Related
will galaxy get 3d drivers or not?spica already got.and wokin good.what about this galaxy??this phone graphics sucking me to play many games.
It already has 3D drivers .
First, we need a source of 2.2, with all drivers. Then we can make some optimalizations, but don't think it will run every game at good framerate!
I think it will only let you play some games at better FPS (like Raging Thunder 2), games that doesn't work now (like Modern Combat: Sandstorm) I think will not work ever on this phone
Gsam101 said:
It already has 3D drivers .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But can you please share your 3D drivers with us. So that we can also use it with our i5800. It would really be very nice of you.
Thanks in advance.
--------------------------------------------------
Current Device = Samsung GT-i5801
JPF Clean ROM FroYo + JPB Kernel and some perf tweaks.
madhuranand007 said:
But can you please share your 3D drivers with us. So that we can also use it with our i5800. It would really be very nice of you.
Thanks in advance.
--------------------------------------------------
Current Device = Samsung GT-i5801
JPF Clean ROM FroYo + JPB Kernel and some perf tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, they are included in the phone aren't they ? And they work not so bad..
Gsam101 said:
Well, they are included in the phone aren't they ? And they work not so bad..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But whenever i try to play HD games or Sims 3 it only gives me white textures.
Spica does not have a GPU too...
with jpf+mod jpb kernel+lagfix2 quadrant says i have opengl es-cm 1.1 which is weird since i think i had 2.0 before :S. Could it be do to the jpb kernel?
P.S. I can play tank hero which says: "OpenGlL 3D graphics"
Gsam101 said:
It already has 3D drivers .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what u have them already??
can u please share them?i'm not able to play so many games on my galaxy i5801.
thanks in advance.
if anyone have galaxy 5 then please check its GPU name using Quadrant sys info and share with us so that we can figure out WHY our galaxy 3 performs bad compared to galaxy 5.
Even galaxy 3 has better cpu.
snowcloud said:
if anyone have galaxy 5 then please check its GPU name using Quadrant sys info and share with us so that we can figure out WHY our galaxy 3 performs bad compared to galaxy 5.
Even galaxy 3 has better cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i5500-Galaxy 5-has a Qualcomm 7227 processor which features a real dedicated GPU, Adreno 200, which happens to be the SAME GPU that is found in the first generation Snapdragon processors! Galaxy 3 processor is SC56442A6E, which is not better than 7227, only the max operating frequency is higher.
That's why Galaxy 5 performs better than Galaxy 3...
hamsiro said:
i5500-Galaxy 5-has a Qualcomm 7227 processor which features a real dedicated GPU, Adreno 200, which happens to be the SAME GPU that is found in the first generation Snapdragon processors! Galaxy 3 processor is SC56442A6E, which is not better than 7227, only the max operating frequency is higher.
That's why Galaxy 5 performs better than Galaxy 3...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want to inform every galaxy 3 owner that guys dont loose hope about 3d gameplay
I just bought galaxy 551 for my brother and to my surprise even though both the phones have identical processor and clocking frequency galaxy 551 scores 373 in 3d graphics in quadrant advanced.So maybe samsung or developers can do something to improve the 3d graphic drivers.
Cheers
rdass3646 said:
I want to inform every galaxy 3 owner that guys dont loose hope about 3d gameplay
I just bought galaxy 551 for my brother and to my surprise even though both the phones have identical processor and clocking frequency galaxy 551 scores 373 in 3d graphics in quadrant advanced.So maybe samsung or developers can do something to improve the 3d graphic drivers.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy 551 DOES NOT HAVE the same processor than the Galaxy 3 ! Try to compile/run a Galaxy 551 kernel on the Galaxy 3 and you'll see why i say that.
Gsam101 said:
Galaxy 551 DOES NOT HAVE the same processor than the Galaxy 3 ! Try to compile/run a Galaxy 551 kernel on the Galaxy 3 and you'll see why i say that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you might be correct on that aspect but the main problem about galaxy 3 is bad texture. compression which can be resolved via proper programing as the chipset in galaxy 3 does not require any dedicated gpu to run 3d programmes or games.but just to confirm I will try the 3d drivers of galaxy 551 on galaxy 3 as I have both the phones at my home.
Will post the results soon.
Thank s
disappointed that a lower priced Galaxy 5 has got a 3d processor while the higher version galaxy 3 didn't.
5800 does not support 3D cpu is not it?
G3 dosn't had any opengl hardware.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
why does the galaxy 551 supports 3d
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
Criminal23 said:
G3 dosn't had any opengl hardware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our G3 already supports OpenGL 1.1
Swypnięte z i5800
Yes, It supports OpenGL 1.1, but CPU is rendering all, so that means we don't have OpenGL hardware
Hello, I saw somewhere that Galaxy S 2 has two different processors. I bought phone on saturday and I would like to find which processor has my phone? Any advice how to find out? And also,are they same quality or are they different?
Thank you
Google search is amazing, you should try it. Xda has a search feature also. If you got a box with your handset it probably mentions which one also.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I'm not sure but i heard that the I9103 has the tegra processor but a lcd screen
Don't know if this is right or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Quick system info tells you which cpu you have among other things.
Hi I tryed but could not find anything. SO you think I should have Exynos because ihave I9100? Which one is better? I hope they are same.
PoTi_96 said:
I'm not sure but i heard that the I9103 has the tegra processor but a lcd screen
Don't know if this is right or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's rumor about a HongKong version with Tegra 2 1.2Ghz and SAMOLED plus display
Also, the FCC certification records show three different models approved for the US market:
I9100 (FCCID: A3LGTI9100)
I9100T (FCCID: A3LGTI9100T)
I9100G (FCCID: A3LGTI9100G)
I'm assuming the I9100T is the Tegra version, based on the suffix. Nothing in the publicly available docs I've looked at confirms that. The I9100G is new -- it was apparently added to the FCC site earlier today.
3waygeek said:
Also, the FCC certification records show three different models approved for the US market:
I9100 (FCCID: A3LGTI9100)
I9100T (FCCID: A3LGTI9100T)
I9100G (FCCID: A3LGTI9100G)
I'm assuming the I9100T is the Tegra version, based on the suffix. Nothing in the publicly available docs I've looked at confirms that. The I9100G is new -- it was apparently added to the FCC site earlier today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Per Engadget/pocketnow, one of those must be a CDMA variant for verizon and Sprint
So I checked info in my phone and processor is 1.2 GHz ARM V7 dual core. No Tegra.I just hope that this processor is good. I think they used ARM for Galaxy S.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
shawt said:
So I checked info in my phone and processor is 1.2 GHz ARM V7 dual core. No Tegra.I just hope that this processor is good. I think they used ARM for Galaxy S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both Tegra and Exynos are of same family.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture#ARM_cores
They maybe little different in terms of implementation. I believe the Tegra 2 is without NEON instruction sets.
May not be a strictly easy way to compare which one is better. I think the general consensus is Exynos 4210 has overall better performance compared to the Tegra2.
I would think that you have Exynos (atleast I myself would like that).
cheers..
Bukem75 said:
Per Engadget/pocketnow, one of those must be a CDMA variant for verizon and Sprint
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My guess is that it's the G version. When I looked through the FCC docs last week, it appeared to me that the I9100 & I9100T supported AT&T's set of GSM frequencies, and were, in all aspects pertaining to FCC certification, identical.
I haven't had time to look at the FCC docs for the G version, as they were put up less than 24 hours ago, but if it's a CDMA version for Sprint/Verizon, it should be readily apparent by looking at the list of certification documents (i.e. they mention CDMA frequencies instead of GSM).
Galaxy S vs. Galaxy S2
OK I am quite worry about processor in my Galaxy S 2 now. I checked Galaxy S vs. galaxy S 2. In quadrant system informaton about CPU is this :
Galaxy S
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 2(v7l)
Cores : 1
Architecture : 7
Revision : 2
Galaxy S2
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 1(v7l)
Cores : 1 ... ?!?
Architecture : 7
Revision : 1
So did they used the same processor but just changed speed??? Cores 1 ??? Maybe system info is wrong, but I think this is strange, don't you think???
Maybe thsi program is not made for Android 2.3.3 ?
Do you know which code is for CPU information?
From what I read, Quadrant cannot dual cores, and lists it as one core.
Quadrant reads the LG Optimus 2X dual core as a single core. I presume it is thus for the i9100, and any other dual core 'phone.
I tryed few app from the market and they all read same information.Hopefully I have dual core CPU...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
shawt said:
I tryed few app from the market and they all read same information.Hopefully I have dual core CPU...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the cpu speed on quadrant?
Under system information.
Current freq. : 200 MHz
Max freq. : 1200 MHz
Min freq. : 200 Mhz
Bogo MIPS : 1592.52
shawt said:
OK I am quite worry about processor in my Galaxy S 2 now. I checked Galaxy S vs. galaxy S 2. In quadrant system informaton about CPU is this :
Galaxy S
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 2(v7l)
Cores : 1
Architecture : 7
Revision : 2
Galaxy S2
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 1(v7l)
Cores : 1 ... ?!?
Architecture : 7
Revision : 1
So did they used the same processor but just changed speed??? Cores 1 ??? Maybe system info is wrong, but I think this is strange, don't you think???
Maybe thsi program is not made for Android 2.3.3 ?
Do you know which code is for CPU information?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant just gets it wrong, don't worry your S2 is fine and does have a Dual-Core 1.2ghz processor just look at your quadrant result...3000+ you're not going to get that on a stock Kernel from any single core phone are you ?
Hope that helps you
Thank you I had about 3000 just wanted to know what type processor I have in my phone.
forgetmyname said:
From what I read, Quadrant cannot dual cores, and lists it as one core.
Quadrant reads the LG Optimus 2X dual core as a single core. I presume it is thus for the i9100, and any other dual core 'phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since KE7, quadrant is reporting 2 cores
well yours is a uk one, so we have the exynos version , which is the superior of the 2
hello everyone...
i noticed on quadrant in system information that in cpu info is sais...
name : armv7.....
max freq:...
min freq:....
cores: 1 (shouldnt it be 2 here)????????????????
also how much total memory does the galaxy s2 has?
857mbs???
[email protected]@xyS said:
hello everyone...
i noticed on quadrant in system information that in cpu info is sais...
name : armv7.....
max freq:...
min freq:....
cores: 1 (shouldnt it be 2 here)????????????????
also how much total memory does the galaxy s2 has?
857mbs???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use the search
Simple answer - Quadrant is garbage...
Also, its in no way designed for use on dual core phones.
So I'm reliably informed.
...waiting for an sgs2 tegra 2 !
Tegra 2 Information
conantroutman said:
Simple answer - Quadrant is garbage...
Also, its in no way designed for use on dual core phones.
So I'm reliably informed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so thats one more reason to not believe quadrqant cause i overclocked my phone in the same freq and voltages as other users in here and i take very small scores in quadrant...
(•.•) said:
...waiting for an sgs2 tegra 2 !
Tegra 2 Information
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
keep that garbage out of my phone
What is it with this model and those optimized games? and compatibility issues? Seriously? Would it be solved anytime soon? Or is the G in the end means i shud give up hope on my phone? Most S2 optimized games on samsungapps can't be installed
From JayceOoi's website:
In short, Samsung Galaxy S II GT-I9100 is using Samsung own Exynos 4210 SoC CPU and ARM Mali-400 GPU. And GT-I9100G uses Texas Instruments OMAP4430 CPU and PowerVR SGX540 GPU.
TWO DIFFERENT INTERNAL SPECS, DIFFERENT GPU AND CPU.
I9100G
- Doesn’t overheat easily, better battery life.
- CPU seems to be capped at 1008 MHz.
- Poorer 3D performance.
- Can’t download apps / games developed for Samsung Galaxy S II I9100 in Samsung Apps / Android Market.
- Fonts in PAPAGO! very small.
- Not much custom firmware / modification
I9100
- Overheat easily, poor battery life on Android 2.3.3. Android 2.3.5 fixed it.
- Fully use 1.2 GHz CPU.
- Better 3D performance.
- Anti-Aliasing (4xAA and 16xAA) support with Chainfire3D Pro.
- Lot of custom firmware, kernel, modification, tweaks…
Please Vote to get CyanogenMod on your I9100G
Guys,
Please vote the poll in the following link to get CyanogenMod on your I9100G.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1583091
You can find the poll at the top of the thread. Please spread the news.
nicholaschum said:
- Can’t download apps / games developed for Samsung Galaxy S II I9100 in Samsung Apps / Android Market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didn't get this point really... i have the G-variant and i didn't see any problem when downloading any app or game to it... am not sure if the applications are actually developed for a special mobile version, mostly apps/games are developed for "Android" and not for a certain company such as samsung or HTC or any other and neither for any model like GT-i9000 , GT-i9100 or even GT-i9100G etc...
ICS for GT-I9100G in india is available now!!!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1679210
Sivabalan said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1679210
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
enjoy the upgrade hope they keep on releasing other updates for all countries in the upcoming 2 days...am actually waiting for CM9 to be officially finalized so i can flash it
at www dot samsung dot com /es/consumer/mobile-phone/smartphones/android/GT-I9001HKDFOP
Sorry I cannot post links
This device has no page at XDA-DEVELOPERS and it will not have official ICS.
It is being sealed in Spain by Vodafone and it needs some work.
Thanks in advance.
It does have a page here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1270
Thanks
Thanks
But ... It has no phone picture and it is not listed at the database being at your link as a submodel of the SG S I9000 that it is not
Samsung must use other name system for their devices
But SG S+ I9001 is a total different hardware than SG S 9000
And a lot of "normal" users will brick their phones trying to put a SG S ICS on a SG S+ and as it is being sold a lot in Spain, Germany, Russia and China this Christmas season perhaps a SG S+ ICS will be later at the "mod market"
I think it would be a good idea to put this model at the database with its own different specs and thread.
I have read some complains about this matter.
And i think they have good reasons to ask their different space not for having a similar name is a similar - in hardware - phone. Perhaps the name is because is near in the market segment but is very different in hardware.
mitcoes said:
Thanks
But ... It has no phone picture and it is not listed at the database being at your link as a submodel of the SG S I9000 that it is not
Samsung must use other name system for their devices
But SG S+ I9001 is a total different hardware than SG S 9000
And a lot of "normal" users will brick their phones trying to put a SG S ICS on a SG S+ and as it is being sold a lot in Spain, Germany, Russia and China this Christmas season perhaps a SG S+ ICS will be later at the "mod market"
I think it would be a good idea to put this model at the database with its own different specs and thread.
I have read some complains about this matter.
And i think they have good reasons to ask their different space not for having a similar name is a similar - in hardware - phone. Perhaps the name is because is near in the market segment but is very different in hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? You couldn't tell the difference by just looking at them anyways. The only major differences in hardware are the graphics cards and processors (and of course chipset): http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3115&idPhone2=3908. It doesn't matter that it doesn't have it's "own" forum (at least it has one).
Please use the Q&A Forum for questions Thanks
Moving to Q&A
All equal outside but not inside Chipset, CPU and GPU
Chipset Hummingbird Qualcomm MSM8255T Snapdragon
CPU 1 GHz Cortex-A8 1.4 GHz Scorpion
GPU PowerVR SGX540 Adreno 205
Any phone with only one of this different parts will have other ICS rom - and of course different drivers and performance.
What you say is as if you have a desktop computer with the same monitor, keyboard, mice, webcam, hdd, case, but one is Intel+Nvidia and the other AMD+ATI, the inside is very important isn't it?
mitcoes said:
Chipset Hummingbird Qualcomm MSM8255T Snapdragon
CPU 1 GHz Cortex-A8 1.4 GHz Scorpion
GPU PowerVR SGX540 Adreno 205
Any phone with only one of this different parts will have other ICS rom - and of course different drivers and performance.
What you say is as if you have a desktop computer with the same monitor, keyboard, mice, webcam, hdd, case, but one is Intel+Nvidia and the other AMD+ATI, the inside is very important isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I said - They have different cpu's, gpu's, and chipsets. They will never be separated, so there is no point debating.
just go here http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1270
that is the official sgs+ page