Related
I tried this for my Evo 3D and it worked awesome. I can stay connected with more signal strength and my download speeds are faster:
http://webupon.com/web-talk/epic-4g-signal-boost/?ref=nf
I know its for the epic, but works on the EVO 3D as well. The Directions are very similar
This is nothing new and was posted in the development section months ago.
My "DU4L C0R3 SH00T3R" shot you down in 3D! -Security Off-
I ma try this later when I Get off thanks for the link
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
this is on 3g..in an area that didnt have 3g until a month ago
You must of got Evdo Rev B early son!!!
私の"DU4L C0R3 SH00T3Rは"³Dであなたを撃墜！トゥパックをねじ込みます 。
"AOSPのBACK!" ┌П┐[◣_◢]┌П┐
Lucky what phone u gots?
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
What's the big deal?
Those speeds are not remarkable for 3g..
nebenezer said:
What's the big deal?
Those speeds are not remarkable for 3g..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For most of us they are
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
nebenezer said:
What's the big deal?
Those speeds are not remarkable for 3g..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my speeds are half that or worse...I'll take those anyday
For EVDO, look at his upload... Rev A can't hit 1mbps upload
bitslizer said:
For EVDO, look at his upload... Rev A can't hit 1mbps upload
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I had the HTC Hero I was hitting that upload at peak & averaging 800Kbps upload. My Downloads were around 2.2Mbps down.
Those are Rev. A speeds. Glad to see that they're returning.
r0cky0790 said:
You must of got Evdo Rev B early son!!!
私の"DU4L C0R3 SH00T3Rは"³Dであなたを撃墜！トゥパックをねじ込みます 。
"AOSPのBACK!" ┌П┐[◣_◢]┌П┐
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not rev b son
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
evdo rev B you say? the evo 3d can do that?
I just got a whopping 26kbps dl and 120 kbps ul speeds. In Salt Lake City.
bsnyder217 said:
evdo rev B you say? the evo 3d can do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, many smartphones in the Sprint line-up will. The question is if Sprint will be smart & activate it on the newtork. All the ducks are lined up.
so i have it?
bitslizer said:
For EVDO, look at his upload... Rev A can't hit 1mbps upload
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure it can, just not very often.
bsnyder217 said:
so i have it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Highly unlikely.
bsnyder217 said:
so i have it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
Think of it this way, you have the Gun (Rev. B support) but no bullets (Active Rev. B network)
bsnyder217 said:
this is on 3g..in an area that didnt have 3g until a month ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man, that is sad when someone gets excited about 1mbps...sigh
I mean, I would love to get that speed also, but my buddies on AT&T and Verizon consistently get 2M-4M all day long.
I'm getting a whopping 70k during the day with full bars.
aweskelo said:
man, that is sad when someone gets excited about 1mbps...sigh
I mean, I would love to get that speed also, but my buddies on AT&T and Verizon consistently get 2M-4M all day long.
I'm getting a whopping 70k during the day with full bars.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow it couldn't be more opposite for me in central Florida. I work for AT&T installing the cell equipment and I have Sprint. No wonder so many Sprint users are complaining about 3g speeds.
Average 3g in Houston, TX :
Taken on the way home from work... tonight.
But, yeah, 3g is usually between 1&2..
(Not really that impressive, IMHO.)
<<work in progress>>
Wifi at home, however, is pretty ok in my book....
(and that's not even the best connection speed).
<<work in progress>>
Also, current 4g, while I'm here...
<<bringing it since 2010>>
I've kinda always felt this way about it...
http://m.androidcentral.com/verizons-response-fcc-about-bootloaders-surprises-nobody
As the saying goes... "One bad noob spoils the bootloader".
\\Carved into this thread by my RAZR//
http://android-gz.com
If the phone is unlockable, with a tool available from Motorola with a warning saying "If you unlock the bootloader of this device, your warranty is void... blah blah" .. Thats Motorola's loophole for no support.
Mortify1 said:
If the phone is unlockable, with a tool available from Motorola with a warning saying "If you unlock the bootloader of this device, your warranty is void... blah blah" .. Thats Motorola's loophole for no support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually (mostly) not Motorola. The problem is carriers, worried about their bloatware (especially Verizon). Motorola has stated that as soon as carriers (Verizon) allows unlocked bootloaders, they'll comply with a tool similar to HTC's. All Big Red cares about is raping your wallet... HARD (I have the bills to prove it) and their bloatware sucks data like no other app you'll find anywhere. The reason our bootloaders have chastity belts is because Verizon wants to protect their bloat, and keep playing Viking (not Minnesota style, Nordic Viking) on your payroll. That's at least my take on things... Besides, this phone is a beast out of the box, AND (at some point) we WILL get ICS. There aren't any fully functional ports of it out, and anyone who's ever flashed a ROM, or customized Kernel will tell you that there are drawbacks to flashing them in most cases (I know, I was a hard core flashaholics with the EVO).
\\Carved into this thread by my RAZR//
http://android-gz.com
IP IHI II IL said:
It's actually (mostly) not Motorola.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I appreciate how crappy Verizon is (American friends regularly remind me), I really don't see why they keep getting brought up as if they're chiefly responsible - Moto started this locked bootloader trend with the original Milestone, the GSM variant of the Droid, and went as far as to tell customers to buy a Nexus One if they wanted a development platform. There are open market GSM RAZRs, no carrier attached, bootloader locked like all the rest (I'm posting this from one). Even the developer edition has a locked bootloader. I'm sure VZW have a lot of sway with Moto, but that doesn't explain why all of the other RAZRs are locked too.
Still hoping that merger gets us the result we want when it's all ironed out. It's a shame it's worked out like this. Kudos to the devs we have for accomplishing so much when they're so shackled.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
what the hell does verizon have to do with all the other consumers all over the world. keep your damned bootloaders on verizon and unlock all the other ones >_> sold overseas. moto support has been **** ever since they released the v6.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
What you guys aren't thinking about is how much carriers pay to have an "Exclusive" phone. AT&T paid out of their butt to get the iCrap, and so did Sprint when the "exclusive" contract ended. Think about the MSRP. The manufacturers of these devices say they're worth up to $600+. We get them for $199 (or $0.01 in my case) because of the money the carrier spent to get your $1,500+ per year on their contract... From a business perspective it makes complete sense, but for us... It SUCKS! THAT'S why Verizon is to blame...
\\Carved into this thread by my RAZR//
http://android-gz.com
IP IHI II IL said:
What you guys aren't thinking about is how much carriers pay to have an "Exclusive" phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The RAZR isn't a Verizon exclusive device outside of the US, though, which is pretty much my point.
Absolutely agree that the existing business model is very broken, but it isn't going to change until people stop buying subsidized handsets.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
onslaught86 said:
The RAZR isn't a Verizon exclusive device outside of the US, though, which is pretty much my point.
Absolutely agree that the existing business model is very broken, but it isn't going to change until people stop buying subsidized handsets.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed...
\\Carved into this thread by my RAZR//
http://android-gz.com
IP IHI II IL said:
Agreed...
\\Carved into this thread by my RAZR//
http://android-gz.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sucks even more that none of the US networks are truly cross-compatible, makes subsidies almost a necessary evil. I hope for everyone's sake that the logical extension of VoLTE leads to cross-compatibility.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Just thought I would share this article that came out today saying AT&T LTE is going to be launching 4G LTE in 12 cities starting in April-May. Exciting stuff for those that just picked up a Note. =D
List of cities:
Cleveland, OH
Akron, OH
Canton, OH
Naples, FL
Bloomington, IN
Lafayette, IN
Muncie, IN
Baton Rouge, LA
New Orleans, LA
St. Louis, MO
Bryan-College Station, TX
Staten Island, NYC
Source: theverge.com
Thanks, good news.
prayii said:
Just thought I would share this article that came out today saying AT&T LTE is going to be launching 4G LTE in 12 cities starting in April-May. Exciting stuff for those that just picked up a Note. =D
List of cities:
Cleveland, OH
Akron, OH
Canton, OH
Naples, FL
Bloomington, IN
Lafayette, IN
Muncie, IN
Baton Rouge, LA
New Orleans, LA
St. Louis, MO
Bryan-College Station, TX
Staten Island, NYC
Source: theverge.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, Pacific NW is left out again.
jpeg42 said:
Wow, Pacific NW is left out again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
No love for Washington state, just rain...
I was so excited when my Note showed that little 4g icon at the top. And when I noticed it was getting better speeds than my Wifi, I assumed I was somehow getting LTE.
Then I saw some of the speedtest.net results from the true LTE users and realized I was somewhere between Edge and 4g.
Since the Tmobile fix, I've gone back to my unlimited SIM, but I am no longer satisfied with the <1Mbps speed that Tmobile offers in this area. At least with fauxgee through At&t I was getting ~4Mbps.
When I read this release earlier, I just got even more depressed. I don't think AT&T has any intention of bringing LTE to my area even by 2013.
Why should I, at 5x slower speeds, be paying the same as my counterparts in big cities?.
I guess this decision isn't going to be as easy as I had hoped.
Sent from my AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note using the XDA Premium app.
No Miami still really?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
I can't believe that out of all the cities included that att isn't giving philadelphia LTE. It's more than just personal gripe, but philadelphia is 1 of the most major cities in the country and were still running on 3G. The speeds are pretty good to be honest, but there's still no excuse
Need more in California
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Wow. Nothing for Seattle or Portland? Pathetic
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk
New Orleans, La has LTE near downtown
No SE Michigan but its going to Cleveland of all places. SMH
Still nothing for Buffalo, NY? That's very depressing.
no for Philadelphia ?
I'm excited about the LTE as I live in St. Louis, but its not a hug deal as I don't really find HSPA lacking.
Sent from my Galaxy Note i717
Just to commiserate with the others from Philly...we continue to be left out in the cold.
I was talking to a tech blogger who moved from California to DFW and she was commenting on how much easier it is to do business outside of Cali. She said it is so difficult to put towers up if you need them and to get permits to adjust the networks etc. She mentioned in Texas it is much more business friendly which is why we have good networks. I noticed that even when Sprint launches their Lte network in a few Texas cities once it comes online.
Not sure if the ATT LTE rollout is affect by this but I suspect it is. The business climate where you live will unfortunately probably affect your LTE availability.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Minneapolis / St. Paul should be a top priority. Verizon launched there the first day they had LTE. ATT needs to compete.
phillyrican said:
no for Philadelphia ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lactardjosh said:
Just to commiserate with the others from Philly...we continue to be left out in the cold.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
zoso28 said:
I can't believe that out of all the cities included that att isn't giving philadelphia LTE. It's more than just personal gripe, but philadelphia is 1 of the most major cities in the country and were still running on 3G. The speeds are pretty good to be honest, but there's still no excuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me four! What about Philadelphia? What do we have to do to get LTE they keep putting up WIFI hotspots but no LTE?
Make one more for Philly.
PowerMan572 said:
Minneapolis / St. Paul should be a top priority. Verizon launched there the first day they had LTE. ATT needs to compete.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 where is the love for Minnesota
Sent from my Iconia A500 using Tapatalk
Updated 4/10/2013
Champaign, Illinois
Rockford, Illinois
Laramie, Wyoming
Texarkana, Texas
Cape Girardeau, Missouri
Portsmouth, New Hampshire
Columbia, Missouri
Wooster, Ohio
Cortland, New York
Roanoke, Virginia
Huntsville, Alabama
Gallup, New Mexico
Lansing, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Youngstown, Ohio
Petersburg, Virginia
several southern New Jersey shore points
Salem, Oregon
Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Visalia, California
Flagstaff, Arizona
Goldsboro, North Carolina
Williamsport, Pennsylvania
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Orangeburg, South Carolina
Merced, California
Shreveport, Louisiana
Topeka, Kansas
Valdosta, Georgia
Troy and Greenville, Alabama
Elizabethtown, Kentucky
Morgantown, West Virginia
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Florence/ Muscle Shoals, Alabama
Corinth/new Albany, Mississippi
Cookeville, Tennessee
Greenwood/Cleveland, Mississippi
Millville, New Jersey
Huntington, West Virginia
Leonardtown, Maryland
Muskegon, Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Atlantic City, New Jersey
Corsicana, Texas
Flint, Michigan
Huntsville, Texas
Spokane, Washington
Hancock County, Georgia
Farmington, New Mexico
Batavia, New York
Seneca Falls, New York
Dayton, Ohio
Manhattan, Kansas
Rio Grande Valley, Texas
Dover, Delaware
Chico, California
Laredo, Texas
Columbus, Indiana
Gulfport/Biloxi, Mississippi
Paris, Texas
Davenport, Iowa
Monroeville/Evergreen, Alabama
Athens, Texas
Asheville, North Carolina
Wilson, North Carolina
Jefferson and Commerce, Georgia
Here are the big 7 cities getting it today (9/6/2012).
Anchorage, AK
Bakersfield, CA
Bridgeport, CT
Modesto, CA
Jacksonville, FL
Omaha, NE
Syracuse, NY
Scheduled cities by end of Q4 2012:
Albany, NY
Albuquerque, NM
Allentown, PA
Cincinnati, OH
Charleston, SC
Columbia, SC
Columbus, OH
Detroit, MI
El Paso, TX
Fayetteville, NC
Ft. Myers, FL
Gary, IN
Grand Rapids, MI
Green Bay, WI
Harrisburg, PA
Hartford, CT
Honolulu, HI
Knoxville, TN
Lancaster, PA
Little Rock, AR
Louisville, KY
Memphis, TN
Milwaukee, WI
Nashua, NH
New Haven, CT
Philadelphia, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Portland, ME
Providence, RI
Reading, PA
Rochester, NY
Sacramento, CA
Salinas-Seaside-Monterey, CA
Seattle, WA
Springfield, MA
Toledo, OH
Tucson, AZ
Tulsa, OK
Wilkes-Barre, PA
Wilmington, DE
Not a single city in GA. :'(
Thanks for the list!
Thanxs
I get screwed again
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I assume they did a soft launch in Syracuse starting last week, I've been showing LTE on my Note for about that long.
it's already in Philadelphia. At least the few parts I was in.
Podunk towns like Modesto and Bakersfield get it before Sacramento... SMH
guess we will never get it in ocala florida....
Great post ....thank you !!
Still no love for Salt Lake City, Utah ....
We can host the Olympics ...but not good enough for LTE .......Hmmmm
Oh well ....maybe next time ....g
sweetboy02125 said:
Here are the big 7 cities getting it today.
Anchorage, AK
Bakersfield, CA
Bridgeport, CT
Modesto, CA
Jacksonville, FL
Omaha, NE
Syracuse, NY
Scheduled cities by end of Q4:
Albany, NY
Albuquerque, NM
Allentown, PA
Cincinnati, OH
Charleston, SC
Columbia, SC
Columbus, OH
Detroit, MI
El Paso, TX
Fayetteville, NC
Ft. Myers, FL
Gary, IN
Grand Rapids, MI
Green Bay, WI
Harrisburg, PA
Hartford, CT
Honolulu, HI
Knoxville, TN
Lancaster, PA
Little Rock, AR
Louisville, KY
Memphis, TN
Milwaukee, WI
Nashua, NH
New Haven, CT
Philadelphia, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Portland, ME
Providence, RI
Reading, PA
Rochester, NY
Sacramento, CA
Salinas-Seaside-Monterey, CA
Seattle, WA
Springfield, MA
Toledo, OH
Tucson, AZ
Tulsa, OK
Wilkes-Barre, PA
Wilmington, DE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously! Bakersfield and Modesto, but not Fresno!? Last I checked Fresno was just a "wee" bit larger (Fresno county at least)/more up to date (with the "BIG" chain stores, restaurants, etc./and ummm.....Well I live there so, that would be my 3rd and Main reason LTE should've been brought here. Lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 09:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:21 PM ----------
Finagle69 said:
Podunk towns like Modesto and Bakersfield get it before Sacramento... SMH
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EXACTLY! GOOD POINT
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
COME to Sacramento already!!! I bet by then, the network will be infested with the new iPhone users. EWWW :banghead:
-Once you go NOTE, you'd say 4 inches a Joke
[Lady]: "How do you carry that huge phone in your pocket?"
[Note User]: "I'm used to having huge stuff in my pants"
Go Cincinnati! EndOfYEar! oboy.
They most of been testing Seattle last month for a week wife and I had lte and it was pretty damn fast. After a week it disappeared , wonder why its taking so long if its already up and working good.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Lovin' some LTE in Bakersfield!
We'll have 5G before Fresno gets any love...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
slaydog said:
Lovin' some LTE in Bakersfield!
We'll have 5G before Fresno gets any love...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes sir!!! Bakersfield baby!!! And we do have around 400,000 people so stop hating and start congratulating!
Columbus!!! Hope its sooner than later.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
mazdamiata210 said:
it's already in Philadelphia. At least the few parts I was in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What parts would that be?
Finally in Fayetteville, had it a few weeks ago for about 5 minutes. Just long enough to do a speed test.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Which is why when people asked me why I bought an international note, even though at&t was going to be offering an LTE version, I just
laughed and said by the time LTE gets to my market, the Note2 will be out. At this rate, the Note3 will be announced before my market
gets LTE :crying:
JGuinan007 said:
What parts would that be?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on a train to center city from Glenside and I've got LTE right now.
Edit: lost it at North Broad.
Edit 2: back at Market East.
Edit 3: lost it at Suburban.
Edit 4: back at 30th Street
p51d007 said:
Which is why when people asked me why I bought an international note, even though at&t was going to be offering an LTE version, I just
laughed and said by the time LTE gets to my market, the Note2 will be out. At this rate, the Note3 will be announced before my market
gets LTE :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One benefit to having an lte device in a non kte matket, is that if you have the unlimted grandfathered plan you wont get throttled at 3 gigs. lte devices get 5 gigs before being throttled.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app