My conversation with Hugo Barra of Xiaomi may interest you Devs and owners of the Mi3...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So I e-mailed him, and asked him if he knows the status of the Lollipop ROM by Ivan which was teased before.
[See THIS POST by me]
This is what he replied.
So I guess we still have to wait a few more months...but if this time, it's true, then I suppose I can live with that...:fingers-crossed:
[NOTE: I know threads exist for both kernel sources and Lollipop discussion, but I couldn't decide where to post this, so instead of posting same thing in both, I made this thread. If mods think that's not the right procedure, please make whatever changes you want. Just that people need to know this!]
EDIT:
An official update regarding kernel sources (at least now they're not ignoring the matter):
http://en.miui.com/thread-66692-1-1.html
Turns out we were right in speculating that the reason they haven't released it is cuz they're still working on the Mi4 using the same sources.
Here's an extract:
"The reason we have not shared kernel sources yet is actually quite simple. Hugo explained this at the press conference in India last week. The kernel source code for these devices contains a significant amount of source code that will be used in two upcoming models. If we release the kernel source in its current state, we will be revealing more than we would like to about future devices. We will change this going forward, but right now it is a constraint we have to live with. We hope you can understand this position, and we're very sorry for the frustration we may have caused!"
That's right, they're acting like they haven't been violating the GPL all this while...
Wonder what the other device is, though...
(EDIT: Turns out it was the Mi Note!)
UPDATE:
Sources are out:
https://github.com/MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource/tree/cancro-kk-oss
The Dork Knight Rises said:
My conversation with Hugo Barra of Xiaomi may interest you Devs and owners of the Mi3...
So I e-mailed him, and asked him if he knows the status of the Lollipop ROM by Ivan which was teased before.
[See THIS POST by me]
This is what he replied.
If this time, it's true, then I suppose I can live with that...:fingers-crossed:
[NOTE: I know threads exist for both kernel sources and Lollipop discussion, but I couldn't decide where to post this, so instead of posting same thing in both, I made this thread. If mods think that's not the right procedure, please make whatever changes you want. Just that people need to know this!]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So they are going to take more 4-5 months.....
purval6300 said:
So they are going to take more 4-5 months.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. But if this is TRUE, and they DO release all sources in that time, I can afford to wait...
But it'll be hard, yeah...
What the fork?
that *beep* said redmi 1s sources are coming in Q1 2015 and now it turned to mi3.
I was waiting for follow up on issue. he added some "engineer" to conversation & disappeared.
fudge this sheet.
Just as i thought.They will only release the kernel source after the miui lollipop.
CharsiBabu said:
What the fork?
that *beep* said redmi 1s sources are coming in Q1 2015 and now it turned to mi3.
I was waiting for follow up on issue. he added some "engineer" to conversation & disappeared.
fudge this sheet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They suggest they dont have complete sources with them, as they are working on it.
Q1 is waay too long they can take uptill april/may ,they will release after the sale of mi4 globally
Whitewalker. said:
They suggest they dont have complete sources with them, as they are working on it.
Q1 is waay too long they can take uptill april/may ,they will release after the sale of mi4 globally
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q1 is 1st January to 31st March. Of course they have th kernel sources but the dont wanna released it yet
Related
anyone working on a stock gb or asop rom for this device?
I use go launcher and it is a lot better than the samsung touchwiz default launcher. the other samsung touchwiz items do not bother me
That actually has nothing to do with what the thread was created for.
Give it time, people will start to develop for this phone as time passes
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA
I doubt anyone will bother with AOSP GB, most people seem to be waiting to do ICS roms, which is what this device should have come with anyway.
Most will be waiting to dev ics? That's honestly the most bs answer I've ever received on this site in my life. That's like saying they are going to develop yellow snow in hell but waiting for it to snow....
themisfit said:
Most will be waiting to dev ics? That's honestly the most bs answer I've ever received on this site in my life. That's like saying they are going to develop yellow snow in hell but waiting for it to snow....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assume what you will, but if I were a developer and I had any inkling that an OS update was on the horizon for the phone I'm using, I'd probably opt to not develop for an OS that will be obsolete, since it's likely that no one would even use the ROM once ICS is out.
In other words, if I were a developer, I'd wait for ICS too.
themisfit said:
Most will be waiting to dev ics? That's honestly the most bs answer I've ever received on this site in my life. That's like saying they are going to develop yellow snow in hell but waiting for it to snow....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
jpeg42 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am i wrong in saying that lol
Rom devs need source code to work from.
Alot of what you see going on right now is piddly because without source code, not much can be done (based on my limited understanding of how this all works).
Not to discount the one or two roms out there now, its a good start but Samsung needs to give up the goods.
littlewierdo said:
Rom devs need source code to work from.
Alot of what you see going on right now is piddly because without source code, not much can be done (based on my limited understanding of how this all works).
Not to discount the one or two roms out there now, its a good start but Samsung needs to give up the goods.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The sources have been out for a while now.
https://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=SGH-I717
Being the source code for all the i717 models are listed here i didn't know what it would take for an asop version of gb for the note
baudilus said:
Assume what you will, but if I were a developer and I had any inkling that an OS update was on the horizon for the phone I'm using, I'd probably opt to not develop for an OS that will be obsolete, since it's likely that no one would even use the ROM once ICS is out.
In other words, if I were a developer, I'd wait for ICS too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem with this statement is you say "update on the horizon" when it is in fact a ways away..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I honestly wish someone would put out a cm7 version for our notes to gives us something better than stock at least until ics comes out, not saying that saurom and tpc aren't nice and trust me I'm pretty happy with saurom rom in my note, but coming from my htc hd2 that had dozens of roms to choose from , and coming from cm9 before I got my note , kinda leaves me hoping for just a bit more rom developing that we have at the moment, if I didnt work 50+ hours a week and had kids to take care of I would take a crack at my own rom but just don't have the time for that level of development.
Hi a lot of users tell my why we dont have FM on CM10 or CM10.1 and i said umm good question.
I dont now c code or Java code but i thing i a have gone in to the final step loock up this Screenshot.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It locks better than other FM builds now the only problem is this:
It said this error:
Unable to start AndroidMediaPlayer
So some help for going in with the app....
In Atachemnts is the APK that works more or lees
the app is 2 bytes?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Ben36 said:
the app is 2 bytes?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes is very simple FM but we need to fix this error
So.. yet another of my exploratory digressions
Munjeni already got "FM part" of radio to work on CM9* here (and it wouldn't surprise me if the apk on the top of this thread had something to do with it)
As with FXP's try (officially merged into CM around Feb2013) also added and mentioned back in those pages though, audio output was broken.
Seemingly STE hardware audio blobs had broken routing. I'm not sure why usual shimming around working stock libs couldn't be a solution, but still.
*and others in AOSP 4.1
After giving up for a year then, discussion resumed on these pages (and onward)
But for as much as the best minds were at it (and ADM sources were available!), it just so happened those days, that hell was breaking loose between kk breakage of omx, bluetooth .. and cm going bonkers with QA.
Furthermore so called "ST-Ericsson/Sony Proposed Android FM API" had been dropped out (purportedly because long story short, at the end of the day it was only producing results on fuji board Xperias)
With (I think) most of XDA jumping into the qualcomm FM bandwagon (and we also have a nice open app nowadays!)
And AFAIK switching to that (i.e. V4L?) become eventually in god 95A31's plans.. till dropping his dev thread for AOSX first, and then eventually feeding up with everything altogether later.
I'm not sure how much is left of all these brainstorming attempts in that rom code, but at least in this and this repos a lot of juicy lines remain for anybody to get inspiration.
Also worth investigating if any similarity with BCM early 2012 phones helps (since they should support both STE and BCM api - the latter having an open stack)
/me is also also intrigued to think TI-based 2011 line seems to have comparable routing problems
Meanwhile, on google side, they too added something to AOSP, but my educate feeling is that it's mostly for MTK-cradevices
What else?
Updating to 3.4 (is there a time it wouldn't?) could really help thanks to igloo sources (and firmware?).
Don't forget in a perfect world, even transmit pin should be exposed. EDIT: except this isn't, and QCOM recently dropped transmitting tho
And you can read late Mike Reid talking about testing endpoints.
Last but not least, I found some invaluable datasheets yes one is hdmi but idk where else to post it
Well, i heard people complain about gpl license breaking (you have all the rights of this world) and for missing kernel's source. Now i'm here for report (sorry for my awful english ) the word of Hugo Ibarra that confirm the release of MI3 source later this year. And i like to add that xiaomi already release source for mi2 and mi2s.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(if isn't a fake screen)
kekkojoker90 said:
Well, i heard people complain about gpl license breaking (you have all the rights of this world) and for missing kernel's source. Now i'm here for report (sorry for my awful english ) the word of Hugo Ibarra that confirm the release of MI3 source later this year. And i like to add that xiaomi already release source for mi2 and mi2s.
(if isn't a fake screen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is complete BS. They have to release it upon device release. This is why this forum was made. To help call them out and to Rip MIUI apart.
zelendel said:
Which is complete BS. They have to release it upon device release. This is why this forum was made. To help call them out and to Rip MIUI apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, that's exactly why I wasn't willing to buy this device.
There are already plenty of threads on miui forums complaining about lack of kernel source.
Before the launch of this device in India, I was almost convinced to buy Moto G by my fellow members from galaxy y section.
But the specs were too good to ignore given the same price group.
When I saw that reply, this came out of my mouth:
hey, better late than never.
It's simply disheartening to see that a device as powerful as this being forced to use sole miui rom(or its cooked version).
I haven't tried cm11, but from what i've heard, people are loving it.
One of the developers(varun chhitre) of cm11 for this device has prior experience dealing with micromax(another non compliant oem).
If/When kernel sources get out, I hope this device gets developer support.
CharsiBabu said:
lol, that's exactly why I wasn't willing to buy this device.
There are already plenty of threads on miui forums complaining about lack of kernel source.
Before the launch of this device in India, I was almost convinced to buy Moto G by my fellow members from galaxy y section.
But the specs were too good to ignore given the same price group.
When I saw that reply, this came out of my mouth:hey, better late than never.It's simply disheartening to see that a device as powerful as this being forced to use sole miui rom(or its cooked version).
I haven't tried cm11, but from what i've heard, people are loving it.
One of the developers(varun chhitre) of cm11 for this device has prior experience dealing with micromax(another non compliant oem).
If/When kernel sources get out, I hope this device gets developer support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill be honest. Dont count on it. Most Devs have a very big hate for them and no matter how good the hardware is will not touch the device until it comes clean.
Oh he and I know each other well from my attempts to help with the Micromax issue.
Better late than never. Still they hardly have cared about gpl. Releasing sources, after they release new device.
Sent from my C1904 using XDA Free mobile app
zelendel said:
Ill be honest. Dont count on it. Most Devs have a very big hate for them and no matter how good the hardware is will not touch the device until it comes clean.
Oh he and I know each other well from my attempts to help with the Micromax issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah , good step by xda but i don't have any Hope that they will release kernel source and even if they do , it will be some bunch of crap to stop user's from spamming there customer support for kernel source .
They already broke privacy of many user's by stealing data .
try signing this it might help
www.change.org/en-IN/petitions/xiao...pt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition
kekkojoker90 said:
Well, i heard people complain about gpl license breaking (you have all the rights of this world) and for missing kernel's source. Now i'm here for report (sorry for my awful english ) the word of Hugo Ibarra that confirm the release of MI3 source later this year. And i like to add that xiaomi already release source for mi2 and mi2s.
(if isn't a fake screen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshot looks like fake to me, from interface it looks like Facebook but he have different FB DP.
Well u know that we all can change the dp
Anyways, just hope it comes true
Sent from MI3 using Tapatalk
Where is the screenshot come from ? Link required.
Hope it's true.
Check this link.
http://disqus.com/hugobarra/
@varun.chitre15 how did you made the kernel source of mi 3.From where did you get the sources
kernel source code.
Also check this https://github.com/mi3-dev found this but of no use for me, I am no dev, spread this please if it's of any help.
I trust hugo barra and they will release it by december
Shahan_mik3 said:
I trust hugo barra and they will release it by december
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its uploaded by varun.chitre15 the guy who made cm11 for mi 3.
thejoker said:
Its uploaded by varun.chitre15 the guy who made cm11 for mi 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is uploaded?
Shahan_mik3 said:
What is uploaded?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel source,ofcourse
thejoker said:
The kernel source,ofcourse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope....kernel sources are not released....he compiled a ROM without the sources.
Shahan_mik3 said:
Nope....kernel sources are not released....he compiled a ROM without the sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So we cant make for example Paranoid Android from this sources????
thejoker said:
So we cant make for example Paranoid Android from this sources????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes we can....and there are already slimkat and mokee open source.
And carbon ready to be tested and omni under development
hi.
im starting this thread in hope some of the devs that work with le max 2 can develop nougat.
due to the attacks from the ones that doesnt do nothing to help, @ffboy2009 doesnt seem to be sharing anymore work in xda. hope he can reconsider.
hope @STEVE_MARS, @ParasiTe_RemiX, @madsurfer1, @Bshuy2003, @Cuoco92 and others(sorry if i forget someone) can develop this for our phone, since @FFboys2009 provided the sources and some screens of a nougat rom working in our device.
sources and screens for nougat
https://github.com/zhaochengw/android_kernel_letv_msm8996
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Why this guy zhaochengw is banned on XDA?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=1513079
Last Activity: 4th May 2010 11:01 AM
I would really love to help but I am not a developer, however I am still having hopes that even thought ffboy has left other developers can build a really great rom, thank you in advance for your diligently work.
That OP. LMAO
"Attacks from those doing nothing to help". Priceless. If you only knew.
another waste thread linking source of banned users work...
oh, and the "due to the attacks from the ones that doesnt do nothing to help" is a nice add from someone who knows nothing about whats going out there in the real world... I needed a laugh, thanks for that..
If ffboy copys your work you havê the right to be upset. I Also think he should post is work here. Same goês for you. I think it would be better to everyine if the work was shared here. If you dont post your work here, like you said, why the fuc* do you come here to complain? Im no developer and im just saying i think it would be better if everyone shared here what they have. There are a few people here that mau be able to help if the work das posted here.
For example, ive spent hours today testing build from the dev @crept just to help people get nougat fast in this device.
Cheers
@CrackerTeg this is your work. Can it be here so other people can take a look?
https://github.com/CrackerTeg/device_leeco_x2
That is mine, yes. Its open sourced so people can do with it what they please. No, I won't post BrokenOs on this forum as there is an "understanding" between my team and the administration here.
CrackerTeg said:
That is mine, yes. Its open sourced so people can do with it what they please. No, I won't post BrokenOs on this forum as there is an "understanding" between my team and the administration here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok. you could have said that in the begining. this mess could and should have been avoided. lol. with your last post ive found your teams website that i didnt know and also joined your google plus community. can i follow there your work on the leeco? thanks again
nosidefcp said:
ok. you could have said that in the begining. this mess could and should have been avoided. lol. with your last post ive found your teams website that i didnt know and also joined your google plus community. can i follow there your work on the leeco? thanks again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had zero reason to mention it in the beginning. I was just allowing everyone to assume they knew how the world worked and laughed at it all. There's far more to the world of android development than this forum and by this forum, I mean xda.
@CrackerTeg - can you share logcat for camera error? (If in your devtree it can't work)
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
I'm wondering how active the user base with this device is, in terms of modifications. I develop for another device, Moto G Stylus 5G, which has almost identical specs. I'm thinking of ordering a N200 5G to develop for. What features would you guys be interested in having? Also, are there any other developers in the community with a N200 5G?
i'm litterally working on it right now lol. Working on a device tree / better twrp support. kernel is one thing i haven't managed to compile yet though
I'd be super happy to have custom ROM.
I have the T-Mo version which is unbearable coming from Pixel.
Kernel would be a great addition too, after ROM .
This phone has a 2021 cpu but it runs slower than my 5 year oneplus.
Thanks!
zj45499 said:
I'd be super happy to have custom ROM.
I have the T-Mo version which is unbearable coming from Pixel.
Kernel would be a great addition too, after ROM .
This phone has a 2021 cpu but it runs slower than my 5 year oneplus.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, much slower than my OP5.
Would be stoked to see some more development for N200, and I know several others would be as well!
zj45499 said:
I'd be super happy to have custom ROM.
I have the T-Mo version which is unbearable coming from Pixel.
Kernel would be a great addition too, after ROM .
This phone has a 2021 cpu but it runs slower than my 5 year oneplus.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand your struggle. I daily drive a OnePlus 8 and the Nord makes me mad because of how poorly optimized the software is. The refresh rate isn't quite calibrated. We'll see what I can do for it. I just got the kernel to compile from source last night, today it's onto device/vendor tree bringup for ROMs
Didn't I see, somewhere in the forum, that the source for the N200 kernel was missing some key components? Did they release a full one?
edale1 said:
Didn't I see, somewhere in the forum, that the source for the N200 kernel was missing some key components? Did they release a full one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it'll have to have those parts reintegrated for a fully working build. working on this process now
process is complete, we need some testers:
Nord N200 Testers
A group for discussing N200 custom software testing. All off topic discussion has been moved to this group: https://t.me/+1qZHIItf9R80MTYx Check pinned messages for important messages and shared/confirmed working files.
t.me
Watch these folks, they're doing something special.
Woop Woop. The collaborative efforts. Currently this device has 4 devs working together.
Just a friendly reminder (and to bump this thread up in most recently commented on):
If you would like to:
Keep track of our progress,
Test the latest updates from us,
Or to inquire about becoming a part of our collaborative effort to bring up software on this device,
Please join our telegram group
Nord N200 Testers
A group for discussing N200 custom software testing. All off topic discussion has been moved to this group: https://t.me/+1qZHIItf9R80MTYx Check pinned messages for important messages and shared/confirmed working files.
t.me
All of our dev team are admins of this group and work together within our organization @ https://github.com/oneplus-sm4350
Happy flashing
Got a build that boots with most all functions intact (+wireguard), just a few more to test. I'm going to have a thread going soon for you guys.
Spoiler: Proof
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}