So CM just released the CM installer on to google play that would make flashing ROMs a breeze and they support every SII except i777,,,quite dissapointing...not that flashing ROMs is difficult the traditional way but it would have been nice to have a "one click" option to flash them
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/CyanogenMod_Installer#Supported_Devices
Given CM's recent actions and current direction, I imagine those here on XDA probably don't care too much and will even less as time goes on.
Sent from my SGH-i777 using xda app-developers app
i was able to get i777 roms
sremick said:
Given CM's recent actions and current direction, I imagine those here on XDA probably don't care too much and will even less as time goes on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will you please elaborate? What are CM's recent actions and current direction that is causing concern to the XDA community?
mcjathan said:
Will you please elaborate? What are CM's recent actions and current direction that is causing concern to the XDA community?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree...is this "recent actions" something new that has happened or is this something that has been going on for a while? I have always been pretty happy with CM's roms.
I take it you guys missed them becoming Cyanogen, Inc and our developers leaving them behind to work on Omni instead?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Slavestate said:
I take it you guys missed them becoming Cyanogen, Inc and our developers leaving them behind to work on Omni instead?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they end up being some sort of global sell out money makers or something I'll throw up. I just hope they always remember where they came from. I've always loved the CM team.
Yes...I completely missed them becoming CyanogenMod Inc...thanks for the info.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Slavestate said:
I take it you guys missed them becoming Cyanogen, Inc and our developers leaving them behind to work on Omni instead?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. A bit more detail at https://plus.google.com/106978520009932034644/posts/L8FJkrcahPs
There's a lot of things that annoyed me but I would've tolerated - but the Focal disaster changed everything.
Hope they will support soon
Related
One of the devs of the famous AOKP rom just tweeted that it will be coming soon for our Notes.
http://twitter.com/Whitehawkx/status/212971078211993601
Maybe I'm missing something, but don't we already have AOKP?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
RavenZwei said:
Maybe I'm missing something, but don't we already have AOKP?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not the official one
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Ah, I see. Well, if the official is similar to the unofficial, then I can't wait. Never used AOKP before then and I really liked it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Let's hope. I really miss the thrill of nightlies on CM9. Gives me something new every morning.
Crack flasher *lurking*
G-note rock'n fj cm9!
since it's vague when they say "att note" im really hoping this means i717. international note always seems to get all the love *crossing fingers*
eqthinklab said:
since it's vague when they say "att note" im really hoping this means i717. international note always seems to get all the love *crossing fingers*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. "ATT Note" implies i717. If they would have just said "Note", that would have been vague. Throwing ATT in there makes it clear as day.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
welchertc said:
No. "ATT Note" implies i717. If they would have just said "Note", that would have been vague. Throwing ATT in there makes it clear as day.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct N7000 already had AoKP
"Since God created man, and man created the Galaxy Note, the Galaxy Note are like a gift from God, Randal!"
And he said msm8660 devices which is the S3 processor inside our i717 Notes.
Yeah, white hawk is the man. I used there ROM's on my s2
welchertc said:
No. "ATT Note" implies i717. If they would have just said "Note", that would have been vague. Throwing ATT in there makes it clear as day.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
duh... ur right.. my bad... when i dont see # always assume it's international. now i cant wait!! loved my evo on aokp...
Do you think it will some how have s pen support?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
bhundt said:
Do you think it will some how have s pen support?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No source, no pen ppl
bhundt said:
Do you think it will some how have s pen support?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not since it is based on AOSP
Hello I'm fairly new to Android and I'm just getting to know about flashing and hacking. But what does aokp stand for and what is it, along with cm9. I wouldn't be asking questions but I don't know where to look here. Can someone give me a thread where I can find out about all these terms and what not.. Thank you, greatly appreciated
Sent from my SGH-I717D using xda premium
ronaldruy said:
Hello I'm fairly new to Android and I'm just getting to know about flashing and hacking. But what does aokp stand for and what is it, along with cm9. I wouldn't be asking questions but I don't know where to look here. Can someone give me a thread where I can find out about all these terms and what not.. Thank you, greatly appreciated
Sent from my SGH-I717D using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOKP stands for Android Open Kang Project, CM9 is CyanogenMod 9. Basically they are both similar roms that are built from open source vanilla android, and can be built for basically any android phone so long as a developer is willing to put in the time. They both share some code with each other, yet AOKP tends to have a few more tweaks, and both are crazy fast. They also have a theme engine that allows people to make themes that can be applied on any phone running AOKP or CM9, regardless of which phone.
As for learning other stuff, I point you here for terminology: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=22223555
And for how to root/rom go here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=24539068
I suggest just taking some time on stock to learn the ins and outs of how the stock software works, and reading as much as possible on here, before you try to do anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
ronaldruy said:
Hello I'm fairly new to Android and I'm just getting to know about flashing and hacking. But what does aokp stand for and what is it, along with cm9. I wouldn't be asking questions but I don't know where to look here. Can someone give me a thread where I can find out about all these terms and what not.. Thank you, greatly appreciated
Sent from my SGH-I717D using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both are based off of AOSP which is the Android Open Source Project. Google released the source code for Android ICS and developers take that code and make their own roms. CyanogenMOD is basically pure Android ICS but with some extras. AOKP is based on AOSP but with themes, tweaks, etc. They both are different and both very good.
We currently have both roms but unofficial versions of the roms.
AOKP: http://aokp.co/index.php/news
CyanogenMOD: http://www.cyanogenmod.com/
An official before source drops Nice. Unofficial still works great though.
I thought AOKP was based on CM9
Sent from my CM9‘d SGH-I717 using xda premium.
I've been watching development progress on this since I bought this phone back in March. I'm running one of the latest CM9 builds and while it runs very well, there are still a number of issues with it in terms of stability and functionality. As we know, development on CM9 has mostly come to a standstill.
I've been excited keeping up with the CM10 progress and how it seems to be coming to a usable and relatively stable state, however now I'm reading everybody is working on getting CM10.1 booting instead of continuing to fix the issues with CM10.
Now I don't want to seem unappreciative of the work our developers do on their free time, but what's the point of all of this effort if it doesn't result in a good, usable product?
cloakzore said:
I've been watching development progress on this since I bought this phone back in March. I'm running one of the latest CM9 builds and while it runs very well, there are still a number of issues with it in terms of stability and functionality. As we know, development on CM9 has mostly come to a standstill.
I've been excited keeping up with the CM10 progress and how it seems to be coming to a usable and relatively stable state, however now I'm reading everybody is working on getting CM10.1 booting instead of continuing to fix the issues with CM10.
Now I don't want to seem unappreciative of the work our developers do on their free time, but what's the point of all of this effort if it doesn't result in a good, usable product?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly makes cm9 unusable? As far as I know blue tooth (Edit) and MHL are the only things that have yet to be perfected. I've run a couple cm9 builds that really blow jb on my friend's phones away.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
With everything 100% working? No you won't. Blame it on HTC, not us.
And cm9 runs fine. 10 runs great but has a purple camera and the FFC isn't likely to get fixed easily, if ever. We don't have the jb blobs for it. And the ICS blobs only support pmem.
Can always go back to pmem for everything but it runs terribly then.
The point is I like to tinker and problem solve. Brain exercise so to speak. I don't release ROMs for this reason. I have zero desire to provide support for them. I personally just like to see what I'm able to do and build skills.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
chad0989 said:
With everything 100% working? No you won't. Blame it on HTC, not us.
And cm9 runs fine. 10 runs great but has a purple camera and the FFC isn't likely to get fixed easily, if ever. We don't have the jb blobs for it. And the ICS blobs only support pmem.
Can always go back to pmem for everything but it runs terribly then.
The point is I like to tinker and problem solve. Brain exercise so to speak. I don't release ROMs for this reason. I have zero desire to provide support for them. I personally just like to see what I'm able to do and build skills.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I must say you do it extremely well
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
CM9 is extremely stable. I have used it as a daily driver for a long time now.
I have had CM9 on here longer than any other ROM even stock.
We need someone like Linus Torvalds around here.
HTC doesn't give support to developers?
*cue middle finger seen by millions*
Sent from my HTC Rezound using Tapatalk 2
wlmeng11 said:
We need someone like Linus Torvalds around here.
HTC doesn't give support to developers?
*cue middle finger seen by millions*
Sent from my HTC Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
chad0989 said:
With everything 100% working? No you won't. Blame it on HTC, not us.
And cm9 runs fine. 10 runs great but has a purple camera and the FFC isn't likely to get fixed easily, if ever. We don't have the jb blobs for it. And the ICS blobs only support pmem.
Can always go back to pmem for everything but it runs terribly then.
The point is I like to tinker and problem solve. Brain exercise so to speak. I don't release ROMs for this reason. I have zero desire to provide support for them. I personally just like to see what I'm able to do and build skills.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Understood. I really didn't mean to be seem to be assigning blame -- I'm extremely appreciative of and wholly admire the work you and others have put into this device. I was asking as a genuine question as it was unclear to me what kind of direction is being aimed for and what the goals are.
Keep doing your thing, and I appreciate the input. :good:
And I'm far from an expert on these things (my background is in system administration and networking, not programming), but on the camera issue, doesn't the Rezound use the same camera module as the Droid Incredible? I know there are working CM10 builds with everything on the camera working but video. Perhaps this could be of use?
GrayTheWolf said:
CM9 is extremely stable. I have used it as a daily driver for a long time now.
I have had CM9 on here longer than any other ROM even stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Sent from my HTC Rezound.
alphabets said:
This.
Sent from my HTC Rezound.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Obaterista93 said:
This.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That.
alphabets said:
This.
Sent from my HTC Rezound.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obaterista93 said:
This.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These.
Sent from my HTC Rezound using Tapatalk 2
wlmeng11 said:
These.
Sent from my HTC Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those.
jon7701 said:
Those.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dat there
dyetheskin said:
dat there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dass es.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Obaterista93 said:
Dass es.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beanstalk.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Ya some funny dudes....lol.
How about THAT!
imparables said:
Ya some funny dudes....lol.
How about THAT!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean... THIS?
Obaterista93 said:
You mean... THIS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well,
You can go with this, or you can go with that.
But this is where it's at
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Squirrel1620 said:
Well,
You can go with this, or you can go with that.
But this is where it's at
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That commercial....................
Is there a way to use Samsungs multi window app on an AOSP ROM?
yes.
but it would involve you creating the app.
probably couldnt call it multiwindow...call it dualview.
No, and won't happen unfortunately.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
There is an app called cornerstone multitasking which works simular to multi Window. But it's a tablet app and is only available as a feature that would have to be baked into a rom. Idk if anyone has started using this mod or if it even works for jb. But it appears to have been designed only for 7 and 10 inch tablets. It would look crammed for four or note 2.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
iflip said:
There is an app called cornerstone multitasking which works simular to multi Window. But it's a tablet app and is only available as a feature that would have to be baked into a rom. Idk if anyone has started using this mod or if it even works for jb. But it appears to have been designed only for 7 and 10 inch tablets. It would look crammed for four or note 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cornerstone has pretty much been abandoned because of bugs. I really wish more would have been done with it so the bugs could've been worked out and I could get rid of touchwiz.
I'm sure other devs will come up with their own variants. And just a matter of time when Android will implement it. Maybe in Android 5 or 6.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
eraursls1984 said:
Cornerstone has pretty much been abandoned because of bugs. I really wish more would have been done with it so the bugs could've been worked out and I could get rid of touchwiz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was abandoned because Google told CM that they couldn't implement it into CM.
JetBlue said:
It was abandoned because Google told CM that they couldn't implement it into CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that's a shame. I'm glad I didn't really use Multi-window enough to find a specific niche for it to matter, since I've moved on to AOSP. There was only a few things holding me back on TouchWiz, and that was one of them. But honestly, there's very few times where it actually is worth using.
It'd still be nice to be an option though. Wonder what the conflict is.
JetBlue said:
It was abandoned because Google told CM that they couldn't implement it into CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never heard that, never even seen a version of CM with it in it (not saying there wasn't one) all the other roms I did see and use that had cornerstone weren't supported very long because of the bugs (the reason the devs gave for not continuing to release with cornerstone)
eraursls1984 said:
I never heard that, never even seen a version of CM with it in it (not saying there wasn't one) all the other roms I did see and use that had cornerstone weren't supported very long because of the bugs (the reason the devs gave for not continuing to release with cornerstone)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Steve Kondik posted cornerstone pics for CM 10.1 it was going to be implemented but CM was threatened by Google saying they would be banned from the Android Market. If you want to read the full thing it's in the comments of that post. https://plus.google.com/100275307499530023476/posts/ViCME1bb8F6
Cornerstone for Jelly Bean was just released as open source. I would love to see it baked into Paranoid. Would make a great experience.
txyaloo said:
Cornerstone for Jelly Bean was just released as open source. I would love to see it baked into Paranoid. Would make a great experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you see that?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
diamantericos said:
Where did you see that?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/Onskreen/cornerstone/wiki/Getting-Started:Developers
Is there a pure AOSP rom out there or nearly pure made to work with the DNA?
Short answer: Nope
Long answer: You are more than welcome to look through the Development thread. There are only a dozen or so Roms so it shouldn't take you too long
Longer answer: CM10.1 is in the works but I'm not sure its at daily driver status yet.
Sorry for the sarcasm...
Memnoch73 said:
Short answer: Nope
Long answer: You are more than welcome to look through the Development thread. There are only a dozen or so Roms so it shouldn't take you too long
Longer answer: CM10.1 is in the works but I'm not sure its at daily driver status yet.
Sorry for the sarcasm...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol your longer answer wasshorter than the long answer
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Cm 10.1 is working except for camera iirc.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Bigandrewgold said:
Cm 10.1 is working except for camera iirc.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. It's almost there. As soon as the camera is working I would consider it dd status
Sent from my ViperDNA using Tapatalk 2
I've been using CM 10.1 for my dd for a little over a week and have had no issues other than the lack of camera and an easily removed issue with GPS.
I'm no developer, but from my experience with the LG Spectrum, once CM has all of the hardware functioning, then AOSP and AOKP are not terribly difficult. In the case of the spectrum, a fully functional pacman ROM was released a few months after CM was completed.
Question of my own. What exactly needs to be done to gain official support for CM? I would love to be able to flash nightlies like on my nexus 7.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Cm is not pure aosp.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Lykarsis said:
I've been using CM 10.1 for my dd for a little over a week and have had no issues other than the lack of camera and an easily removed issue with GPS.
I'm no developer, but from my experience with the LG Spectrum, once CM has all of the hardware functioning, then AOSP and AOKP are not terribly difficult. In the case of the spectrum, a fully functional pacman ROM was released a few months after CM was completed.
Question of my own. What exactly needs to be done to gain official support for CM? I would love to be able to flash nightlies like on my nexus 7.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using it as dd off and on. It's good enough for me to use it a few days a week for now. I really hope development picks up after cm10 is ready. I feel like not enough developers have this phone for there to be a lot of support. Idk if devs actually need the phone to make ROMs for it though.
Regardless, Chad, cr, fly, and the other devs working on cm have done a spectacular job. If we have a cm ROM, aokp, and pa I will be ecstatic.
Is there any point in having a 100% pure aosp ROM?
Sent from my ViperDNA using Tapatalk 2
dogredwing1 said:
Cm is not pure aosp.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm aware. But it is close, so once CM is achieved, it wouldn't be too hard to get AOSP. Or at least that is how it was explained to me.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Lykarsis said:
I'm aware. But it is close, so once CM is achieved, it wouldn't be too hard to get AOSP. Or at least that is how it was explained to me.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? Cm is aosp with fixes and more options. It's literally better.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
123421342 said:
Why? Cm is aosp with fixes and more options. It's literally better.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, but some people prefer just plain AOSP. My girlfriend is that way.
Wish that would port paradroid...would be nasty on this phone..
Lykarsis said:
I agree, but some people prefer just plain AOSP. My girlfriend is that way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it IS AOSP. Even so, how can someone prefer less options? Not even that, how can someone prefer a worse experience?
123421342 said:
But it IS AOSP. Even so, how can someone prefer less options? Not even that, how can someone prefer a worse experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because everyone is different...
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
123421342 said:
But it IS AOSP. Even so, how can someone prefer less options? Not even that, how can someone prefer a worse experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't want all the crap themeing and "mods" that come with CM, I just want pure android, if I want to add something ill do it myself.
I've contemplated back and forth for some time whether I want to build AOSP for the DNA. The camera really has been a PITA for another device I've been working on; It shouldn't be as camera works on CM10.1. However, it would suck to put all that work into it for the camera to be the hold up (although, I don't think it will be as difficult since its 8mp and the one I have somewhat working is 13mp).
The main issue is that if I build AOSP (well technically I have already built it), I would prefer to stick to google's base code as much as possible without bringing in CAF/CM code to achieve goals. Doing this, makes things a bit more difficult.
I suppose it's also a bit of whether it is worth the effort and if people really want it as well.
drewX2 said:
I've contemplated back and forth for some time whether I want to build AOSP for the DNA. The camera really has been a PITA for another device I've been working on; It shouldn't be as camera works on CM10.1. However, it would suck to put all that work into it for the camera to be the hold up (although, I don't think it will be as difficult since its 8mp and the one I have somewhat working is 13mp).
The main issue is that if I build AOSP (well technically I have already built it), I would prefer to stick to google's base code as much as possible without bringing in CAF/CM code to achieve goals. Doing this, makes things a bit more difficult.
I suppose it's also a bit of whether it is worth the effort and if people really want it as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Iam sure people will want goodies from you, drew.
Just put your stuff in front of public and see how people gobble them up :fingers-crossed:
I see your Schwartz is as big as mine!
CM, AOSP ... it's all gravy.. they'll get it.. all of it.. in time.. They have made enormous stride with CM 10.1 it's almost unbelievable what they've accomplished.. DD for me.. because from here on out, it's all fixes and tweaks.. I wouldn't mind a pure Vanilla AOSP rom, but these things take time.. We'll get there.. Not just yet.. but I'm sure things are cooking now that many of the issues have been fixed..
So for the first few months I've had this thing I turned off almost all touchwiz bells and whistles. Bad memories from previously owned samsung devices.
Anywho I've recently been doing a lot of Youtubing and am finding multiwindow very very helpful (I'm mainly interested in the audio). Anyone else found a us for it?
How about the other stuff like air *?
alephnaut said:
Anyone else found a us for it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if you'd consider this a "use" but multi-window is/was a major factor in my decision to run CM on my S4!
Cool. CM supports multiwin?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
I have been using multi Window for a long time s3 rooms had it to. I use my phone often at work for real work. Reading prints and calculator at the same time, sending emails and reviewing a doc to make sure I am correct.
alephnaut said:
Cool. CM supports multiwin?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope that's only for TW no way of easily porting that over and since cm is for many different devices... Let's just say it would be a massive nuclear pain in the ass to even attempt to port it over... Not to mention it would almost certainly be illegal because of patents and probably have to dirty hack with samsung manufacturer code signatures.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
alephnaut said:
Cool. CM supports multiwin?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I find multiwin to be annoying, I run CM to NOT have any TouchWiz stuff, most of which I don't need or want.
CM does everything I want and/or need so I don't miss any of the TouchWiz annoyances.... err, I mean, features.