last night I installing antutu benchmark app and do some benchmarking.
The result is make me surprised!
I only manage to score 45k mark.
What happens actually?
I'm using B330 stock rom
It is supposed to score more than 50K
Anyone want to share their antutu score?
In honor 7 i have 51273 points, but i have second phone (low price) xiaomi redmi note 3 pro and have 85k
Why do you want to use a (mainly) graphics benchmark on a non gaming SOC?
Also score depends a lot on the ROM, settings, services and apps running. B180 got 53K and B370 got 51K.
PC Mark is a more (general) suitable benchmark for this SOC.
Antutu benchmark not all about graphic, it benchmarking your ram, cpu etc,.
And I'm using latest antutu app.
Stock rom b370
I got a AnTuTu score of 53454 yesterday?
Sent from my PLK-L01 using XDA-Developers mobile app
On b371 stock I might say?
Sent from my PLK-L01 using XDA-Developers mobile app
As reported by @Speedo.thc he got a pretty good score here(56129)
Related
I'm just wondering what good benchmark results are. I'm at 683 at 1200mhz. What are you guys getting for results?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
demo23019 said:
Thats really low
Is this quadrant without lagfix at 1.2 score?
If so i get with new JI5 at 1gz no lagfix 915
And 8.3 score with linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using king's #2 kernel. Are my numbers bad? I thought that the lower the number the better. I'm new with using benchmarks, so I really have no idea what I'm doing haha.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
i was using jacs kernel but it doesn't work with update so im stuck at 1ghz for now
Buy yea i never used setcpu to bench and with that yea lower is better.
im getting 755 with long bench
Im sure someone else will come post with similar 1.2 setup
I'm getting 622 on Long Bench in SetCPU
9.723 in Linpack
1940 in Quadrant
That's at 1200MHz on JAC's ExtremeMod with Voodoo, stock Deodexed 2.1
Dan_Brutal said:
I got 8.4 with linpack, and 633 with long bench in the set CPU app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your numbers are fine. Dont be too conserned with benchmark scores even though it is fun to run them from a gear head point of view...
Although if you want a bit more accuracy, run any benchmark three times and average out your total score.
My scores are, so you have an idea:
Linpack= 9.2 averaged on three runs
SetCpu= Long Bench 636 averaged on three runs
Quadrant= 1863 on three runs
*(RyanZ's lagfix has been proven to cheat Quadrant thus giving users a much higher score. example: 2300,2400 etc.)*
Running Bionix 1.5 w/Jacs OC/Voodoo kernel
what apps is everyone using for their benchmark tests? i did antutu and quadrant, got 24,430 and 12292 respectively. are those good scores?
edit: i also ran vellamo and got 2081 on html5 and 814 on metal...
I got 12700 in Quadrant and 25524 in AnTuTu all stock. Benchmarks really don't mean much.
Other people run 3dmark and Geekbench too. And Epic Citadel.
hey guys, got a quick question.
i benchmarked the phone on the stock rom.
in this case only with quadrant benchmark. i got about 40000 points. on all custom roms between 20k-27k points.
i got the snapdragonversion and tested my n5x and compared the phones, both on customroms.
they were pretty even, eventhough the RMN4 should outperform my n5x.
but the most confusing thing was that i got pretty much the half of the points in the quadrant benchmark on a customrom compared to the stock rom.
in the 3dmark "sling shot extreme" benchmark i got:
1096 points (Nexus 5x)
458 points (Redmi Note4)
could anybody run this tests on his phone to gimme a feedback about this?
in the antutu benchmark i got about 64k-66k points, whereas the stock rom is about 81k points
L-ViZ said:
hey guys, got a quick question.
i benchmarked the phone on the stock rom.
in this case only with quadrant benchmark. i got about 40000 points. on all custom roms between 20k-27k points.
i got the snapdragonversion and tested my n5x and compared the phones, both on customroms.
they were pretty even, eventhough the RMN4 should outperform my n5x.
but the most confusing thing was that i got pretty much the half of the points in the quadrant benchmark on a customrom compared to the stock rom.
in the 3dmark "sling shot extreme" benchmark i got:
1096 points (Nexus 5x)
458 points (Redmi Note4)
could anybody run this tests on his phone to gimme a feedback about this?
in the antutu benchmark i got about 64k-66k points, whereas the stock rom is about 81k points
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SD 808 on the N5X is a higher end SOC than the SD 625, so N5X should outperform RN4 Qualcomm.
For me the Stock ROM and Custom ROMs get pretty much the same results on all the benchmarks.
alresave said:
The SD 808 on the N5X is a higher end SOC than the SD 625, so N5X should outperform RN4 Qualcomm.
For me the Stock ROM and Custom ROMs get pretty much the same results on all the benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can your share your results from antutu or quadrant standard and your rom/kernel/performance related settings? would be very kind of you
Can you guys say what is the maximum benchmark score for mido 4/64gb variant in latest software update I Mean miui 9 I got a score of 59k is it good?
meheboobalam1 said:
Can you guys say what is the maximum benchmark score for mido 4/64gb variant in latest software update I Mean miui 9 I got a score of 59k is it good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm? Are you still that concern with benchmarks these days?
anyways, i got 64K+ on ViperOs, a good score but in Quadrant i got uninspiring results. (SD, 3GB version)
59K is good enough as long its perform well as day to day driver without any hiccup.
GabrielScott said:
Hm? Are you still that concern with benchmarks these days?
anyways, i got 64K+ on ViperOs, a good score but in Quadrant i got uninspiring results. (SD, 3GB version)
59K is good enough as long its perform well as day to day driver without any hiccup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using official stock ROM. Not a fan of custom ROM not anymore ultimately we will come back to stock ROM so why. Not modified stock ROM like Xiaomi.eu
65k on AEX without any modifications, 4/64gb variant.
64-65k on redmi note 4x (sd) 3/32, rom RR
Mine is 0 coz I dun care... Lol
aabenroi said:
Mine is 0 coz I dun care... Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if I was going to use benchmarking apps, I would rather use Geekbench4 or PC Mark2.0.
DarthJabba9 said:
Well, if I was going to use benchmarking apps, I would rather use Geekbench4 or PC Mark2.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
aabenroi said:
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MTk is scoring high because it's faster but for short amounts of time because they overheat, after 10-15minutes of heavy usage like gaming it's reducing CPU/GPU frequency to reduce heat (thermal throttling), and then the performance is much worse.
Thats why benchmarks are useless, they are too short to show the real performance. For example Snapdragon 625 can keep the same performance for hours during heavy gaming without thermal throttling, because it's super power & thermal efficient.
aabenroi said:
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The secret is to look at single-core performance. Multi-core benchmarks are always very high on MTK because their chips usually have more cores than others. However, how many apps actually use all those cores? All that the extra cores do is to suck your battery.
k3lcior said:
MTk is scoring high because it's faster but for short amounts of time because they overheat, after 10-15minutes of heavy usage like gaming it's reducing CPU/GPU frequency to reduce heat (thermal throttling), and then the performance is much worse.
Thats why benchmarks are useless, they are too short to show the real performance. For example Snapdragon 625 can keep the same performance for hours during heavy gaming without thermal throttling, because it's super power & thermal efficient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I agree,
Beside that, benchmark just measure raw power, big raw power is useless without good optimization.
Snapdragon n Kirin have lower raw power but easily beat mtk because they're way more optimized.
DarthJabba9 said:
The secret is to look at single-core performance. Multi-core benchmarks are always very high on MTK because their chips usually have more cores than others. However, how many apps actually use all those cores? All that the extra cores do is to suck your battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nowdays, mtk score very high at single core as well... But it still sucks...
I am using latest miui 10.3.8 with locked boot loader and my geek bench score is
SINGLE CORE-498
MULTI CORE-1751(latest geek bench from play store) I have seen way higher single scoreof other users. Is there any problem in my device ?please help my smartphone is still in warranty.
Hi
Just ran the new Geekbench 5 and my score is attached along with Geekbench 4 score, definitely big difference so what has changed in the scoring method?
I read recent reviews on Geek Bench 5 showing very low scores for POCO. This is clearly a bug in the latest version. Please use GeekBench 4 for accurate scores.