HTC EVO V 4G versus HTC ONE V, both on Virgin Mobile.
They obviously some huge differences (single vs dual-core, 3G vs WiMax 4G, screen size, actual device size), but which one would you choose? (If you were me)
I work in NYC where there is WiMax 4G coverage, so should that influence my decision?
exjoburger said:
HTC EVO V 4G versus HTC ONE V, both on Virgin Mobile.
They obviously some huge differences (single vs dual-core, 3G vs WiMax 4G, screen size, actual device size), but which one would you choose? (If you were me)
I work in NYC where there is WiMax 4G coverage, so should that influence my decision?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I live in the Staten Island area, I have the EVO V with a seidio 4000 mAH extended battery. 4G works great and its a solid phone, go with the EVO V.
xlylegaman said:
I have the EVO V with a seidio 4000 mAH extended battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm rolling with that setup too. Also bought the uber-crucial-slapyourmomma custom protective case for it to. Damn thing is a beast.
The Evo for sure. Bigger screen size, dual core, just an all around great device. One annoying thing I really hate about the One V is that it has a sealed battery...so annoying.
Yeah that sealed battery in the HTC ONE is a major turn off.
Related
Hey guys,
So I'm on my second android phone, currently an unlocked htc g2 on at&t. I love android and I love htc. Inconveniently, I also love full qwerty keyboards, limiting my interest to certain phones. My g2 is great, minus the fact that I can't get on the att 3g network. While its not a huge deal being stuck on EDGE, it obviously limits my web browsing when I'm away from wifi and the att 3g hotspot in my house teases me. There is not an att android phone that interests me one bit, leaving me to unlock (previously used an unlocked mytouch 3g slide).
I'm wondering if there is any sort of solution to my problem.
At&t 3g compatible, qwerty keyboard android phone???
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Sent from my G2 using XDA App
Motorola has 2 options that are newer phones on att per phonescoop that are droid 2.1 or higher with keyboards.
Sent from my DROID2 using XDA App
There is the HTC Desire Z. It is identical to the T-Mobile G2 only a different display technology, and HTC Sense UI.
Recently us version with AT&T 3G frequencies was released. If you are goign to get one, be careful that you are getting US version(850/1900) and not euro version(900/2100)
Negri Electronics sells the US HTC Desire Z
negrielectronics .com/htc-desire-z-850-1900-3g-unlocked.html
gsmarena .com/htc_desire_z-3421.php
I understood that the HTC Rider is going to be the GSM version of the EVO and will be released in europe/asia but i dont see much details about in on the net and since im not from the USA, i would need the GSM version
Does it has a release date already? i saw the EVO will be out on June 4th but thats for the american market right?
I am asking cuz i want to get the sensation, but i saw the EVO and thought perhaps i should wait a bit
No one knows about a GSM version for Europe?
It hasn't even officially been announced as a gsm version even though we 110% know it exist.
Sent From My HTC Evo 4G Using Tapatalk On The Now Network From Sprint.
http://www.handtec.co.uk/product.php/4800/htc-evo-3d--sim-free-unlocked-black-
Could this be reliable? a GSM version of EVO 3D being sold on handtec soon?
Hi Mates,
Dont make guesses. Itz real.
I bot the phone in india through ebay. It supports GSM.
Phone performance is as gud as iphone.
only the built-in speaker is not good.but when connected to earphone or external speaker then its rocking blast.
thanks,
Which one should I wait for or get?
I know with 4G it'd be more expensive though but it will have Snapdragon, which I don't really like.
But Exynos should have a better performance and I could brag about the new Exynos chip but the downside is LTE doesn't work with it.
Sir-Awesome said:
Which one should I wait for or get?
I know with 4G it'd be more expensive though but it will have Snapdragon, which I don't really like.
But Exynos should have a better performance and I could brag about the new Exynos chip but the downside is LTE doesn't work with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. S4 is actually a decent SoC
2. If you live in an area with decent HSPA speeds then it might not be too bad to go with 3G version
Depends on where you are located. If you are in the US where LTE is supported, I would go for the 4G since you will be paying alot less than the international price. If you are in the UK, I would get the quad core version with a carrier that gives you a plan on that. I'm in the US and if any carrier offers the quad core version, I would take that instead of the 4G because I don't even have 4G in my area, and I think more phone power would be better since WiFi is everywhere now.
GS3Central said:
Depends on where you are located. If you are in the US where LTE is supported, I would go for the 4G since you will be paying alot less than the international price. If you are in the UK, I would get the quad core version with a carrier that gives you a plan on that. I'm in the US and if any carrier offers the quad core version, I would take that instead of the 4G because I don't even have 4G in my area, and I think more phone power would be better since WiFi is everywhere now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in Australia, we just got LTE last year but only on one carrier.
And they're gonna be expensive, probably like around 70 dollars a month.
The smallest LTE plan is 59/month, the HTC Velocity.
There's also the S2 4G for 64/month.
will there ever be a gsm version, possibly with the tegra 3 processor? i know that the tegra 3 doesn`t support lte but i think htc really made a mistake by not releasing this elsewhere. its so much better than the one x.
http://www.unwiredview.com/2012/05/29/htc-one-x-with-global-roaming-to-be-released-by-china-telecom-in-june-images-and-specs-leak/
Close. No kickstand though. Mix between OneX and Evo LTE tbh.
I doubt the actual Evo 4G LTE will have a GSM version since the original one didn't and this is a flagship Sprint phone. The argument for the 3D having a GSM counterpart could be HTCs desire and hype with the 3D feature.
I'm deciding between the Rogers HTCRaider (vivid) and now I run into this. What are the differences between the evo models and what one does Rogers have? I would think nothing but it seems passmark is showing big differences.
androidbenchmark . net/device_list.php
HTC EVO 3D X515a
1,538
Rank: 121
HTC EVO 3D (no model?)
1,819
Rank: 51
HTC EVO 3D GSM (running ICS 4)
1,950
Rank: 23
Why such differences? And the raider is rank 40, so it's on par with the "no model" but way better than the x515?
I have purchased two Rogers evo 3d 's and both have been the X51a models. As for bench marking, I have not ever done it with stock. Both cpu's are 1.2 Ghz. I think the real difference is 3d on the evo and LTE on the raider.