i have looked at various threads, including the FXP thread for the cm10.
I am really confused:
1) between the cm10 nightly or the fxp.
2)which version of cm10nightly or fxp( keeping in mind the bugs)
3) which kernel to use ( i need a kernel which can reduce bugs, save battery , and allow me to overclock)
4) how to make the walkman button work on these roms
please help me...
Please search before posting a new thread, all questions should be answered in other threads
1) There is no difference between the nightly and the FXP versions, but FXP will do more updates
2) Use the latest FXP cm10 release
3) Use the kernel from the zip or Mesa for cm10 or lupus or cm10 extended, the one you like :good:
4) I don't have a lww so I don't know but there should be a thread about this...
Touchscreen fix
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2068819
Related
I have an SK17A (Xperia Mini Pro) and am interested in installing FXP on it. I have some questions:
1) Will I notice improved performance over Sony ROM .58? Will most everything work as it should? Will an average user experience an improvement using FXP? Or will I be more frustrated with unknown issues?
2) I'm leaning towards the CM 7.2 ROM and not the CM 9.0 ROM based on what I have read in the developer forum as 9.0 seems very unstable and buggy at this point. Is this accurate?
3) There seem to be outstanding bugs in FXP based on CM 7.2 (keyboard issues, etc) that are easily fixable but have been around for a long time. Are they really easily fixable? Why haven't they been fixed in FXP 103?
4) Why do I need to install Sony ROM .42? Is the install not possible with .58?
5) Why is there no GAPPS download linked for the Xperia Mini Pro in the FXP thread?
6) If I proceed I assume I need to follow these general instructions:
-unlock boot using fastboot
-install CWM
-backup (Nandroid?)
-install FXP
-install GAPPS
Is this accurate?
Any answers to these questions would be greatly appreciated as I haven't seen them in my forum browsing and searching so far.
First of all NO ONE CAN COMPARE WITH STOCK ROM STABILITY ! In case of stability stock ROM is THE BEST ! And the performance ? With few uninstallation of unwanted software and freezing unwanted process you can make stock rom even more faster than CM is...
Second CM is in [development] its 100% not stable and fully working out of box as Stock ROM is....
and CM9 is highly......... unstable right now I have tested it on my XMP and i reflashed to stock ROM in just 15 min of look.
Third CM is not giving concern to problems as they have posted the keyboard fixes and other fixes before so they are just developing ROM for other things ...
You have to hit your head over forums to solve your each and every bug you found.
Fourth you need not to be on .42 to install CM7 you can do it on .58 too but i am sure if you are looking for fully functional os with stock features too then you gonna dislike CM.And i m saying this cause i have tested CM on .42 HU and .58 Global ...
Fifth Gapps are not included in CM due to copyright issues so you have to install them separately ...
You can find it on official cyanogen Mod site or other forums too
Sixth
Your steps are correct but after backup you have to add one step thats "Wipe data/factory reset and wipe cache partition" through ClockWorkMode recovery options
and after that install FXP ROM
Backup is not necessary its optional unless you want to restore your previous ROM as you left it before flashing CM.
You can make Nandroid backup using Clockworkmode recovery option "backup and restore" and the backups can be found on SD card in SDCARD/clockworkmode folder.And can be used to restore your previous ROM anytime.
Lastly i have tested hell out of each and every rom and finally i switched to stock one .58 ROM not .62 as its not global one.
And i have installed Mini Mode update to get widget panel in status bar and reboot option in power menu.
Used system app remover and titanuim backup to remove and freeze unwanted apps.
And also i have used all launcher and switched to stock one and the Xperia Arc launcher for stability and performance.
And Finally ... you have any querries ? comment back i will answer you and DO NOT Hesitate to Hit THANKS button if you are satisfied with my answer and do care for my time that i spent to answer your question to get your problems solved.
NOTE : I am not against any ROM or any developer and please note if stock ROM is for ******* then every handset is made for *******
Its not my words Moderator Please refer this
Arrogant and edited Comment
Original Comment
What is the difference between the MiniCMSandwish and FXP CM9 ROMs?
as i have noticed the main difference it is the customization options fxp is purely cm9 and minicmsandwich is like aokp here http://forum.aokp.co/page/news it is not that famous as cm9 but they have pretty nice customization options.
as of the kernel i haven't tried the last fxp 114 but kamarush rc3 kernel it's pretty nice it has a lot of governors and i/o schedulers to chose so i prefer it over fxp.
hope it helps!
I've tried both and MiniCM is much more stable. Also, due to supporting little ammount of devices and not being just a port-job, MiniCM it's far more optimized and suitable for daily usage.
i would also go with MiniCM, just waiting for the remaining bugs to be ironed out...
I used both ROMs and MiniCM is much more stable + it has less bugs. Also the battery life is much better then FXP's
miniCMSandwich is faster than FXP CM9.
I'm unable to install the MiniCMSandwis kernel
Hi, i'm unable to install the MiniCMSandwish kernel. plz help me. here is the thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1583255
I'm desperate to install miui, but the kernel is disappointing me. plzz plzz plzz help someone. I've posted the details there
Thanks
I prefer Mini CM, is very good
Hello, i flashed FXP cm9, flashed xKernel AOKP v3.1. And wifi wont turn on. Any ideas to fix it?
Flash embed kernel, not sirkays... AOKP means Android Open KANG Project.. no FXP, CM.... Next time post on Q&A Section..
Please post in the kernel's thread or in the Q&A thread stuck at the top of this forum. Thank you.
Is there a matrix of compatible baseband/kernel/ROM configurations? I tried using sirkay's boot_9.587c - ICS - xKernel v9.587-C, flykernel0_6, and flykernel0_8, but they all caused reboot cycle (bootloop) with CM9.1 FXP 142.
I had to extract boot.img out of the FXP zip file and flash that kernel to successfully load up CM 9.1. Incidentally that kernel version is 2.6.32.9-FXP. FWIW, I was upgrading from CM7.2 RC1, updated baseband from D-64 to G-77 before flashing kernel and then CM 9.1.
Ideally I want to use the fastest kernel out there compatible with CM9.1, and one with Linaro would be ideal. Any suggestions?
Am I missing something, there's a whole topic specifically for questions ... [HELP] Q&A Thread - MUST POST ALL QUESTIONS HERE [ 1 2 3 ... Last ]
...I'm new here but it seems some people either can't read or just cba.
Yes there is Q&A thread!
Anyway for CM based ROMs you have to use CM kernel otherwise you got bootloop... i've heard AOSP/AOKP is compatible but i never tried it myself
Folks;
running CM10 nightly builds on a WT19i / coconut device, so far all along with (Extended LWW Kernel for CM10) - this works well so I'm mostly happy, yet I still wonder whether it's just me or whether the actual boot.img that comes with CM10 nightly zips doesn't reliably work / boot on WT19i? What are your experiences?
Cheers and thanks,
Kristian
Thread can be closed. This is not relevant anymore.