I was looking through some other threads while I found this , they have mentioned our device(old version though), but at end of post OP have mentioned of the module working for kernal 3.4 of various devices, I was confused, that is why I am posting it here so that devs could have a look at it....
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2059411
If I'm not confused flar already brought this kernel to us a while ago
Sent from my HTC Desire X
RishiChhikkara said:
..... but at end of post OP have mentioned of the module working for kernal 3.4 of various devices, I was confused, that is why I am posting ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're confused because you don't write it full, it is not 3.4 but 3.4.10 and our DX kernel is 3.4.0
ckpv5 said:
You're confused because you don't write it full, it is not 3.4 but 3.4.10 and our DX kernel is 3.4.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
got it..
Related
[KERNEL] International FROST Kernel
NOTICE: This is COMPATIBLE with AOSP+ AND PureAosp JellyBean 4.3!
Just a statement regarding kernel source: The Kernel Source is of course covered under GPL version 2. Free software does NOT mean no work or time was spent working on it. I have donated a large sum of my free time to hack this kernel. If you use my modified kernel source in parts or in its entirety, I kindly ask you mention its origins and to send me a github pull request or PM whenever you find bugs or think you can help improve my kernel hack further. This way the entire community will truly benefit from the spirit of open source. Thank you !
THIS KERNEL IS CURRENTLY IN TESTING STATUS AND NOT BETA OR STABLE
*Features*
Quad Core is disabled by default, the X+ will now turn into a Dual core device (this can be changed with the performance governor)
Memory features are = to that of a 3.4 android kernel
more to come
XDA:DevDB Information
Frost, a Kernel for the HTC One X+
Contributors
Lloir, tombriden, corne, Maxwen, faux123
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2013-09-18
Last Updated 2013-09-30
Reserved
Reserved
Re: [KERNEL] SUPER WIP Pizza Kernel AT&T
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
don728871 said:
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the Linaro optimizations consist of both changes made to the Android Open Source Project (and CM) as well as a special toolchain that uses GCC 4.7. Because this is a kernel that is only offered in its source form, it is up to you to build it with the Linaro toolchain if you want to see the performance benefits that can arise from the Linaro optimizations. Also Lloir was somewhat specific in telling you not to make feature requests (I would consider Linaro such a request), so you might want to read his post a bit more closely next time.
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
fantik_m said:
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go here. This is the most up to date that i could find.
TheJokah said:
You can go....... This is the most up to date that i could find.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
fantik_m said:
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
TheJokah said:
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Lloir said:
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can take as long as you want. Nobody is trying to rush your fantastic work. Keep it up bro! :highfive:
[No message]
I just saw this : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=41115145
Will this affect us who love the JB ROMs as there is no Kernel Source for JB yet from hTC
It will affect us if we post JB ROMs which are not based on stock kernel without releasing the source code. So I think we should show up in the thread there and start gathering devices which face the same or a similar problem, so we can form a greater community against those manufacturers.
Yes it will affect, basically according to it your JB ROM is against rules
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
What I understand is, if using the stock boot.img and there is no source code for it, we have to remove the boot.img from the ROM as every users supposed to have the stock boot.img in their device.
I have no problem to remove the boot.img but the problem is we have many noobs which are not so sure with all the workaround and how to get things done
buggingme said:
Yes it will affect, basically according to it your JB ROM is against rules
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
ckpv5 said:
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
hcdav said:
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes obviously :laugh:
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Hi
ckpv5 said:
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good::goodont worry, you can unpack the stock boot.img. Just make some harmless changes in ramdisk and repack it. Then share the modified ramdisk on github along with zImage.
PM me if you need help on this.
Regards
Yasir
P.S. I know its a workaround, so some xda recognized dev is welcome to correct me if what i said above is wrong.:good::good:
I found This:
zelendel says:
"This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom."
So i guess, custom JB Rom by you is in danger of removal.
neXus PRIME said:
So i guess, custom JB Rom by you is in danger of removal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is ok if I remove the kernel.
It just that I don't have much time to redo the ROM.
I'll try to find time to make init.d support without ramdisk mod and post updated ROM.
If I don't have enough time, I can only upload a new ROM after I come back from vacation in mid June
hcdav said:
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats whole point of zelendels post, also dont like to hear that, i think i have to download roms I wanted to try next week in advance
Now the question is whether we can boot jb with our ics kernel or not.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
prototype-U said:
Now the question is whether we can boot jb with our ics kernel or not.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried. Used ics zimage with jb ram disk. Logcat is ok . Display never appears. Unlocks n vibrates. But you can't see anything
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Could it be possible just to use kernel from kernel.org, config from ICS HTC and adjusting this config a bit so that it works or is the kernel from android too much different from the linux kernel?
So i unnecessarily try to use prebuilt 3.4 kernel for cm10.1 because if it will working, i won't be able to share it -.-
atis112 said:
So i unnecessarily try to use prebuilt 3.4 kernel for cm10.1 because if it will working, i won't be able to share it -.-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your hard work is nonetheless appreciated, thank you for that and also your efforts towards organising the petition etc.
Ok, but if I'm not mistaken, as soon as HTC releases JB's kernel sources every ROM based on it will be "legal" or according to xda rules and not been removed right?
May be they're waiting for every country to get JB by OTA to release them (I believe only India doesn't have received it yet if I'm not mistaken).
By the way @atis112, did you get any answer from GPL?
Have you all a great day
Enviado desde mi HTC Desire X usando Tapatalk 2
gbueno6 said:
Ok, but if I'm not mistaken, as soon as HTC releases JB's kernel sources every ROM based on it will be "legal" or according to xda rules and not been removed right?
May be they're waiting for every country to get JB by OTA to release them (I believe only India doesn't have received it yet if I'm not mistaken).
By the way @atis112, did you get any answer from GPL?
Have you all a great day
Enviado desde mi HTC Desire X usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet. I think we need to wait some weeks for their answere.
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
zelendel said:
If a recovery is being posted for a device that has no kernel source then it is removed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ckpv5 said:
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be... So we should download the existing recoveries as fast as we can before they are deleted...
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda premium
ckpv5 said:
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Recovery working fine with ics kernel on JB too.
Hello, I wanted to ask you, who are a community of experts, to take off a question.
Why us with the galaxy s3 int we are still stuck at version 3.0.xx kernel? and for example users with galaxy s plus they have kernel versions 3.4
There are some incompatibilities?
is a problem of the processors Exynos?
Thanks for your attention
because you shouldn't compare versions in different devices.
PS read the sticky threads before posting. Qs go into Q&A
Because Samsung. Exynos or not, they keep certain kernel versions a long time.
On the other hand, if it works and works well, why upgrade?
Glebun said:
because you shouldn't compare versions in different devices.
PS read the sticky threads before posting. Qs go into Q&A
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the error (if there is any mod that can move the discussion in Q & A :good
Anyway I did this comparison because it was the first terminal that came to my mind,
why do you say that I should not compare your different terminals?
Theshawty said:
Because Samsung. Exynos or not, they keep certain kernel versions a long time.
On the other hand, if it works and works well, why upgrade?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, no, it works well for what it is just my question on this fact because you can get to a kernel upgrade (perhaps in the end it does not change anything)
Volpe92 said:
No, no, it works well for what it is just my question on this fact because you can get to a kernel upgrade (perhaps in the end it does not change anything)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernels usually have a higher linux version.
Theshawty said:
Custom kernels usually have a higher linux version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's right! ... But also the various Temasek, Googy, Siyah etc. to s3 are stationary to that version 3.0.xx, for what I wondered why even the custom kernel does not make a version upgrade
Volpe92 said:
It's right! ... But also the various Temasek, Googy, Siyah etc. to s3 are stationary to that version 3.0.xx, for what I wondered why even the custom kernel does not make a version upgrade
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The US S3's have the 3.4 kernel now I believe. They are all Qualcomm-equipped devices, though.
Theshawty said:
The US S3's have the 3.4 kernel now I believe. They are all Qualcomm-equipped devices, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh .... then it is assumed to be due to the processor Exynos and its sources to blame? : (
We are forced to keep up with updates to Samsung?
If so I put his soul in peace because you are no longer heard from those sources : Angel:
Volpe92 said:
Oh .... then it is assumed to be due to the processor Exynos and its sources to blame? : (
We are forced to keep up with updates to Samsung?
If so I put his soul in peace because you are no longer heard from those sources : Angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so, yeah.
Yes they're different kernel strains.
3.0.85 is the latest in one strain used in aosp (3rd July) released the same day as 3.4.52
https://www.kernel.org
They run in parallel
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
rootSU said:
Yes they're different kernel strains.
3.0.85 is the latest in one strain used in aosp (3rd July) released the same day as 3.4.52
https://www.kernel.org
They run in parallel
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for site
you see that needs to stay that way ...
In fact, I now mount the Temasek 3.0.85 great kernel
Last thing: but essentially have no difference the two versions?
Volpe92 said:
Thank you for site
you see that needs to stay that way ...
In fact, I now mount the Temasek 3.0.85 great kernel
Last thing: but essentially have no difference the two versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.4 is supposedly better.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
3.4 over 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 introduces bugfixes (obviously) but more important, it introduces new "features".
I put features in " because often a new feature will be a hardware driver or a new protocol or method.
However, these new features wont be relevant to all hardware sets. For example, I don't need my s3 kernel to provide support for the latest broadcom Gigabit pci-x network card or update chipset drivers for the intel i7-540M laptop processors....
In 3.0.x we get the same bug fixes. There's really no point updating the base version if it doesn't include a feature we need.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
rootSU said:
3.4 over 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 introduces bugfixes (obviously) but more important, it introduces new "features".
I put features in " because often a new feature will be a hardware driver or a new protocol or method.
However, these new features wont be relevant to all hardware sets. For example, I don't need my s3 kernel to provide support for the latest broadcom Gigabit pci-x network card or update chipset drivers for the intel i7-540M laptop processors....
In 3.0.x we get the same bug fixes. There's really no point updating the base version if it doesn't include a feature we need.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have centered the answer : D this is what I wanted.
As you say you "run in parallel" : Highfive:
Thank you very much for your reply and to all those who responded
Volpe92 said:
As you say you "run in parallel"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. From the link I posted on the last page, kernels 3.0, 3.2 and 3.4 are longterm support, meaning these kernels will continue to be updated for some time.
I paraphrased the title a little bit. I was looking through the different kernels available for the i9300 and noticed all of kernels only use up to Linux kernel 3.0.101, why is that?
Gold_Diesel said:
I paraphrased the title a little bit. I was looking through the different kernels available for the i9300 and noticed all of kernels only use up to Linux kernel 4.0.101, why is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As much i know the latest Linux kernel released few days back(4 December 2013) is Linux Kernel 3.12.3..
suyash1629 said:
As much i know the latest Linux kernel released few days back(4 December 2013) is Linux Kernel 3.12.3..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, sorry I meant 3.0.101. I'll edit the first post now.
Just like the title says. I've been searching for a while now with no luck. Can one point me in the right direction? Thanks!
acompres said:
Just like the title says. I've been searching for a while now with no luck. Can one point me in the right direction? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
viper has its own custom kernal or atleast sense 5 does.
There's only 2 custom kernels for sense roms, one sense 4 and one sense 5 and they are not currently supported anymore. They are crpalmers sense kernel (sense 4) and beastmode by zarboz (sense 5) You can find them in the developement threads. Any other kernels such as joelz or viper are basically stock kernels.
xlxcrossing said:
There's only 2 custom kernels for sense roms, one sense 4 and one sense 5 and they are not currently supported anymore. They are crpalmers sense kernel (sense 4) and beastmode by zarboz (sense 5) You can find them in the developement threads. Any other kernels such as joelz or viper are basically stock kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thought cr had sense 5 kernal also
thayl0 said:
thought cr had sense 5 kernal also
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. I contacted him about developing one and he stated that he he used aosp so he had no intention of producing another sense kernel.
xlxcrossing said:
Nope. I contacted him about developing one and he stated that he he used aosp so he had no intention of producing another sense kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Technically, that was about producing one without kernel source. When HTC releases kernel source code, I'll probably build a version with it unless it requires some major reworking.
crpalmer said:
Technically, that was about producing one without kernel source. When HTC releases kernel source code, I'll probably build a version with it unless it requires some major reworking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for clarifying. It should be noted for people wondering such as the OP in this case that a true custom kernel requires source to be released. I'm not sure which features zarboz put in beastmode 3.0.
xlxcrossing said:
Thanks for clarifying. It should be noted for people wondering such as the OP in this case that a true custom kernel requires source to be released. I'm not sure which features zarboz put in beastmode 3.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zarboz made some display changes to make the source code we have work with 4.2.2 ROMs. Without, the display doesn't work at all.
crpalmer said:
Zarboz made some display changes to make the source code we have work with 4.2.2 ROMs. Without, the display doesn't work at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see, the lesson here being if source isn't released then you're stuck with modified stock kernels.