Related
Could I get few people to post their scores? I wanna make sure im on par with a normal photon and I didn't **** something up LOL
Sent from my Unlocked Alien MoPho
I have scored as high as 2,800 and as low as 2,000. Not sure what accounts for the fluctuation (The lower scores have been more recent).
slicedcheese said:
I have scored as high as 2,800 and as low as 2,000. Not sure what accounts for the fluctuation (The lower scores have been more recent).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After the first two runs, I can consistently get 2,750-2,800 on Quadrant Standard.
Are you running a stock rooted/locked setup? Or are you running a custom rom/unlocked/overclocked setup? Cause I'm usually around 4500 to 4900.
xTMFxOffshore said:
Are you running a stock rooted/locked setup? Or are you running a custom rom/unlocked/overclocked setup? Cause I'm usually around 4500 to 4900.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My scores were just run as stock & unrooted. I reset my phone last weekend for a service call and Sprint is going to exchange it tomorrow for a new (and hopefully less buggy) Photon.
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?
I got a 5400 without the loop trick with it well is 9000 high enough
Lokifish Marz said:
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Lokifish Marz said:
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that ****Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?[/URL]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, never knew about that.
And my bootloader is unlocked, i am also on alien build #1.
Switch to the Skinny ROM with the OC kernel. That flies.
xTMFxOffshore said:
Switch to the Skinny ROM with the OC kernel. That flies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking about it just going to wait a little longer till my phone feels a little less new.
Ill throw in a few. Running CM7
Quad - 3458(before i loaded CM7i was around 2500 if i remember correct)
Linpack Single Thread - 42.34
Linpack - Multiple Thread - 69.239
AnTuTu - 5149
Vellamo - 863
3496 running skinny with the 1.3 kernel I have been loving this rom, having great battery life as well
Just curious but what are your Guy's charging times? Like from anything under 5 percent to 100 percent. I am asking just because drain times vary but charge times should not.
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
I just got a 3 in linpack
Sent from my g1 using XDA App
lroy said:
Ill throw in a few. Running CM7
Quad - 3458(before i loaded CM7i was around 2500 if i remember correct)
Linpack Single Thread - 42.34
Linpack - Multiple Thread - 69.239
AnTuTu - 5149
Vellamo - 863
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Well you have one option for cm7, lol
DethMetalz69 said:
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
DethMetalz69 said:
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you had to unlock to get cm7?? is better than stock? do you lose any functionality?
hjcg2001 said:
did you had to unlock to get cm7?? is better than stock? do you lose any functionality?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You loose all blur stuff. If you ran or have used cm7 before, you'll want it again and again. It's snappy and smooth. My stock blur would fc on me but my photon w cm7 has not fc once yet.
For charge times, I was at 27% (after 3 days run time) and I got to 95% in less then an hour and a half.
This week I may flash the beta kernel for cm7 and retest but depends on work schedule. Still trying to get a good calculation of cm7 and battery run time. So far amazing!
Little better after flashing jokers v3 kernel for CM7. loving CM! I think my phone can go faster then I can type with my ugly thumbs.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Cm7 with jokers kernel.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
NOTE: If you have issues with WiFi, IT IS NOT DUE TO THE KERNEL, but due to the ROM you are running.
The kernel is now online....sorry, was working on a new server for us, we should have a ROM here soon too.
Features:
Low Power BCM Bluetooth mode
Backported 2.6.38 autogroup
Backported 2.6.38 ck3 patchset
Lagfree governor with fully functioning sysfs
Overclocked to 1.83GHz
Slight under-volting
In-Call recording
Sysfs vdd interface
Properly scales second processor without perflock and using stock mpdecision
Kernel
Z
saved..............
Ziggy's at it again, can't wait till we can test this!
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Already a great start! Just need s-off and ill be happy to give this one a run.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Can't wait for soff. This sounds sweet
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
making me jealous i don't have s-off i even powered off to check again when i saw this post
Ahhhhhhhh....Zigfy no **** brotha LOL....here we go fellas. Were just gettin started. Thanks man. Just made my night
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
how high do you think the vigor can OC to stable??
combatmedic870 said:
how high do you think the vigor can OC to stable??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the most i've seen any msm8660 device overclocked it 1.99 ghz which is what vigor has
JoelZ9614 said:
the most i've seen any msm8660 device overclocked it 1.99 ghz which is what vigor has
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but you guys are awesome! we gotta get 2.0 stable!!!
combatmedic870 said:
but you guys are awesome! we gotta get 2.0 stable!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shouldn't be a problem, I'll start playing some more with it, I'm sure Virus will be happy too, since it's the same processor on the 3D.
Z
ziggy471 said:
Shouldn't be a problem, I'll start playing some more with it, I'm sure Virus will be happy too, since it's the same processor on the 3D.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do u got one Zigg? Or are u just Devin for it? Man this a great news!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
ziggy471 said:
Shouldn't be a problem, I'll start playing some more with it, I'm sure Virus will be happy too, since it's the same processor on the 3D.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that would be sweet, i read that its only stable to 1.7.....thats what everyone keeps telling me as well. I dont think ive seen a phone yet hit the 2.0 barrier on a dual core!
what are the steps you use on your kernel. I know the stock goes from 1.18 straight to 1.5. did you change that so it atleast has 1.2,1.3 and 1.4? it also goes from 192 straight to 384. do you add a 200 in there at all. I think that would help with power savings. especially when it comes to haves a screen off profile. The phone gets a little laggy when you have it set to just 192mhz for screen off. its better when its 192-384mhz. But having a 290 or something in there would help out im sure and save a little bit of juice due to being able to set it to 192-290 or what not.
just wondering. i thought the stock kernel on the phone was a little odd in them regards. it really likes 1.5 and really hates 192mhz.
Yeah i haven't been able to get the evo 3d s3 to overclock past 1.7 without rebooting.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
fernando sor said:
Yeah i haven't been able to get the evo 3d s3 to overclock past 1.7 without rebooting.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well everyone's device handled the OC differently right? Like I was able to get up to 1.83 with no reboots, where some couldn't get above say 1.7 .....it seems as if some of the devices out there had higher capabilitys than others.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
fernando sor said:
Yeah i haven't been able to get the evo 3d s3 to overclock past 1.7 without rebooting.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
reverepats said:
Well everyone's device handled the OC differently right? Like I was able to get up to 1.83 with no reboots, where some couldn't get above say 1.7 .....it seems as if some of the devices out there had higher capabilitys than others.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It all boils down to voltage, some devices require more voltage than others, some require less. My 3D handles 1.83 all day long, but I had 3D's running at 1.83 LONG before I even had one, remember, I'm on Verizon.
Z
ziggy471 said:
It all boils down to voltage, some devices require more voltage than others, some require less. My 3D handles 1.83 all day long, but I had 3D's running at 1.83 LONG before I even had one, remember, I'm on Verizon.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well good to have you on the rezound zigg
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
reverepats said:
Well everyone's device handled the OC differently right? Like I was able to get up to 1.83 with no reboots, where some couldn't get above say 1.7 .....it seems as if some of the devices out there had higher capabilitys than others.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I noticed some stated they could clock to that
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
You would think duel cores would be more overclockable... I can oc my Inc2 to 1.8 all day long and be stable... But I run stock speeds anyways so no biggy, but ill definatly be using zigs kernels in my roms...
Sent from my Htc Rezound using taptalk pro
ziggy471 said:
It all boils down to voltage, some devices require more voltage than others, some require less. My 3D handles 1.83 all day long, but I had 3D's running at 1.83 LONG before I even had one, remember, I'm on Verizon.
Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jeez I didn't even know you were on Verizon the entire time. I thought u were on sprint LOL...ahh well. Pretty stoked about this.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
Hey, so just like the title says are you stable at 1.6ghz do a little test run quadrent on your phone and than if it passes your probably good but also try 10mins of angry birds just to make sure i on the other hands cannot run quadrent at 1.6ghz
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
K Rich said:
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Running stable at 1.6 also. Check this to run at 1.5.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1469710
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Andrew149 said:
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm stable at 1.5 (1350mV), though I don't run it at that daily. It was covered in steve's init thread in development. Look in the last few pages.
i run antutu all the time at 1.6 with no problems. guess i got lucky
Ok just gave my 1600mhz 50mv more and its stable now so i can finally overclock a little higher when needed
Stable only to [email protected] here. Locks up after that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Mine overclocks to 1.6 with no issues at all. I ran it like that for weeks until I decided that I want longer battery life. The stock speed is still fast, and underclocking still results in acceptable responsiveness.
I use Tasker to overclock my phone when playing certain intensive games. Otherwise, my phone is usually underclocked.
Mine's never crashed at 1.6, but I don't really stress test it there besides with benchmarks.
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Stable at 1.6 with custom kernels or tegrak on stock kernel. UV too.
SHOstock
Onepointsixingit
Mine is stable at 1.6ghz ✔
poofyhairguy said:
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow have you tried giving it more voltage.
Mine is stable at 1.6. Don't run it at that though regularly.
I've run 1.6 through quadrant and antutu many times. Never crashed.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I am very stable at 1.6
I have never had any issues at 1.6 and that is on just about every rom. I dont ever keep it at that cuz i dont enjoy sucking my battery but it is definitely fun to show off to others, HAHA! Also I have a captivate and the highest it would let me overclock it was 1.7 and that is ridiculous but it was unstable. lol
I've found a way to make almost every setting I have tried relatively stable. You just have to keep tweaking. It's not as simple as getting an overclock app and maxing. Here are some screen shots I took of a recent bench. This is only at 1632. I customized a I9100 ICS rom to be fully functional on my I777 and I'm scoring higher just above 1600 than I was closer to 1700. I was ranked 720 but those transformer primes! I wish it was only mobile phones on the chart! lol
Mine is stable at 1.6.......but im like everyone else. Don't like watching my battery drop like the ball at times square on new years eve lol .mine seems pretty happy at 1.4 with some under volting
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I'm currently on The Unofficial v1.5 and supposedly it supports overclocking up to 1.9 ghz. Has anyone else using this rom noticed that when you raise the clock speed that high it just reboots constantly? Its supposed to be able to support it, so have I done something wrong?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
I'm currently on The Unofficial v1.5 and supposedly it supports overclocking up to 1.9 ghz. Has anyone else using this rom noticed that when you raise the clock speed that high it just reboots constantly? Its supposed to be able to support it, so have I done something wrong?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most kernels say 1.9 but u should stay at 1.83. 1.9 creates bootloop
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Yes...it does bootloop alot at that speed.. the safest speed is 1.83 or even 1.89 that's plenty of enough speed without any problems...
tmb993 said:
I'm currently on The Unofficial v1.5 and supposedly it supports overclocking up to 1.9 ghz. Has anyone else using this rom noticed that when you raise the clock speed that high it just reboots constantly? Its supposed to be able to support it, so have I done something wrong?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.94 os max speed if u read it says 1.83 stable
sent from team perfections ics rom
The max speed on any device is always unstable. Actually most of the time the top two or three speeds ar always unstable. It also depends on the device too. My Note and your Note may not be stable at the same speed and the rom has nothing to do with it, its the chip in your phone. I remember I had a Touch Pro 2 once that most people could only over clock to 710MHz but a few of us could overclock to 786MHz. I have my Note running pretty stable at 1836 but I have seen some people complaing about bootloops at that speed so it really depends on your device. Remeber when testing out clock speeds make sure that you never check "Apply At Boot" in case the speed is not stable and only check it when you find a stable speed. Her's a video of someone running stable at 1890MHz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4hd5jG1ztc
porkenhimer said:
The max speed on any device is always unstable. Actually most of the time the top two or three speeds ar always unstable. It also depends on the device too. My Note and your Note may not be stable at the same speed and the rom has nothing to do with it, its the chip in your phone. I remember I had a Touch Pro 2 once that most people could only over clock to 710MHz but a few of us could overclock to 786MHz. I have my Note running pretty stable at 1836 but I have seen some people complaing about bootloops at that speed so it really depends on your device. Remeber when testing out clock speeds make sure that you never check "Apply At Boot" in case the speed is not stable and only check it when you find a stable speed. Her's a video of someone running stable at 1890MHz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4hd5jG1ztc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ur right its called a hot reboot
sent from team perfections ics rom
Thanks guys. Been running solid at 1.83 ghz. Min around 702 MHz. Battery lasts almost all day. Anyone found better settings for battery life?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
Thanks guys. Been running solid at 1.83 ghz. Min around 702 MHz. Battery lasts almost all day. Anyone found better settings for battery life?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Leave it at 1.5max and 192min. If you're not doing anything that requires oc'ing, why set it high.
would that cm9 1.5 ?
if so , where are you over clocking from ?
babymatteo said:
Yes. Leave it at 1.5max and 192min. If you're not doing anything that requires oc'ing, why set it high.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It runs sooo much smoother overclocked. But ill try what you said.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
Thanks guys. Been running solid at 1.83 ghz. Min around 702 MHz. Battery lasts almost all day. Anyone found better settings for battery life?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
384 min 1836 max is the best one use lagfree on setcpu
sent from team perfections ics rom
JB calhoun said:
384 min 1836 max is the best one use lagfree on setcpu
sent from team perfections ics rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it true that 384 is the minimum samsungs can run? I used to have my atrix down to 192 and it worked fine (tegra 2)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
erick161 said:
Is it true that 384 is the minimum samsungs can run? I used to have my atrix down to 192 and it worked fine (tegra 2)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it can go down to 192
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Just a tip if you overclock your CPU it will drain the battery life faster keep this in mind.....
The unofficial v1.5 rom came with an OC tool. If I downloaded another one, say SetCPU, will it just override the native tool?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
The unofficial v1.5 rom came with an OC tool. If I downloaded another one, say SetCPU, will it just override the native tool?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know is because i never rooted my device and i know im missing out a ton of features im going to keep stock for a while is because i like how my phone works at the moment.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
animeware said:
I don't know is because i never rooted my device and i know im missing out a ton of features im going to keep stock for a while is because i like how my phone works at the moment.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have no idea and you don't root phones then why are you even here?! Talk about pointless...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I've already flashed two kernels in hopes of overclocking my Note 1. On one, it hung at the Samsung screen and on the other it booted (after doing something with each app) but kept showing force close messages that I couldn't close.
I really want to overclock my phone because it freezes a lot.
Also, I haven't had any luck with radios, either. These flash okay, but with dramatically slower speeds. Right now, I get on avg. 10 mpbs, but I've seen people with upwards of 50.
How could I do these things? Thanks.
we need more info to help you. what rom you are running. carrier you are on. what methods of overclock you tried. more info, the better we can assist.
s89281b said:
we need more info to help you. what rom you are running. carrier you are on. what methods of overclock you tried. more info, the better we can assist.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running Blackstar XI with AT&T. And I've only tried flashing overclock kernels, with no success. SetCPU lets me underclock, but the current kernel doesn't let me OC.
Kind of the same with the radios. I've only tried flashing them, with no faster speeds.
Are there other methods then these ways?
donteatsoap7 said:
I've already flashed two kernels in hopes of overclocking my Note 1. On one, it hung at the Samsung screen and on the other it booted (after doing something with each app) but kept showing force close messages that I couldn't close.
I really want to overclock my phone because it freezes a lot.
Also, I haven't had any luck with radios, either. These flash okay, but with dramatically slower speeds. Right now, I get on avg. 10 mpbs, but I've seen people with upwards of 50.
How could I do these things? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well hopefully your flashing correct kernels for whatever ROM your running first thing ... And the 50mbps is probably due to the LTE speeds tmo released in a few cities .. Kansas is one I know of .....and over clocking isn't always the best ... I underclock myself to help save battery ... I'm not calling you a noob by any means but read up on android news and check our forums and you will fins your answers I promise
£|@$h•h°|i©
shayneflashindaily said:
Well hopefully your flashing correct kernels for whatever ROM your running first thing ... And the 50mbps is probably due to the LTE speeds tmo released in a few cities .. Kansas is one I know of .....and over clocking isn't always the best ... I underclock myself to help save battery ... I'm not calling you a noob by any means but read up on android news and check our forums and you will fins your answers I promise
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, thanks. Maybe it's best that I don't OC it. Thanks.
I'm not saying don't over clock I just don't cause of battery drain ...... You can just watch CPU temperature and be careful ...maybe don't over clock to max just a little bit like 1600 or something
£|@$h•h°|i©
The only kernel capable of over clocking right now is ptmr3s kernel but I believe it only works with that hong Kong firmware. There are older kernels that can over clock but won't work with the latest cm merges. Like Shane said don't max out most notes can't handle it I never go higher then 1792. Over clocking is great but I don't think we will see a over clock kernel any time soon maybe look into scripts and tweaks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
pockets916 said:
The only kernel capable of over clocking right now is ptmr3s kernel but I believe it only works with that hong Kong firmware. There are older kernels that can over clock but won't work with the latest cm merges. Like Shane said don't max out most notes can't handle it I never go higher then 1792. Over clocking is great but I don't think we will see a over clock kernel any time soon maybe look into scripts and tweaks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. If you want fast charge and UC go with Chris's. I personally have no need for over clocking. Under clocking is more beneficial.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Deleted
£|@$h•h°|i©
shayneflashindaily said:
Deleted
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
That's great that you guys under clock you must save a ton of battery for the performance you lose wonderful. However he's not asking about under clocking. Seeing how every one is giving there opinion I'll give mine do you really save that much batery ? I don't under clock because my battery life is acceptable and if my phone gets low I charge it whether I'm at home car wherever. do you guys not have to charge your phones every day? So what is the point?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
pockets916 said:
That's great that you guys under clock you must save a ton of battery for the performance you lose wonderful. However he's not asking about under clocking. Seeing how every one is giving there opinion I'll give mine do you really save that much batery ? I don't under clock because my battery life is acceptable and if my phone gets low I charge it whether I'm at home car wherever. do you guys not have to charge your phones every day? So what is the point?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Under clocking does not reduce performance. Mediocre gaming does not need 1.5ghz if you UC to 1.2/1.1 your performance will remain the same... Out of the extra hour of battery life that doesn't reduce performance its kind of a no brainer. Anyways stay on topic.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Take your own advice
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Reallllly Lol why argue over something so small ... Give your advice on experience and deal with it ...I like to under clock you like to over clock so what..........
£|@$h•h°|i©
Exactly.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Unfortunately we all have to charge through out the day cause Samsung didn't think to put a huge battery in a huge phone Haha .... A 3100 sized battery would have been ideal .... But that's another topic .. As for over clocking I would love to go to about 1600 on the ROM I'm on but I have yet to find a overclockable kernel for 4.2.2 ..well phase is touchwiz right ?
£|@$h•h°|i©