ok i gotta question about benchmark tests!
i got my mini running on miniCM RC2 and lovin it! but i was just wondering why my benchmark score isnt that high as by other guys!
Antutu benchmark score is between 950 and 1010
and by quadrant standard its between 850 and 980
i have seen alot higher scores on the forum and wanna know what you do differnt than i do!? ( 1150-1250)
and why do these 2 programms always have differnt results!?
and btw sd tools got me at 6MB/s at writing and 14 MB/s reading it should be alot higher as i got my sd cache up to 3048....
some advice would be cool
1)the antutu benchmark adds points for sd card reading and writing speeds and therefore would be higher than quadrant pro benchmarking.Read both the outputs with patience and you will notice this.
2)as for read/write speeds,it would also depend on the class of the sd card you use.
3)I am surprised you seem to get lower quadrant scores.The ideal way to use this ROM(according to me) is start from scratch on a clean sd card without partition.In any case,there is no need for partition.
Best wishes.
yes.. try quadrant pro and you will have higher scores.
wuhoo 1210 today yeaah
X10mini miniCM RC2 overclocked using XDA Premium App
Related
I'm just wondering what good benchmark results are. I'm at 683 at 1200mhz. What are you guys getting for results?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
demo23019 said:
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using king's #2 kernel. Are my numbers bad? I thought that the lower the number the better. I'm new with using benchmarks, so I really have no idea what I'm doing haha.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
i was using jacs kernel but it doesn't work with update so im stuck at 1ghz for now
Buy yea i never used setcpu to bench and with that yea lower is better.
im getting 755 with long bench
Im sure someone else will come post with similar 1.2 setup
I'm getting 622 on Long Bench in SetCPU
9.723 in Linpack
1940 in Quadrant
That's at 1200MHz on JAC's ExtremeMod with Voodoo, stock Deodexed 2.1
Dan_Brutal said:
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your numbers are fine. Dont be too conserned with benchmark scores even though it is fun to run them from a gear head point of view...
Although if you want a bit more accuracy, run any benchmark three times and average out your total score.
My scores are, so you have an idea:
Linpack= 9.2 averaged on three runs
SetCpu= Long Bench 636 averaged on three runs
Quadrant= 1863 on three runs
*(RyanZ's lagfix has been proven to cheat Quadrant thus giving users a much higher score. example: 2300,2400 etc.)*
Running Bionix 1.5 w/Jacs OC/Voodoo kernel
I am wondering what is the point of just pursuing higher Quadrant score?
Ok, you got a high quadrant score, does it mean your phone is running better?
Better has different aspects:
stability
speed
battery consumption
usability
so, come on guys, please stop pursuing higher score blindly!
I always see people posting how hight their quadrant score were, but not mentioning if their phone were working better with that high scores.
anguslaw said:
I am wondering what is the point of just pursuing higher Quadrant score?
Ok, you got a high quadrant score, does it mean your phone is running better?
Better has different aspects:
stability
speed
battery consumption
usability
so, come on guys, please stop pursuing higher score blindly!
I always see people posting how hight their quadrant score were, but not mentioning if their phone were working better with that high scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point of going for a high quadrant score is speed & response, the higher quadrant is the higher the response and speed of the OS will be ,cause if you check in quadrant it checks CPU/RAM/3D/2D/I/O.
The 3D,2D and RAM doesnt change between OS's but CPU and I/O does,because I/O is the "Input / Output" that if it is higher,the OS will work alot smoother nevertheless because its clean and simple just how it was ment to be.
Also 2.1 and 2.2 does make a diference,i mean read about the diferences and they say the 2.2 can be between 100% to 500% faster,and if you check stock 2.1's 500 compared to stock 2.2's 1400,you get around 280% more speed.
Battery Consumption / Stability : It has nothing to do with Q's scores,thats more of the OS configuration and CPU Scaling.
Just try it out yourself : Use Normal SE 0.24 and do Q ,youll get around 500 or so,and you will notice the OS is very laggy even without a live wallpaper.
Now go for FreeX10 2.2 and do Q,youll get around 1400 and it will work awesomely fast even WITH a live wallpaper.
So in one brief description : The higher Q's score is,the better the device's Hardware interacts with its Software giving you smoother and faster usability of it,and stability + battery consumption is something totally diferent that if they dont work as they should,can be fixed by modifying the OS and its settings.
Edit : Thats why we are after high Q's scores rather than Linpack scores,Linpack only tests CPU speed by using the language defined in the OS (JIT etc)and even if it would be 120 would be useless if the I/O is rubbish.
So yeah,Q's score marks a diference.
Regards
Lawyered ?
So i just ran a test for the antutu benchmark with just the phone and nothing else and this is what i got Ill be running quadrant bench test also and that will be in my next reply Cant wait for root and unlock!
EDIT: Heres quadrant test stock with no 4g or extra stuff
wow how is the Antutu score so high???
hairdewx said:
wow how is the Antutu score so high???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadcore and that 2gb of ram haha imagine if i put my 64gb sd card in there haha
theDK10 said:
quadcore and that 2gb of ram haha imagine if i put my 64gb sd card in there haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sd cards don't help performance.
I got an Antutu score of 18424 right after activation
For reference, my Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet only had scores in the 12,000 range... WOW
I just received my Galaxy Note II today and was a bit shocked that it scored a lower score in AnTuTu's benchmark than my HTC Droid DNA. Given that it has a faster CPU and less pixels to render, you would think it would be faster.
I scored 19164 with my HTC Droid DNA, which is much higher than the 18084 I got with the Galaxy Note II.
makoto said:
I just received my Galaxy Note II today and was a bit shocked that it scored a lower score in AnTuTu's benchmark than my HTC Droid DNA. Given that it has a faster CPU and less pixels to render, you would think it would be faster.
I scored 19164 with my HTC Droid DNA, which is much higher than the 18084 I got with the Galaxy Note II.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Processor is newere on the droid dna, I will always say we don't use benchmarks, so stop being disappointed in your score it by no means represents everyday use..They are both future proof for a few years..
I have to laugh at people who care about benchmark scores when they have a device with a quad core cpu in it running Android.
Haha I don't care really about benchmarks I was just impressed that's all. DNA is nice but I need sd card and something with battery life. Only got about 3/4 through a day on a full charge.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
My s3 scores 6200 on quadrant, 11000 on antutu...tells you benchmarks are worthless.
droidstyle said:
My s3 scores 6200 on quadrant, 11000 on antutu...tells you benchmarks are worthless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im guessing rooted and unlocked? lol i got mine up 12000 rooted with a different kernal. As long as the phone runs fast and smooth i could care less lol
Benchmarks are far from worthless. They are an objective indicator of how certain components perform under the exact same stress test.
Now what you can say is worthless is people who look at a final score that is rather irrational instead of looking at individual component scores.
For example, CPU scores in these benchmarks is a clear indicator of which phone has a faster processor. While the very same phone that had a slower processor may have a significantly better GPU. What this means to the end user is that expect games to perform better on the slower CPU phone, but also expect things like web browsing to perform worse on the same device.
It's all objective comparisons, certainly not something to claim as "worthless" but at the same time if you do not look at it the right way and just throw a generic total score number around, then you won't be fairly comparing any two devices properly.
slide83 said:
Sd cards don't help performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. The higher class sdcard, the faster the read/write speeds = better performance.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
ks3rv3rg said:
Wrong. The higher class sdcard, the faster the read/write speeds = better performance.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you :victory: My 64gb sd card increased the benchmark also. :good: And ya i usually look at certain things when running benchmarks but thats usually when im rooted and unlocked is when i really look at them closely.
After running Quadrant, my phone seems to warm up and each subsequent score is somewhat lower. I started at 6500 and it bottoms out around 6000. Anyone else have this heat problem?
Make sure everything is closed out when u run a test. It's putting everything to work in the phone so it's stressed out which could cause a lot of heat
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
hey guys, got a quick question.
i benchmarked the phone on the stock rom.
in this case only with quadrant benchmark. i got about 40000 points. on all custom roms between 20k-27k points.
i got the snapdragonversion and tested my n5x and compared the phones, both on customroms.
they were pretty even, eventhough the RMN4 should outperform my n5x.
but the most confusing thing was that i got pretty much the half of the points in the quadrant benchmark on a customrom compared to the stock rom.
in the 3dmark "sling shot extreme" benchmark i got:
1096 points (Nexus 5x)
458 points (Redmi Note4)
could anybody run this tests on his phone to gimme a feedback about this?
in the antutu benchmark i got about 64k-66k points, whereas the stock rom is about 81k points
L-ViZ said:
hey guys, got a quick question.
i benchmarked the phone on the stock rom.
in this case only with quadrant benchmark. i got about 40000 points. on all custom roms between 20k-27k points.
i got the snapdragonversion and tested my n5x and compared the phones, both on customroms.
they were pretty even, eventhough the RMN4 should outperform my n5x.
but the most confusing thing was that i got pretty much the half of the points in the quadrant benchmark on a customrom compared to the stock rom.
in the 3dmark "sling shot extreme" benchmark i got:
1096 points (Nexus 5x)
458 points (Redmi Note4)
could anybody run this tests on his phone to gimme a feedback about this?
in the antutu benchmark i got about 64k-66k points, whereas the stock rom is about 81k points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SD 808 on the N5X is a higher end SOC than the SD 625, so N5X should outperform RN4 Qualcomm.
For me the Stock ROM and Custom ROMs get pretty much the same results on all the benchmarks.
alresave said:
The SD 808 on the N5X is a higher end SOC than the SD 625, so N5X should outperform RN4 Qualcomm.
For me the Stock ROM and Custom ROMs get pretty much the same results on all the benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can your share your results from antutu or quadrant standard and your rom/kernel/performance related settings? would be very kind of you
I am using latest miui 10.3.8 with locked boot loader and my geek bench score is
SINGLE CORE-498
MULTI CORE-1751(latest geek bench from play store) I have seen way higher single scoreof other users. Is there any problem in my device ?please help my smartphone is still in warranty.
Hi
Just ran the new Geekbench 5 and my score is attached along with Geekbench 4 score, definitely big difference so what has changed in the scoring method?
I read recent reviews on Geek Bench 5 showing very low scores for POCO. This is clearly a bug in the latest version. Please use GeekBench 4 for accurate scores.