What is The best lollipop ROM for this device? I currently use archidroid 3.15 with boeffla kernel that is very good
For me it is Resurrection remix 5.5.9.
wondie said:
For me it is Resurrection remix 5.5.9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? What are The differences?
Vix_Sk said:
Why? What are The differences?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know much about Archidroid. I like Resurrection because of its configuration organization, battery, RAM which mostly use about 500MB RAM and give me about 300MB + free RAM. What about yours?
Edit:
My Antutu Benchmark score is 25,759 with this rom. Stock Rom used to be 18,000 to 19,000 range.
wondie said:
I don't know much about Archidroid. I like Resurrection because of its configuration organization, battery, RAM which mostly use about 500MB RAM and give me about 300MB + free RAM. What about yours?
Edit:
My Antutu Benchmark score is 25,759 with this rom. Stock Rom used to be 18,000 to 19,000 range.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have this..i think is better
Edit: i made a second test because the first time i installed The app 1 second before The test and the second was better XD
Vix_Sk said:
I have this..i think is better
Edit: i made a second test because the first time i installed The app 1 second before The test and the second was better XD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds cool. I installed it and the Antutu was 40,000+. It is amazing but it over clocks the CPU to 1.6 GHz by default. My worry is the battery life. The more you use CPU, the more battery usage. How long does yours last?
wondie said:
That sounds cool. I installed it and the Antutu was 40,000+. It is amazing but it over clocks the CPU to 1.6 GHz by default. My worry is the battery life. The more you use CPU, the more battery usage. How long does yours last?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CPU is to 1.4 with boeffa kernel.if you don't play games The battery is very good XD...without games...1 day...with games 1/2 day
That seems ok.
Another one opinion?
My personal favorite is Resurrection remix too.
You should try a couple of ROMs to find what's best for you.
You can take a look at temasek's, blisspop & archidroid too.
Related
I've had a nose for newest member of SE Walkman family, this small phone tweaked turns out to be powerful and perspective yet very affordable phone! Ice-cream sandwich officially announced, great sound, solid camera, and , and... overclockable hardware geek index 10+ No more introduction, lets get to numbers...
1. CM 7.2 ROM with its own kernel, OC-ed at max 1.6 GHZ stable, Quadrant score of 2700!!
2. Stock 4.0.2.A.0.58 ROM vanilla, Quadrant score 1800.
3. Stock 4.0.2.A.0.58 ROM with RAGE KERNEL V2 (OC open to 2.0 GHZ) on my phone goes 1.9 GHZ stable making Quadrant score of 2550 , will try tonight combining Cyanogenmod ROM and RAGE KERNEL V2, it should penetrate 3k barrier , geek's wet dream
No kernel at the moment is UV (undervolting) capable.
Software: Voltage control, tnx to xan http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1107468
domagoj_zg said:
, will try tonight combining Cyanogenmod ROM and RAGE KERNEL V2, it should penetrate 3k barrier
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you tried that?
how do you get that kind of score in quadrant? I already OCed my wt19i to 1.9ghz and got only a score of 1800.. what tweaks did you applied?
Does benchmark score really matter that much to you guys? Its just numbers
Benchmarks are for people, who like to showoff.
These numbers are not important at all, the real performance is what matters.
since my galaxy mini with cm7 oc'd to 800mhz got higher score than my LWW, using quadrant advance, i quit believing those app....
sent from my Walkman
I did antutu test on CM7 on 2ghz.
Does this mean I have good CPU?
XperianPro said:
I did antutu test on CM7 on 2ghz.
Does this mean I have good CPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks do not show that kind of information.
Someguyfromhell said:
Benchmarks are for people, who like to showoff.
These numbers are not important at all, the real performance is what matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precisely. Benchmark score if bragged publicly is just like saying "my thing is bigger than yours". Just pure pathedic.
Someguyfromhell said:
Benchmarks do not show that kind of information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant on stability.
XperianPro said:
I meant on stability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmark doesn't show stability...
Ok, yes, if you completed the test, your phone was stable for those few minutes.
Someguyfromhell said:
Benchmark doesn't show stability...
Ok, yes, if you completed the test, your phone was stable for those few minutes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not few minutes,two hours.
oh, then the scores i got from benchmark is not really the true performance of my phone? thanks for the answers guys.
rerenznz said:
oh, then the scores i got from benchmark is not really the true performance of my phone? thanks for the answers guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? People still believe on 'benchmarks'? It's numbers for bragging.
And also if you want to test the stability of your phone, there's this stress-testing tool to see if your oc/uv/uc is stable enough for normal everyday use. Click me.
Kira.Lawliet said:
What? People still believe on 'benchmarks'? It's numbers for bragging.
And also if you want to test the stability of your phone, there's this stress-testing tool to see if your oc/uv/uc is stable enough for normal everyday use. Click me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stability tests can be dangerous. When your phone can't take that much power(overclocked CPU), it might just kill itself(due to temperature).
Basically, just play a HD game on your phone and you can put fun and stability test to one.
Someguyfromhell said:
Stability tests can be dangerous. When your phone can't take that much power(overclocked CPU), it might just kill itself(due to temperature).
Basically, just play a HD game on your phone and you can put fun and stability test to one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the info.. then my way in testing my phone is right.
is there no compatibility between rom and kerner even if they are for the phone model
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
com975 said:
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what abou AOKP rom ?
AOKP bricks my phone.
Installed slimbean after this, its really good and antutu is 4100 but i ram is the same as cyanogen
com975 said:
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did it too before but I have tested rooted official firmwares and V20D was the best, and not Slim Bean.
V20D gives me 100mb. It's not better then SlimBean for me.
com975 said:
V20D gives me 100mb. It's not better then SlimBean for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
caiejay said:
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excatly
caiejay said:
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. But for me, SlimBean is better. But I am using V10K now. More Ram and better benchmarks.
v10k is best rom so far for our device. Im heavy user, mostly internet browsing , lots of texting, lots of calls, twitter, charging my phone sometimes twice a day...
I get flashed every rom found here, but i always restore my v10k nandroid backup after some time.. Thats my opinion.
Gusta_HR said:
v10k is best rom so far for our device. Im heavy user, mostly internet browsing , lots of texting, lots of calls, twitter, charging my phone sometimes twice a day...
I get flashed every rom found here, but i always restore my v10k nandroid backup after some time.. Thats my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using CM10 because of Gandalf kernels 1.3 GHz, althrough im using it on 1190 MHz with SMARTASSV2 Governor, zRam, Allow purging of assets and Krenel samepage merging in memory management. With these settings my phone is faster in games like Subway Surf (I play it with no laggs at all)
Zdravo Gusta_HR
kristijan505 said:
Im using CM10 because of Gandalf kernels 1.3 GHz, althrough im using it on 1190 MHz with SMARTASSV2 Governor, zRam, Allow purging of assets and Krenel samepage merging in memory management. With these settings my phone is faster in games like Subway Surf (I play it with no laggs at all)
Zdravo Gusta_HR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your phone become unstable, if reboots occured without any visible reason, you fried your cpu. you can't speed up your system with overclocked cpu, but you can damage your phone with that. More RAM installed in our device will significantly speed up system overall. Rest is just painfull placebo effect.
Before lg l7 i got Samsung Galaxy S + (plus) .. an 1.4 ghz clocked variant of famous Samsung galaxy S clocked "only" at 1.0 Ghz. And guess what?? I kept phone underclocked @ 1.0 Ghz working just fine and draining less batterry.
Gusta_HR said:
If your phone become unstable, if reboots occured without any visible reason, you fried your cpu. you can't speed up your system with overclocked cpu, but you can damage your phone with that. More RAM installed in our device will significantly speed up system overall. Rest is just painfull placebo effect.
Before lg l7 i got Samsung Galaxy S + (plus) .. an 1.4 ghz clocked variant of famous Samsung galaxy S clocked "only" at 1.0 Ghz. And guess what?? I kept phone underclocked @ 1.0 Ghz working just fine and draining less batterry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont know about that but I have got Galaxy 3 before L7 and I have overclocked it from 667MHz to 1300MHz with no problems like unstable phone, rebooting or anything else but games were a lot less laggy.
hey have look at this screenshot..!
The person that provided me this screenshot said that he is developing a new kernel.
But then i saw the score not validated as it was red but then he said would release the kernel to select users and also he said he will be making a video on the kernel highlights.
But how did he attain such high scores???
Holy crap how is that even possible ? Who is this magician ? It doesn't look like overclock , CPU score is less important than our actual values (24000 for 1804 + 1440 MHz)
Need some explanation but wow , wait &see
ol I got almost 100k once on old guyver kernel + eu miui dev with kernel tweaks and heavy debloat on my 2GB ram model k3nzo
but thats the reason I dont trust this benchmark...
Ok so i contacted the guy named Riju and he said his work would take another week to compare before releasing it to the public.
He also mentions the support for nougat rooms and mm miui roms, quick charge 3.0,improved battery performance and better graphics with vulkan api stork
I got higher scores in 3D, CPU and RAM, BUT...UX? Wtf?
Sebaskyclad said:
I got higher scores in 3D, CPU and RAM, BUT...UX? Wtf?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How you got this freaking benchmark?!? I've never got more than 84k! Please tell me what is your setup!
Carlocarnev2000 said:
How you got this freaking benchmark?!? I've never got more than 84k! Please tell me what is your setup!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got ~88k with AICP Nougat + Radon (stock settings) + F2FS. Nothing more.
Carlocarnev2000 said:
How you got this freaking benchmark?!? I've never got more than 84k! Please tell me what is your setup!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using new LineageOS unofficial (7.1.1), nothing special, stock radon settings(3.4), only set the governor to Impulse.
This totally insane!!
Antutu 6.0.1 could be easily used to have a good score I don't know how, but it's in link with the kernel... I could go to 120K with guyver kernel ... but it's bug is just with antutu 6.0.1
https://youtu.be/uOlOSbLp-J8?list=PLyjrOYSiemcuTICj-NBeqHHXqXuukSoIa
antutu is not a good way to judge device performance.
this score is complete bs... this version of antutu can be manipulated to have this high of a score. tell this kernel creator to run a new benchmark using the latest antutu version and see how it fares.
I flash Vulkan API and android N blobs for SD650, got 86k, if overclock might near 100k, but that's too high in the image.
AIDA screenshot for Vulkan API proof.
Lol no updates yet
Kernel release?
sent from Base
does numbers really matter? i highly doubt there's a noticeable difference in performance between this guy's score and the typical benchmark score of our phones.
drckml said:
does numbers really matter? i highly doubt there's a noticeable difference in performance between this guy's score and the typical benchmark score of our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance will feel better for sure. Battery life, system stability, product life and thermals will suffer though. Which do you find more important is the real question I guess.
but why do u want this score overclocking means higher risk of damage an just getting 20000 more wont do any wonders, apps incompatible will stay like that. It is a great phone which in my opinion dosent need overclocking atleast for now.
i have KATE.
i installe dfrom the play store 3 apps, cpu spy, cpu sply + and cpu spy reloaded.
then i used the phone... and tested it with geekbench and antutu. ok..... the apps show that i NEVER used the 400mhz freq and i neved went over 1400mhz.
BUT SD650 should go up to 1,8ghz!!!!
what is the problem? i noticed this bug on the rom with i received the phone miui 7.3 then in this actual 8.0.5.0 stable.
Just to be sure, i am in this moment updating with OTA to the latest 8.1.3.0 for my KATE
The Redmi Note 3 SD version has 6 cores, but only 2 of them can hit near 1.8GHz. The other 4 run around 1.4GHz. Also, with the stock MIUI ROM/kernel, I think the minimum frequency for the 4 little cores is 600+ MHz.
so, the app does not see the 2 more powerfull cores?
You should use kernel adiutor mod if you want to change governors or frequencies
P.s miui sucks
what rom do u suggest me? i am still waiting for the ok from xiaomi to unlock the bootloader
realista87 said:
what rom do u suggest me? i am still waiting for the ok from xiaomi to unlock the bootloader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LineageOS/AOSP for a lighter, faster, newer material design experience.
Resurrection Remix for more customization out of the box.
Personally I use Nitrogen OS...its best imo
Benjimaestro said:
LineageOS/AOSP for a lighter, faster, newer material design experience.
Resurrection Remix for more customization out of the box.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but the most customizable rom should be the PAC rom. am i wrong....? this rom should include all features from other roms.
realista87 said:
but the most customizable rom should be the PAC rom. am i wrong....? this rom should include all features from other roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buggier than RR.
XD XD
ok so i think after unlock bootloader i'll go with xiaomi.eu or globerom... i like the included features (at least for what i read...) of GOVTUNER MOD, viper4arise ecc
The ones I've seen only boost the CPU and GPU afaik. I'm running SlimRom 7.1.2 on stock kernel on the Wi-Fi only version. I'm a total noob, please help.
Vatrom's LOS 15.1 ROM is really quick and stable if you're just looking to boost performance. But no, I don't know a kernel to overclock ram.
Thanks, slimrom is very fast as well, so I'm pretty sure the bottleneck is the ram. It only slows down if I have many running apps. Tbh I'd prefer overclocking the RAM if I had to choose.
TickleMeShlomo said:
Thanks, slimrom is very fast as well, so I'm pretty sure the bottleneck is the ram. It only slows down if I have many running apps. Tbh I'd prefer overclocking the RAM if I had to choose.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be sure, you need to have proof in the form of benchmark results. Again, it is practically impossible to overclock memory hardwire.