Would you say that the Moto Z is "fast" in day-to-day use? A higher rating indicates that you think the Moto Z exhibits fantastic performance. Like, is it as fast as your tears when you watch The Titanic?
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
It's the best phone to date I have the s7 edge and iPhone 6s plus and the z is always faster day to day
Here are benchmarks from my moto z from geekbench3 after two pretty close together tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
jdawg334 said:
Here are benchmarks from my moto z from geekbench3 after two pretty close together tests.
View attachment 3841018
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ 1 Have also had the S7 edge and day to day use the Moto is faster and totally lag free.
Here ia mine..
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
orbitz52 said:
Here ia mine..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your phone have serious problems...
enetec said:
Your phone have serious problems...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just bought it.. [emoji27]
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 12:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:29 AM ----------
Benchmark using geekbench4
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 12:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 AM ----------
orbitz52 said:
Here ia mine..
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now it's okay, I hope.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
orbitz52 said:
I just bought it.. [emoji27]
Now it's okay, I hope.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now it's perfect...
No lag, no heating up.
fastest phone I've ever owned.
FAst in general terms, but enabling the "resising screen" option slow downs a lot the GUI.
not the best
Not the fastest phone I ever seen
But fast enough for many if not all things. Totally foobar to have every 6 to 12 month a new Phone.
I'm happy with the Moto Z in all manner.
I've compared benchmarks and noticed that my Moto Z (Brazilian Edition) has a lower hardware (CPU) than others. Brazilian version of moto z is "cropped" compared to moto z usa, for example. I'm so sad. I don't feel it is fast as expected and my biggest frustation is the smothless. See my benchmark results:
Does anyone know how to make this moto z faster and smooth?
eduardowillame said:
I've compared benchmarks and noticed that my Moto Z (Brazilian Edition) has a lower hardware (CPU) than others. Brazilian version of moto z is "cropped" compared to moto z usa, for example. I'm so sad. I don't feel it is fast as expected and my biggest frustation is the smothless. See my benchmark results:
Does anyone know how to make this moto z faster and smooth?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our Z has 1.8giga max speed compared to the US droid that sports default and higher (2.2 giga I presume) max. It is because of the battery. But if you put on some custom kernel you can gain those max clock values. Just tell me why do you need this. Mine blazing fast. Data, response, multitasking... Not a single lag since the day one. SOT is a bit decent though. Can get around 5 hrs of usage, not playing games. And that is just fine when bearing in mind the battery being of 2600 mah. Do not take these syntetic benchmark so closely. Or you'd be sleeping well enough when having better score? I came from my beloved Nexus 5x and this phone outperforms it in some ways. Getting this phone for 240 usd on a special one-off event made me jump into the lake and enjoy the show.
I'm not caring about benchmark tests at all. Sometimes I got lagging and heating up with some regular use, not gaming. I'm using it with INCIPIO battery mod trying to reach end of day without plug it to an outlet. Shoud I take it to a custom rom?
my devices has some real problems with gps apps. 3-4hours drive it will just make all apps stuck. i expected more from this phone...
if we're talking benchmarks im sure there are plenty of phones that can surpass it HOWEVER if we are talking overall speed and responsiveness it surpasses all the recent phones i owned
(LG V20,NOKIA 8,PIXEL,HTC 10,HTC U ULTRA,Iphone 8 plus,iphone 7 plus,lg g6,galaxy s8,huawei p10,note FE and many more)
This is ok,right?
Sent from my Motorola Moto Z Droid using XDA Labs
This is a good result.
Related
Appears to show that the Tegra2 Version (for S Korea) is significantly faster than the Exynos (Intl) version.
http://forums.tmonews.com/index.php?topic=16966.0
Though as mentioned here that version should be avoided for other reasons:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13234818&postcount=4
That's the exynos chip from MWC(1ghz) , which also scored 2000 on Quadrant I would even buy the sgs2 if it scored 750 , if its as smooth as it is now in UI interaction
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
murklor said:
Try this instead?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/1-2-ghz-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-benchmarked-shows-mind-blowing-speed/
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SGS2 would have scored higher in games if it wasn't capped at 60 FPS
murklor said:
I had to retrieve my password and post for the first time in forever just for this thread.
An idea would be to NOT use old pre-production 1Ghz units as comparison.
Try this instead?
... [needed to remove to post]
Productivity: 3700 points
Games: 2400 points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that - I was conscious it might be old news.
I had forgotten about the speed bump - doh!
Have anyone tried GLBenchmark? If not I would be grateful if anyone tried and published the score.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GLBenchmark 2.0
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
flooki said:
Strange, according to that benchmark it has 5 red and blue bits and 6 for green - 16 in total. Of course that's rubbish, judging from all photos I've seen there's absolutely no way it only has 16 bit color. Does anybody know what's going on there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is the setting used by the benchmark, not a limitation in the GPU or the display.
thats not right is it?
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad. Of course it could be a game bug with mali400, chances are pretty high.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
murklor said:
That glbenchmark data show some interesting things. Overall perfomance seem very good with some massive boosts over tegra 2 in some areas, yet other areas like triangle performance doesnt come close.
Hm, synthetic benchmarks are a poor comparison anyway. I would like to see some game comparison... The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea ive seen that-think its just a bug rather than performance measure, im sure gameloft will release a s2 version
murklor said:
The one thing about S2 that has alarmed me is a youtube video of Shrek kart, optimus 2x vs galaxy s2. Optimus 2x is perfectly smooth while galaxy s2 stuttered something bad... Real bad.
Sorry, dont have the link :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
tjtj4444 said:
I've seen that one too, but I think that was with an older non-retail version of SGS2, here you got a recent video with excellent Shrek Kart performance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LERZvYvJqwc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for link
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Probably because they announced that it would be 4 times faster than previous devices (meaning Galaxy S I guess) before doing any benchmarks, and then realised that it was nowhere near 4 times faster
So they had to overclock as much as they could.
KingKuba13 said:
Why do you think they made it 1.2 and not 1.0????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Sensation will come with a 1.2GHz dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU so I guess they didn't want to look like they were not keeping pace.
Ok, so I think that benchmarks don't mean all that much, but thought I'd post here to get a bit more understanding.
Just ran this AnTuTu benchmark test and thought it compared well with other devices out there so far, in particular the Galaxy Nexus. Being that the REZOUND only has a temp root and is still on Gingerbread, is this not a good sign that this device is going to scream when we see S-off and full ICS roms?
Is AnTuTu even a credible Benchmark test? I have heard that "friends don't let friends run Quadrant" but am not sure if this one is any better.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks in advance for your input.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
msjohnson2868 said:
Ok, so I think that benchmarks don't mean all that much, but thought I'd post here to get a bit more understanding.
Just ran this AnTuTu benchmark test and thought it compared well with other devices out there so far, in particular the Galaxy Nexus. Being that the REZOUND only has a temp root and is still on Gingerbread, is this not a good sign that this device is going to scream when we see S-off and full ICS roms?
Is AnTuTu even a credible Benchmark test? I have heard that "friends don't let friends run Quadrant" but am not sure if this one is any better.
Thanks in advance for your input.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well im usually scoring around 5700's . them 3 phones are so close its craziness. I think once we get S-off this device will be MUCH better. If we ever even get S-off.
Completely unreliable. More for fun that anything man. Not to mention if you went from a Class 4 to a Class 10 SD card you would score significantly higher.
I guess what I'm wondering is that according to this benchmark, the stock, Sensed Rezound is really close to the Nexus, which is stock Android, and hardware optimized. Once we get s-off and ICS it seems it will be the fastest thing around.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
Again, you are going off an unreliable set of tests. Most of them mean nothing in the real world.
AtLemacks said:
Completely unreliable. More for fun that anything man. Not to mention if you went from a Class 4 to a Class 10 SD card you would score significantly higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True about the sd card...but it is fun anyway.
It seems that there is at least some reliability to this though...even if it is subjective. I'm curious to see what the improvement will be once the software on the REZOUND is the same as the Nexus.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
AtLemacks said:
Again, you are going off an unreliable set of tests. Most of them mean nothing in the real world.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any test that is reliable?
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
I prefer Quadrant, I score typically 2200-2500. Cannot wait for s-off so I can debloat this thing.
No, and everyone has their favorites. If you are only using it for ****s and giggles just use the one you like the most.
5485 Antutu here!
Did a temp root and tricked out the SD card speed. 25MB/s read speed, 6.3 MB/s Write speed.
Hey all, I scored a 5831 on Antutu. (posted on their system under 'thatsricci' as well)
I just added a PNY class10 SD card 32GB and it scored 9.0mb/s write and 15.3MB/s READ. I think that's pretty acceptable! Definitely helped the score a bit.
RAM: 891
CPU I: 1948
CPU FP: 861
2D: 274
3D: 1254
DIO: 360
SD Write:90
SD Read: 153
CPU Freq: 1512MHz
Total: 5831
has anyone noticed an increase in Frame rate in games or reduction of Thermal throttling due to the new kernel ??
I have, no proof but my device definitely doesn't get hot now and seems to run smoother.
NFS MW now runs smooth without any lag.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
Ran StabilityTest for about 7-9 minutes and stayed at 1.7GHz, but the clock speed still drops in increments of 100MHz when throttling begins. So far, the lowest I've seen was 1.3GHz. Maybe the throttle limit is just stopped at 1.3GHz? (I put my N10 near a heater for a short period of time, the throttling happened quicker, but still only down to 1.3GHz).
It seems to happen at regular intervals too, according to the CPU Load graph anyway:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Posting here also but I posted this in the franco kernel thread.. I see very similar performance as espionage
I ran 10 Antutu CPU and RAM benchmarks in a row and couldn't get it to throttle down.. It stayed *solid 1.7ghz through every time. She was hot and my N10 is even in a case... I simply couldn't get it to throttle down.
This is in the middle of test #10
* - I don't count the small 100mhz drops as throttling.. That's just the test changing for a second and lowering the CPU load for a flash..
Wogga said:
NFS MW now runs smooth without any lag.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NFS MW is still causing throttling for me, down to 1Ghz. It still runs ok though.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
---------- Post added at 05:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:45 PM ----------
styckx said:
Posting here also but I posted this in the franco kernel thread.. I see very similar performance as espionage
I ran 10 Antutu CPU and RAM benchmarks in a row and couldn't get it to throttle down.. It stayed *solid 1.7ghz through every time. She was hot and my N10 is even in a case... I simply couldn't get it to throttle down.
This is in the middle of test #10
* - I don't count the small 100mhz drops as throttling.. That's just the test changing for a second and lowering the CPU load for a flash..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you get the cpu speed displayed like that?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
stonebear said:
NFS MW is still causing throttling for me, down to 1Ghz. It still runs ok though.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
---------- Post added at 05:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:45 PM ----------
How do you get the cpu speed displayed like that?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's Perfmon.. From the fine folks at Chainfire... Well worth the price.. I bought it the day it was released and well worth it. I'm seriously surprised how seemingly no one knows about it. It's been released for quite awhile.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...51bGwsMSwxLDMsImV1LmNoYWluZmlyZS5wZXJmbW9uIl0.
styckx said:
It's Perfmon.. From the fine folks at Chainfire... Well worth the price.. I bought it the day it was released and well worth it. I'm seriously surprised how seemingly no one knows about it. It's been released for quite awhile.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...51bGwsMSwxLDMsImV1LmNoYWluZmlyZS5wZXJmbW9uIl0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man.
I'm running Vanilla RootBox 5-18 w/ houstonn minimum 167ghz kernel. These are real crappy Quadrant Standard scores. I'm amazed at how bad they are. I've ran RootBox before, and I was getting around 7000+ I'm not sure why they've dropped so much, and on stock I got 8000+ but this.. This is just sad. I'm not saying this is a RootBox problem, Im just wondering if any of you guys are getting these results?
I tuned everything to its MAX for one and the other one is the usual settings I have it on. But for it to be on max, isn't this a little low.
The 5k one is max settings the 3k one is my normal settings.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Settings for max.
Thanks! Looking forward to yalls comments.
Sent from my Optimus G using xda premium
Eh. Benchmark scores are influenced by so many things, they're not really a very good indicator of performance. Does your phone do what you need it to? Is it quick enough for you? Then don't work about any bm score.
Sent from my Optimus G using XDA Premium HD app
Digil said:
Eh. Benchmark scores are influenced by so many things, they're not really a very good indicator of performance. Does your phone do what you need it to? Is it quick enough for you? Then don't work about any bm score.
Sent from my Optimus G using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Tyler44346 said:
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What??? When you flash a different ROM just wipe "system reset" and if you want system. That will format you data, system and cache partitions. This is known as a "clean flash". Then wipe dalvik/cache and reboot.
BM scores are irrelevant. What matters is how the ROM/phone performs.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Tyler44346 said:
Yeah it is still snappy quick. I'm just obsessed with my bm scores. I have a old phone that is a peice of crap, and now they are about equal in benchmark scores. :/ Its just a little frightening. I think it may just be getting lower and lower because flashing things adds junk, then when you get rid of that and add a different thing, the junk stays there and just keeps piling up. Do you know if LGNPST completely gets rid of everything? or just /system, /data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not why. Software can influence benchmarks. I've used some lagfixes on my Captivate to push it higher than some S3 scores. Ignore benchmarks they have no importance. I'd worry more about the phone doing what I want without issues.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
This. And also, the quality of the benchmarking solution can be an issue as well. I have heard that Quadrant is outdated and does not benchmark fast, quality phones very well. Check out Antutu maybe....
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Its always been easy to cheat at synthetic benchmarks. They're worthless.
Sent via LG E970 with houstonn aokp 4.2.2
I'm going to disagree s bit an say benchmarks are good for testing a phone against it self. Has your phone gotten higher scores before? If so, my guess is temperature throttling. Down load quick system info app. It will show cores and usage while operating so you can see if you're reaching top max settings. Click arrow next to info in notification tray and info will float like qslide
OG e970 stock+
mystery emotionz 5.1
1.72 GHz oc/uv
It's not entirely throttling. I've disabled temp throttling, run it in the deep freeze, etc. I also check time in state logs to verify that all cores stay pegged at maxfreq.
Sent via LG E970 with houstonn aokp 4.2.2
Lg did a great job with optimizing the stock ROM n kernel. This is why stock out scores aosp. To bad you don't feel the difference in day to day use.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
is normal to have such a low number in my verizon lg g3. g2 below lg?I tested 3 times
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sorry for my language
Mine scores a 35453. I notice your battery is at 19%, do you have battery saver enabled? That would be my bet as to the discrepancy.
CapitanFantasma said:
is normal to have such a low number in my verizon lg g3. g2 below lg?I tested 3 times
sorry for my language
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also getting slow scores such as yourself. I figured I should be getting 35k+ but nope only 30k. Be sure to update this thread of you get it figured out.
Thanks
samg77 said:
I'm also getting slow scores such as yourself. I figured I should be getting 35k+ but nope only 30k. Be sure to update this thread of you get it figured out.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What widgets and apps do you still have running in the background? That affects performance. I have bloat disabled and I can routinely get 35K and above. Highest score was 37K.
Benchmarks mean nothing if you don't know the exact state of the device.
I just tested mine and got 34222 as my score. Still a little slower than my HTC One M8.
the G3 throttles back really easily. Unless it's been sitting idle for a while or you've disabled throttling, you won't get 35k+. see this
steelersmb said:
I just tested mine and got 34222 as my score. Still a little slower than my HTC One M8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I just got with Dalvik, but only 28,213 with ART enabled.
Did a factory restore just for kicks.
Quadrant Standard 13918
Antutu 25554
After about 3 mins in the fridge....
Quadrant 23926
Antutu 35001
Temp throttling holds true......
New update
Stock g3 non rooted
Mine is 28459. All bloatware is disabled. My device was fully charged. All apps except Nova launcher are greenified.
Sent from my Rooted VS985
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There we go, finally optimized for the G3.
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What xposed tweaks are these?
Can we revisit this thread...I've been jumping back and forth between my G2 and G3 and in every day use, I find the G2 to be much snappier. Of course I'm running XDABEBB on my G2 and stock rooted on my G3...but the G2 is noticeably quicker. It looks like the benchmarks are showing that the performance of the G3 is being hampered by something. What am I missing here? While I like the G3, I can't figure out why it performs worse than the G2.
ouch1976 said:
Can we revisit this thread...I've been jumping back and forth between my G2 and G3 and in every day use, I find the G2 to be much snappier. Of course I'm running XDABEBB on my G2 and stock rooted on my G3...but the G2 is noticeably quicker. It looks like the benchmarks are showing that the performance of the G3 is being hampered by something. What am I missing here? While I like the G3, I can't figure out why it performs worse than the G2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The display. Same 801 processor having to push that many more pixels. Although, I recall watching a video of the G3 Alpha(I think it's called Alpha, it's the G3 variant with an 805) and it didn't perform all that much better than the non 805 G3.
EvoRocker said:
The display. Same 801 processor having to push that many more pixels. Although, I recall watching a video of the G3 Alpha(I think it's called Alpha, it's the G3 variant with an 805) and it didn't perform all that much better than the non 805 G3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Newer, faster clocked chip with another gig of ram...I would happily sacrifice some pixels for a quicker experience...it reminds me of the Asus Transformer Prime vs the Transformer Infinity...the older version was better in my opinion...
bpyazel said:
Stock rooted, debloated and a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm getting in the 40K-42K range also.
Not sure what the G2 gets in this benchmark.
it would be nice if you guys could edit the img out of your replies.
really sux scrolling through this huge ass screen shot repeatedly.
thanks