I have tested a couple of ROM for the past week and I got mixed results in Antutu Benchmark. I managed to get a maximum of 42000 and a minimum of 33000 points in Antutu.
I am asking for whoever got over 42000 to let us know which ROM did he used and what Kernel version. Also if it is possible the performance of the battery under that specific ROM.
Thanks
pchip2012 said:
I have tested a couple of ROM for the past week and I got mixed results in Antutu Benchmark. I managed to get a maximum of 42000 and a minimum of 33000 points in Antutu.
I am asking for whoever got over 42000 to let us know which ROM did he used and what Kernel version. Also if it is possible the performance of the battery under that specific ROM.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
benchmarks arent a indication of how fast a rom feels
try some roms and see what you like the feel of
and yes performance under battery is posible, just depends on your rom config and your personal root user settings for some things
pchip2012 said:
I have tested a couple of ROM for the past week and I got mixed results in Antutu Benchmark. I managed to get a maximum of 42000 and a minimum of 33000 points in Antutu.
I am asking for whoever got over 42000 to let us know which ROM did he used and what Kernel version. Also if it is possible the performance of the battery under that specific ROM.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fastest ROM for Xperia Z2 is its stock ROM. The .314 version.
V4LKyR said:
Fastest ROM for Xperia Z2 is its stock ROM. The .314 version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock, debloated and odexed (not deodexed - odex files are very important if you neee speed).
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
funky0308 said:
Stock, debloated and odexed (not deodexed - odex files are very important if you neee speed).
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know what those 2 words after "stock" mean, but yeah. When you fresh install the stock ROM, is it debloated and deodexed on its own? Or are those some seperated complicated processes that I have to do? Like debloating the ROM first and then deodexing it or deodexing the ROM first and then debloating it. Yeah?
He's saying not to deodex. Your best thing to do is take stock rom, root it, debloat it (twitter, Facebook and whatever else, there's a thread about bloat here somewhere). If you don't know what odex is do not touch it, for the most part you only want to deodex if you need to modify the framework.
I did try a antutu benchmark, but each time was different, so the score is not all
Liquid smooth is by far the fastest operating ROM I've ever used on any device. Transitions happen so fast it's like apps are slapping you in the face! As far as processing things, that's always going to be the same on any ROM.
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Free mobile app
Related
Hello everybody, I'm opening the thread just to read opinions from you all about the kernels that are currently available.
The one I've been using is void #echo, which in my humble opinion with the combination of a tweaked deadline scheduler and a lionheart governor provides great performance, battery life and minimum lag whatsoever.
I do understand that it depends on needs which shall be used, however, I would like to know which one to you guys works smoother and provides better performance / battery life.
I always aim for performance over battery life (I didn't buy a SGSII to get poor performance )
In terms of battery life, I can get it up to 22~23 hours on battery, using WCDMA only / HSPA+ during day and enabling airplane mode during night.
Fast Dormancy disabled and deep sleep working correctly (XXKL1).
I don't like the complexity of siyah and to be good on batt you have to tweak it more with UV and thing like that ,wish is not my style to make trying/errors on my brand new 600$phone !
I tried speed mod wish is very great actually with great overall perform
void echo is the one Im trying right now ! since 2 days its feel very strong and good on battery with good performance on games without getting the phone very hot
neak is good but its more a copy/past of the overall coders over wish is good in one sense but its a bit laggy in game with lucrative mod but defenatly one of my favorite kernel out there ! Im waiting for 1.3 to let simone correct some bugs
Siyah is the tweakers' heaven. You can fine tune every last bit of your phone.
I personally love void, it feels very fast and has good battery life.
I tried NEAK for a short time and it seemed fine but quite many report lag in games(using on demand governor seems to fix it though).
Thanks for the feedback guys, I'm waiting for N.E.A.K 1.3x too
lsv-1 said:
Thanks for the feedback guys, I'm waiting for N.E.A.K 1.3x too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as one of the posts above said siyah is the tweakers heaven..haha trust me i never used it before as i thought it was to complicated. but once you have done your reading and read other peoples posts and what they do to get the best out of the kernel you have a winner...all the rest look good i am not saying anything bad but for me from now on any rom i use siyah is coming with me due to the fact it has so many options to it and so much i can play around with i am in heaven
hope that helps...oh and on a side note i have been tempted to upgrade to a different rom but the current base i am using and with the kernel i have and the settings that i am using the only time i will actually jump ship is if one there is a stable cm9 out there by the amazing team hacksung. Two if Gokhanmoral does a siyah kernel for cm9 which i think will be when kernel sources are made available and three cause i have already my voodoo app all configured with my poweramp player to get the best sound possible i would be foolish to make the step at this moment of time...
So my advice for battery speedmod if you are not into tweaking alot with voltages and clock frequencies and if you want the best of both worlds then siyah
siyah 2.6.4.
Neo3000 said:
as one of the posts above said siyah is the tweakers heaven..haha trust me i never used it before as i thought it was to complicated. but once you have done your reading and read other peoples posts and what they do to get the best out of the kernel you have a winner...all the rest look good i am not saying anything bad but for me from now on any rom i use siyah is coming with me due to the fact it has so many options to it and so much i can play around with i am in heaven
hope that helps...oh and on a side note i have been tempted to upgrade to a different rom but the current base i am using and with the kernel i have and the settings that i am using the only time i will actually jump ship is if one there is a stable cm9 out there by the amazing team hacksung. Two if Gokhanmoral does a siyah kernel for cm9 which i think will be when kernel sources are made available and three cause i have already my voodoo app all configured with my poweramp player to get the best sound possible i would be foolish to make the step at this moment of time...
So my advice for battery speedmod if you are not into tweaking alot with voltages and clock frequencies and if you want the best of both worlds then siyah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great feedback bro, I tried Siyah in the past but honestly when I used it I didn't know there were parameters to tweak (didn't check the REF documentation LOL).
Do you get smoother behavior / better performance / higher benchmark scores tweaking the parameters? In quadrant I get around 4604 with void.echo.
as my "personal" opinion...
since i instaled V3RTR3MA.V.4.0 rom, i've been using void#echo
couldn't ask for more its fast and stable... nothing too complicated and i could get 8186 in the quadrant benchmark... a really great kernel...
void echo.By far best kernel for common user,who doesn't want to do all kind of tweaks&stuff.By default is great.If you are into a litle tweaking, you can OC and UV without any issues.
I used it since it was released.No issues at all, battery friendly, great performance.
Trully a KISS principle follower.
My personal advice to all,avoid all roms&kernels that are heavily customized and have alot of useless "tweakes" and scripts on them.The more things on it, more chances of breaking up.
Look for simple builds,as close as it can be to stock,eye candy is not performance.
Jkay makes great themes wich you can apply to the rom.
Phyxsyus said:
as my "personal" opinion...
since i instaled V3RTR3MA.V.4.0 rom, i've been using void#echo
couldn't ask for more its fast and stable... nothing too complicated and i could get 8186 in the quadrant benchmark... a really great kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WoW that sounds nice, if you turn off RAWR what's the score?
kimitza said:
Trully a KISS principle follower.
My personal advice to all,avoid all roms&kernels that are heavily customized and have alot of useless "tweakes" and scripts on them.The more things on it, more chances of breaking up.
100% agree most of the battery better and greater speed for these kernels is actually unproven and just advertising bumf .
I have used the kernels listed in the topic and in each case stock kernel has benchmarked better using multiple tests .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kimitza said:
void echo.By far best kernel for common user,who doesn't want to do all kind of tweaks&stuff.By default is great.If you are into a litle tweaking, you can OC and UV without any issues.
I used it since it was released.No issues at all, battery friendly, great performance.
Trully a KISS principle follower.
My personal advice to all,avoid all roms&kernels that are heavily customized and have alot of useless "tweakes" and scripts on them.The more things on it, more chances of breaking up.
Look for simple builds,as close as it can be to stock,eye candy is not performance.
Jkay makes great themes wich you can apply to the rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with your opinion, and that's the reason why I use only Sammy Stock ROMs
I've flashed a number of roms and kernels in the past few months since May, best combination for me is usually a near stock rom, plus a stable kernel like Speedmod, they just work without needing any tweaking apart from custom set up that's it.
I don't generally like the number of tweaks in some roms but each to their own.
I find stock fine and fluid and stable enough without much problems.
Yeah..i get 6500+ without rawr and oc to 1600.you forget one thing,ALL other kernels have tweaked I/O scheduler enabled. Knzo says very clear in his thread.it's a way to cheat,that's why this tweak is not default on his kernel.
About rom,look for odexed.tornado2 by brotuck is one of the best around(odexed,pretty much stock,only useless apps removed from it).combined with jkay theme and coid echo...my s2 flies
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
kimitza said:
Yeah..i get 6500+ without rawr and oc to 1600.you forget one thing,ALL other kernels have tweaked I/O scheduler enabled. Knzo says very clear in his thread.it's a way to cheat,that's why this tweak is not default on his kernel.
About rom,look for odexed.tornado2 by brotuck is one of the best around(odexed,pretty much stock,only useless apps removed from it).combined with jkay theme and coid echo...my s2 flies
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the suggestion dude! I'll take a look to it! Beside the removal of stock apps, what tweaks are included to achieve that score?
Best kernel so far for me is hardcore's speedmod.
Fast, first time I broke the 6000 barrier on Antutu benchmark without overclock. And great battery life, one full day + charging only by the end of day two, with normal use.
Normal use for me is making phone calls, surfing web and playing games sometimes, not more than 20min per "session". Turning wifi and 3g off when phone on standby. And switching to airplane mode overnight.
And yes I tried other kernels....
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
lsv-1 said:
Thanks for the suggestion dude! I'll take a look to it! Beside the removal of stock apps, what tweaks are included to achieve that score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None.i dont flash a rom for benchmark scores.i flash it for how it works.those benchmarks cand be tricked,but whats the point?what do you preffer?a rom&kernel with high results on tests,but moves like crap,laggy,fc's with high battery drain or a phone that is snappy,smooth,fast,great battery life and works properly?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
kimitza said:
None.i dont flash a rom for benchmark scores.i flash it for how it works.those benchmarks cand be tricked,but whats the point?what do you preffer?a rom&kernel with high results on tests,but moves like crap,laggy,fc's with. high battery drain or a phone that is snappy,smooth,fast,great battery life and works properly?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't get me wrong, I do prefer all that, I just wanted to know what things are changed in those roms to get that performance.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I have been using void echo kernel these past few days. But I switched to Speedmode because of an issue. My phone gets very hot once I backup my nand on CWM. Also sometimes when I play games. Do you guys have this issue too?
rhai said:
I have been using void echo kernel these past few days. But I switched to Speedmode because of an issue. My phone gets very hot once I backup my nand on CWM. Also sometimes when I play games. Do you guys have this issue too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
= high CPU usage .
jje
hey people and good day!
im new to s3 just bought it today and im still having the galaxy note in my hand
but itv very big for me
and i feel the changing with smoothness the s3 is incredible smooth
so my question is,should i root it and put custom rom?
because in my notre i change almost every 3 days the rom because the note little bit lag
but here with s3 its looks goddes with everything
so should i do it it will be better with the custom roms or it will make it more lag then the stock??????
bubu23 said:
hey people and good day!
im new to s3 just bought it today and im still having the galaxy note in my hand
but itv very big for me
and i feel the changing with smoothness the s3 is incredible smooth
so my question is,should i root it and put custom rom?
because in my notre i change almost every 3 days the rom because the note little bit lag
but here with s3 its looks goddes with everything
so should i do it it will be better with the custom roms or it will make it more lag then the stock??????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really depends on the rom and kernel you are using. At the moment I am on Omega 4.2 (going to update to 5.0 now) and SiyahKernel 1.0 over clocked at 1.6GHz. I find the S3 very smooth, more compared to stock. The stock rom is pretty smooth but if you feel that there is a lag you could always install a custom rom and kernel. With the SiyahKernel you can overclock upto 1.8GHz.
FIVE86 said:
It really depends on the rom and kernel you are using. At the moment I am on Omega 4.2 (going to update to 5.0 now) and SiyahKernel 1.0 over clocked at 1.6GHz. I find the S3 very smooth, more compared to stock. The stock rom is pretty smooth but if you feel that there is a lag you could always install a custom rom and kernel. With the SiyahKernel you can overclock upto 1.8GHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is even the point of overclocking this phone with the software available now? There is really no need. I've actually used SetCPU to downclock my CPU when battery gets below 40% to save battery, and even more at 20%.. and it still runs fine.You're just wasting battery and shortening the life of your phone.
Stock is smooth as poop, ask yourself if you're happy with smoothness and speed.. Why risk to get weird bugs like camera fc all of the sudden etc?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Agree you need to read what the custom rom is offering in real terms not hype and decide . bear in mind that every custom rom built claims to be faster smoother saves your battery and will fly you to your destination in first class .Few say hey this rom is slower than stock as i have messed with stuff and cut and pasted a few themes .
jje
PS saying that i am in the process of flashing a stock rom purely to test out my recovery procedures for getting back to a clean stock rom .
I have a question about installing a custom ROM, will it wipe your device after installing the custrom ROM? (I want to install the latest firmware AF2) TIA
bordikun said:
I have a question about installing a custom ROM, will it wipe your device after installing the custrom ROM? (I want to install the latest firmware AF2) TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope.
bortak said:
What is even the point of overclocking this phone with the software available now? There is really no need. I've actually used SetCPU to downclock my CPU when battery gets below 40% to save battery, and even more at 20%.. and it still runs fine.You're just wasting battery and shortening the life of your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By doing underclock is battery save notic able? Will it harm cpu as it always underclock and then again back to normal?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
hisee said:
By doing underclock is battery save notic able? Will it harm cpu as it always underclock and then again back to normal?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, underclocking won't harm it, having a massive overclock for most of the phone's life will probably shorten it's lifespan though.
Hey guys, we already know that the Xperia Z ultra is a beast, and in benchmarks its the second fastest phone going
But... what if you wanted it even faster?
I found this thread a while ago http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2546120
Its a qualacomm optimized patch that makes your phone run faster, its in the Nexus 4 thread BUT this was actually ported from the Moto X If im not mistaken, Could it work with our phones? I dont see why not, its a SD800...
Let me know if you go ahead and flash it and see a difference or if it only works on nexus's devices, again the Moto X isnt a nexus device...
Maybe it could worth if you have the GPE Z Ultra or the GPE Ultra Rom
J
I'm on it. Will report back soon.
EDIT: LOL, give me some more time. I just noticed that i don't have recovery installed. I'm on GPe so it'll only take a minute.
EDIT 2: Flashed and my Ultra still works. Running Antutu now.
EDIT 3: LOL. GPe doesn't seem to score well in Antutu, and i scored only 26000 points last week when i tried it. I tried it again after flashing the files, and guess what? 42000 points. Yes i'm joking, i got 25000, so i guess Sony have already used some newer bionic and dalvik libs (that thread is older than the GPe after all). Well, i'm reverting. It works though, so there's that.
Ah, that's a shame :/ at least they work !
What happens when your on gpe and you put art on instead of dalvik does it make a difference in benchmarks ?
J
Sent from my C6833 using xda app-developers app
LordManhattan said:
EDIT 3: LOL. GPe doesn't seem to score well in Antutu, and i scored only 26000 points last week when i tried it. I tried it again after flashing the files, and guess what? 42000 points. Yes i'm joking, i got 25000, so i guess Sony have already used some newer bionic and dalvik libs (that thread is older than the GPe after all). Well, i'm reverting. It works though, so there's that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, that matches about what I got. In performance settings I don't (Or rather, didn't) I notice an issue, so it must be something with how Antutu does things.
Alright, so i've spent the last three hours trying to revive my Ultra. After i wanted to revert the libs, i reflashed GPe as told in that thread, but what i forgot was that stock GPe doesn't include recovery (but the new tweaked version does), so my Ultra got stuck on the Sony logo, and i didn't have recovery. To make it worse, my computer wouldn't recognize it anymore, so i couldn't flash boot.img or anything. I struggled with drivers for three hours until i managed to flash boot.img and re-flash and wipe again. It's all fine again now, but do NOT touch those libaries unless you have an escape plan.
LordManhattan said:
Alright, so i've spent the last three hours trying to revive my Ultra. After i wanted to revert the libs, i reflashed GPe as told in that thread, but what i forgot was that stock GPe doesn't include recovery (but the new tweaked version does), so my Ultra got stuck on the Sony logo, and i didn't have recovery. To make it worse, my computer wouldn't recognize it anymore, so i couldn't flash boot.img or anything. I struggled with drivers for three hours until i managed to flash boot.img and re-flash and wipe again. It's all fine again now, but do NOT touch those libaries unless you have an escape plan.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm glad it worked out - I was worried for you reading that.
hassanmahmood said:
I'm glad it worked out - I was worried for you reading that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested them over the weekend as well, ended up with bootloops as well - thus I'm not on GPe any more
If you look in the benchmark thread I did some testing with the libs and it did sore higher:
Code:
Module [COLOR="Blue"]ART[/COLOR] [COLOR="Red"]modded ART[/COLOR] [COLOR="Purple"]modded BE Rom[/COLOR] [COLOR="Lime"]Stock BE Rom[/COLOR]
Total [COLOR="Blue"]24500 [/COLOR][COLOR="Red"]29313 [/COLOR][COLOR="Purple"]30642[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]34684[/COLOR]
Multi task [COLOR="blue"]4112[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]6154[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]5647[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]6621[/COLOR]
Runtime [COLOR="blue"]1522[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]1603[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]3538[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]3526[/COLOR]
CPU int. [COLOR="blue"]2583[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]2869[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]2618[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]3214[/COLOR]
CPU fp [COLOR="blue"]2072[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]3130[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]3134[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]4059[/COLOR]
RAM Oper. [COLOR="blue"]1287[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]1289[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]1296[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]1613[/COLOR]
RAM Speed [COLOR="blue"]2118[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]2376[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]2043[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]2236[/COLOR]
2D [COLOR="blue"]1622[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]1613[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]1640[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]1642[/COLOR]
3D [COLOR="blue"]6640[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]7955[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]8616[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]9464[/COLOR]
Storage i/o [COLOR="blue"]1864[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]1649[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]1465[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]1561[/COLOR]
Database [COLOR="blue"]680[/COLOR] [COLOR="red"]675[/COLOR] [COLOR="purple"]645[/COLOR] [COLOR="lime"]685[/COLOR]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Blue is 4.4.2 GPe on art
The Red is 4.4.2 GPe on art with the bionic patch
Bootloops with the dalvik mod so not tested - required a full wipe to get working again
On the nexus 4 it get like extra 10k on antutu,maybe its only for the snapdragon s4 pro.
Sent from my C6802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
That's what some people are saying, but it came from the moto x and that doesn't have a snapdragon s4 pro
Sent from my C6833 using xda app-developers app
atrix2 said:
On the nexus 4 it get like extra 10k on antutu,maybe its only for the snapdragon s4 pro.
Sent from my C6802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you even read my post, I showed tjat it scored 5k higher, that was a second run right after installing the mod so the ultra was getting quite warm by then. On a cold run I guess it would have got even better scores - didn't notice any difference in using the phone though
Is this all for the sake of benchmark scores? As in no noticeable increase in performance?
CptAwesomeTT said:
Is this all for the sake of benchmark scores? As in no noticeable increase in performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't notice any difference in the hour or so I had the bionic mod installed, but it did increase the 3D score and floating point score so if you were using either of those alot I guess you may feel the difference?
Hello all , i create this thread to discuss the impact of the KitKat 4.4.2 on our phones , for me it was a disaster , my G2 was lag free score always more than 36000pts on antutu and more than 20000 on quadrant , now with 4.4.2 i get only 28000 pts on antutu and 17000 on quadrant .
AND YOU ?
Same here...only quadrant 21126.
Send from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
dont know why ...
gabilondo said:
Same here...only quadrant 21126.
Send from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have another G2 Korean version F320S same issue 28000 on antutu ...., and both D802 and F320S lag time to time ... i dont know why
Mine doesn't lag but antutu score is really affected.Before kitkat 36540,after 28000.Quadrant score is the same before and after update.
Trimis de pe al meu LG-D802 folosind Tapatalk
gabilondo said:
Mine doesn't lag but antutu score is really affected.Before kitkat 36540,after 28000.Quadrant score is the same before and after update.
Trimis de pe al meu LG-D802 folosind Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when you power on and you try to type your PIN it dosnt lag little when you click the numbers ? im asking coz i have the same lag in both versions !
I never use pin code,sorry..
Trimis de pe al meu LG-D802 folosind Tapatalk
HoussaMON said:
when you power on and you try to type your PIN it dosnt lag little when you click the numbers ? im asking coz i have the same lag in both versions !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure if there would be a difference, but i'm on d801 (t-mobile). i don't see any lag with either JB or KK
pitchdarkice said:
not sure if there would be a difference, but i'm on d801 (t-mobile). i don't see any lag with either JB or KK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i had no lag on JB but i have some with KK on both versions , can you share with us your benchmark scores ?
All benchmarks are affected by kitkat, but it doesn't indicate the lags/smoothness
I tested all kk roms including CM ones. Now i'm on not official for my phone kk from vodafone (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2664933) and it's all the same. These are my scores : Antutu 25000-27000 and Quadrant 16000-17000. Usualy in Antutu i got 31000 on PA kitkat. And with stock 422 i got 34700. In Quadrant i got 20000-21000 on stock 422. But i think there might be an issue with Quadrant and Antutu, because on 3dmark everything is up the roof(pics), Ice Storm - maxed out, Ice Storm Extreme - maxed out, and Ice Storm Unlimited 17127.
GraphMusic said:
All benchmarks are affected by kitkat, but it doesn't indicate the lags/smoothness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been running the 4.4.2 since yesterday and besides the lack of root, I really think the update solves most of the strange lag in lg stock launcher. Also apps open up much faster, eg. facebook before had a 1-2 second lag before showing the ui, now its like 700 ms and updating the feed is also much snappier.
Antutu gives med 33.000 which is more or less the same as on 4.2.2 stock.
D802 32 gb international here, running 4.4.2 Verizon branded kdz taken from the links here on xda.
HoussaMON said:
i had no lag on JB but i have some with KK on both versions , can you share with us your benchmark scores ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate when people with low knowledge on how android or benchmarks work start thread.It's a disaster for your phone to be more responsive with lower benchmarks?Instead it's a disaster when ur phone is less responsive with higher benchmarks that smokes every other companies' device.These are some threads I wish the mods burn no even delete.Benchmarks NEVER EXPLAIN REAL LIFE PERFORMANCE!How many times should noobs here this!Even devs like @faux123 and @maxwen tell u how a kernel can be optimized to come in with much power when the user needs it and not when the user isn't and their kernels score less benchmark performances and greater performance + battery life than stock kernels for all the devices they've worked with.Benchmarks can't be read by individual scores alone.Did u check the i/o,single core and other unique performances in your benchmarking app.Btw OEMs do learn how to cheat on benchmarks after their first updates so wait for an OTA with "bug fixes" which means benchmark cheats incoming if u want higher benchmarks!
hackarchive said:
I hate when people with low knowledge on how android or benchmarks work start thread.It's a disaster for your phone to be more responsive with lower benchmarks?Instead it's a disaster when ur phone is less responsive with higher benchmarks that smokes every other companies' device.These are some threads I wish the mods burn no even delete.Benchmarks NEVER EXPLAIN REAL LIFE PERFORMANCE!How many times should noobs here this!Even devs like @faux123 and @maxwen tell u how a kernel can be optimized to come in with much power when the user needs it and not when the user isn't and their kernels score less benchmark performances and greater performance + battery life than stock kernels for all the devices they've worked with.Benchmarks can't be read by individual scores alone.Did u check the i/o,single core and other unique performances in your benchmarking app.Btw OEMs do learn how to cheat on benchmarks after their first updates so wait for an OTA with "bug fixes" which means benchmark cheats incoming if u want higher benchmarks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
an i hate when a "HALF-GEEK" start his bla bla bla BLU without reading , all what you said we know it ! but when we talk benchmarks we mean smothness not only scores , and my PHONES ARE LESS RESPONSIVE WITH kitkat I HAVE LAGS ON BOTH VERSIONS ,that why i starts this thread! i have multitask : 4730 CPU Integer : 1532 storage I/O 1622 Database I/O 589 bla bla bla so please ... if you cant discuss and respect others and if you dont like a thread no one oblige you to participate .
great!!!!
Alexzander said:
I tested all kk roms including CM ones. Now i'm on not official for my phone kk from vodafone (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2664933) and it's all the same. These are my scores : Antutu 25000-27000 and Quadrant 16000-17000. Usualy in Antutu i got 31000 on PA kitkat. And with stock 422 i got 34700. In Quadrant i got 20000-21000 on stock 422. But i think there might be an issue with Quadrant and Antutu, because on 3dmark everything is up the roof(pics), Ice Storm - maxed out, Ice Storm Extreme - maxed out, and Ice Storm Unlimited 17127.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you didnt notice any irresponsiveness/lag ?
HoussaMON said:
you didnt notice any irresponsiveness/lag ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No lag so far . Everything is butter smooth. But i didn't have time to test the gps yet.
HoussaMON said:
i had no lag on JB but i have some with KK on both versions , can you share with us your benchmark scores ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 27958 on antutu and 17522 on quadrant, so the benchmark numbers haven't correlated to the quicker responsiveness
I don't bother with benchmarks but I can tell you my phone feels exponentially faster and more responsive. Everything just feels smoother.
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
So overall their is a actual performance improvement in KitKat?
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I don't really care about the benchmarks... Kit kat so smooth... Put's jelly bean to total shame...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app
Just curious what folks benchmarks are on stock kernel,no init.d scripting etc...just plain stock rom...heres one myself and rayheath have been testing Im working on...This one was run on 6-30-2014
Wonders_Never_Cease said:
Just curious what folks benchmarks are on stock kernel,no init.d scripting etc...just plain stock rom...heres one myself and rayheath have been testing Im working on...This one was run on 6-30-2014
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine's a bit higher... Sense 6 ver. 3.14.707.3, taken just now... stock incl. kernel, odexed, but rooted and busybox-ed.
Despite no more proofs available, I feel that this Sense 6 gives lower score than that of Sense 5.5 with KK, which normally reached 287xx.
When factory reset a few days ago, the score stayed at 27xxx.
Thanks was just curious