I have tried Mesa,krsh,rage,extended stock.
Mesa apparently gives better battery life but it takes so long to boot, almost 2 mins tops!
which is the best in terms of performance?i dont actually care about the battery life
try panic
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1861905
rak.subramanian said:
I have tried Mesa,krsh,rage,extended stock.
Mesa apparently gives better battery life but it takes so long to boot, almost 2 mins tops!
which is the best in terms of performance?i dont actually care about the battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
threads comparin Roms and/or kernels are strictly not entertained here. Try different kernels for your phone and get your own opinion or read each and every supported kernel's thread and post there. Please friends, don't reply and bump this thread.
.:goutham:.
gouthamthemostwanted said:
threads comparin Roms and/or kernels are strictly not entertained here. Try different kernels for your phone and get your own opinion or read each and every supported kernel's thread and post there. Please friends, don't reply and bump this thread.
.:goutham:.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dint know i shouldnt post here,
That said, is it really important that you warn people? Lol
Sent from my ST15i using xda premium
:fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed:
I am on xperia mini GB
Where can i find stock kernel with only two way call recording patch? plus maybe root, not busybox(on rage kernel is very old version) and not other stuff..
Closed as best kernel/ROM threads are not allowed, this one must've slipped past.
Thanks
AvRS
Related
Guy can we make little pool. What is best kernel and what version battery wise in your opinion? i m prety sure there is alot of people asking this question. You can just say name of kernel and version. thank you
Send from my SG2-i777 using XDA Premium App
No, try them yourself.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Had you spent a little time searching you would have found this thread already in progress and a number of similar threads already closed.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1511725
Miami_Son said:
Had you spent a little time searching you would have found this thread already in progress and a number of similar threads already closed.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1511725
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya. This thread is gonna get closed. There's really only 2 kernel options so it's not that hard to try them both out.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Its not same. Other thread is more details whats disabled what apps you using and **** i dont care what you use i want to know what version of the kernel seem to be best battery wise. DO NOT post in here unless you posting kernel and version.
Send from my SG2-i777 using XDA Premium App
Go try for yourself ROM 1.1 and wow people are ignorant kernel 2.6.
EDIT: PUTTING HELPFUL STUFF HERE?
Each persons use and what the expect of the phone is different. If you have wakelocks keeping your phone awake due to a rogue app, you will have less of a battery life than others. Asking people what they use is like asking what browser they use. Some might be better than others but it depends on what you like and what you are used to.
Oh and if something makes a difference, look at the amounts of thanks compared to the # of posts... and he even has a "GIVE ME THANKS" sig.... If you have to ASK for thanks, something is wrong with you.
Entropy512s kernel is basically legendary for how good it is. I've read people love 12/8, and 2/07 I believe and a few others. I use his latest.
I've read Siyah is good too, people claim better battery live on 2.6.8 and 2.6.9.
I wouldn't say either is "best" but I prefer Entropys. It's smooth and comes with CWM verses the, I believe, redpill in Siyah.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Kernel alone has little to do with battery life. There are so many factors affecting battery usage that the premise of your question is worthless and is the reason these kinds of threads get closed. They serve no purpose. As was said, try them for yourself because that's the ONLY way you will find what works best for you, your phone and the way you use it. There are no shortcuts in this regard.
So much info out there, whats the best kernel out there at the moment? Neak's sounds intresting im mainly looking to over/underclock my devices.
Thanks andy
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Siyah ore speedmod i say
But just try!
Just try them and decide yourself. In my opinion, the best car in the world is the Lancia Integrale I currently drive, the best kernel is Siyah which I'm currently using, but many people disagree with me on both counts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Best rom Best karnel posts are banned try them all .
A question = Q&A PLEASE .
jje
well u can go and read what peaple say about every KERNEL and then decide wich one u want
that how i did and choce to stay with stock + root lol
andyuk77 said:
So much info out there, whats the best kernel out there at the moment? Neak's sounds intresting im mainly looking to over/underclock my devices.
Thanks andy
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best is undoubtedly Noob-kernel. Try it. Best kernel ever.
Sent from my little monster GS2
Yandvoiris said:
well u can go and read what peaple say about every KERNEL and then decide wich one u want
that how i did and choce to stay with stock + root lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fine but we will have yet another post asking exactly the same tomorrow and the day after and the day after to join the list of five thousand posts already asking the same question .
We would be far better off with a kindergarten section for repetitive posts .
jje
The reason we have threads dedicated to kernels is so that you can click on those threads and read what people are saying about them. From there, you flash the kernel and you watch how your phone behaves for a day or two. At this point, you come back to the kernel thread and make a post about your experience.
Creating threads asking for people to do this for you is lazy but it also doesn't really work. Why? Because your device couple with your usage patterns will be different than the 6 people who actually reply to your thread with random kernel recommendations. Making this post and the hundreds we get exactly like it COMPLETELY POINTLESS AND A WASTE OF SPACE. If you're too lazy to read/search and make up your own mind, XDA might not be for you.
Closed.
Hey folks,
As everyone know most of the smart phones we have aren't really smart in terms of there battery life. From stock Roms to all of the customized roms passed by chiefs have there pros and cons, and this thread has no intention to bring on any comparison among them..
Share your experience about your battery life with the ROM you have installed on GS3, along with the kernel information and any other tweaks you guns have. Hope it would be very useful for those who always want there batteries to give a extra juice
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Hidden best KERNEL/ROM thread. Good try though...
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
This one:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1935514
drakester09 said:
This one:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1935514
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, i like this one too
Heaven forbid we have a discussion comparing battery life. Geez.
OP: I like the idea of this discussion. Having limited experience, it will greatly benefit me. Thank you for trying. Too bad people take the Internet too seriously to just have a friggin' discussion.
Posted using TapaTalk on a Galaxy S3, slave to AT&T, Constitutionalist American, little "r" republican.
Depends on your usage...try them all and see
AdamRRT said:
Heaven forbid we have a discussion comparing battery life. Geez.
OP: I like the idea of this discussion. Having limited experience, it will greatly benefit me. Thank you for trying. Too bad people take the Internet too seriously to just have a friggin' discussion.
Posted using TapaTalk on a Galaxy S3, slave to AT&T, Constitutionalist American, little "r" republican.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They get locked because it's BLOODY IRRELEVANT.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
....fml why dont people read the freakin rules man.... seriously
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
AdamRRT said:
Heaven forbid we have a discussion comparing battery life. Geez.
OP: I like the idea of this discussion. Having limited experience, it will greatly benefit me. Thank you for trying. Too bad people take the Internet too seriously to just have a friggin' discussion.
Posted using TapaTalk on a Galaxy S3, slave to AT&T, Constitutionalist American, little "r" republican.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is your first post here on xda and it was to support someone breaking the rules.
Well done sir, good start.
Best ROM/kernel threads are pointless because best is completely subjective. Same goes for battery life, your usage and mine could be completely different, ergo, what's good for the goose is not necessarily good for the gander.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I got in before the lock
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
I actually find this kind of thing useful, having come from another phone. I really can't be bothered trying every different ROM out there for several days to evaluate and decide which is best.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
The post does not ask which ROM or Kernel is "better" because that is meaningless, but it is asking about user experiences with different ROMS and battery life.
I don't have time to try all the different ROMS out there, and this is why this is a forum no? Sharing experiences maybe?
Crdroid is my choice, totally worth trying
This is a developers forum. Not random talk and discussion, try to argue with people that follow the rules because they don't suit you, get mad when called out on not following the rules forum. If you read it objectively, you will see its a best kernel/ROM thread. He is asking for your combo of ROM and kernel with the battery life. That is a hidden way of asking what gives the best battery life. It will not work for every person the same. Its subjective to the user. There's nothing with a census of best. Some things work better for some and others it will be terrible. Get over it.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
b-eock said:
This is a developers forum. Not random talk and discussion, try to argue with people that follow the rules because they don't suit you, get mad when called out on not following the rules forum. If you read it objectively, you will see its a best kernel/ROM thread. He is asking for your combo of ROM and kernel with the battery life. That is a hidden way of asking what gives the best battery life. It will not work for every person the same. Its subjective to the user. There's nothing with a census of best. Some things work better for some and others it will be terrible. Get over it.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Asking what ROM is the best might be pointless but asking which ROM people PREFER is different.
Statistic work with the amount of answers. If one person say it prefer ROM "X", it might worth nothing. But if 10000 people say they prefer ROM "X", then it doesn't matter if people use their phone differently. ROM "X" is the most prefered ROM all around.
True that the battery life will differ from individuals because not everybody use the phone the same way but one person use his phone always the same way. I flash at least 3 ROMs a week so I can objectively compare the battery life of each ROM.
You might get different battery life depending on your use, but still you can tell which one give better battery life
Noobs are getting smarter. Disguising best rom threads as something like this.
But its the wrong type of smart XD
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
I got good results with SuperNexus and stock CM10. But I end up using different rom, because these are too basic and I wanted to use some stock samsung apps.
Although battery life depends on various factors. You can improve battery life by lowering sync and disable location services as much as possible.
Here is a great guide for improving battery life. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=937080
b-eock said:
But its the wrong type of smart XD
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really don't see the problem. The last thread about "which is the best ROM" ended with someone proposing to make a comparison chart of the ROMs, and it was agreed(by the moderator) that it was a good idea. This thread is a comparison of the battery life between ROMs.
---------- Post added at 02:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:01 AM ----------
rl421403 said:
Here is a great guide for improving battery life. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=937080
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is a great guide:good:
Since few users gave their experience,I'll talk about mine: I've tried XPower on JellyBean 4.1 and with the Galaxyh(I think that would be the name) kernel
It gave me 48h and still had 7% battery left on the phone,so it would go till maybe 60h..
It was the one that gave me more battery life in all the Rom's I've tried so far
Right now I'm on Omega Aokp v4.2 and with the Syiah kernel 1.7rc3+
Since the installation of this Rom and kernel was yesterday,I can't give some good answer about the battery life on this,because once I'm a noob I've just figured out how to turn only dual core to save some battery late night..
Sent from something better than my pc
I've seen several posts saying that the Siyah Kernel is the best, the performance and the battery life is impressive. Only I did not see much difference in battery life. Yank555 already used also in ROM AOSP and the difference was too small. I'm now using kernel Phenomenal 4.0 Extreme, that I noticed a big difference from the others: the battery life, but the performance is not so good, when scrolling within the application's configuration a bit of lag. So I would like to know the opnion of you, I want a kernel that preferably battery life, so I do not use my phone, only the basics, such as SMS, calls, data, and others.
Sorry my english, I'm brazilian and I have only basic knowledge in English.
Sorry - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1935514
Thanks for the warning dude.
KernelGM said:
Thanks for the warning dude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't ask "what's best ", it could be more appropriate if you say something like "somebody please gimme some advice on what kernel I should use"
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
qtwrk said:
Don't ask "what's best ", it could be more appropriate if you say something like "somebody please gimme some advice on what kernel I should use"
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is just "what's best" in another form. No form of "Advice on X for me" is really allowed because it's a too personal question. He needs to try various kernels for himself and make up his own mind. Laziness will be the death of humanity one day.
The day people start to read the stickies I'll be a happy moderator.
Thread Closed.
There are a plethora of kernals available for the i9300 but being a bit of a noob I'm wondering what the differences and benifits are in each...coding, features or otherwise?
I have personally being using WanamLite 4.1.2 roms for the past 8months or so, recently updating from LLA Tto MB5. And about two weeks before updating I switched from Siyah 1.8.9 to Boeffla 2.7-2.8 and personally found that battery life was improved. I'm still running Boeffla on MB5 however Wanam has now released his Adam kernal. I know other kernal are available but what are differences as I mentioned above.
Any info would be great guys.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
The differences are:
-battery life (as you've said) for kernels like phenomenal, hydrx-d (for example)
-sound improvements for kernels like boeffla
-speed
various kernels work differently on various sgs3's so just test em and choose which one you like more
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
kernEl
^
^
^
This ^
d4niven said:
There are a plethora of kernals available for the i9300 but being a bit of a noob I'm wondering what the differences and benifits are in each...coding, features or otherwise?
You can only read and try they all tell you what they claim to improve .
Best rom what rom what kernel posts are not allowed .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
Ahh ok I was wondering why I couldn't find much on this topic.
I'm not looking to be told which is the best or any form of heads up between kernals.
It's just often I see 'tweaked'. So I was hoping to find out in what way each kernal is tweaked and how will this affect things.
Just plain facts so people can make up their own mind.
Thought it would be good to have a centralised location for a discussion that covers this.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
It's worth having a really in depth look at the kernel threads, and following links to ie. Governors explained, and stuff like that, it takes a while to get to grips with it, but then half the fun is going through the learning process, finding the facts, building the picture, gaining understanding, the main point to note I'd that most custom kernels come with fully functioning and optimized default set up, so you don't need to do anything initially giving you tinge to figure out how all the functions effect performance.
As always reading lots is the key
d4niven said:
A
Just plain facts so people can make up their own mind.
Thought it would be good to have a centralised location for a discussion that covers this.
We have had that and it just gets into a my kernel is bigger then your kernel post .
Good idea then PM a mod and put it to them .
I will give my opinion none is better they are all much the same performance wise on SGS3 .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
slaphead20 said:
It's worth having a really in depth look at the kernel threads, and following links to ie. Governors explained, and stuff like that, it takes a while to get to grips with it, but then half the fun is going through the learning process, finding the facts, building the picture, gaining understanding, the main point to note I'd that most custom kernels come with fully functioning and optimized default set up, so you don't need to do anything initially giving you tinge to figure out how all the functions effect performance.
As always reading lots is the key
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JJEgan said:
d4niven said:
A
Just plain facts so people can make up their own mind.
Thought it would be good to have a centralised location for a discussion that covers this.
We have had that and it just gets into a my kernel is bigger then your kernel post .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been reading the kernal posts for a bit now but the definition of tweaks etc seemed a bit vague.
Regarding the governors I agree, I had read up on these when i had my i9100. And currently trying pegasusq speedmod on the s3 to see how that pans out. Cheers though I'll read up on these a little more.
I thought the moderators would of kept the post in check to stop the whole competition scenario.
Was only hoping for an explanation and as I said some facts, thinking it would of been good for the forum and useful for other i9300 owners.
Cheers though
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
d4niven said:
JJEgan said:
I've been reading the kernal posts for a bit now but the definition of tweaks etc seemed a bit vague.
Regarding the governors I agree, I had read up on these when i had my i9100. And currently trying pegasusq speedmod on the s3 to see how that pans out. Cheers though I'll read up on these a little more.
I thought the moderators would of kept the post in check to stop the whole competition scenario.
Was only hoping for an explanation and as I said some facts, thinking it would of been good for the forum and useful for other i9300 owners.
Cheers though
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest if you want stuff explaining then most people would, if willing, go of and link you to threads or copy paste stuff, the best thing is read the last 20 pages of each thread, gives a good idea of performance/stability etc
The moderators simply don't have time to wipe everyone's bums and owing to the over proliferation of adolescent hormones and board room egos here, these threads always go badly wrong!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the users of this forum followed the rules then their would be room for such a kernel thread providing someone is willing to update it daily .
However as users do not follow the rules the forum is a clogged up mess .
Guess how many multiple what kernel posts would still be posted after such as topic was stickied many many as many users prefer to post instead of read sadly .
But as i said PM a dev with your idea .
jje
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
Not being a dev myself. My idea was to have a centralised location, here, where the kernal dev's could state exactly what they had tweaked and possibly what the benefits are.
So many kernals seem to offer the same features, but nothing really gets down to the nity grity.
:thumbup: Slaphead, in hindsight I can totally see where your coming from and why this wouldn't work => end up in a cat fight over why things are good and why they're bad / who's right and who's wrong.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
again, kernEl.
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
Glebun said:
again, kernEl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..wasted on me. I don't get the kernEl chat...someone care to explain lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
it's kernel, not kernal.
Glebun said:
it's kernel, not kernal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
There was me thinking there some running joke going there
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Re: [Q] i9300 Kernals...?
d4niven said:
Haha
There was me thinking there some running joke going there
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was......your spelling just teasing, for some reason when people misspell kernel like that, it always gets dived on! Don't take it personally
slaphead20 said:
There was......your spelling just teasing, for some reason when people misspell kernel like that, it always gets dived on! Don't take it personally
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair do's.
I can can be rather pedantic at myself at times ...especially if it's a recurring thing
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2