Related
THIS ISNT A WHO's BETTER THIS IS A WHICH DO YOU PERFER AND WHY THREAD
Example:
I use AOKP Because I like the speeds that I get with it the fact that it's a more minimalistic rom and that fact that it has a very nice GUI to accompany it however, CM9 also holds a spot in my heart because I do like many of the features that Cyanogen Mod comes out with, that are sometimes delay pushed into AOKP due to stability checks.
Which do you perfer AOKP or CM9
AOKP Pro: Sleek, Fast, Large User Group to help bug resolve, Nice GUI, Hilarious Thread posts. Compatible with NEAK kernel.
AOKP Con: 2 Con's atm. Dialing on dial pad creates a very bizzar vibration bug in my device not others and google play is still having purchase bug's however I believe that is just my gapps
CM9 Pros: large dev crew, very speedy development, Nightly Builds if you wanna see whats going on, Cutting edge coding, very few bugs on stable releases.
CM9 Cons: Flashing Addicts HEROINE :|, Leaves more to the user to design and set up rather then a flash and go kinda rom.
Give your feedback, Why you chose the one you use.
Pro's / Con's
General thoughts.
I am simply trying to get the other-side of the spectrum
ohhhhh reddddddd. Where you be?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Cmon virus, you should know better than to start a thread like this.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Virus1x said:
THIS ISNT A WHO's BETTER THIS IS A WHICH DO YOU PERFER AND WHY THREAD
Example:
I use AOKP Because I like the speeds that I get with it the fact that it's a more minimalistic rom and that fact that it has a very nice GUI to accompany it however, CM9 also holds a spot in my heart because I do like many of the features that Cyanogen Mod comes out with, that are sometimes delay pushed into AOKP due to stability checks.
Which do you perfer AOKP or CM9
AOKP Pro: Sleek, Fast, Large User Group to help bug resolve, Nice GUI, Hilarious Thread posts. Compatible with NEAK kernel.
AOKP Con: 2 Con's atm. Dialing on dial pad creates a very bizzar vibration bug in my device not others and google play is still having purchase bug's however I believe that is just my gapps
CM9 Pros: large dev crew, very speedy development, Nightly Builds if you wanna see whats going on, Cutting edge coding, very few bugs on stable releases.
CM9 Cons: Flashing Addicts HEROINE :|, Leaves more to the user to design and set up rather then a flash and go kinda rom.
Give your feedback, Why you chose what you chose.
Pro's / Con's
General thoughts.
I am simply trying to get the other-side of the spectrum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
read that, I am in no way attempting to start a fight or anything I thought XDA was formed on the ideas of sharing ones creative genius thoughts and critisim regarding the development and modification of the ANDROID Devices thus, This thread I see is in no way causing any fights or breaking the guiding idea of what XDA is
Virus1x said:
read that, I am in no way attempting to start a fight or anything I thought XDA was formed on the ideas of sharing ones creative genius thoughts and critisim regarding the development and modification of the ANDROID Devices thus, This thread I see is in no way causing any fights or breaking the guiding idea of what XDA is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you haven't been around lately because comparison threads aren't allowed
Spelled preference wrong btw
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
MWilkenson said:
ohhhhh reddddddd. Where you be?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry. His more furious alter-ego has this one!
As stated, ANY VERSUS thread is not allowed.. So, nipping this one in the bud, and killing it here.
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
zZDave_Stud said:
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
What hurts the rezound, was that everyone was expecting to get it and then immediately switch to ICS so the gingerbread development lacked a lot. And leaks don't really help us at all as far as ICS goes. Here we are 8 months after the debut of ICS and we are still left out in the cold.
There are a few people still trying to make AOSP happen, but for now, senseless is as close as you'll get.
bukithd said:
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wasn't aosp brohan. I reiterate, no aosp, only SENSELESS
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
zZDave_Stud said:
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
fo0you said:
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
dogswind said:
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesss I'd love to have a cm7 . I actually just downgraded back to gb firmware
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Quada said:
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright awesome, thanks for the replies everyone, I can't wait for chad's kernel. And I believe that atm I would use CM7 over the assortment of ics roms we have as well.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't hold my breath. Bottom line is that there has been no updates released to the "public" in a couple of months, just word of mouth that they have it working, except for a few bugs.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think making it a community rom is a pretty good idea.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
zZDave_Stud said:
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's all you really need then use Slim or CleanRom DE. Slim especially has pretty much all of Sense stripped away either is worlds better for battery life.
Chad is doing what protekk couldnt do.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Newt is currently working on aokp. Says he has calls and texts working so far and next step is data.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Hey guys, I'm working a lot of hours and I need to have a reliable phone, which ICS or JB ROM is best? I'm new to this phone, so, I don't know what my options are.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
I would say epinter one is the most reliable one for now. i bet he is cooking somthing good with his atm ROM and the leak also, so it would be even better.
ajt1995 said:
Hey guys, I'm working a lot of hours and I need to have a reliable phone, which ICS or JB ROM is best? I'm new to this phone, so, I don't know what my options are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you say reliable?
Then forget about both ICS and JB and go with GB. Any variant will do.
ICS/JB ROMs are just too unfinished yet to be a reliable daily driver, IMO. People are woking hard on them though, so there is no doubt they will one day become as reliable as good old GB.
Agreed.
ravilov said:
Did you say reliable?
Then forget about both ICS and JB and go with GB. Any variant will do.
ICS/JB ROMs are just too unfinished yet to be a reliable daily driver, IMO. People are woking hard on them though, so there is no doubt they will one day become as reliable as good old GB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a very accurate summary of where we stand. I'm still running Nottachtrix 1.3.1 even though Nottach left the Atrix over a month ago, just because everything works on it. Bluetooth, wifi, HWA, Ubuntop, all cameras, and even a decent selection of themes for both android and linux.
But with the new leak libs, there is sure to be a fantastic CM9/10 ROM that takes advantage of them. We just have to be patient.
Hi
If you're not using thoroughly your phone, the CM10 form Epinter is now reliable enough for a daily use.
I was using CM7 since months, and after trying CM10 last week, i'm still using it and have found no real limitations for a basic usage.
I'd recommend you to keep a GB based rom if you want to have the most reliable system and if video recording is a primary need for you.
Just my $.02: I don't even use the "latest" GB 2.3.7 ROM: I've returned to Neutrino 2.6 EE (the latest is 2.91 at this writing). CM 7.2 RC1 was the most stable + efficient ROM from the CM gurus for my Atrix. I charge my phone once every two or three days too.
Think about driving a car that everyone laughs at that's never needing to go to the shop. Gits ya there, gits ya back, reliably and without anyone really paying attention to it, and it just goes and goes and holds its own against everyone else. Newest doesn't always mean best; trustworthiness does.
Epinter's CM10 worked OK for me despite the few well known bugs.
You might give the brand new AtrICS ROM a shot. It's hard to believe that it could already be as stable as it claims to be, but with working hardware acceleration, it should have some bugs fixed as compared to CM10.
dhc243 said:
Epinter's CM10 worked OK for me despite the few well known bugs.
You might give the brand new AtrICS ROM a shot. It's hard to believe that it could already be as stable as it claims to be, but with working hardware acceleration, it should have some bugs fixed as compared to CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. I'm on it right now and its pretty kick ass.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Deggy said:
+1. I'm on it right now and its pretty kick ass.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about sleep reboots? If its reliable, ill give it a shot.
Im used to tweaking Samsung devices, where do I start?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
ajt1995 said:
What about sleep reboots? If its reliable, ill give it a shot.
Im used to tweaking Samsung devices, where do I start?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only had one reboot. I don't think it's rom related. Words with friends is the culprit. Happened during that.
Is your bootloader unlocked?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Deggy said:
Only had one reboot. I don't think it's rom related. Words with friends is the culprit. Happened during that.
Is your bootloader unlocked?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this phone is bone stock.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Deggy said:
Only had one reboot. I don't think it's rom related. Words with friends is the culprit. Happened during that.
Is your bootloader unlocked?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, completely stock.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
I highly recommend the newbie guide sticky in the atrix general forum. Saved my butt so many times. And there's no Odin on Motorola phones.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Deggy said:
I highly recommend the newbie guide sticky in the atrix general forum. Saved my butt so many times. And there's no Odin on Motorola phones.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Odin was awesome. I've also had an ETC phone, so, I think ill be okay. Thanks guys.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
epinter JB rom
I am using epinter's JB rom and it works flawlessly.
Thanks,
Jinesh
I switched from epinter's CM10 to AtrICS today and found it to be a fairly usable. You trade some features for others.
I prefer the interface of CM10 to AtrICS, but AtrICS feels really snappy thanks to the HWA. I'll probably get used to ICS after a while. The Camera works well, but, like others I noticed that after switching from the back camera to the front, there was some corruption on the right side of the screen. Going into Camera Settings and unchecking then rechecking the Widescreen box fixes this. There are problems with the unlock screen of AtrICS; it can be slow to appear when you press the power button and I have seen the screen turn on for a split second before turning right back off. If you let the phone go into a deep sleep, you may see a black screen for a minute, in my case the unlock screen did eventually appear. I've had one reboot right after closing a bunch of apps running in the background then trying to open a browser.
WiFi works great with AtrICS and mobile data feels faster than I remember.
My mobile gone hot after a few minute use AtrICS, and experienced network lost. The phone also hot with epinter 's version.
Restored TopSmart1.3. GB has the stablity I trust.
Deplov said:
My mobile gone hot after a few minute use AtrICS, and experienced network lost. The phone also hot with epinter 's version.
Restored TopSmart1.3. GB has the stablity I trust.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TopSmart is not supported anymore. You may want to move to a supported gb rom like MROM....
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
dhc243 said:
I switched from epinter's CM10 to AtrICS today and found it to be a fairly usable. You trade some features for others.
I prefer the interface of CM10 to AtrICS, but AtrICS feels really snappy thanks to the HWA. I'll probably get used to ICS after a while. The Camera works well, but, like others I noticed that after switching from the back camera to the front, there was some corruption on the right side of the screen. Going into Camera Settings and unchecking then rechecking the Widescreen box fixes this. There are problems with the unlock screen of AtrICS; it can be slow to appear when you press the power button and I have seen the screen turn on for a split second before turning right back off. If you let the phone go into a deep sleep, you may see a black screen for a minute, in my case the unlock screen did eventually appear. I've had one reboot right after closing a bunch of apps running in the background then trying to open a browser.
WiFi works great with AtrICS and mobile data feels faster than I remember.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does your camcorder autofocus very often (around 1-5 seconds)? Mine does with Somebody's CM10, I'm just wondering if it just me.
Whats the best CM10 JB ROM for the Rezound that is stable, fast and smooth and has very good batter life? Also, what would be a good Kernel to go with that ROM? Right now I'm on a CM9 ROM
Sent from my Rezound using xda app-developers app
They're all roughly equal in most areas. The instability with AOKP is gone in JB, so it's more about what you want out of the ROM. PAC has the most options, vanilla CM10 has the least (though still more than CM9), and AOKP is in the middle. Neo also has his customized versions of CM9 and AOKP if you like his stuff.
Stability wise, JB is overall a tick behind ICS AOSP, but not much (not enough to worry about in my book). I recommend pmem over ION if you are faced with the choice, and if you want to get the smoothest performance, check out one of the custom kernels (I hear Ermahgerd is good ).
I can vouch for Neo's AOSP jb Rom as far as speed and smoothness. Very few bugs at least for me (never use bluetooth) and I personally like snuzzos funky kernel (haven't tried the newer kernels like ermergerd or the oc kernel I have seen in the development section) but I don't think you can go wrong with any of the jb builds out there now because even a completely clean cm10 build without Linaro is pretty quick and definitely a very usable dd.
Sent from my Rezound using xda premium
Well I personally recommend my build.
Runs really well with no issues except for HD video which is a problem with all the JB ROMs.
GrayTheWolf said:
Well I personally recommend my build.
Runs really well with no issues except for HD video which is a problem with all the JB ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on Grey's CM10, since 1/9/13 and no random reboots super fast/smooth.
Sent from my Nexus 7 on CM10.1
its all about testing each one one. some say grays is better, some say neo, some say shrike. Each one has its pro's and con's. you wont get an answer on which one is the "best"
just jump in and try each one.
GrayTheWolf said:
Well I personally recommend my build.
Runs really well with no issues except for HD video which is a problem with all the JB ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u post a link to that? ill give it a try
izink said:
Can u post a link to that? ill give it a try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I win!
Here ya' go:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=35997827&postcount=1
GrayTheWolf said:
I win!
Here ya' go:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=35997827&postcount=1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried out your latest release of CM10 & im not sure if its just me but for some odd reason the only thing that's really getting under my skin is that I can hear my own echo during calls. Also, I wanted to point out that there are times when I have no signal for a good couple of minutes or so. Everything else is dandy from there on.
Thanks
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
ChuckZv2 said:
I tried out your latest release of CM10 & im not sure if its just me but for some odd reason the only thing that's really getting under my skin is that I can hear my own echo during calls. Also, I wanted to point out that there are times when I have no signal for a good couple of minutes or so. Everything else is dandy from there on.
Thanks
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no noise cancelling in our AOSP device code, so what come in the mic goes out of the earpiece. I don't hear it as a echo though. Someone had to point it out to me for me to even notice it, because to me, it sounds just like an old analog landline.
shrike1978 said:
There's no noise cancelling in our AOSP device code, so what come in the mic goes out of the earpiece. I don't hear it as a echo though. Someone had to point it out to me for me to even notice it, because to me, it sounds just like an old analog landline.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that's exactly what im referring to, I just wasnt sure how to describe it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
ChuckZv2 said:
I tried out your latest release of CM10 & im not sure if its just me but for some odd reason the only thing that's really getting under my skin is that I can hear my own echo during calls. Also, I wanted to point out that there are times when I have no signal for a good couple of minutes or so. Everything else is dandy from there on.
Thanks
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also the signal issue you are talking about is an issue with all AOSP ROMs. Enable airplane mode, wait a few seconds, and disable airplane mode and then your service should come back.
I am interested in trying out CM10.1 stable, but want to see if others have some feedback to share with the rest of us.
Some questions :
- Is it really "stable"? Any reboots?
- Any feature not working (bluetooth, tethering, etc...)
- Battery life?
- Compatibility with different custom kernels?
- Any issues with network (LTE/4G)?
Thank you in advance.
ddochi11 said:
I am interested in trying out CM10.1 stable, but want to see if others have some feedback to share with the rest of us.
Some questions :
- Is it really "stable"? Any reboots?
- Any feature not working (bluetooth, tethering, etc...)
- Battery life?
- Compatibility with different custom kernels?
- Any issues with network (LTE/4G)?
Thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still reboots
I don't use bluetooth nor therering
Only ran it for 24 hrs so I can't help you with battery cause you need to give it about a week or so before you can actually see how battery performs.
I use this kernel with no issues. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2326786
I din't notice any LTE/4G issue
Reboots for me too. Its like twice in past 48 hrs and it was random. Not too bad. A reboot to startup is only about 20 seconds.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Been running it since it dropped. I have had a couple of reboots. I have had some screen flickering. Tethering works. LTE= 28.05Mbps/Down & 12.26Mbps Up in Jackson MS
Out of all the roms I have tried I like it the best so far.
mrkavanagh said:
Been running it since it dropped. I have had a couple of reboots. I have had some screen flickering. Tethering works. LTE= 28.05Mbps/Down & 12.26Mbps Up in Jackson MS
Out of all the roms I have tried I like it the best so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
6/26 nightly seems more stable.
The "Enable keys notifications" (also known as BLN) does not work. It worked in 10.0.
On the positive side, they've added this feature called, "Ask for reminder snooze delay" which allows you to set the reminder time to something different than the default 5min (I just noticed this feature; not sure if it's totally brand new). I remember this feature was available on the Palm OS ten years ago and since then I haven't seen it on any mobile OS (not sure if BB had it) until now.
Poriotis said:
The "Enable keys notifications" (also known as BLN) does not work. It worked in 10.0.
On the positive side, they've added this feature called, "Ask for reminder snooze delay" which allows you to set the reminder time to something different than the default 5min (I just noticed this feature; not sure if it's totally brand new). I remember this feature was available on the Palm OS ten years ago and since then I haven't seen it on any mobile OS (not sure if BB had it) until now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BLN was taken out. If you want BLN you might want to try a different kernel.
Ltilt2 said:
BLN was taken out. If you want BLN you might want to try a different kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I know...I learned the hardway on another post
Same here with the reboots. It does get annoying but whatever. I might end up going back to Samsungs JB.
Anyways. Battery isn't so bad either. But I'm on a brand new battery finally after a year with the phone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
A friend of mine is going to work on CM10. Now that we have SGH-I717 source I'm sure it will be stable as CM9 with 0 reboots.
On latest root box with no reboots yet ..been over 12hrs
®••TB°×
shayneflashindaily said:
On latest root box with no reboots yet ..been over 12hrs
®••TB°×
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll get them. Go to YouTube and try watching a video, that's where it usually happens for me on any 4.2.2 Rom.
I'm running FJ's ICS AOSP Rom for the past 7 day with no issues. No reboots no matter what I throw at it.
Nope YouTube is fine for me ...ill probably get one eventually
®••TB°×
shayneflashindaily said:
Nope YouTube is fine for me ...ill probably get one eventually
®••TB°×
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.2.2 roms are like walking on egg shells.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Not for me really.. I've had a better expierence with custom 4.2.2 then our official 4.1.2. I've been lucky enough tk have stability with it
But yes gotta watch your steps
®••TB°×
shayneflashindaily said:
Not for me really.. I've had a better expierence with custom 4.2.2 then our official 4.1.2. I've been lucky enough tk have stability with it
But yes gotta watch your steps
®••TB°×[/QUOTE
Did you try PJB v2 with non OC kernel? Best rom ever with no issues at all.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I don't think so ... I flash a the time so I get lost on what I have flashed ..lol might give it a run
®••TB°×
shayneflashindaily said:
No I don't think so ... I flash a the time so I get lost on what I have flashed ..lol might give it a run
®••TB°×
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But try to get the one with default jb kernel. No OC kernel. The oc kernel has some bugs and the dev is working fixing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Ltilt2 said:
4.2.2 roms are like walking on egg shells.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
roms are like women, treat them right and they treat you right
and youtube is def not an issue, thats probably my most used app
but as i said on my other post a bit ago, everyones phone is different, and everyones phone use is different so we cant expect everyone to have the same results
this is why having the choice to flash anything and everything you want and finding what works best for you, makes android so desirable
Right on. Yeah when I Need a flash fix I'll consider it
®••TB°×