 or 4 hours pretty easy if I'm messing with it literally non-stop.
Thanks for all the information fellas. Much appreciated.
Sent from my Incredible using Tapatalk
if you live in a 4G area go for the thunderbolt.
I came from the dinc and really the only two significant factors is 4G and a bigger screen.
My only gripes with the dinc was (in my experience) the call quality was atrocious. The thunderbolt is a step up in call quality for me.
Battery life is the same for me (I used the evo battery in my inc) but since you are using a bigger battery on the dinc you will see a significant hit.
The thunderbolt is an all around better built phone but I could have totally kept with the dinc if I lived in a 3G area.
If it's free.. do it. if not, save your money and look toward the new line of android phones coming out for the holiday season.
PhillyCheez said:
if you live in a 4G area go for the thunderbolt.
I came from the dinc and really the only two significant factors is 4G and a bigger screen.
My only gripes with the dinc was (in my experience) the call quality was atrocious. The thunderbolt is a step up in call quality for me.
Battery life is the same for me (I used the evo battery in my inc) but since you are using a bigger battery on the dinc you will see a significant hit.
The thunderbolt is an all around better built phone but I could have totally kept with the dinc if I lived in a 3G area.
If it's free.. do it. if not, save your money and look toward the new line of android phones coming out for the holiday season.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get an upgrade in March, so I'm tempted to just hold off and wait till then. But, I REALLY love new toys. It won't be free, but if the price is reasonable, I may give it a shot.
Hello all,
I'm currently a Samsung galaxy s2 user, just switched from using the iphone 4 because of all the rumors about the galaxy s2. And till now im impressed by everything it has to offer except its battery life.
I love my galaxy s2, but the only problem is battery life, and thats the main reason im being pulled over to buy the iphone 4s!!..
getting that isnt the problem..
I tried way too many custom ROMS, different kernels etc, but ended up with an average 6-7 hr battery life with heavy usage and that doesnt even involve listening to music while commuting. If i did that as well, im sure my battery wud barely last 5 hrs... which isnt ideal at all, im sure everyone feels the same way... Right now im on stock KI3 firmware, rooted. KI3 is slightly better than what bell gave me as stock - KG2.
now i want some strong points of why i shouldn't move back. I've been an iphone user since the 2g iphone and it was amazing!
Only if i could improve my battery life on galaxy s2 i wouldnt have these temptations to move to iphone again.
Should I move back to the iPhone?
no, galaxy s2 is the best !xD
my battery is very good so i don't care just try some kernels or roms
iPhone 4s is much better than SGS2 IMO.
Better size, better display (imo SAMOLED+'s colours are too cartoony), better resolution, better camera, better audio, much better battery and a much faster processor.
Also, iOS has proper dual core optimizations and actually makes good use of the A5 chip, wheras with SGS2, you'll have to wait for a stable ICS rom comes out.
Despite the negativity of the i4s, I personally think it'll be one of the most underrated phones this year.
But that's just my opinion.
My s2 often gives me 16+ hrs of heavy usage (my phone is from the first batch) my other half got a white s2 a few weeks ago and he has dreadful battery life. Both same firmware ect. Although mine is made in korea both battery and handset. His is made in china. Different colour mainboards too. Mines blue his is green.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Well just to make the point clear, you will never get your sgs 2 to have as much of a battery life as the IP4S. iOS is simply much better at handling battery life than android.
Now it depends on what you want really. Do you value battery life over functionality/choice?
Personally what do you expect of a phone with a dual core 1.2ghz processor? If you expect 12 hrs now that is simply idiocy. You have a laptop that can do that? I don't cuz mine lasts 2 hrs with heavy usage. I haven't read of any laptop being able to last 12 hrs of heavy usage either. No I don't expect a laptop to have a battery life like that either. Now this is a phone with a processor better than most if not all netbooks, it is not going to have a 8hr+ battery life with heavy usage just like a laptop.
I feel your pain with battery life. Also, screen burn in isshowing its face on mine too. But threw iphone is waaaaaay too locked down to make it an easy choice.
Sounds like you dont have things set up correctly to me or your using some resource hogging apps.
Im on wifi all day, send between 40-70 sms a day, couple of phone calls, tweetdeck auto updating, around 20mins of music (well, podcast, but it is an audio file), auto updating of all my apps enabled in the market and the obvious hour or so web browsing and 10mins or so of minecraft when I sneak off for a break in the toilets and I get home with around 30%
Dont forget, your also comparing a closed up OS which has been around for a fair old while to an open one which is still reasonably new which each phone manufacturer has his way with before chucking the phones out
Im not going to fight the android corner as you admitted yourself you are 'looking for reasons to not move back'. Which sounds as though you have already made up your mind.
If you want to go get a shiny fragile phone with a half eaten apple on it by all means do Glad you've at least tried Android though, your light years ahead of 90% of Iphone owners who live around here lol.
must be something thats killing your battery in the background. I quite easily get over a day and between 5-6 hours screen on time. Longest ive had was 6hr 38 mins screen on.
Download better battery stats and see whats running in the background.
Lawl you all are missing a very important statement in his post. "HEAVY USAGE"
What is heavy usage? Web browsing, playing a 3d game, watching a video, recording a video, taking pictures, etc. So of course he is going to get 6-7hrs of battery life.
I agree with the above post. find out whats draining your battery. Shouldn't be that low...unless you are just sitting on your sofa browsing constantly because your so excited about a new phone like i was.
Also you can buy a dock charger and extra batteries set for cheap together (ankhers set) so you never have to plug your phone into a charger again
But it sounds like you have alot of money to burn...then why not...being in a locked system isnt so bad when your willing to just buy every app and media at premium prices and your happy with the interface
Thanks for the quick reply guys, and yes, i m loving my galaxy s2 as i mentioned earlier. And yes, im a heavy user, around 100 texts, playing 3d games (sandstorm, brothers in arms etc). I barely keep wifi on as i haf 6gb of data which is almost unlimited. and im getting 7 hrs, which apparently seems to be good. If thats the case then I have nothing to complain about...
And in terms of money, lol i dont have any... its just i could get an iphone if i sold this one... no way i could afford to keep both!
Stick to the SGS2 and wait for the SGS3 till then.
Hmm, If were I, I would like the iPhone 4S. The iOS 5's new feature iCloud and iMessenge really attracted me.
And can get many apps for it:
http://www.enolsoft.com/blog/best-free-iphone-4s-apps/
SGS2! iPhone4S is inferior in many many ways. It's a ****ty phone.
/ownership bias
u should wait untill the ICS rom is out. that should improve the battery life, because it will be customized to a dual core processor.
Iphone 4S is quite a good phone, but I'm personally against Apple's politics regarding software and price. I don't want Itunes, no format support like FLAC or MKV, no Flash. Also Android has more customization abilities in themes and menues.
I like the big screen and weight on the GS2. Well, the battery life could be better on SGS 2. But there's a Samsung 2000mah battery available at the moment and you can easily replace the battery.
I have been in the same boat in fact I have swapped my Iphone 4 for a SGS2 three times, until finally I realise that the SGS2 really is a SuperPhone.
The reason you will find battery life not quite as good as the Iphone4, is basically down to the fact the Iphone is not actually doing a lot.
I waited until iOs5 before swapping back to this truly, greatest phone since the HD2, iOs5 really is a disappointment to say the least, you get a pull down bar that kinda copies Android to a point, but fails in the fact with its Iphone basic-ness yet again, the weather links to the most basic of weather apps, the notification animations appear at the top all very nicely, but the top bar doesn't state that notifications are listed within, they tried to match the Androids version but in true Iphone style, didn't leave in the design to allow users to feel its their notifications.
One thing you will never get away from even jailbroken is the fact you are not free to choose...you will never own your Iphone, it owns you, Android on the other hand is the opposite and with the SGS2, its power and freedom is far more adaptable than the iphone4.
I've got a charge, and was wondering if anyone has switched from the charge to the resound? Curious if there's any improvement in data and GPS connection compared to the charge? I haven't heard anyone losing their mind, do I think there is...anyone? The charge has kinda soured me on Samsung phones, and if there are improvements going to this phone I'll take it. I have a feeling the nexus might be more of the same garbage as the charge. Even though I'm fulled rooted debloated and on GB 2.3.7 my connection is so unstable it makes me furious...
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
Edit...2.3.6
toby1064 said:
I've got a charge, and was wondering if anyone has switched from the charge to the resound? Curious if there's any improvement in data and GPS connection compared to the charge? I haven't heard anyone losing their mind, do I think there is...anyone? The charge has kinda soured me on Samsung phones, and if there are improvements going to this phone I'll take it. I have a feeling the nexus might be more of the same garbage as the charge. Even though I'm fulled rooted debloated and on GB 2.3.7 my connection is so unstable it makes me furious...
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Charge is a POS phone ,they literally just threw it together so people could have another choice besides the T-bolt. You pretty much paid $300 for the super amoled + (which imo was the only thing the phone had going for it.. Well it had an okay camera too). So yes if you were to ditch your Charge, and come to the Rezound, you'll be happy you did.
Not a Charge, but I came from a Thunderbolt(which was considered the best of the original 3 - Charge, Revolution, Thunderbolt)...
This Rezound compared to a Thunderbolt(that had gone through an assortment of Kernel/Radio/ROM changes) isn't exactly a big step up.
Performance wise, it's only slightly faster then an overclocked Thunderbolt & the GPS is about the same as a Thunderbolt on a Sense 3.5 rom(which was highly accurate).
This phone is nice and all, but if I hadn't damaged my Thunderbolt and knowing now the performance difference, i'd still be using my Thunderbolt.
Luckily I am getting my $400 deposit back in April, around the time the quad-core phones are supposed to be coming out so I'll be upgrading again then unless things really start to happen for the Rezound.
$400 deposit? Holy crap!
If you just go into a Verizon store and hold the Rezound in your hand you will notice a much better build quality, not to mention the camera's are better, screen is better, etc..
voxigenboy said:
Not a Charge, but I came from a Thunderbolt(which was considered the best of the original 3 - Charge, Revolution, Thunderbolt)...
This Rezound compared to a Thunderbolt(that had gone through an assortment of Kernel/Radio/ROM changes) isn't exactly a big step up.
Performance wise, it's only slightly faster then an overclocked Thunderbolt & the GPS is about the same as a Thunderbolt on a Sense 3.5 rom(which was highly accurate).
This phone is nice and all, but if I hadn't damaged my Thunderbolt and knowing now the performance difference, i'd still be using my Thunderbolt.
Luckily I am getting my $400 deposit back in April, around the time the quad-core phones are supposed to be coming out so I'll be upgrading again then unless things really start to happen for the Rezound.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's the 3g/4g switching? The charge sometimes leaves me hanging on the handoff for minutes or until I reboot. That's the worst thing about it. They fixed GPS on the latest leak, but the stock people still haven't seen that. How long does a GPS fix take?
toby1064 said:
How's the 3g/4g switching? The charge sometimes leaves me hanging on the handoff for minutes or until I reboot. That's the worst thing about it. They fixed GPS on the latest leak, but the stock people still haven't seen that. How long does a GPS fix take?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only thing with the 3G / 4G bit is that if I stay in a 4G area it never switches to 3G. Although, if I happen to stray into a 3G area, it doesn't always switch back to 4G, so I'll have to manually turn the radio off/on, then it kicks back into 4G.
I have noticed if the phone is idle it won't switch automatically. But if I turn on the screen and do something for a minute, it will in fact roll over to 4G.
I just traded in my Charge for the Rezound. No regrets. GPS the 5 times I have used it was INSTANT lock on, not the 5-10 minutes with the Charge. Doesn't have the freezing and weird radio reboots either. An extended battery exists, and one can actually find it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
reverendbill said:
I just traded in my Charge for the Rezound. No regrets. GPS the 5 times I have used it was INSTANT lock on, not the 5-10 minutes with the Charge. Doesn't have the freezing and weird radio reboots either. An extended battery exists, and one can actually find it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, that's what I needed to hear, may just hit eject on samsung then...nice.
toby1064 said:
I've got a charge, and was wondering if anyone has switched from the charge to the resound? Curious if there's any improvement in data and GPS connection compared to the charge? I haven't heard anyone losing their mind, do I think there is...anyone? The charge has kinda soured me on Samsung phones, and if there are improvements going to this phone I'll take it. I have a feeling the nexus might be more of the same garbage as the charge. Even though I'm fulled rooted debloated and on GB 2.3.7 my connection is so unstable it makes me furious...
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
Edit...2.3.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup, i sold my charge on ebay for 300 and upgraded to this. I am SOO HAPPY to be done with that phone. the rezound is faster, smoother, more reliable, and the GPS works !! lol.
the charge had a nice screen, but the rezound screen is much much better. It does have that LCD glow to it, but it is so amazingly clear and vibrant, there is no comparison to the charge at all.
battery life is about the same (as with all phones)
GPS , it just works, every time, all the time
I live in sacramento CA and for some reason i have ****ty signal in my house, on the charge i could never make a phone call, with the rezound, i not only make and receive calls on it, but i can hold a 4g signal as well. The radioa/antenna seem to be superior to the charge.
build quality is much nicer
the camera much better than charge camera, wich was actaully pretty decent
1080p HDMI out...
sound is awesome from the headphones with beats.
SENSE is the cats meow compared to touchwiz
my bluetooth headset works again, constantly. On the charge it was hit and miss
Overall, the phone is Def an upgrade from the charge in both functionality, usability, and 'wow' factor
Agree with all that. I never liked the charge, got it just to get grandfathered in on 4g. Crap phone. Love the Rezound.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
voxigenboy said:
Not a Charge, but I came from a Thunderbolt(which was considered the best of the original 3 - Charge, Revolution, Thunderbolt)...
This Rezound compared to a Thunderbolt(that had gone through an assortment of Kernel/Radio/ROM changes) isn't exactly a big step up.
Performance wise, it's only slightly faster then an overclocked Thunderbolt & the GPS is about the same as a Thunderbolt on a Sense 3.5 rom(which was highly accurate).
This phone is nice and all, but if I hadn't damaged my Thunderbolt and knowing now the performance difference, i'd still be using my Thunderbolt.
Luckily I am getting my $400 deposit back in April, around the time the quad-core phones are supposed to be coming out so I'll be upgrading again then unless things really start to happen for the Rezound.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
idk what you're talking about but this phone runs loops around my friends Oc'd Tbolt on CM. The radio is also immensely better i've get consistent download speeds of 30-50 mbps whereas the tbold the highest was 20-25. Just wait until ICS hits the Rezound and true hardware acceleration is enabled. GB doesn't have true hardware acceleration, and frankly doesn't make much use of the second core. But even then it's still easy to see the differences, just a shame the Rezound is bogged down by a bloated up sense.
zetsumeikuro said:
idk what you're talking about but this phone runs loops around my friends Oc'd Tbolt on CM. The radio is also immensely better i've get consistent download speeds of 30-50 mbps whereas the tbold the highest was 20-25. Just wait until ICS hits the Rezound and true hardware acceleration is enabled. GB doesn't have true hardware acceleration, and frankly doesn't make much use of the second core. But even then it's still easy to see the differences, just a shame the Rezound is bogged down by a bloated up sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just find that personally, navigating the b.s. "sense 3.5" on this phone is very similiar(speed-wise) to my Thunderbolt that i last had "BAMF SoaB v1.03" OC'ed to 1.9GHz. i find to when loading up 720p .mkv videos, it still takes almost as load to load on the Rezound as it did on the Thunderbolt.. just with the Rezound, the annoying "out-of-sync" crap i'd experience here & there is nearly gone 100% now.
as for downloading, on my Thunderbolt i was averaging 4 - 5Mbps, and now on the Rezound it's peaked at 13Mbps(but averages around 7 - 8Mbps)... obviously, 4G speeds are going to vary from area to area, but is still an improvement.
and furthermore, yes.. i do realize that once this phone's rooted & we start getting kernals/radios/roms this thing is going to improve tremendously then(especially with CM9).. i'm just a bit disappointed that the "stock" Rezound isn't what i had expected it to be.
msticlaru said:
yup, i sold my charge on ebay for 300 and upgraded to this. I am SOO HAPPY to be done with that phone. the rezound is faster, smoother, more reliable, and the GPS works !! lol.
the charge had a nice screen, but the rezound screen is much much better. It does have that LCD glow to it, but it is so amazingly clear and vibrant, there is no comparison to the charge at all.
battery life is about the same (as with all phones)
GPS , it just works, every time, all the time
I live in sacramento CA and for some reason i have ****ty signal in my house, on the charge i could never make a phone call, with the rezound, i not only make and receive calls on it, but i can hold a 4g signal as well. The radioa/antenna seem to be superior to the charge.
build quality is much nicer
the camera much better than charge camera, wich was actaully pretty decent
1080p HDMI out...
sound is awesome from the headphones with beats.
SENSE is the cats meow compared to touchwiz
my bluetooth headset works again, constantly. On the charge it was hit and miss
Overall, the phone is Def an upgrade from the charge in both functionality, usability, and 'wow' factor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I got Verizon to roll my upgrade fwd to the 25th of this month (7mos early), so I think I'm going to pull the trigger on the rezound on friday. With the improvements you just mentioned, I think my mind is made up. Better reception and GPS?!? I'm convinced that if I get a nexus, I will sadly realize it has the charge's radios, and then I'll get an ulcer, lol.
reverendbill said:
Agree with all that. I never liked the charge, got it just to get grandfathered in on 4g. Crap phone. Love the Rezound.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got the charge when I did for just that reason! Boy they got us didn't they.
toby1064 said:
Got the charge when I did for just that reason! Boy they got us didn't they.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed they did. My buddy had nasty problems with the 4 Tbolts he went through, and the LG screen sucked. It was all bad choices.
voxigenboy said:
i just find that personally, navigating the b.s. "sense 3.5" on this phone is very similiar(speed-wise) to my Thunderbolt that i last had "BAMF SoaB v1.03" OC'ed to 1.9GHz. i find to when loading up 720p .mkv videos, it still takes almost as load to load on the Rezound as it did on the Thunderbolt.. just with the Rezound, the annoying "out-of-sync" crap i'd experience here & there is nearly gone 100% now.
as for downloading, on my Thunderbolt i was averaging 4 - 5Mbps, and now on the Rezound it's peaked at 13Mbps(but averages around 7 - 8Mbps)... obviously, 4G speeds are going to vary from area to area, but is still an improvement.
and furthermore, yes.. i do realize that once this phone's rooted & we start getting kernals/radios/roms this thing is going to improve tremendously then(especially with CM9).. i'm just a bit disappointed that the "stock" Rezound isn't what i had expected it to be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mmm I've only found there to be any possibily of out of sync for videos with .mkvs. But then again .mkv format is junk and I don't expect much out of that format. I'm pretty sure this phone will pound the crap out of the RAZR and Nexus on AOSP/stripped down sense and custom kernal, I have no doubt about it. There have been issues w/ stock sense, I'm not sure which model it was but the Sense was laggy as balls till some OTA was pushed out. There is no reason this phone should lag on the built in UI w/ the hardware specs. I just attritube it to all the crapware Verizon has loaded in , and sense 3.5 is probably not as polished as it could be. I think once ICS hits this phone even on a stock build/debloated it'll run loops around the RAZR and Nexus. Hell even currently how the phone is it beats both those phones in some areas.
I had the Charge and recently got the Rezound. It's like these two phones aren't even in the same league.
Everyone has pretty much covered why the Charge was a lackluster phone especially the choppy performance, GPS lock time and general unreliable nature of it.
My Charge is going up for sale ASAP!
zetsumeikuro said:
Mmm I've only found there to be any possibily of out of sync for videos with .mkvs. But then again .mkv format is junk and I don't expect much out of that format. I'm pretty sure this phone will pound the crap out of the RAZR and Nexus on AOSP/stripped down sense and custom kernal, I have no doubt about it. There have been issues w/ stock sense, I'm not sure which model it was but the Sense was laggy as balls till some OTA was pushed out. There is no reason this phone should lag on the built in UI w/ the hardware specs. I just attritube it to all the crapware Verizon has loaded in , and sense 3.5 is probably not as polished as it could be. I think once ICS hits this phone even on a stock build/debloated it'll run loops around the RAZR and Nexus. Hell even currently how the phone is it beats both those phones in some areas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had some lag at first on my rezound, buy it got smoother every day and now is very smooth. It runs circles around a stock bolt and trying to compare is crazy. Build quality I'd this phone is much nicer as well. I think someone just has buyers remorse.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
I went from Fascinate to Charge to Rezound. The Charge is the Fascinate with the Droid name, a lil more ram, super amoled+ screen better camera and 4G. It's ok, but so not worth the $300 they were charging.
Now the Rezound:
Lets see... 4G, 1 gig Ram, 1.5 Ghz Qualcom core2(lol) with Adreno GPU, 720 Super LCD with ppi higher than the iPhone4/4s, instant GPS lock, beats audio and the battery lasts me a whole work day. The T-bolt is a steaming pile compared to the Rezound and the D Charge is a summer 2010 era phone.
I posted this on HTC's Facebook page:
I just wanted to let you know I've chosen not to get the DROID DNA.
The device has amazing specs, from the high quality screen (SLCD) to the performance (my personal favorite is off screen buttons). However the battery is far too small and will not last an entire work day. Also the amount of storage memory is far too low to be functional. If this device shipped with a 2500 or 3300mAh battery and a microSD card slot, I’d pay full retail for it. For now, I will have to use the Motoroal RAZR MAXX HD.
Please HTC, produce a premium no-compromise product; push it to all carriers and regain the crown of smartphone leader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really want this phone, but almost no usable local storage and a battery that won't make it to 5pm is unacceptable. Please like the comment on their Facebook page. I feel that if HTC actually knew people would pay top dollar for a PREMIUM NO-COMPROMISE phone, they'd actually make it. Imagine a DROID DNA with a 3300mAh battery and 128GB storage or a microSD, with a minimum guarantee of 3 software upgrades. I'd pay $400 on-contract for that. No problem.
Find it, like it.
FACEBOOK LINK.
You people complaining about battery life crack me up. Never even used the device, yet you know it wont make it all day! The one person on the boards that does have it posted that he was on over a day of use with 42% of battery left!! His estimation was 3 hours of screen on time. I'll take that!! So before you cry on Facebook, wait till the phone actually comes out and reviews come in.
dmbfan13 said:
You people complaining about battery life crack me up. Never even used the device, yet you know it wont make it all day! The one person on the boards that does have it posted that he was on over a day of use with 42% of battery left!! His estimation was 3 hours of screen on time. I'll take that!! So before you cry on Facebook, wait till the phone actually comes out and reviews come in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no possible way that a 2080mAh battery will be able to power that furnace-of-a-display with heavy use all day long.
My RAZR MAXX is down to 20% when I plug in most days. I seriously doubt HTC has pulled out a magical battery bunny.
"There's no replacement for displacement."
dreamliner330 said:
There is no possible way that a 2080mAh battery will be able to power that furnace-of-a-display with heavy use all day long.
My RAZR MAXX is down to 20% when I plug in most days. I seriously doubt HTC has pulled out a magical battery bunny.
"There's no replacement for displacement."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If once the reviews start coming out stating poor battery life, I'm with ya!!! But until then, hold off. No sense in complaining about something you no nothing about (I don't mean you personally). That's all I'm saying.
dmbfan13 said:
If once the reviews start coming out stating poor battery life, I'm with ya!!! But until then, hold off. No sense in complaining about something you no nothing about (I don't mean you personally). That's all I'm saying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So does that mean you'll send me a PM when the result is the MAXX still has better battery life?
Doesn't the Droid DNA have the S4 Pro processor? Doesn't it use less power leading you to have a good amount of battery life even if the battery itself isn't all that big? Just putting that out there...
Sent from my ASUS CM10 TF700T
I turn wifi off, screen is on (never sleep) and Pandora is running. I post the battery life after battery hits 20%. Does that work for you all or would you like to try something else to?
NorthlandAZ said:
I turn wifi off, screen is on (never sleep) and Pandora is running. I post the battery life after battery hits 20%. Does that work for you all or would you like to try something else to?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can post my battery stats tonight when i get home since i have been on 4g since i took it off the charger this morning and cant use wi-fi at work
NorthlandAZ said:
I turn wifi off, screen is on (never sleep) and Pandora is running. I post the battery life after battery hits 20%. Does that work for you all or would you like to try something else to?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, that'd be interesting to see. I don't Pandora a whole lot, but I do YouTube. Though I wouldn't dream of using YouTube in any quantity over LTE. I'd burn off my data in a few days.
Typical usage for me is ~2 hours of voice calls, 1-2 hours of navigation and screen on about 5 hours or so. I don't work in an office but rely heavily on remaining 'connected' so the phone gets used, heavily.
Reality is I'll probably end up with a DNA at some point, I'm just pissy about the battery and storage. It's pretty pitiful when my brand new smartphone can't replace my 4 year old MP3 player.
dreamliner330 said:
Hmm, that'd be interesting to see. I don't Pandora a whole lot, but I do YouTube. Though I wouldn't dream of using YouTube in any quantity over LTE. I'd burn off my data in a few days.
Typical usage for me is ~2 hours of voice calls, 1-2 hours of navigation and screen on about 5 hours or so.
Reality is I'll probably end up with a DNA at some point, I'm just pissy about the battery and storage. It's pretty pitiful when my brand new smartphone can't replace my 4 year old MP3 player.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can do netflix or I have a few HD movies on Google Cloud too. I'll do a hour of Pandora and then start a HD movie if you'll like. Also all my music is on Google cloud.
NorthlandAZ said:
I can do netflix or I have a few HD movies on Google Cloud too. I'll do a hour of Pandora and then start a HD movie if you'll like. Also all my music is on Google cloud.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What I'd really like is to try it myself How do you get so lucky and get to have this phone right now? I'll do whatever it takes. I promise I'll quit crying about battery and memory at once!
S4 Pro + New LCD technology = better energy use. I can't say whether or not the S4/LCD will consume more or less power, but I can say that they'll be more power efficient in comparison to a phone using older tech. 2020mah battery seems decent.
As well, kind of seems strange to me to try and compare the device to the MAXX lines, they're devices created with battery life as a priority, and let's not forget that they weren't created that way at first. In Motorola's marketing strategy it was RAZR first, then the MAXX. Suddenly so many people who had the RAZR needed the MAXX. Moto earned a nice bit of extra profit. Who's to say HTC might not do the same?
xxfallacyxx said:
S4 Pro + New LCD technology = better energy use. I can't say whether or not the S4/LCD will consume more or less power, but I can say that they'll be more power efficient in comparison to a phone using older tech. 2020mah battery seems decent.
As well, kind of seems strange to me to try and compare the device to the MAXX lines, they're devices created with battery life as a priority, and let's not forget that they weren't created that way at first. In Motorola's marketing strategy it was RAZR first, then the MAXX. Suddenly so many people who had the RAZR needed the MAXX. Moto earned a nice bit of extra profit. Who's to say HTC might not do the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I'm afraid of. If they release something a little better, DNA+ or something, with bigger battery and memory card slot, I'd be so, so upset. But there are no leaks like that at the moment. And I'd rather not wait 6 months, too.
Another Verizon stepchild. No thanks.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Its funny to see people complaining about the battery life when they havent used the phone...
Just think this.. The Htc One S has 1650mAh battery and lasts longer than any other normal phone (excluding the MAXX line), so guys please wait unil reviews appear and make your own desicion....thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
I fully support your action.
HTC need to listen to their customer. Put replaceble battrey phone into product line.
All this complaining when no one has used the phone is hilarious. Everyone is just ASSUMING they know the battery life will be crap. You don't know what HTC has pulled off since you aren't HTC.
Highlydoubt HTC would sell a phone if it only lasted 2 hours or whatever short amount of time you all expect. If that's the case, they'd make no money off it because everyone would return it.
dmbfan13 said:
You people complaining about battery life crack me up. Never even used the device, yet you know it wont make it all day! The one person on the boards that does have it posted that he was on over a day of use with 42% of battery left!! His estimation was 3 hours of screen on time. I'll take that!! So before you cry on Facebook, wait till the phone actually comes out and reviews come in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, you believe that then I have a ice cube factory to sell you in Anartica. Come on, I have the SGS3 with a 2100mAh battery running Jelly Bean. The Droid has a 2020mAh battery, over sized display with more pixels than Carter has pills and let's not forget LTE. He may have gotten that phone thru a day without using LTE, no videos and very little use, real use. To me this phone is a no buy, will never buy a top of the line device like that without storage and battery. On top of all this I would bet the phone has a locked down bootloader.
The Note 2 might not have the same quality screen but that doesn't bother me, I like the idea of plenty of storage, great battery, the software is killer, did I say killer, yep and the developers will be all over this phone. The Note 2 is a easy choice over the new Droid.
It's too bad the phone had everything going for it and they cheap out with the parts that cost the least to add to a phone. I would much rather have the phone a little thicker with a larger battery and plenty of int storage. If their not going to give you an sd card then the minimum of int storage should be 32gb. The available storage on the new Droid is probably about 11-12mb. That is a complete fail IMO.
Just My Opinion
Not A p
Just to let you know stop comparing the DNA to the note 2 it is not a phablet. This phone has no features that would make it one. So in theory this is the best large Smartphone on the market.
vinnyjr said:
Right, you believe that then I have a ice cube factory to sell you in Anartica. Come on, I have the SGS3 with a 2100mAh battery running Jelly Bean. The Droid has a 2020mAh battery, over sized display with more pixels than Carter has pills and let's not forget LTE. He may have gotten that phone thru a day without using LTE, no videos and very little use, real use. To me this phone is a no buy, will never buy a top of the line device like that without storage and battery. On top of all this I would bet the phone has a locked down bootloader.
The Note 2 might not have the same quality screen but that doesn't bother me, I like the idea of plenty of storage, great battery, the software is killer, did I say killer, yep and the developers will be all over this phone. The Note 2 is a easy choice over the new Droid.
It's too bad the phone had everything going for it and they cheap out with the parts that cost the least to add to a phone. I would much rather have the phone a little thicker with a larger battery and plenty of int storage. If their not going to give you an sd card then the minimum of int storage should be 32gb. The available storage on the new Droid is probably about 11-12mb. That is a complete fail IMO.
Just My Opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the people is testing the battery with movies, LTE, and bunch of other crap. He said he'll post the results.
How do you possible think that a 16 GB phone will only allow you 11-12mb of storage? Can you please tell where the remaining 15 GB just vanished off to?
Ok so I haven't upgrade yet, but I would like someone here to challenge my logic because I really like the aesthetics of the HTC one.
For a phone, I really like survivability. Especially a phone that can last for more than four years. One of the gripes I have with the HTC one was that it has a non-removable battery. At first, I didn't really mind since I can get portable chargers and what not. However, I then started to think about the long term quality of the battery. I would think that battery would start to degrade after two years.
With the S4, I can easily just slap a new battery when the old one starts to degrade.
I just want a phone that would last for four years and maybe potentially more.
You would possibly be the only person on earth that keeps a phone 2 or more years. The HTC one will definitely last as long as you need it too. Look at the iPhone, it has a non removable battery and it's very successful. I had my 4s almost two years and it needs a new battery; it says 100% but my battery stats app says it's really only charging to 70%. Im certain with only two years the battery has lost capacity. anyway, if you want a removable battery get the plastic s4, if you want a sturdy solid built phone that is probably one of the greatest android phones to date get the one. The battery life is really good, its been almost two days of moderate usage and I'm at 53%. It will be diff for every one.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2
I agree. If you feel the removable battery is better for YOU than get it. I don't worry about it since I don't keep using my device that long. And even if I do pass it on to family I will just send the device in to get the battery replaced IF anyone cares to use it still. After a few years I doubt it though since my family will be using a newer device.
Out of all my smartphones the HTC One is my favorite. Great device. Glad I got the 64GB model.
Sent from my HTC One
Honestly none of us knows the lifespan on the HTC One as it's only been out a few months. Only time will tell. If you plan on sticking with a phone for 4 years, I suggest you get the S4 since the battery can be easily changed. Just remember that Samsung are known for having weak radios. (My old Note radio was going bad after one year).
Sent from the "ONE" phone for me
SKyRocKeting727 said:
Honestly none of us knows the lifespan on the HTC One as it's only been out a few months. Only time will tell. If you plan on sticking with a phone for 4 years, I suggest you get the S4 since the battery can be easily changed. Just remember that Samsung are known for having weak radios. (My old Note radio was going bad after one year).
Sent from the "ONE" phone for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Samsung is still going strong after 2 years.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
xcrazydx said:
My Samsung is still going strong after 2 years.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What Samsung phone is it?
theangryman said:
What Samsung phone is it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The skyrocket.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
theangryman said:
Ok so I haven't upgrade yet, but I would like someone here to challenge my logic because I really like the aesthetics of the HTC one.
For a phone, I really like survivability. Especially a phone that can last for more than four years. One of the gripes I have with the HTC one was that it has a non-removable battery. At first, I didn't really mind since I can get portable chargers and what not. However, I then started to think about the long term quality of the battery. I would think that battery would start to degrade after two years.
With the S4, I can easily just slap a new battery when the old one starts to degrade.
I just want a phone that would last for four years and maybe potentially more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
given today's technology, asking for, or expecting, a phone to last 4 years is really pushing it. at that point, i dont think your battery is the biggest concern you should have. that said, i'll try to draw on some physics to help persuade you...this phone is made from aluminum, which is going to dissipate heat pretty well. I've noticed times when my One feels a bit warm after playing games or extended periods of streaming video, but then i check the temps and see that it's not unusually hot at all. I personally feel that the aluminum body helps to dissipate heat well and, theoretically, could help with the phone's longevity. I've done no scientific studies on this, but it's just a logic i'm applying from other cases of technology and heat with regards to product life. Think of it as a sort of heat sync for the phone. I've had SGS4's in my hands for a couple of minutes before and have felt them get extremely hot while messing around with the phone, FWIW.
xcrazydx said:
The skyrocket.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Skyrocket's power button causes the phone to restart. Hardware issue. The screen has gotten worse. Battery has lost its capacity. Glad that it lasted good for you but for me it didn't. Even my iPhone 4 lasted me through more besides the home button going bad. My girl's Note 2 home button is starting to go bad as well. I'm not saying that I won't ever get a Samsung again...just saying that I haven't had much luck with its durability in the past. This is my first HTC and so far I have no complaints. But we'll see after an entire year (if I don't decide to get the HTC maxx or Note 3)
Sent from the "ONE" phone for me
SKyRocKeting727 said:
My Skyrocket's power button causes the phone to restart. Hardware issue. The screen has gotten worse. Battery has lost its capacity. Glad that it lasted good for you but for me it didn't. Even my iPhone 4 lasted me through more besides the home button going bad. My girl's Note 2 home button is starting to go bad as well. I'm not saying that I won't ever get a Samsung again...just saying that I haven't had much luck with its durability in the past. This is my first HTC and so far I have no complaints. But we'll see after an entire year (if I don't decide to get the HTC maxx or Note 3)
Sent from the "ONE" phone for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I remember you from the skyrocket forum. Lol. The skyrocket has shown issues for some people with the power button. Batteries are expected to deteriorate. Development in the skyrocket forum is still going strong. It was a great phone to have and I still enjoy it.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
The phone will last as long as you take good care of it. If you wanna be clumsy/don't care then it won't last no where near 4 years.
Far as battery I think you get 500 recharge cycles before the health starts to drain
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
Buy HTC One online
[Buy HTC One online in India at themobilestore.in, Quad-core 1.7 GHz Krait 300, Super LCD3 capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors, v4.1.2 (Jelly Bean). Best Price, EMI option available.
My Samsung is still going strong after 2 years.