Related
Hi, time ago i got 2200 on quadrant score with cyanogenmod. Now i can max get 1950. Why???
LoKKeR said:
Hi, time ago i got 2200 on quadrant score with cyanogenmod. Now i can max get 1950. Why???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a big deal..Quadrants are a piece of ****..They never give an accurate reading
Maiby overclock have ruined the cpu? It's possible? I don't use anymore it from a lot of time.
Ah, last score i got was 2000. The scores vary according to the governor system i set. What's the best governor for big games or generally for games?
If your using your rom that's why. The miui stuff slows it down incredibly. But miui isn't about speed.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
jusada said:
If your using your rom that's why. The miui stuff slows it down incredibly. But miui isn't about speed.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nono i get this score with all roms.
A user of xda with my rom have got up to 2000 on quadrant score.
Mmmm... I'll try Cyanogenmod-7.1-KANG. I remember that is one of the best rom i have tryed.
LoKKeR said:
Maiby overclock have ruined the cpu? It's possible? I don't use anymore it from a lot of time.
Ah, last score i got was 2000. The scores vary according to the governor system i set. What's the best governor for big games or generally for games?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, overclocking MOST DEFINITELY fault your processor in some way.
And the Prawsome is right: Quadrant scores don't mean anything at all. 0% reliable. You know what the best benchmark is? Your experience
Oh, and the best governor for gaming would be performance.
This post was sent from hell.
I just wonder how fast Neo was from the beggining. I had allways good results with the Neo on the benchmarks and allways with stock SE roms. I don´t like MIUI and even CM7. A good kernel is the key for those snapdragons. The following images are the proof that if we can correct many bugs, this ICS rom will make those Neos fly.
If you like speed, just take a look at the pictures and see for your self what you CAN do with Xperia NEO!
Credits for this:
Festa20 for is ics rom v2
Kernel marckernel0.3 for ics
Link for kernel:
http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?t=304072
wow ... you must be kidding me !!!
unfortunately i can,t get this on my neo
No I´m not, and I think I could go a bit faster, the only problem is the heat.
I´ve tryed for hours to get a stable system in between the crashes. I´ve made two complete benchmarks and this one was made in the refrigerator... lol.
testadeferro said:
... and this one was made in the refrigerator... lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a frozen neo !!! He He
I´ve made this just to proof that the NEO is a great device, I think the ARC/ S are only better on the screen. I want to wait for a stable ICS and I believe NEO will pull out from the 2900 antutu points with 2.3.4 to 3600 antutu points with 1024 mhz in ICS. And with a good kernel you´ll be able to work fine with 1,4 ghz and 4000 antutu points. By far over some expansive devices.
testadeferro said:
I´ve made this just to proof that the NEO is a great device, I think the ARC/ S are only better on the screen. I want to wait for a stable ICS and I believe NEO will pull out from the 2900 antutu points with 2.3.4 to 3600 antutu points with 1024 mhz in ICS. And with a good kernel you´ll be able to work fine with 1,4 ghz and 4000 antutu points. By far over some expansive devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also thought so at the first ... but after holding the arc in my hands and comparing it to my neo .... there is a massive difference in screen,looks,sound of the speaker.
but for real world the arc is a so delicte device that get cracked by it self ... WTF?
in terms of performance they are the same...but the neo is a little faster due to the smaller screen.
anyway i lOVE my neo.
fire-warrior said:
I also thought so at the first ... but after holding the arc in my hands and comparing it to my neo .... there is a massive difference in screen,looks,sound of the speaker.
but for real world the arc is a so delicte device that get cracked by it self ... WTF?
in terms of performance they are the same...but the neo is a little faster due to the smaller screen.
anyway i lOVE my neo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neo is not faster because of the screen because both devices feature the same screen resolution!
Sent from my MT15i using xda premium
+5 To Neo and Arc owners!
Sent from my MT15i
Two great devices...
I´ve been testing a arc S also and the benchmarks are the same as NEO in the stock rom with NEO overclocked at 1.4 ghz with stock rom and inteks kernel v15.
omg!!! this s awesome!! :-o
Sent from my MT15i using Tapatalk
testadeferro said:
I´ve made this just to proof that the NEO is a great device, I think the ARC/ S are only better on the screen. I want to wait for a stable ICS and I believe NEO will pull out from the 2900 antutu points with 2.3.4 to 3600 antutu points with 1024 mhz in ICS. And with a good kernel you´ll be able to work fine with 1,4 ghz and 4000 antutu points. By far over some expansive devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 3760 points using s.e tweaked 0.8.5 and inteks v 15 and oc @ 1.5ghz so what's the big difference....
Or you mean @1ghz ics will put out 4000?! Thanks....
Sent from my MT15i using xda premium
3663 points with ICS at 1024 mhz.
So you don´t need to waste your battery and the performance is the same as yours.
I saw this epic rom in the Optimus one Forum
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1764170
The Benchmark score is so epic. I think IT has The Same specs like our ace so can somebody maybe Port this to our device.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
comments are not at all positive..
besides without source compiling performance boost is literally dreams..
troullis2004 said:
I just tried it and i have to say that i got as low as 1720 something with quadrant using 480-787 smartass v2 and as low as 1838 using antutu with same cpu settings...
Man, i think that somethings up with that picture! No way our device gets that score!
Also i get an FC when I click brightness setting! I can' t change it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anything more to be said?
benchmark score doesnt mean almost nothing
i get 3k on my live with walkman on stock based rom with stock kernel
and it doesnt lag
better yet its buttery smooth
EDIT:
forgot to say that score is without sd card (i dont have 500mb free ]
i want to buy the sola this month for a great price
the question is if the phone is good...battery life, preformance, ect..
Is there any bugs or lag which i should be aware of ?
thanks !
nathan96 said:
i want to buy the sola this month for a great price
the question is if the phone is good...battery life, preformance, ect..
Is there any bugs or lag which i should be aware of ?
thanks !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything is great except camera and battery life.
There is no lags.
I think the camera is ok, enough to use. The battery is not too bad. And Sola will get ICS 4.0.4 this month!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
neectron said:
Everything is great except camera and battery life.
There is no lags.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats wrong with the camera and the battery life ?
i heard that the battery can hold up to a day and a half with medium usage and even more with light usage...
sony cameras are the best.
what is wrong ?
nathan96 said:
whats wrong with the camera and the battery life ?
i heard that the battery can hold up to a day and a half with medium usage and even more with light usage...
sony cameras are the best.
what is wrong ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera is medium.Battery can last upto 3-4hrs constant usage.
Sent from my MT27i using xda app-developers app
Battery life and camera isn't all that disappointing.. It would easily last a day if used normally(wifi on all day with background data and auto sync etc) and would last nearly half ID used heavily..
The phone is powerful, and the best if you cant spend a few extra bucks for gs2 or xperia p.. Gs2 being better..
I am having 200+ apps and still no lag or any issue..
The GPU aint very powerful. You wont enjoy HD games if you have many widgets on the home screen..
If you are into gaming, id suggest buy some phone with Adreno220 or better.. Mali-400 sucks..
The floating touch, really helpful in browsing, fun to play around and to show off among friends..
I love my phone, and would not suggest anyone not to buy one.. Its the best in its segment and i enjoy using it..
Just waiting for the ICS could be annoying.. When Jelly Bean is coming to the market..
Rest, is your choice..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
zenchikage said:
Battery life and camera isn't all that disappointing.. It would easily last a day if used normally(wifi on all day with background data and auto sync etc) and would last nearly half ID used heavily..
The phone is powerful, and the best if you cant spend a few extra bucks for gs2 or xperia p.. Gs2 being better..
I am having 200+ apps and still no lag or any issue..
The GPU aint very powerful. You wont enjoy HD games if you have many widgets on the home screen..
If you are into gaming, id suggest buy some phone with Adreno220 or better.. Mali-400 sucks..
The floating touch, really helpful in browsing, fun to play around and to show off among friends..
I love my phone, and would not suggest anyone not to buy one.. Its the best in its segment and i enjoy using it..
Just waiting for the ICS could be annoying.. When Jelly Bean is coming to the market..
Rest, is your choice..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks !
Now I cant decide wheather to go for the Arc S or the Sola...
I now have the Atrix 4G which pretty much sucks (it could be better on JB but MOTO isnt going to release JB).
I love the ARMv7 + tegra 2 but no use on GB for a duel core device
So bottom line, Sola or Arc S ?
Dont go for arc s.. Its 2011 modeland thus is very unlikely to get JB..it has single core processor and the only benefit would be larger screen..
It was my first decision when I was buying a phone.. But i waited for sola to be released and i am really thanking my patience..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
Doesn't the sola has a slightly worse camera and battery ?
I really need good battery life..
Too bad it doesnt have a front-facing cam, what a shame !
P.s the Sola doesn't have ICS yet and the Arc does. there are plenty of JB roms out there as far as i know...i love both devices but cant decide :<
Go for Sola.It has dual core CPU, and Mali 400.
Its very fluid to use.I do like Sola,but not the battery life.
By constant usage, I mean continuous 3g usage(not background) or gaming.
Sola will get ICS this month.
Sent from my MT27i using xda app-developers app
The French twitter says it'll get ICS this week.. Just can't not be happy..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
zenchikage said:
The French twitter says it'll get ICS this week.. Just can't not be happy..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then Sola it is ! thanks i'd appreciate that if you'd keep commenting about pro's and con's
nathan96 said:
Then Sola it is ! thanks i'd appreciate that if you'd keep commenting about pro's and con's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go for SOLA mannnnnnnn!!!! But BEWARE! Battery problems await!!!!!
Ps: The GPU for Sola is Mali400, not Mali400MP4 like in the Galaxy S2, this means Sola's GPU only have 1 core, the S2 has 4 cores. But SOLA's still better than the iPhone 4 and 3GS's Powervr SGX 535.
Besides, everything's great. Cameraa is not so gud but, what are instagram or Photoshop for, rite! )
cnkhanh said:
Go for SOLA mannnnnnnn!!!! But BEWARE! Battery problems await!!!!!
Ps: The GPU for Sola is Mali400, not Mali400MP4 like in the Galaxy S2, this means Sola's GPU only have 1 core, the S2 has 4 cores. But SOLA's still better than the iPhone 4 and 3GS's Powervr SGX 535.
Besides, everything's great. Cameraa is not so gud but, what are instagram or Photoshop for, rite! )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No front facing camera
Sorry for so many q's but now i am thinking to get the U maybe...I hear that it's build quality is better and it has a front facing cam + smaller screen = better battery life, am i correct ?
Same battery bro. Maybe worse. On the gsmarena site, they say that the U has a 1305 mAh battery while Sola's is 1320
Sent from my MT27i using xda app-developers app
Better buy Xperia U! The LED bar is very very very very cool and have front facing cam! Who know we can face unlock on ICS update???
Sent from my ST25i using xda app-developers app
Elwino2.3 said:
Better buy Xperia U! The LED bar is very very very very cool and have front facing cam! Who know we can face unlock on ICS update???
Sent from my ST25i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which one is better preformance wise and build quality ? isnt it hard to type fast on the U ?
nathan96 said:
which one is better preformance wise and build quality ? isnt it hard to type fast on the U ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Performance is same with Xperia Sola, The build quality?? hmmm dont ask again! Sony is the best quality
Typing is a bit hard, but if u use Go Keyboard you can type easier. Xperia U is also NXT Series
Floating Touch is only inch's range between finger and screen.
So the conclusion, both phone (xperia u and xperia sola) have "his" pros and cons.
Don't buy U.. Small screen, No Card Slot, looks like a baby of Xperia S that came out before it was meant to.. And etc.. And Sola doesn't belong to any series.. NXT is just S,P,U..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
zenchikage said:
Don't buy U.. Small screen, No Card Slot, looks like a baby of Xperia S that came out before it was meant to.. And etc.. And Sola doesn't belong to any series.. NXT is just S,P,U..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont argue here
Sent from my ST25i using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 08:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:14 PM ----------
zenchikage said:
Don't buy U.. Small screen, No Card Slot, looks like a baby of Xperia S that came out before it was meant to.. And etc.. And Sola doesn't belong to any series.. NXT is just S,P,U..
Sent from my MT27i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xperia U is nominated on Mobile Words bla bla bla #imforget
If u want to look, visit sony mobile page on facebook
Sent from my ST25i using xda app-developers app
is antutu benchmark reliable? because before, when i was using stock ICS .431 in my Xperia Active with locked bootloader, i always get a score of 3300++ but when i switched to IceCreamPureness, i only get arround 3000 to 3100. does this mean that stock without any tweaks is better than IceCreamPureness in locked bootloader?
adin234 said:
is antutu benchmark reliable? because before, when i was using stock ICS .431 in my Xperia Active with locked bootloader, i always get a score of 3300++ but when i switched to IceCreamPureness, i only get arround 3000 to 3100. does this mean that stock without any tweaks is better than IceCreamPureness in locked bootloader?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock is better in stability than custom Roms... Actually it's a matter of taste that matters.
My overclocked walkman scored 5000+ in antutu but it still lags sometimes..
Sent from my WT19i
adin234 said:
is antutu benchmark reliable? because before, when i was using stock ICS .431 in my Xperia Active with locked bootloader, i always get a score of 3300++ but when i switched to IceCreamPureness, i only get arround 3000 to 3100. does this mean that stock without any tweaks is better than IceCreamPureness in locked bootloader?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS is "heavier" than GB, any rom will perform better on gb than ics, and 2011 devices weren't really designed for ics...
Don't trust benchmarking too much. To know u'r rom good or bad, just play those heavy games. U will know.
Rudjgaard said:
ICS is "heavier" than GB, any rom will perform better on gb than ics, and 2011 devices weren't really designed for ics...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they are both ICS ROMs
chepoz said:
Don't trust benchmarking too much. To know u'r rom good or bad, just play those heavy games. U will know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whenever i try antutu benchmark, i get around 50-60fps with stock ICS and only 45-50 with icecreampureness. what do you think?
Change you cusrom better..
Sent from my Xperia Mini Pro using XDA
adin234 said:
whenever i try antutu benchmark, i get around 50-60fps with stock ICS and only 45-50 with icecreampureness. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go see my pureness thread one guy has posted ......he got more than 4500 score without Overclock on my pureness rom..
and i got around 4300 undercolcked at 800mhz....
and more over i wont thrust benchmarks.
when use the ul come to know the performace, responsiveness ,speed...
i play all hd games...runs same as GB
sandy7 said:
go see my pureness thread one guy has posted ......he got more than 4500 score without Overclock on my pureness rom..
and i got around 4300 undercolcked at 800mhz....
and more over i wont thrust benchmarks.
when use the ul come to know the performace, responsiveness ,speed...
i play all hd games...runs same as GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you using a custom kernel? because i have locked bootloader.
adin234 said:
are you using a custom kernel? because i have locked bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even i tested on locked Bl...still the scores are more than 4000.....
benchmarks i dont trust....
by using rom ill come to know...that my rom is way faster than stock
sandy7 said:
even i tested on locked Bl...still the scores are more than 4000.....
benchmarks i dont trust....
by using rom ill come to know...that my rom is way faster than stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried to flash rom again, but to no avail, it still scores like that, maybe its my device
will just try to tweak stock rom patterned to yours if its okay
i see it's really faster at but with 3d rendering only having about 40-45 fps, it doesn't do good with 3d games. already tried it with temple run brave