Hi, i have noticed that the available aosp roms are pretty stable and they came super quick to the device.
My question is; how and why is it like this, is the G2 developer-friendly or are they just "cheating" or bypassing something i dont know about?
I also wonder how the G2 is compared to the N5 regarding development of roms and such..thanks in advance.
infexis said:
Hi, i have noticed that the available aosp roms are pretty stable and they came super quick to the device.
My question is; how and why is it like this, is the G2 developer friendly or are they just "cheating" or bypassing something i dont know about?
I also wonder how the G2 is compared to the N5 regarding development of roms and such..thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The G2 smokes the N5 regarding development of ROMs and such... Because there are NO ROMs for the N5!!!???
And they're totally cheating. That's why they're developers. Why ask how or why and just hit the thanks and DONATE.
Mandelbrot.Benoit said:
The G2 smokes the N5 regarding development of ROMs and such... Because there are NO ROMs for the N5!!!???
And they're totally cheating. That's why they're developers. Why ask how or why and just hit the thanks and DONATE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello mr. obvious, fyi. i have donated several times to different devs (you could have asked first) and i ask because i am curious (duh!)
Wait...first we have threads asking why there is no development or ROMS available, folks threatening to return their phones if they don't see ROMs
&
then we have ROMs and folks are asking why we have ROMs? Wait, whut?! LMAO
Mandelbrot.Benoit said:
The G2 smokes the N5 regarding development of ROMs and such... Because there are NO ROMs for the N5!!!???
And they're totally cheating. That's why they're developers. Why ask how or why and just hit the thanks and DONATE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand your question and from what i know is that phones utilizing qualcom chips are easier to develop for because the sources are available unlike exynos.
malek777 said:
I understand your question and from what i know is that phones utilizing qualcom chips are easier to develop for because the sources are available unlike exynos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you talkin' bout Willis?
infexis said:
Hi, i have noticed that the available aosp roms are pretty stable and they came super quick to the device.
My question is; how and why is it like this, is the G2 developer-friendly or are they just "cheating" or bypassing something i dont know about?
I also wonder how the G2 is compared to the N5 regarding development of roms and such..thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no cheating if developers find the correct drivers and sources they can port ROMs easily. Nexus 5 just came I'm sure in a few weeks it will be flooded with ROM and Kernels.
ShyamSasi said:
There is no cheating...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats why i put those quotation marks there...
Sometimes I wish there was a thumbs down button...
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Related
I just went to check whether an update is released (I was bored) and It said "an update is available for your phone, but the servers are busy." What do you guys think this means? There's a thread on this for the skyrocket too...
I think it was ****ed up that Willy Wonka made Charlie think he didn't win the contest.....
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!!!........
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
And Red should be in to break his foot off in your ass shortly.
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
tylerdurdin said:
I think it was ****ed up that Willy Wonka made Charlie think he didn't win the contest.....
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!!!........
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
shadowskorch said:
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's xda... thats 50% of the content.
It's the hidden law that people have to magically know that for the AT&T GS2 forum that you must only post in this thread right here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554561
Just amazing...
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I updated my phone yesterday its lighting fast now and there is this new unicorn wallpaper that is really amazing...
sent on my hacked telly from interspace...
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
yahoowizard said:
It's the hidden law that people have to magically know that for the AT&T GS2 forum that you must only post in this thread right here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554561
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, I didn't know about that 'hidden law'. Sorry everybody
Phalanx7621 said:
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
yahoowizard said:
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh where to start on how wrong you are
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Nick281051 said:
Oh where to start on how wrong you are
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, okay, okay, I've seen that one post about how there's only developers here and whatnot. But yeah, this thread in particular does help developers somewhat, so yeah.
shadowskorch said:
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll face a lot of people like that here lol.
yahoowizard said:
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um that's 3 reasons?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
ChefAnt said:
Um that's 3 reasons?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And now would be a bad time to tell you that I'm currently studying math in college >.>
But yeah, I was going to counter his two with my two, then I added one later on as I thought of it. Never bothered to change the initial sentence though
Dude. When ICS hits it hits. And if u can't find anything on Google about ics release dates or possible release dates u aren't searching right. Either way when it does drop u go right ahead and flash that buggy bloated OS. I'll stick with my AOKP.
Edit: I sound like a douche in this post. So no more arguing. Hope we get official ics too sometime soon. But odds are I won't flash it anyway ;-p
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
yahoowizard said:
Haha, okay, okay, I've seen that one post about how there's only developers here and whatnot. But yeah, this thread in particular does help developers somewhat, so yeah.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh you're right about this being a developers forum but you're completely wrong about the assumptions that only "elite" members can post. You're about as wrong as humanly possible. We only yell at people for threads like these because it does NOT help any developer in any way and this question gets asked over and over again all in separate threads which bog down the forums an leave less room for the more legitimate questions/ posts. And once you've been on here a while you usually know when you should post a thread or when you shouldn't. I've created a total of 2 threads and only one of them was a thread asking a question (the other was for a pair of cm7 themes) and I made sure it hadn't been asked before. Understand a little better?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
yahoowizard said:
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am with you on how this i777 should behave and tone down but you list 3 reasons that I think useless, or should I say "non-productive", here's why
1. If you google/search and find nothing, you MUST think, I mean automatically think, that it is either NOT NOW or NEVER happen. Just like when you search a word and it isn't in the dictionary, you should automatically know that the word is not exist or not being defined yet.
2. custom ROM is for who love to flash, if ones don't want to flash, why would they come here in first place? Moreover, if AT&T decide to release their OFFICIAL ICS for this i777, the owners would get the update automatically, right? Then why stop here anyway
3. If the official ICS did come out? if so, then search/google in step one already yield some results.
Phalanx7621 said:
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not everyone roots/roms. I'm waiting on the official update. From past experiences there are people within the industry on this sitewho have information that isn't yet released to the public.
as title ^^
garykhx said:
as title ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can someone add developers to a phone? Xda isn't a company that has developers that get paid to make custom roms and kernels. Developers here are all volunteers. They don't get paid for what they do. They develop for phones they have.
Show some respect.
jsel said:
How can someone add developers to a phone? Xda isn't a company that has developers that get paid to make custom roms and kernels. Developers here are all volunteers. They don't get paid for what they do. They develop for phones they have.
Show some respect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same think with me bro!
Show some respect
Sent from my ST25i using xda app-developers app
how i know : (
jsel said:
How can someone add developers to a phone? Xda isn't a company that has developers that get paid to make custom roms and kernels. Developers here are all volunteers. They don't get paid for what they do. They develop for phones they have.
Show some respect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk about it. I'm new to here. And btw, I meant to ask the genius users of Xperia U to develop the rom...
garykhx said:
Idk about it. I'm new to here. And btw, I meant to ask the genius users of Xperia U to develop the rom...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you will have to wait its still a new phone even unlocking the phones sim lock hasnt been out long and is only possible through SETools.
give it a while and once ICS is out and the devs get hold of the phone it will happen, altho we have to wait for ICS 1st!!! lol
Once it has ICS you may see more devs. Problem is the phone isnt widely available for free on all carriers and it isnt the flagship model. Most lowend phones receive less dev support.
garykhx said:
as title ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Casually I'm carrying 5 experienced Xperia U developers in my pocket. I've dropped them in the U development forum for your pleasure. I hope I've helped you
Enviado desde mi LT26i usando Tapatalk 2
Don't drop them from too high, they might get hurt and then they'd be useless
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk 2
mrsatan said:
Once it has ICS you may see more devs. Problem is the phone isnt widely available for free on all carriers and it isnt the flagship model. Most lowend phones receive less dev support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say that it has to do primarily with sales, not with the status of the phone as high or low end. The Xperia Play was a mid-high end when it came out, and it didn't have a huge community since it sold poorly. The HTC Wildfire and Xperia X8 were thought as mid-low end or low end models and they still have a following: they sold decently well. One has to take into account other factors as well: whether the bootloader is locked or unlocked (this basically blows Motorola out of the water), whether the company is overall hostile or friendly towards devs (Sony has made huge strides to please them, which has shown nice results), the difficulty of making ROMs themselves (Chinese companies have tablets which are easily hackable, but they tend not to publish source code)...
Hi Guys,
I'm looking for a good custom rom for my girl GT-5839i.-
Looking for ICS ou JB, preferably CM rom.
Can someone help me with some lights.
I'm quite experiente with Huawei phones but I'm finding a bit complicated dealing with this Samsung especially because of the fórum organization and afraid to mess the phone due to compatibility issues.
Thanks in advance.
Actually, there is no ICS/JB rom for our ace-i, but you can try CyanogenMod 7.2 rom of biel, which you can find here..
And if you want to see all the rom, search in development section.
Thanks a lot.
It's a shame no real dev work being done for this phone
Actually, it's not easy, because we don't have gpu sources, however there is a CM9.1 rom, but very laggy.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app
This device sucks loo
Djuganight said:
Thanks a lot.
It's a shame no real dev work being done for this phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude go buy a new phone then, we didn't tell you to buy it. I can't believe you just said no real work done. As all devs are trying they're hardest.(especially biel and his team and sniper killer) I think you should get you lazy as* off that couch and make your own custom rom if all your gonna do is complain
Djuganight said:
Thanks a lot.
It's a shame no real dev work being done for this phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How will you define real development work?
This has been said several times that instead of bashing and saying someone sucks, you should see how hard it is and mostly people aren't paid for doing this. You should be grateful to have this much, many devices don't even have this much development.
Howdareme said:
Dude go buy a new phone then, we didn't tell you to buy it. I can't believe you just said no real work done. As all devs are trying they're hardest.(especially biel and his team and sniper killer) I think you should get you lazy as* off that couch and make your own custom rom if all your gonna do is complain
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other devs are also working hard
And as a common misconception, making custom ROM, or theme or mod isn't development
Just telling you, I mean no disrespect to anyone
Oh, thanks for telling me that!
Biel took almost an year for Cm7, he even bought our phone just for developing. Even I, that don't know much about android, am learning and trying to help. How can you simply spit on everyone's work?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app
Djuganight said:
Hi Guys,
I'm looking for a good custom rom for my girl GT-5839i.-
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are no good roms at all for your girl s5839i -_-
Just rott in hell with stock rom.....
Kernelizer said:
There are no good roms at all for your girl s5839i -_-
Just rott in hell with stock rom.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its rooted already but I would like to have the no time out option for BT otherwise its always a pain to conect to car system.
This feature is only available from ICS onwards or any good custom rom
PS. ****y device....
Is anyone here able to built a CM11 for D802?
For HTC One there are 3 builder but the closest device to Nexus 5 has no-one that can do this? Please help.
Any patience? It's being worked on. No ones getting paid to dev for this device.
Sent from my LG G2
Pr1meSuspect said:
Any patience? It's being worked on. No ones getting paid to dev for this device.
Sent from my LG G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's bad. this device is so nice and fast. compared with my HTC One it is generations ahead.
There's no point in asking this question. Do you really think there's devs who start building the latest cm for the g2 because you say pretty, pretty please, while if you hadn't asked, they wouldn't build it? I really can't understand why people start threds like this.
AuxXxilium said:
that's bad. this device is so nice and fast. compared with my HTC One it is generations ahead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
android404 said:
There's no point in asking this question. Do you really think there's devs who start building the latest cm for the g2 because you say pretty, pretty please, while if you hadn't asked, they wouldn't build it? I really can't understand why people start threds like this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meanies he's just wondering
android404 said:
There's no point in asking this question. Do you really think there's devs who start building the latest cm for the g2 because you say pretty, pretty please, while if you hadn't asked, they wouldn't build it? I really can't understand why people start threds like this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wishfull thinking I wager.
No is the answer you always have unless you ask.
Sometimes asking guarantees a no, difficult. lol
Sent from my LG-D802
threads like this will always keep coming, best is to report it.
Here is how it is: the device is new, as always with new devices it takes time before enough people have the device to work with it. The htc one has been around for some time and enough devs have it to have "3 builders".
In about 6 month when next cm version releases and a new phone releases, guess what? This phone will get the "updates" faster than that new phone. And repeating this year after year until everyone is poor.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
hi.
does anybody know about lollipop for i717r?
i found it in this link.
http://www.johnpinem.com/upgradeupdate-galaxy-note-i717-to-5-0-lollipop/
is this original? can i use rom in this link?
Payman62 said:
hi.
does anybody know about lollipop for i717r?
i found it in this link.
http://www.johnpinem.com/upgradeupdate-galaxy-note-i717-to-5-0-lollipop/
is this original? can i use rom in this link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you say scam. 50 plus pages offering the very same file links for 100's of devices. Click to accept offer to continue type links. Just stick to the devs here on the forum.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717
I don't know if this is legit, but that website is terrible. You have to go through advertising to download the files. And he intentionally split the file into 3 parts so you have to go through more adverts.
Scam!!!
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Payman62 said:
hi.
does anybody know about lollipop for i717r?
i found it in this link.
http://www.johnpinem.com/upgradeupdate-galaxy-note-i717-to-5-0-lollipop/
is this original? can i use rom in this link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, Sorry that's fake.
has lollipop built for galaxy note 1 i717r ?
Payman62 said:
has lollipop built for galaxy note 1 i717r ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Devs are working hard to build it, but there seems to be issues building it from source and flashing it. Some Quincyatt users tried to flash it when a dev build it, but failed to flash. Be patient . You might have to wait until February or earlier, because other devs that make roms for other phones are already building Lollipop 5.0.2, which is major fixes,
TeamAndroid14 said:
You might have to wait until February or earlier,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Februaryyyyyyyyyyy
it is late
Payman62 said:
Februaryyyyyyyyyyy
it is late
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, well devs are working really hard. It isnt easy to build roms from source. It also wasnt easy to build KatKat roms from source for quincy because devs say there always was a problem build roms from source for us . Give it time, it will come..
Posted by crooks tried to post comments would not post should not cost to get updates.
Payman62 said:
Februaryyyyyyyyyyy
it is late
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better late than never. Patience young one
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
captemo said:
Better late than never. Patience young one
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of proof do we have that we aren't waiting on a ghost?
There is no proof. The original Note is a very aged device now, but very reliable. As reliable as the talent of the developers that exist on XDA. You only have a few choices.
Trust and be patient
Develop yourself
Buy another device.
Don't be so quick to throw the first option away. Sorry, I haven't looked at your stats, but I have been here a while with several devices. One thing I have learned, this device won't die.
Good things come to those who wait. They said the Note wouldn't get JB. They said it wouldn't run KK.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
captemo said:
There is no proof. The original Note is a very aged device now, but very reliable. As reliable as the talent of the developers that exist on XDA. You only have a few choices.
Trust and be patient
Develop yourself
Buy another device.
Don't be so quick to throw the first option away. Sorry, I haven't looked at your stats, but I have been here a while with several devices. One thing I have learned, this device won't die.
Good things come to those who wait. They said the Note wouldn't get JB. They said it wouldn't run KK.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was using a Note 3 for a while. Awesome device, but because of the locked bootloder and the fact that safestrap is no longer supported, I just went back to the Note. I'll settle for a slower device as long as I have the flexibility to customize it. I have a hard time understanding why OEMs force consumers into using their ROMs.
P.S. - It's Motorola
captemo said:
There is no proof. The original Note is a very aged device now, but very reliable. As reliable as the talent of the developers that exist on XDA. You only have a few choices.
Trust and be patient
Develop yourself
Buy another device.
Don't be so quick to throw the first option away. Sorry, I haven't looked at your stats, but I have been here a while with several devices. One thing I have learned, this device won't die.
Good things come to those who wait. They said the Note wouldn't get JB. They said it wouldn't run KK.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's all fine and dandy, I just wish these mystery developers, could at least Identify themselves and make a note (no pun intended) that they do in fact have intention on porting 5.0 to the note, and are in fact at some stage of development (no eta required). I prefer to have this than to having someone, who isn't claiming to be one of these "undercover developers", tell me "yeah someone is probably working on it, and it's probably going to be out in February." for all I know you may be getting your information from talking to a horses butt hole (no flame intended). Even a link to an non-credible noob from some backwater internet forum saying he's in the beginning development stages would be better than "yeah someone is probably working on it, and it's probably going to be out in February."
mrsurge said:
That's all fine and dandy, I just wish these mystery developers, could at least Identify themselves and make a note (no pun intended) that they do in fact have intention on porting 5.0 to the note, and are in fact at some stage of development (no eta required). I prefer to have this than to having someone, who isn't claiming to be one of these "undercover developers", tell me "yeah someone is probably working on it, and it's probably going to be out in February." for all I know you may be getting your information from talking to a horses butt hole (no flame intended). Even a link to an non-credible noob from some backwater internet forum saying he's in the beginning development stages would be better than "yeah someone is probably working on it, and it's probably going to be out in February."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd encourage you to check out the "AT&T Galaxy Note I717 Android Development" and take note of some of the users who have contributed in the past. Those individuals would most likely be building for our device.
Well, I am sorry that I am not your developer in shining armor. Its people like you and your lack of patience which keep developers lurking in the shadows.
No flame intended.
Why don't you try yourself then?
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
captemo said:
Well, I am sorry that I am not your developer in shining armor. Its people like you and your lack of patience which keep developers lurking in the shadows.
No flame intended.
Why don't you try yourself then?
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol to tell you the truth, I didn't care who or when 5.0 was coming out, I wouldn't have cared up until someone deliberately said:
Devs are working hard to build it, but there seems to be issues building it from source and flashing it. Some Quincyatt users tried to flash it when a dev build it, but failed to flash. Be patient . You might have to wait until February or earlier, because other devs that make roms for other phones are already building Lollipop 5.0.2, which is major fixes,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which was fine with me, but he DID make it seem like he knew of something going on behind the scenes, so the "proof" I wanted in this case would be a link to some sort of bug report thread or actual development thread. (I wish you could quote me on badgering anyone for a release date LOL) and I voiced this into a reply to the so condescendingly put:
And the Jedi Knight said,
Better late than never. Patience young one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The proof I wanted was in no way shape or form a request for an ETA, but then you had to go ahead and post this
...Trust and be patient...
...Good things come to those who wait....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like we are an angry mob begging you (someone who is not developing for the note, or knows nothing of the matter) for the release date like our lives depend on it.
Ps. I would hardly call what KitKat does on the Note, "running".
mrsurge said:
Ps. I would hardly call what KitKat does on the Note, "running".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lulz. I've had a great experience with select KK ROMs, particularly Unofficial AOKP and SlimKat. Maybe you just need to know what you're doing. Just passing by to say that and off with you now.
P.S. Thanks devs
mrsurge said:
Ps. I would hardly call what KitKat does on the Note, "running".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I've been running Kit Kat on both of my notes since release! At release there was some bugs, but I'd say sounds like you haven't tried too many distros of it lol! Any newer CM11 runs pretty damn good. And Liquid runs well! I personally found BrokenOS to be practically flawless and I'm running the newest release of Spirit ROM right now and damn its killer! So I'd love to know how you can say Kit Kat is hardly running? LMAO!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app