Related
Hi guys wondering who has tested multiple kernals on project v. I have used the stock and overstock and prefer overstock. Any input on bali, dragon, or any others?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
depends what you want, battery or speed
Balance[of both, but more battery QUOTE=kyle51;14780722]depends what you want, battery or speed[/QUOTE]
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Mostly battery life
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
brianhaskell said:
Balance[of both, but more battery QUOTE=kyle51;14780722]depends what you want, battery or speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App[/QUOTE]
could try overstock 2.4.1 then OC to 1.2GHz, havent been on project v but my battery was ok with that on other roms
or could try dragonmodz and OC to 1.2GHz, that might have better battery than overstock, havent tried it but people on his thread say they have quite decent battery going up to 1.5GHz
just play around with them for a few days each, see which works best
I'm running TigersBlood3.22 OC to 1.2Ghz and I'm gettin average battle life.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Thanks for the advice. How's tigers blood not overclocked?
kawika said:
I'm running TigersBlood3.22 OC to 1.2Ghz and I'm gettin average battle life.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
DragonMODz kernels have the best battery I've experienced. Followed by Bali 1.8.6UV.
Sent from my SGH-T959
IMHO, DragonModz are awesome kernels, they have all flavors. They have the "Standard" version that its the intermediate between performance and battery life, then they have the ULP version that boosts the battery life, but takes a little of the performance, and last but not least, they have the OC version wich is oriented to performance...battery life is ok with this one, does not suck, but it isn't as great as the ULP/Standard version or Bali's UV.
I have tried several kernels, and i think that my phone was the happiest with DragonMODz.
i have found, for my phone at least
bali UV = great battery life ( 15 hours ) moderate use
bulet 1.48 = great performace ( 21 mflops & 7 hours ) moderate use
overstock 2.4.x = good balance
djluis48 said:
IMHO, DragonModz are awesome kernels, they have all flavors. They have the "Standard" version that its the intermediate between performance and battery life, then they have the ULP version that boosts the battery life, but takes a little of the performance, and last but not least, they have the OC version wich is oriented to performance...battery life is ok with this one, does not suck, but it isn't as great as the ULP/Standard version or Bali's UV.
I have tried several kernels, and i think that my phone was the happiest with DragonMODz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to add that im an moderate/intense user. Im on WiFi 37% of the time, i use lots of intesive GPU using apps like Gameloft's HD games, N64/Gba emulation, i listen to music around 46% of the time and im using Project V until GB gets fully functional (GPS) wich seems to be very soon.
IMO, the best option if you want great battery life and great performance is to buy a 3000mah battery and use an OCed Kernel.
Thanks bro great info. I appreciate all the help with this thread!
djluis48 said:
IMHO, DragonModz are awesome kernels, they have all flavors. They have the "Standard" version that its the intermediate between performance and battery life, then they have the ULP version that boosts the battery life, but takes a little of the performance, and last but not least, they have the OC version wich is oriented to performance...battery life is ok with this one, does not suck, but it isn't as great as the ULP/Standard version or Bali's UV.
I have tried several kernels, and i think that my phone was the happiest with DragonMODz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I ended up flashing bali uv with no overclock and it seems to be killer...thanks everyone
adamcooks said:
i have found, for my phone at least
bali UV = great battery life ( 15 hours ) moderate use
bulet 1.48 = great performace ( 21 mflops & 7 hours ) moderate use
overstock 2.4.x = good balance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bali UV has the best battery life I've seen , after 16-17 hours of moderate use (WiFi, calls, 3d games) i still have on average 40-45% juice.
I've tried different kernels and I have found that being overclocked has hurt my battery life. I think that this phone is snappy enough without being overclocked to 2ghz. Have people found the best battery life with the stock kernel? I'm still new to this...any help and opinions will be very appreciated!
So far I'm doing better than stock on the viperRom setup
Sent from my 3DVO with the XDA app
The problem is you're OC'd to 2 ghz. Most people have reported this as an overkill and it really isn't too stable, if you use set cpu and set up some profiles you will get great battery life. The processor in our phones is clocked at 1.5 to begin with, im currently on joel's rom with the remix kernel oc'd to 1.7 and getting amazing battery life, but i wasn't getting good battery life with the viper rom. I mean everyone's experience is different.
Just find something that works for you, tweaking to your liking is part of the fun with android man!
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
lpjzfan2005 said:
The problem is you're OC'd to 2 ghz. Most people have reported this as an overkill and it really isn't too stable, if you use set cpu and set up some profiles you will get great battery life. The processor in our phones is clocked at 1.5 to begin with, im currently on joel's rom with the remix kernel oc'd to 1.7 and getting amazing battery life, but i wasn't getting good battery life with the viper rom. I mean everyone's experience is different.
Just find something that works for you, tweaking to your liking is part of the fun with android man!
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the lengthy response man..I'll def try messing around with set cpu. I've only ran the phone with the way the kernels come after being flashed
bo5ibbs said:
Thanks for the lengthy response man..I'll def try messing around with set cpu. I've only ran the phone with the way the kernels come after being flashed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First things you should do is set a screen off profile. That will be awesome for your battery life. And you can get set cpu here for free on xda or get it in the market to support the dev
And we're here to help man!
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Would like to thank all the Beta Testers of my Elite kernel for Nexus 7. They have allowed me to see how low voltages can go in the device. Also, credits go to _motley, fosser2, Cpajuste, pershoot, catch1571, pinoyto, masterg0g0, morfic etc...and to who ever I missed. Biggest thanks to my wife for giving me the chance to do this.
UPDATED 10/19/2012
1. This kernel is updated to utilize the latest 4.1.2 by Google for Nexus 7
2. Same voltages applied as before to extend your battery life
3. Same speed of CPU and GPU
4. Same warning as below.
Here is the link
https://rapidshare.com/files/1618065280/ClemsynExtremeBatterySaver4.1.2.zip
Or the one in the button
Please reward my hard work by clicking on the DONATE TO ME button under my sig or donate a Hard Drive with at least 60GB space to make it easier for me to compile. THANKS!!
SOURCE: Compressing at the moment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now to the kernel
This kernel is basically a STOCK kernel with voltage lowered to the lowest possible settings to EXTEND battery life. No tweaks other than voltages
This are for Nexus 7 users who care more about BATTERY life and LESS HEAT than overclocking.
Here are the changes.
1. Undervolting is NOT POSSIBLE in this kernel. Undervolting has been done by me in the kernel
2. CPU voltages are default to maintain stability but it shines in undervolting the other aspects of the device, ie: pll_c, memory, emc, host1x, GPU 2d/3d bus etc...
2. vdd_core/vdd_rail decreased voltage from 1.2 to 1.1mv
3. emc, pll_c, host1x, GPU decreased from 1.2 to 1.1mv
4. Compiled using Linaro Toolchain
5. Speed of GPU 2d/3d/vde etc set at 400 mhz (close to stock of 416)
6. Backlight default decreased to 5 for better reading at night and decrease battery consumption
Here is the link OR CLICK ON THE BOTTOM
https://rapidshare.com/files/3373858690/ClemsynELITEBatterySaverStock.zip
WARNING:
Due to aggressive undervolting of this kernel. It might not work with your device. So please be very familiar with backup/restore of your device
** If you like my work. Please do not hesitate to click on the DONATE TO ME button and add to my Nexus7 fund and reward my work. It will be appreciated THANK YOU.
git https://github.com/clemsyn/Grouper
I will use this as my daily driver when I'm not testing kernels.
Edit: I just realized that this is stock, I though it was like the previous 1.5 one of the series. Would you be updating on that regard in the future?
Edit2: Temp wont reach 40.0 C 37.0 C being the mac with none to light use.
Edit3: So has anyone tried to see if init.d support is there?
very nice!
You need to fix the units used in your op
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Nice job great for people who want their battery to last awhile longer
How would this be performance wise lol
morfic said:
You need to fix the units used in your op
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
krazeecracker said:
How would this be performance wise lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
performance will be same as stock kernel. Longer battery life.
Running this now thanks for the work. Right off the bat like the lower brightness.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Oh Clemsyn, always pushing it to the extreme. Gotta love it. Haha battery saving though?! I always expect the opposite from you Thanks and keep up the awesome work. I might give this a try
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
I'll post some battery pics in a few days
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Just flashed on top of Paranoid Android @ 75% battery. Plan to use my tablet heavily for some streaming this evening and I will report back on battery.
Will this kernel allow tweaking in the style of this thread?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1855100
MyronJ906 said:
Oh Clemsyn, always pushing it to the extreme. Gotta love it. Haha battery saving though?! I always expect the opposite from you Thanks and keep up the awesome work. I might give this a try
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know...I'm not used to it...I guess its part of aging process
z1gackly said:
Will this kernel allow tweaking in the style of this thread?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1855100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it works with the stock kernel, it will work with this.
Probably not then, you still have to modify the code to enable init.d support in AOSP source. Will give this a go anyway for the battery saving. Thanks for your work.
I will test it and put the results in my 'Best Kernel' thread. Very interesting...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
sundar2012 said:
Just flashed on top of Paranoid Android @ 75% battery. Plan to use my tablet heavily for some streaming this evening and I will report back on battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, would be very interested in your result
bcvictory said:
I will test it and put the results in my 'Best Kernel' thread. Very interesting...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, would be very interested in your result too
Thanks you for your hard work. I will test it soon
I got 7 hours, 20 minutes on my battery test. Check my thread for more info.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Post here your battery & benchmark performance! I'm waiting for new kernels to improve battery/processing performance
Scores obtained with stock rooted Rom
asertyio said:
Post here your battery & benchmark performance! I'm waiting for new kernels to improve battery/processing performance
Scores obtained with stock rooted Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my goodness ur mob is really cool
ma HTC DX battery stand only for 4hrs :/ when i use it :/
asertyio said:
Post here your battery & benchmark performance! I'm waiting for new kernels to improve battery/processing performance
Scores obtained with stock rooted Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery stats are fake, so...
Here's mine...
Sent from my HTC Desire X using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda premium
On my DX Android OS eating about one fourth of the battery while the other values are similar to yours and the device spending about 80 percent of time in deep sleep. Do I have to set anything to get better results?
Hello all!
I hope some of you like numbers as much as I do. I thought I should run my handset through a series of benchmarks in order to see just what the dev community has unlocked within this device.
Here we go:
Overclocked to 1.72 GHZ - Governor: Performance
Cubed Kernel 1.2.5
Genome ROM v2
BenchmarkPi:
Average of 5 - 337.4 ms
Best of 5 - 224 ms
Linpack:
Average of 5 - 463.059 MFLOPS
Best of 5 - 510.427 MFLOPS
ANTUTU:
Average of 5 - 18396
Best of 5 - 19270
Vellamo:
HTML5 -- 1737
Metal -- 636
Quadrant:
Average of 3 - 8131
Best of 3 - 8364
These results put the Droid DNA well ahead of pretty much all competition for the next few months. I imagine things will get even better once AOSP Roms make their way to this amazing device.
So - does anyone with a higher overclock have any stats? I would be interested in seeing how well this processor scales.
That quadrant seems low. I've gotten 8254 stock unrooted.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
sent from my beastly powered DNA using Tapatalk 2
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
getting there...
DSB and UKB's latest
System Tuner Pro to take it up a notch or two
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Ndaoud360 said:
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmarks usually don't turn on all the cores. At least that's what I think because I turn all my cores on and all on the performance governor and I get around the 9500's at 1.83Ghz.
I've received over 9k quadrant and 500+ linpack with 1.5ghz. Strangely, powersave gave me better scores than performance (stock kernel)
On cubed kernel 1.5ghz performance = 587
http://imgur.com/u4N5w
Whats the next step in mobile processing? How fast or powerful can they be?
iOSh8er said:
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
23345 cpu! Holy fruck!
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I love this phone
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By the way, while my phone is stable on these settings it drains my battery too fast to be usable. I leave the cores set to 1890, but as long as I don't have the setting on "performance" I actually see decent battery life. My quadrant drops into the upper 9k's though without the governor set to performance.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are the chosen one my friend. No, but really... dayyuummmnnn!
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
tbukkos said:
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. I could probably have a done a little more tweaking on the I/O score. The kernel used for this does support GPU OC, but I haven't found a tool that I feel comfortable using to OC the GPU yet. That and probably more realistically: I moved on to conquering other things once I managed the 10k score that was my goal.